logo
British Gas boss in shock admission over electricity prices

British Gas boss in shock admission over electricity prices

Daily Mirror15-05-2025

Chris O'Shea, chief executive of owner Centrica, has spoken honestly of what he sees as the real benefit of moving to net zero energy such as wind and solar
British Gas boss Chris O'Shea has delivered a stark message about the pursuit of a net zero power grid - warning it isn't the golden ticket to slashing electricity bills. Chris O'Shea, chief executive at Centrica - British Gas's parent firm - said: "The shift to renewable power will NOT materially reduce UK electricity prices from current levels."
Taking to LinkedIn to express his thoughts, O'Shea stressed that the move towards net zero energy sources like wind and solar is more about delivering price stability and safeguarding against future price shocks than cutting household energy bills. "They may give price stability and avoid future price spikes based on the international gas market, but they will definitely not reduce the price," he noted in his post.

This assertion puts him out of step with other energy leaders such as Octopus head Greg Jackson and Dale Vince of Ecotricity, not to mention Energy Secretary Ed Miliband. His remarks are at odds with claims made by the Government that shifting to greener energy would be a win for lowering family expenses.

His comments come despite British Gas rolling out deals with cheap or even free electricity for certain customers during periods of excess wind and solar generation. In his warning, O'Shea explained that although the cheapest green technologies can compete with gas on price, others, like floating wind and tidal power, could set consumers back by up to three times as much.
He said: "We need to stop having a polarised debate populated with unsubstantiated, but convenient, sound bites. I fully support the move to a cleaner energy system. I am simply very frustrated that people peddle misinformation at best, and disinformation at worst."
These statements clash with Labour's election campaign promises from last year. At that time, Ed Miliband committed to reducing household bills by £300 annually by 2030 through a transition to clean energy. The Labour manifesto said: "Families and businesses will have lower bills for good, from a zero-carbon electricity system."
After assuming office, Mr Miliband reiterated this commitment, announcing: "The only way to guarantee our energy security and cut bills permanently is to speed up the transition away from fossil fuels and towards home-grown clean energy."
However, Mr O'Shea disputes that viewpoint. He cited the Government's Contracts for Difference (CfD) scheme as an example, which assures renewable energy producers a set, index-linked price for every megawatt hour they generate. When market prices dip under this agreed "strike price" the difference is passed onto consumer bills.

Mr O'Shea said: "Wholesale electricity prices in the UK may well be set by international gas prices." He added: "But the wholesale price does NOT set the price that the majority of consumers pay in the UK. That's because of the Contract for Difference that renewable energy producers get. Essentially, no matter the wholesale price, renewable producers with a CfD get the 'CfD strike price'."
Contracts under the CfD system generally last for 15 years, which means consumers are committed to those prices for an extended period. Highlighting the cost disparities, he mentioned that the average wholesale price of electricity last year was recorded at £82.11 per megawatt hour, while recent offshore wind projects achieved strike prices up to £82.16, and solar and onshore wind rates were around £70 – not enough to significantly lower bills. When it comes to pioneering green technologies, the costs soar: floating wind technology is priced at £195 and tidal stream generation at a staggering £240.

Centrica is a major figure in the energy market, supplying approximately 7.5 million households and 400,000 businesses through its British Gas wing, and invests in a wide range of energy solutions from nuclear to gas and renewable projects like batteries and solar. The company boasts a workforce of 21,000 employees.
Mr O'Shea's stance has been backed by figures on the political right. Reform UK's Energy Spokesperson Richard Tice said: "Another energy expert admits the British people have been deeply misled. More renewables will not bring the electricity price down."

