ULA launch delayed for Amazon's 2nd batch of 27 'Project Kuiper' satellites
The project is part of Amazon's effort to expand global Internet access.
Amazon's second attempted Kuiper 2 launch of 27 additional satellites into low-Earth orbit on top ULA's 205-foot tall Atlas V rocket was delayed shortly before 1 p.m. EDT due to an "engineering observation of an elevated purge temperature within the booster engine," according to ULA officials.
It originally was scheduled to launch during a 30-minute time window starting at 1:25 p.m. EDT from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida on Space Launch Complex 41. The mission is an effort to boost Amazon's growing satellite constellation to a total of 54 launched out of the mandated 1,600 in about a year's time as part of a federal agreement.
"The team will evaluate the hardware, and we will release a new launch date when available," the Colorado-headquartered ULA added.
A live-stream broadcast started roughly 20 minutes or so on multiple online platforms prior to the temporarily delayed liftoff with initial weather forecasts predicting a 75% chance for favorable conditions.
The ULA rocket designated AV-105 would have been the 103rd launch of its Atlas 5 rocket.
ULA President and CEO Tory Bruno wrote during Monday's countdown in a Bluesky post that United Launch Alliance team members at the the time were "working a temperature measurement (that was) warmer than previous" Atlas 5 rocket launches.
It was set to be ULA's second sendoff on Atlas 5 for Amazon's Project Kuiper after ULA successfully sent a first batch of 27 satellites in early April. That first mission's own initial liftoff was likewise scrubbed, but due to weather.
Amazon officials say it Projectt Kuiper will aim to deliver "fast, reliable Internet to customers and communities around the world" with a goal to launch and install more than 3,200 satellites in space by the end of next year, which was a required timeframe part of its agreement with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, or FCC.
Meanwhile, a new launch date has yet to be announced.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ramsey Theory Group Revolutionizes the Automotive Retail Sector with a Secure and Digital-First Sales Platform Proven to Streamline the Sales Process
Ramsey Theory Group is improving the automotive sales experience in a tougher market by giving car dealerships a secure, fully digital AI-driven platform to streamline transactions, ensure compliance, and deliver the convenience that car buyers demand. NEW YORK, Aug. 19, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Ramsey Theory Group, a leading provider of software development, quantitative analysis, information technology, cybersecurity, digital marketing, and product development, announced today that its AI-driven platform for the automotive retail sector is showing strong benefits for dealerships and customers alike. The seamless, compliant, and secure digital solution now is being used by car dealerships nationwide and delivers the following: Simplified, End-to-End Sales Workflow - streamlines the dealership sales process by enabling document uploads, credit submissions, and creation of compliant deal documents - all within a digital, AI-driven ecosystem designed for efficiency and clarity. This approach reduces paperwork, administrative burdens, and errors, significantly cutting time and costs for automotive retailers. Enhanced Compliance and Security - Built with regulatory and fraud-resistant measures in mind, the platform uses AI to ensure that all customer information and deal documentation adhere to compliance standards. This mitigates risk for dealerships and instills confidence in buyers throughout the transaction process. Improved Customer Engagement and Convenience - the app reimagines car buying as a fully virtual, user-friendly experience. Customers can remotely upload identification documents, submit credit application info, and receive compliant deal documentation from the comfort of their own homes. This consumer-centric approach caters to modern buyers' expectations for convenience and transparency. Thoughtfully Designed for Automotive Retailers – the solution was developed following extensive research and conversations with dealership staff and customers. Addressing real-world pain points, the platform delivers a user experience that saves time and enhances satisfaction for both parties in the automotive sales process. "Unlike other solutions for the automotive retail sector, we spent a great deal of time researching and evaluating the pain points of both the car buyers and also the dealerships," said Dan Herbatschek, CEO & Founder of Ramsey Theory Group. "This leapfrog technology brings speed, security, and simplicity to the automotive sales process and we're excited to continue innovating with new feature rollouts for the platform in the near future based on our customers' feedback." Visit to learn more. About Ramsey Theory GroupFounded by entrepreneur and technology innovator, Dan Herbatschek, Ramsey Theory Group leverages its expertise in software development, quantitative analysis, information technology, cybersecurity, digital marketing, and product development to better help organizations optimize their workflow. Working alongside entrepreneurs, the firm bridges the gap between business and software engineering matters - translating the vision of organizations into technologically executable problems. Based in New York, the Ramsey Theory Group specializes in Data-Intensive Application Design, Data Engineering, Business Intelligence, Custom Optimization, Mathematical & Statistical Modelling, Software Development, Data Visualization, Blockchain Development, Blockchain Consultancy, and Web and Mobile Application Development. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Ramsey Theory Group Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If I Could Only Buy and Hold a Single Stock, This Would Be It
Key Points Amazon and its management team are experienced with trying new things. Every success or failure, however, is a learning experience. History has shown that companies that foster innovation and don't punish failure tend to thrive, while those that fear it or are unwilling to adapt often struggle. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Investors can own as many individual stocks as they want and can afford. Sometimes, though, hypothetically imagining that you're limited to just one can be enlightening. That thought experiment forces you to rate and rank the strengths and flaws of every investment candidate on your radar. This process can -- in a good way -- really help you narrow down your list to a small handful of top options. Or one. And I know exactly which one that would be for me. If I could only buy and hold a single stock, it would be Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN). Here's why. What Amazon really is You very likely already know the company. Amazon is, of course, the king of North American e-commerce, accounting for nearly 40% of the market's total revenue, according to research by Digital Commerce 360. It's doing alright overseas, too. Then there's its cloud computing arm, Amazon Web Services, which provides a relatively small portion of its revenue, but is responsible for nearly 60% of the company's operating profits. However, these numbers still don't even come close to telling the whole story. Amazon also manages an on-demand video platform (Prime), owns grocery store chain Whole Foods Markets, does delivery work for other online retailers, and sells prescription pharmaceuticals through its Pillpack arm. It also monetizes its online mall by allowing its sellers to pay for more prominent promotion, creating an advertising business that generated $15.7 billion in revenue last quarter alone, by the way. On top of all that, it owns websites and Twitch, and is the parent to camera-doorbell brand Ring. There's a method to the madness behind these seemingly disparate lines of business, though. While most companies focus on doing one or two things extremely well, Amazon has orchestrated several different lines of business, each of which fuels another, and each of which is fueled by another. The result is a mesh of different profit centers that ultimately funnels consumers and corporations into Amazon's ecosystem. Yes, it's complicated, but yes, Amazon can handle it. That's not quite the only reason I'd be willing to make Amazon my one and only stock holding, though. Jeff Bezos started it Companies founded or grown by bigger-than-life leaders can make for potentially problematic investments. It's just difficult to determine if it's the company that's something special, or the person. If it's the person, what happens when that individual is no longer at the helm? Case in point: General Electric was never quite the same after Jack Welch stepped down as CEO in 2001. Steve Jobs was also nearly synonymous with Apple until he passed the torch to Tim Cook in 2011. While Cook has been a solid successor, he's arguably not quite as captivating or magical as his predecessor. Neither is Apple under him. Still, most high-profile chief executives -- and founders in particular -- manage to leave their mark on their company's culture. That imprint remains part of the organization's ethos even in their absence. While current Amazon CEO Andy Jassy is no Jeff Bezos, for instance, Bezos' philosophy remains. Take, for example, the company's willingness to experiment. As Bezos noted in his 2016 letter to Amazon's shareholders, "Most large organizations embrace the idea of invention, but are not willing to suffer the string of failed experiments necessary to get there." That does not describe Amazon, though. Bezos made a point of fostering a "fail fast, fail often" work culture that did end up producing some failures, such as the Fire smartphone. Such experiments, however, also led to the creation of Amazon Web Services and Amazon Prime, the latter of which has been a massive growth driver for the company. Now Jassy is blending his own mindset with Bezos'. As he said while discussing the company's core 