Western lawmakers aim to confront wildfire crisis through joint legislation
Why it matters: Climate change and drought are causing wildfires to become more intense, widespread and harder to put out.
The legislation comes after the Los Angeles County blazes in January were called one of the costliest wildfire events in U.S. history, with estimated damages reaching up to $131 billion.
State of play: Some highlights of the Fix Our Forests Act — sponsored by Sens. John Curtis (R-Utah), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) and Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) —are:
Reducing wildfire risks in certain areas with more cross-boundary collaboration.
Creating an interagency program to help communities build wildfire-resistant measures.
Increasing research to test and utilize wildfire prevention technologies.
By the numbers: 1,244 wildfires were reported in Utah in 2024, up 54% from 2023, according to data provided by Curtis' office.
In 2024, Utah saw the highest number of wildfire reports the state has seen since 2020.
Zoom out: Nationally, almost 9 million acres burned in 2024 due to wildfires, a 231% increase compared to 2.7 million acres burned in 2023.
The northwestern U.S. led the nation in acres burned last year, according to wildfire statistics provided by the National Interagency Coordination Center.
What they're saying:"Utah and the American West are on the front lines of a growing wildfire crisis — and the longer we wait, the more acres will burn and more families will be impacted," Curtis said in a statement.
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, who is backing the legislation, said the bill would "help us protect watersheds, enhance wildlife habitat, reduce wildfire risk and provide the timber we need to build strong homes and neighborhoods."
Yes, but: Despite Utah being prone to wildfires, attitudes toward climate change vary across the state.
The big picture: Climate anxiety is concentrated in big U.S. metros and some coastal communities, Axios' Alex Fitzpatrick writes.
Many major metro areas, like Salt Lake City, show a relatively higher climate concern compared to their surrounding areas, recent estimates find.
Zoom in: About 71% of adults in Salt Lake said they were "worried" about climate change, per Yale Program on Climate Change Communication estimates based on survey data.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump has ‘good conversation' with Zelenskyy after heavy bombardment of Ukraine by Russia
Donald Trump spoke with Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, on Friday as the US president appears increasingly disheartened over his chances of fulfilling a campaign pledge to end the war between Russia and Ukraine. The call with Zelenskyy comes as Washington has halted its latest shipment of military aid to Ukraine including Patriot air defense missiles and other crucial munitions meant to support the country's defenses, and hours after Russia launched a devastating air attack on Kyiv using a record number of drones and ballistic missiles. Zelenskyy called the conversation 'important and useful' and said in a post said that he and Trump had discussed Ukraine's air defense capabilities, joint defense production and 'mutual purchases and investments', all potentially avenues for Ukraine to restart aid from the United States by providing incentives for the Trump administration to rush crucial munitions to Kyiv. He said that the two sides had agreed to 'increase aerial protection', a particular focus for Kyiv as Russia has increased bombardments of Ukrainian cities despite outrage from Trump and other world leaders. Yet it was not immediately clear whether Zelenskyy had achieved any concrete progress with Trump and in his statement he did not mention the halt of aid shipments from the US or announce their resumption. Axios reported that a source described the call as a 'good conversation'. Related: Russian drone attack on Kyiv injures 14, triggers multiple fires, mayor says Trump said he was 'very disappointed' after a telephone call with Vladimir Putin on Thursday. A Putin aide told reporters that the Russian president was not willing to make concessions on what the Kremlin has called the 'root causes' of the war with Ukraine, a list of grievances that includes Nato expansion and Ukraine's desire to join western economic and security blocs. 'I'm very disappointed with the conversation I had today with President Putin, because I don't think he's there,' Trump told reporters after holding a rally in Iowa on Thursday evening. 'I don't think he's there, and I'm very disappointed. I'm just saying, I don't think he's looking to stop, and that's too bad.' The US has said that it halted the shipments, some of which were already in Poland, due to a review of US military stockpiles that suggested that the country is running low on munitions for its own troops. Germany has said that it is in 'intensive talks' to buy the Patriot missiles for Ukraine, although it's unclear whether those stocks would be available immediately. 'There are various ways to fill this Patriot gap,' a German government spokesperson told a news conference in Berlin on Friday. One option being considered was for the German government to buy the Patriot missile batteries in the United States and then send them to Ukraine. 'I can confirm that intensive discussions are indeed being held on this matter,' the spokesperson said. The shortage of Patriot missiles was further highlighted by the record bombardment of Ukraine in which Russia sent more than 550 drones and ballistic missiles at major cities in what Zelenskyy described as a 'deliberate act of terror'. The strike immediately followed the call between Putin and Trump, Zelenskyy said, and was a 'clear interpretation of how Moscow interprets diplomacy'.
