Steel tycoon Gupta in last-ditch bid to rescue UK empire
The steel tycoon Sanjeev Gupta is mounting a last-ditch bid to salvage his British operations after seeing an emergency plea for government support rejected.
Sky News has learnt that Mr Gupta's Liberty Speciality Steels UK (SSUK) arm is seeking to adjourn a winding-up petition scheduled to be heard in court on Wednesday.
The petition is reported to have been brought by Harsco Metals Group, a supplier of materials and labour to SSUK, and is said to be supported by other trade creditors.
Unless the adjournment is granted, Mr Gupta faces the prospect of seeing SSUK forced into compulsory liquidation.
That would raise questions over the future of roughly 1,450 more steel industry jobs, weeks after the government stepped in to rescue the larger British Steel amid a row with its Chinese owner over the future of its Scunthorpe steelworks.
If Mr Gupta's operations do enter compulsory liquidation, the Official Receiver would appoint a special manager to run the operations while a buyer is sought.
A Whitehall insider said talks had taken place in recent days involving Mr Gupta's executives and the Insolvency Service.
Steel industry sources said the government could conceivably be interested in reuniting the Rotherham plant of SSUK with British Steel's Scunthorpe site because of the industrial synergies between them, although it was unclear whether any such discussions had been held.
Mr Gupta is said to have explored whether he could persuade the government to step in and support SSUK using the legislation enacted last month to take control of British Steel's operations.
Whitehall insiders said, however, that Mr Gupta's overtures had been rebuffed.
He had previously sought government aid during the pandemic but that plea was also rejected by ministers.
The SSUK division operates across sites including at Rotherham in south Yorkshire and Bolton in Lancashire.
It makes highly engineered steel products for use in sectors such as aerospace, automotive and oil and gas.
A restructuring plan due to be launched last week was abandoned at the eleventh hour after failing to secure support from creditors of Greensill, the collapsed supply chain finance provider to which Mr Gupta was closely tied.
Under that plan, creditors, including HM Revenue and Customs, would have been forced to write off a significant chunk of the money they are owed.
The company said last week that it had invested nearly £200m in the last five years into the UK steel industry, but had faced "significant challenges due to soaring energy costs and an over-reliance on cheap imports, negatively impacting the performance of all UK steel companies".
It adds: The court's ability to sanction the plan depended on finalisation of an agreement with creditors.
"This has not proved possible in an acceptable timeframe, and so Liberty has decided to withdraw the plan ahead of the sanction hearing on May 15 and will now quickly consider alternative options."
One source close to Liberty Steel acknowledged that it was running out of time to salvage the business.
They said, however, that an adjournment of Wednesday's hearing to consider the winding-up petition could yet buy the company sufficient breathing space to stitch together an alternative rescue deal.
A Liberty Steel spokesperson said on Tuesday: "Discussions continue with creditors.
"Liberty understands the concern this will create for Speciality Steel UK colleagues and remains committed to doing all it can to maintain the Speciality Steel UK business."
The Insolvency Service has also been contacted for comment.
A DBT spokesperson said:
"We continue to closely monitor developments around Liberty Steel, including any public hearings, which are of course a matter for the company.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
38 minutes ago
- Times
We're in a ‘global fertility crisis'. Does this woman have a solution?