16 leadership principles, "At Amazon, you are not just empowered to speak up if you think we're doing something wrong for customers of the business. You're expected to do so, regardless of level." It works. Amazon is an even bigger company now than it was when Bezos stepped down as CEO. Don't underestimate the power of a willingness to innovate Many investors will point out that a healthy corporate culture doesn't pay the bills. I agree. At some point, to thrive, every company must sell its products or services profitably. Amazon is no exception. History has shown, however, that companies with corporate cultures that encourage innovation and don't punish failure tend to prosper while organizations that are cautiously and defensively managed often struggle. Compare Alphabet today to post-Welch GE, for instance. The manufacturing conglomerate ultimately hit a wall after years of obscuring the true depth of its insurance arm's liabilities from a management team that might have been able to fix them (although the company didn't exactly embrace the advent of the digital age either). Or compare Blockbuster to Netflix. The once-giant video rental chain infamously had a chance to buy the latter for a mere $50 million back in 2000. At the time, Blockbuster was doing on the order of $4 billion worth of business per year, and could have easily purchased Netflix, if only to take its budding competitor out of the market. But it didn't. In its defense, Blockbuster's decision at the time wasn't quite the obvious misstep it seems in retrospect. Remember, Netflix wasn't yet streaming then. It was still only renting DVDs by mail. Given Blockbuster's dominance of the brick-and-mortar movie rental business back in 2000, the logistics behind this new kind of movie rental business model understandably didn't make sense to the now-defunct company. In many regards, though, that story underscores the underlying theme here in an even more effective way. Even if Blockbuster didn't want Netflix, Blockbuster certainly could have leveraged its own powerful brand to become a streaming powerhouse. Likewise, if not Netflix, some other enterprising outfit would have eventually launched the streaming-video business. Netflix was simply the outfit that tried the idea out first, knowing when it did so that it might end in failure. So for my money, I'll bet on a company that is experienced with managing experiments' successes as well as failures -- and learning from both -- to evolve and thrive. That said, it certainly doesn't hurt the bullish argument that Amazon has the financial flexibility to experiment. With its $2.5 trillion market cap, it does more than $600 billion worth of business per year, and turns about $60 billion of that into net income. Meanwhile, it's only sitting on a little over $80 billion in long-term debt. It's much easier not to fear failure when you can actually afford to take big swings, miss, and try again. Should you invest $1,000 in Amazon right now? Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 James Brumley has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and Netflix. The Motley Fool recommends GE Aerospace. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. If I Could Only Buy and Hold a Single Stock, This Would Be It was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
E&E News
33 minutes ago
- E&E News
Trump's AI plan meets a stressed American electric grid
President Donald Trump's plan to make the U.S. a leader in artificial intelligence is also set to remake the country's electric grid in his vision: Bigger, faster and bolstered by fossil fuels. But it's unclear how parts of the plan would be implemented and if it would be enough to ensure the U.S. has ample power to meet demand from energy-hungry data centers over the next decade. In a speech Wednesday, Trump declared that his administration would pursue 'all-out American energy dominance' to promote the AI industry. He promised the country would build as much new electricity capacity as China this year. Advertisement To do so, Trump signed an executive order Wednesday to streamline permitting for new data centers and associated power generation, along with two others related to artificial intelligence model development. The administration also released an action plan Wednesday morning that included ambitions for a 'comprehensive strategy to enhance and expand the power grid.' 