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
White House moves to limit sharing of some classified info with Congress after Iran leak
The Trump administration is planning to limit the amount of classified information it shares with Congress moving forward amid uproar over an internal preliminary assessment that found U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities may not have been as devastating as the president claimed. The move is prompting Democratic pushback from those who argue it would be unwise to restrict congressional access based on suspicion. A White House official confirmed the decision, which was first reported by Axios. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced earlier Wednesday that the Pentagon was launching an investigation into the leak of the assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency. 'I am told by the FBI the leak already is being investigated, and it absolutely should be because this was a top secret intelligence analysis that very few people in the United States government had access to see,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Fox News Wednesday. The U.S. last Saturday carried out strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. Despite assertions from the administration that the strikes set the country's nuclear capabilities back by years, an initial intelligence assessment obtained by some media outlets suggested the damage was more limited, setting the program back only by a few months. According to Axios, the information was shared shortly after it was posted on CAPNET, a system used to share information with Congress. Rep. Jim Himes (Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, criticized the administration's plans. 'The leak of classified information is unacceptable and should be fully investigated and those responsible held accountable. It's also unacceptable for the Administration to use unsubstantiated speculation about the source of a leak to justify cutting off Congress from classified intelligence reporting, particularly when over a million people within the Executive Branch have clearance to access classified top-secret reporting,' he said. 'The law requires the congressional intelligence committees to be kept fully and currently informed, and I expect the Intelligence Community to comply with the law,' he continued. Rep. Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), the chair of the intelligence panel, didn't directly criticize the decision for Congress but lamented the result stemming from the leak. 'I am furious with the repeated, blatant disregard for the very simple, proper handling of classified information. When leakers leverage their access to highly sensitive information to push a political or personal agenda it is to the detriment of U.S. national security and incredibly disrespectful to those who put their lives on the line for our country collecting intelligence and supporting our mission on the ground. Access to classified information is a privilege and with that comes the utmost responsibility to safeguard that information with the highest level of caution and care,' he said in a statement. 'I will continue to work with the Administration to ensure information to keep Congress fully and currently informed is shared via the appropriate Committees with appropriate oversight responsibilities. This reckless and dangerous behavior must end–full stop.' Lawmakers were set to receive classified briefings on Tuesday about the Trump administration's strikes against Iran, but they were postponed until later this week. The Senate briefing will now take place on Thursday. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) announced the House briefing would be Friday. Administration officials have aggressively pushed back on reporting about an early internal assessment that found the U.S. strikes delayed Iran's nuclear program by only a few months. Trump and others have referred to the sites as 'obliterated' and argued they all but eliminated Iran's ability to pursue a nuclear weapon. President Trump also cited an assessment from the Israel Atomic Energy Commission about the success of the U.S. strikes on the Iranian nuclear facilities, which, together with Israeli strikes, set back Iran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon 'by many years.' Updated at 8:36 p.m. EDT. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
Trump meets with Saudi defense minister, discusses Iran situation
President Trump met with the Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman at the White House on Thursday and discussed the situation with Iran and other regional issues, according to a source familiar with the meeting. Why it matters: Saudi Arabia wants to de-escalate tension in the region after the 12-day war between Israel and Iran. The talks took place ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Monday meeting with Trump at the White House. The Trump administration wants to push for a historic peace deal between Saudi Arabia and Israel in the coming months. Details: After his meeting with Trump, the Saudi foreign minister spoke on the phone with Chief of Iran's General Staff of the Armed Forces, Maj. Gen. Abdolrahim Mousavi. "We discussed developments in the region and the efforts being made to maintain security and stability," wrote Bin Salman, who is a younger brother of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Bin Salman also met with White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The meeting between Trump and the Saudi defense minister was first reported by Fox News. The White House didn't immediately respond to Axios' request for comment on Thursday evening. Driving the news: Witkoff plans to meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Oslo next week to restart nuclear talks, Axios reported on Thursday. Araghchi spoke with on the phone on Thursday with Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Eide and discussed the efforts to deescalate tensions in the region, the Iranian Foreign Ministry said. Trump told reporters on Thursday that Iran wants to speak with the U.S. and "it is time that they do." The president said the U.S. doesn't want to hurt Iran. "I know they want to meet and if it is necessary I will do it," he said.