Worrying about the decline in fertility used to be a fringe issue: the reserve of religious leaders, tweedy conservatives and cranky pronatalists. No longer. Last week the United Nations issued a report declaring a 'global fertility crisis'. According to Natalia Kanem, head of the UN Population Fund, which published the report, the world has 'begun an unprecedented decline in fertility rates'. The figures are stark, the consequences potentially grave. In 1950s Britain, for example, the average woman had 2.2 children. Now that figure is 1.44. We are not replacing ourselves. The question is why? The will to procreate is our most primal evolutionary urge, but something is dulling it. What's going on? • Britain needs babies! And PM should find the right words to say so The UN report cites many of the usual suspects: lack of childcare and job security, housing costs, fears about the future. One in five people surveyed in 14 countries said fears about climate change, war and pandemics held them back from reproducing. Thirty-nine per cent pointed to financial constraints. But what if there is something else going on too? One woman with a different answer is Alice Evans, a senior lecturer in the social science of development at King's College London. Evans, a brusque yet charming 38-year-old from Sevenoaks, Kent, has spent much of her professional life travelling round the world, speaking to people from Zambia to the Americas about children: why they want them, why they don't, and what is stopping them from having the family they might want. Evans acknowledges that the factors highlighted by the UN all play a role in the fertility crisis. Yet, she argues, none fully explain why this is happening everywhere, all at once — in countries with vastly different living standards, gender norms, parental leave policies and working practices. Could it be, Evans suggests, that we are spending so much time on the internet that we've stopped falling in love, stopped reproducing? Are we entertaining ourselves into oblivion? At first, this might seem outlandish. But dig into the data and it becomes surprisingly persuasive. 'Looking around the world, we see one really big change which coincides with the fall in fertility,' Evans says. Over the past 15 years or so, smartphones have become ubiquitous, and we have seen the rise of an astonishing array of online entertainment — from online sports gambling to pornography to television streaming services such as Netflix and Hulu. 'It's really only some parts of sub-Saharan Africa that have replacement fertility, which means that each woman would have over two kids in her lifetime,' Evans explains. 'In every other population in the world, we'd expect a contraction of the young working-age population.' What's so different about sub-Saharan Africa? Few people have smartphones. Evans fears that 'hyperengaging media' may be outcompeting the real-world interactions that lead to babies. We spend more time on screens and consequently more time alone. 'Young men in their twenties in the UK are spending as much time alone as men in their sixties and seventies,' she says. In today's Deliveroo and Netflix economy, we socialise less, meet fewer people, and are less likely to find the person with whom we want to have children. Dating apps are struggling to fill the gap. 'Looking both at marriage and cohabiting,' Evans says, 'both of those indicators are down. They are plummeting in Hong Kong, South Korea, across Southeast Asia, across South America.' She's just returned from Costa Rica, where the average age of marriage is 38 for men and 35 for women. In America, up to 55 per cent of under-34s have been estimated to be single. 'We know that half aren't even in a rush to get into a relationship, they aren't bothered about it,' she says. ● The nation's birthrate has plummeted. How did we get here? That fewer people feel rushed into relationships can, of course, be seen as a good thing: a sign of empowerment and freedom, particularly for women. But it's also the case that across the developed world, about a third of men say they are lonely. There is something of a vicious cycle at play too. As we socialise less, we become less charming, less interesting, less confident. 'If I spend every night scrolling or watching Bridgerton, then I'm not necessarily finessing my social skills,' Evans says. 'Maybe I don't have the confidence to just go up to a group of guys, or maybe I don't have a ready group of people to go out with.' Men and women also experience the internet in different ways. Social media algorithms show them different news, different opinions, amplifying the gender divide. It means that across many western countries, the political and cultural gap between young women (who tend to be on the left) and young men (on the right) is growing. Data from Gallup last year showed that American women are 30 percentage points more liberal than American men. In this country, many point to the exorbitant cost of childcare as an inhibiting factor for starting a family. Yet Sweden, with its abundant parental leave and universal childcare, has a birthrate very slightly lower than the UK's. Housing is expensive in many places, yes. But if housing was the major friction, Evans argues, 'we might expect young people to do the cheaper thing and live communally. Across Europe we've seen a massive increase in young men living by themselves.' Evans argues that declining fertility is a threat to our way of life. Without massive migration or some sort of boost from technology such as artificial intelligence, our working-age population will go into decline, our tax base will shrink, our welfare bill will balloon and our towns and villages will begin to resemble parts of rural Italy or Spain, which have begun to empty out. 'If you want to maintain our current standard of living and if you want to maintain economic growth, this is something we should take extremely seriously,' she says. It may also change our political leanings, with religious conservatives having more children than liberal progressives. Even the steps required to tackle climate change will be difficult without a large working population to pay the bill. So what can we do about it? There is no fix-all cure, Evans says. She herself has no children. She was born with Rokitansky syndrome, which means that she has no womb and only one ovary. For a small group of women, including her, improvements in IVF and other fertility technologies could be very important. • How do we get our babies back? More broadly, Evans suggests that if we want to see birthrates increase, and maintain our current standards of living, the government might consider providing serious tax incentives for those who have children. More youth clubs and more community groups might help, she suggests, as would making our culture more family-friendly. Evans would love to see more (and better) rom coms made, with plots celebrating finding love and having a family. She also suggests that we need a serious conversation about tech, and how we make it work for us. 'We need to tackle all these issues at once,' she says. 'No one policy, no one sledgehammer is going to fix everything.' In the midst of all this worrying news, however, there is one thing to celebrate. On Friday Evans married her partner, Usama Polani, a macroeconomist. Now, it's over to the rest of us to pair off.