'There's a global competition to lead in artificial intelligence and we want the United States to win that race,' David Sacks, the White House AI and crypto czar, said on a call with reporters. The action plan's provisions were designed to be implemented in six months to a year, said White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Michael Kratsios. The White House called for streamlining permitting requirements for new data centers and construction of data centers and power generation on federal land. The plan dictates the prioritization of 'reliable dispatchable power sources' like coal and gas plants, keeping existing generation on the grid and even reforming power markets 'to align financial incentives with the goal of grid stability.' Many of the provisions — including support for AI workforce programs — were backed by the Data Center Coalition, which represents the industry. The plan's 'focus on the removal of barriers to faster data center construction and operation — ranging from power access to supply chains to workforce development — which will allow data center companies to continue investing hundreds of billions of dollars to expand U.S. data center infrastructure across the country,' Josh Levi, the group's president, said in a statement. The group called for Congress to take further action on issues such as permitting. The plan was praised by groups representing industries supported by Trump and companies like telecommunications giant Lumen Technologies, which said cutting regulatory barriers would help build an AI backbone. While the plan mentions a need for 'new energy generation sources at the technological frontier' like geothermal and advanced nuclear, it is silent on wind and solar power. Renewable energy is typically the quickest form of new generation to build and has been a backbone for much of the new data center construction. The U.S. Energy Information Administration has reported that wind, solar and batteries accounted for more than 80 percent of new generation in 2024 and forecast that renewables would be 81 percent of new capacity in 2025. 'Companies are investing in renewables not because they love renewable energy, but because it provides the best return,' said Safak Yucel, associate director of the Business of Sustainability Initiative at Georgetown University. 'And the reason is not subsidies, it's that they're cheaper to run.' Large technology companies are continuing to find any energy source — including renewables — available on the grid. Meta, for example, announced a contract this week to purchase 600 megawatts of solar power from a Texas project developed by Canadian energy giant Enbridge to power its data centers. On Tuesday, OpenAI and Oracle announced next steps for the 'Stargate' project, a company with multiple partners backed by Trump that pledged in January to spend $500 billion in four years to build AI infrastructure in the United States. The companies inked a deal to develop 4.5 gigawatts of additional data center capacity, an amount that is more than double the power used in San Francisco. The companies did not specify where the new facilities would be or which power sources they would use but said parts of an existing data project in Abilene, Texas, tied to Stargate is now 'up and running.' In a research note Wednesday, Bank of America said it expected data centers to help U.S. electricity demand increase 2.5 percent annually over the next decade, almost five times more than the rate from 2014 to 2024. The action plan also came a day after United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres called on major tech firms to power their data centers entirely with renewable energy by 2030, warning that the forecast electricity demand is 'not sustainable — unless we make it so.' 'The future is being built in the cloud,' Guterres said in a speech Tuesday in New York. 'It must be powered by the sun, the wind, and the promise of a better world.' Outside view of the newly completed Meta's Facebook data center in Eagle Mountain, Utah on July 18, 2024. The data center is a complex of five large buildings, each over four football fields long and totaling 2.4 million square feet. | George Frey/AFP via Getty Images Abundance or scarcity? Critics charge that the administration's bid to expand the grid for AI is at odds with the policies coming out of the White House. The budget and tax megalaw signed by Trump earlier this month, for example, slashed tax credits and incentives for wind and solar projects. A forecast from BloombergNEF predicts that new wind, solar and energy storage additions could drop 23 percent through 2030 compared to what would have happened without the law. In all, that would be about 117 fewer gigawatts of new power. The Interior Department has also added new requirements for construction of solar and wind on federal lands, which developers have called a form of sabotage. The AI plan's release also came on the same day that Trump's Department of Energy nixed a conditional federal loan for the Grain Belt Express transmission project. That line, set to be one of the nation's largest new grid projects, would carry renewable energy from the Great Plains to large cities in the East, but had opposition from key Republican lawmakers. 'Their rhetoric doesn't match reality,' said Harry Godfrey, leader of Advanced Energy United's Federal Priorities team. 'They talk a game about energy abundance, yet their actions are fundamentally counter-abundance. They're creating scarcity.' In his speech, Trump talked up the potential of nuclear power to back data centers, calling the technology 'incredible.' But the technology — like advanced geothermal — is years away from commercial viability. Even building a new gas plant is expected to take at least five years because of supply chain backlogs. 