He added: "We have sacrificed jobs, industries and wealth on a lie. Net zero is the most stupid policy ever imposed on our nation." Conservative MP Andrew Bowie, the shadow energy minister, lashed out at Labour's eco commitments, alleging: "Ed Miliband's mad dash to net zero by 2050 has been built on ideological dogma, with a total disregard for the consequences inflicted upon the British public."
Yet the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero stood by their strategy. A spokesman said: "We are making the UK a clean energy superpower to get off the rollercoaster of fossil fuel markets controlled by dictators and replace that with clean homegrown power we control."
He continued: "That is how we can protect family finances and our national finances. As evidenced by the National Energy System Operator's independent report, clean power by 2030 is not just doable but would lead to a more secure energy system, potentially reducing electricity costs and lowering bills."
Despite the International Energy Agency's data indicating UK's electric charges are among the highest in the developed world – 50 per cent above Germany's and quadruple the US prices – British Gas recently rolled out perks like complimentary electricity on select days bolstered with surplus renewable energy, aimed at managing grid demand while nudging consumers towards greener practices.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How much money Elon Musk lost because of feud with Donald Trump
How much money Elon Musk lost because of feud with Donald Trump

Daily Mail​

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

How much money Elon Musk lost because of feud with Donald Trump

The controversial former-head of DOGE Elon Musk has reportedly lost more than $34billion from his personal net worth after his fall from grace at the White House and very online break up with the US President. Shares in Musk's Tesla also dropped more than 14 per cent at the end of yesterday, losing about $150billion in market value - the largest single-day decline in the company's history. It is the second largest loss of personal net worth, beaten only by Musk's own wipe out again in November 2021, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index of the 500 wealthiest people on the planet. He remains the richest man in the world, with a huge $334.5 billion fortune. Musk, who officially left the White House last week, reached a peak of nearly $500 billion in the months after Trump's election success. The valuation of his companies had surged thanks to the belief they would profit from his close relationship with Trump and his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, it was reported. But his government contracts with the US were on the line last night as he continued to take part in a savage war with words against Donald Trump, with their partnership breaking down over a tax-cut and spending bill. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump posted on Truth Social. The withdrawal would have potentially huge consequences for his Tesla and SpaceX revenue. SpaceX has been awarded over $17 billion in government contracts since 2015, according to ABC news. Much of that money comes from NASA and the Department of Defence. One of Trump's oldest advisors, Steve Bannon, went further and suggested the government seize SpaceX under the Defense Production Act - a move that would undoubtedly trigger challenges. Musk, who had threatened to decommission the SpaceX Dragon capsule - a critical lifeline for transporting American astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station - ultimately retreated. After a user on X suggested he 'cool off and take a step back for a couple of days', Musk abruptly posted: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' It was not before he claimed that Trump is 'in the Epstein files', suggested that he should be impeached and replaced with 40-year-old Vice President J.D. Vance. Moments before the Epstein charge, Trump had taken to Truth Social and said he had asked Musk to leave his administration and said the billionaire went 'CRAZY!' With that, Musk announced that it was 'time to drop a really big bomb.' This 2014 image shows Elon Musk (right) alongside Ghislaine Maxwell (left) who facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. She's currently serving time in federal prison '@RealDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote. 'Have a nice day, DJT!' Jeffrey Epstein is a serial child sex offender who died in prison in 2019. Trump pledged to release the files related to Epstein, with Attorney General Pam Bondi releasing some pages in February, but most of that information was already in the public domain. 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out,' Musk added. Asked for comment, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Daily Mail in a statement: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' The brawl started when the X-owner had originally campaigned to stop the 'disgusting abomination' of the x bill which he believed would contribute too much to the country's $36.2 trillion debt. Trump's big, beautiful bill' called for getting rid off electric vehicle tax credits - the cause of Musk's frustration, according to Trump. Analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co. estimated that the bill would cut about $1.2 billion from Tesla's full-year profit. Despite staying quiet at first, Trump then told reporters he was 'very disappointed' in Musk and they 'had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore'. Musk immediately responded via tweet, saying: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election'. He had spent nearly $300 million backing Trump's campaign among other other Republicans in last year's election. However, the drastic drop in net worth might not reveal the true impact on Musk who increasingly relies on his private enterprises as a source, it was reported in Bloomberg.