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rachel's gone on a £4TRILLION spending spree... so here's how to make sure it gives your investments a turbo boost: These are some of the firms that will win big - and how to invest in them
After the blowout comes the debt hangover – and economic experts expect us all to end up with sore heads and wallets after Rachel Reeve's Spending Review last week. But while we wait to see which of our taxes she'll raise in the autumn Budget to pay for it all, we can help ourselves by investing in some of the companies that will reap the benefits from her largesse.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Tehran threatens UK as Starmer scrambles RAF: Prime Minister sends jets to the Middle East as war rages between Iran and Israel - and refuses to rule out further British action
Britain last night ordered military reinforcements to be sent to the Middle East as war raged between Iran and Israel – despite bloodcurdling warnings from Tehran not to meddle in the conflict. Sir Keir Starmer ordered the deployment of fast jets and refuelling aircraft from UK bases to bolster UK forces just hours after Iran's state-owned Mehr news agency had warned: 'Any country that participates in repelling Iranian attacks on Israel will be subject to Iranian forces targeting all regional bases of the complicit government'. But Israel, in turn, vowed that unless Iran's missile blitz was halted: 'Tehran will burn'. Speaking to reporters en route to the G7 summit in Canada, the Prime Minister refused to rule out taking further steps in a 'fast-moving' and 'intense' security situation. He said: 'I will always make the right decisions for the UK and our allies. We are moving assets to the region, including jets, and that is for contingency support in the region. I will be clear-eyed in relation to our duties and obligations and my duties as Prime Minister.' Asked if the UK would help Israel stop the attacks, he replied: 'These are obviously operational decisions and the situation is ongoing and developing'. Britain already has fighter jets in the Middle East as part of an operation to counter threats in Iraq and Syria. Sir Keir's announcement came as Iran and Israel continued to trade missiles and airstrikes yesterday, a day after Benjamin Netanyahu ordered a devastating air offensive aimed at smashing Tehran's nuclear weapons programme. Israeli hit more than 400 targets in the past 24 hours as part of Operation Rising Lion, including dozens of missile sites and air defence systems in Tehran. They killed more than 20 army and Revolutionary Guards commanders, including armed forces chief Mohammad Bagheri amd and intelligence chief Gholamreza Mehrabi. Tel Aviv also claimed nine nuclear scientists were among the dead. And around 60 people, including 20 children, were reportedly killed in an attack on a housing complex in Tehran, according to Iranian state TV. Meanwhile, Russian leader Vladimir Putin and US president Donald Trump discussed the hostilities in a 50-minute phone call, with Putin condemning the Israeli attacks. Mr Netanyahu said the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear programme by years but he rejected international calls for restraint, saying attacks would intensify. 'We will hit every site and every target of the Ayatollahs' regime, and what they have felt so far is nothing compared with what they will be handed in the coming days,' said the Israeli Prime Minister. 'We have paved a path to Tehran. In the very near future, you will see Israeli planes, the Israeli air force, our pilots, over the skies of Tehran.' Last night, it was also reported that Ali Shamkhani, Iran's top adviser to its supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, died in hospital a day after being wounded in the first night of Israeli airstrikes. Shamkhani had previously served as Iran's top national security official for a decade and was seen as a rising star of Iranian diplomacy, having represented Iran in talks which sealed a landmark agreement to restore diplomatic ties with Saudi Arabia. In a statement, Israel's military said: 'Since the beginning of the operation [on Friday], over 20 commanders in the Iranian regime's security apparatus have been eliminated.' The targets also included Iran's Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites, where Israel claimed nine senior scientists were