'There is no AI revolution without power,' Godfrey said. 'But under this administration, where are you going to get the power?' The AI Action Plan mentions grid management technologies and tools to make existing power lines more efficient. It also calls for 'new and novel ways' for data centers to manage demand during periods of peak demand, a strategy researchers have said could allow more construction without additional generation. Rob Gramlich, president of the research firm Grid Strategies, said those were 'encouraging proposals' and could continue work on grid enhancements that started under the Biden administration. But, he added, other parts of the plan that tilt the scales toward fossil fuels, especially in interconnection queues, could result in 'market distortion' that slows down new power growth. President Donald Trump talked up the potential of nuclear power to back data centers, calling the technology 'incredible.' Cooling towers four, left and three are seen at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Waynesboro, Georgia. | Mike Stewart/AP Streamlining NEPA A chief way the Trump administration is aiming to expedite a build out of data centers is through regulatory changes, including environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act. The action plan calls for the creation of a categorical exclusion under NEPA 'to cover data center-related actions that normally do not have a significant effect on the environment.' That could free them from conducting environmental impact statements and assessments, if fully implemented. 'Where possible, adopt Categorical Exclusions already established by other agencies so that each relevant agency can proceed with maximum efficiency,' the plan states. That echoes the calls of many in the tech industry, who have complained that it takes too long to build infrastructure. Environmentalists say the language could lead to faster approval of large facilities that worsen air and water pollution. 'Across the South we are seeing states and communities clamor for more information about the infrastructure demands for AI, not less. Transparency is crucial to ensure that the physical infrastructure needed to support AI doesn't threaten our health, energy grid, access to water, and dramatically increase costs,' said Southern Environmental Law Center Climate Initiative Leader Alys Campaigne. The plan, if implemented, could make it harder for communities to obtain important information about nearby data centers, the group said. James Coleman, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, said the language could expedite projects, but it's not a 'silver bullet that gets you out of NEPA review.' Environmentalists could still challenge projects in court if they believe a data center facility did not have adequate environmental review. A court 'is going to make its own interpretation,' no matter what agencies do, he said. At the same time, the Trump administration may be in a better position to win many lawsuits, after the Supreme Court ruled in July that NEPA does not require agencies to consider far-reaching environmental impacts of projects, according to Coleman. Another lingering question is how agencies would look to implement categorical exclusions, since the administration has moved to roll back regulations governing the NEPA process. The Department of Energy issued an interim final rule this year rescinding its NEPA regulations and releasing alternative guidance in its place. 'What does a categorical exclusion mean if you aren't allowed to adopt regulations?' Coleman asked. Tanya Das, the director of artificial intelligence and energy technology policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, said her organization supported the categorical exclusions to expedite the NEPA process. Language in the plan aiming to 'enable AI adoption' also could be useful, considering the time it takes to process applications under NEPA and other regulations. Going through data 'at a human pace can be very slow,' she said. AI tools that sift through data could be an option for expediting reviews, she said. Das said she would be watching closely to see how the administration fleshes out language in the action plan on the grid. The White House included broad directives such as 'stabilize the grid of today as much possible' and 'enhance the efficiency and performance of the transmission system,' but did not specify matching agency actions as of yet to implement many of those goals. Some groups that often back deregulatory actions said they were concerned that the plan puts too much focus on tapping the federal government to finance and guide the technology. The plan, for instance, calls for agencies 'with significant land portfolios' to identify sites suited for data center development. 'We don't want the Energy Department to overshadow private rollout and development of the infrastructure,' said Wayne Crews, a fellow in regulatory studies at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian think tank.