Illegal immigration is turning us into a lockdown society
Illegal immigration is turning us into a lockdown society

Telegraph

time39 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Illegal immigration is turning us into a lockdown society

The mild weather has, we are told, exacerbated the problem of small boats crossing the English Channel. The pledge to 'smash the gangs' is no longer being repeated endlessly by Labour spokespeople (perhaps the recent sunny weather distracted Border Force?) But fear not. The Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, has a plan. She thinks a gigantic governmental IT project is what is now needed to get a grip on the explosion in immigration. Whenever politicians run out of road in trying to solve a problem, it's never long before the introduction of ID cards rears its ugly head. One might say this is an exercise using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, but that would be unfair. The issues at stake tend to be rather bigger than nuts – terrorism, mass uncontrolled immigration, widespread welfare fraud and the like. No, it's more like wildly swinging a sledgehammer in an idiotic attempt to repair a window. The way ID schemes work is to split the population into two cohorts – one which is entitled to something and one which isn't. You want to visit your local GP? You'd better whip out your digital ID card to do so. A police officer doesn't like the cut of your jib and wonders if you should be in the UK at all? You'd be advised to have data on hand to prove your citizenship. Three problems immediately emerge. First, the law-abiding majority are obliged to undertake an ever-increasing number of checks and tests to go about their ordinary lives. Second, it assumes that the people you want to collar are not adept at melting into the black market economy. How many employers are hiring large numbers of illegal immigrants unknowingly and were genuinely just about to get round to making sure they all had the right to work here? None. Third, it relies on the state actually operating a complex IT system successfully. We have surely learnt over recent years that in the vast number of ways the government is able to waste huge tranches of taxpayers' money, botched IT projects are probably top of the list. You can bank on a new digital ID system to break, be littered with errors or both. Ronald Reagan's old dictum – 'there are no easy solutions, but there are simple solutions' – is typically honoured in the breach. The Home Secretary is overreaching for a solution which is difficult and complex but – she is hoping – avoids being especially controversial. Instead, to tackle the immigration disaster, we need to get back to basics. The vast numbers of people coming to our shores are doing so because enforcement is weak, the legal system is soft and the incentives to come here are too great. If you are unwilling or unable to deal with those root causes, there is no database – however magical you may imagine it to be – that will be of much assistance. The reason we have failed to deport many undesirables is not because we are sitting across a desk from them and can't identify who they are or what they are entitled to. Rather it's because our asylum system works at a snail's pace, allows fatuous appeals under human rights legislation, and the package of goodies you receive while you are here is too good to resist. We need to speed up the system so claims take eighteen days (or, ideally, eighteen hours) to process rather than eighteen months. We must ensure that your child's preference for British-made chicken nuggets is not an admissible basis for resisting deportation. We have to find a more robust way of policing the English Channel. None of these are easy to achieve, but they are simple to grasp. Instead, the political elite – this time in the form of Yvette Cooper – prefers to rush down the rabbit hole of believing a flashy computerised system is the answer to our prayers. It probably won't happen. It certainly won't work.

Waspi campaigners say they have been given green light for High Court challenge
Waspi campaigners say they have been given green light for High Court challenge

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Waspi campaigners say they have been given green light for High Court challenge

Waspi campaigners say they have cleared a hurdle in their battle for a High Court challenge. The Women Against State Pension Inequality group is seeking a judicial review to force the Government to reconsider its decision to rule out a compensation package for women affected by the way changes to the state pension age were communicated. The campaigners said they have received an update to say that their case is arguable, setting them on course for a court hearing. A previous report by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PSHO) suggested compensation ranging between £1,000 and £2,950 could be appropriate for each of those affected. But in December 2024, the Government said that, while it accepted the ombudsman's finding of maladministration and apologised for there being a delay in writing to 1950s-born women, a blanket compensation scheme, which could cost taxpayers up to £10.5 billion, cannot be justified. Waspi campaigners submitted arguments back in February for a legal case challenging the decision not to compensate women. Lawyers for the campaigners argue that the Government's reasons for concluding that people should not receive any remedy are a breach of legal principles. Waspi said it also expects a hearing to consider its application for a costs capping order, so that campaigners would not be forced to pay unknown costs to cover the legal fees should they lose. The group said that it may be forced to withdraw its challenge without this financial safeguard. It is also calling on supporters to help raise further funds for the legal challenge. Waspi chairwoman Angela Madden described the green light in its legal challenge as a 'landmark moment in our campaign'. She said: 'We are grateful for the funds raised so far and understand the country's purse strings are tight, but the Government cannot be allowed to brush this injustice aside.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store