killed. An Israeli official said it would take more than a few weeks for Iran to repair the damage at the two sites. Iran later responded by saying only three of its scientists had been killed. They were named by Tasnim, the semi-official news agency, as Ali Bakaei Karimi, Mansour Asgari and Saeid Borji. Across Israel, air raid sirens sent residents into shelters as waves of missiles streaked across the sky and interceptors rose to meet them. At least three people were killed overnight. An Israeli official said Iran had fired around 200 ballistic missiles in four waves. The wounded included Croatia's consul in Israel and his wife, who suffered only minor injuries. Defence minister Israel Katz warned: 'The Iranian dictator [Ayatollah Khamenei] is taking the citizens of Iran hostage, bringing about a reality in which they, and especially Tehran's residents, will pay a heavy price for the flagrant harm inflicted upon Israel's citizens. If Khamenei continues to fire missiles at the Israeli home front, Tehran will burn'. Mr Trump applauded Israel's strikes and warned that much worse was to come unless Iran quickly accepted the sharp downgrading of its nuclear programme. Mr Netanyahu sent effusive 79th birthday wishes to Mr Trump, saying: 'You've been an extraordinary leader, decisive, courageous, with a clear vision and clear action. You have done great things for Israel.' He added that Israel was striking a blow for the free world, saying: 'Our enemy is your enemy and what we're doing, we're dealing with something that will threaten all of us sooner or later. Our victory will be your victory.' Gulf Arab states that have long mistrusted Iran but fear coming under attack in any wider conflict have urged calm. Meanwhile, worries about disruption to the region's crucial oil exports caused the price of crude oil to soar. Those fears intensified yesterday when Iranian general Esmail Kosari said Iran was reviewing whether to close the Strait of Hormuz, the exit point for oil shipped from the Gulf. Tehran insists its nuclear programme is entirely civilian in line with its obligations under a nuclear non-proliferation treaty and that it does not seek an atomic bomb. But, it has repeatedly hidden some parts from international inspectors, and on Thursday it was judged to be in violation of the treaty. Sir Keir Starmer told reporters there would be 'intense discussions' about the Middle Eastern conflict at the annual G7 gathering of world leaders this said he had had a 'good and constructive discussion' with Mr Netanyahu on Friday over the 'safety and security of Israel, as you would expect, between two allies'. Meanwhile Foreign Secretary David Lammy has spoken to his Iranian counterpart to urge calm. Sir Keir said: 'We do have long-standing concerns about the nuclear programme Iran has. 'We do recognise Israel's right to self-defence, but I'm absolutely clear that this needs to de-escalate. That's the primary focus.' Shipping blockade will hit petrol prices By Calum Muirhead The conflict between Israel and Iran could push petrol prices up for British drivers if the Islamic Republic acts on its threats to block a key global shipping lane. Iran is considering closing the 30-mile-wide Strait of Hormuz, which links the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, in retaliation against Israel's attacks, according to Iranian parliamentarian Esmail Kosari. The strait, which is jointly controlled by Iran and Oman, is a vital artery for the world's fossil fuels. A fifth of all oil shipments pass through it, as well as a third of all liquified natural gas. Closing it or disrupting the flow of ships, as Iran has threatened in the past, would strangle the supply of oil and gas on global markets, increasing the price of fuel. A blockade would also put pressure on the British economy and people's wallets as consumers and firms absorb higher energy costs. While it would be hard for Iran to close the strait entirely, it could disrupt oil shipments by attempting to seize tankers that strayed into its waters. Shipping firms are already reluctant to pass through. Frontline, the world's fourth-largest oil tanker firm, is refusing contracts that use the strait. Brent crude, an international oil benchmark, surged to around $74 a barrel after Israel's attacks on Friday – the highest price in more than two months. But this could go up further if Iran closes the strait.
