Inside the legal fight over the telehealth clinics that help women defy abortion bans
Whether this is legal, though, is a matter of debate. Two legal cases involving a New York doctor could wind up testing the shield laws some states have passed to protect telehealth providers who ship abortion pills nationwide.
Dr. Margaret Carpenter faces a felony charge in Louisiana for supplying abortion medication through the mail to a pregnant teen in that state. The patient's mother also faces criminal charges. A Texas judge fined the same physician $100,000 after the state accused her of prescribing abortion medication for a woman near Dallas.
So far, the prosecution hasn't progressed thanks to New York's shield law, which has protected Carpenter from extradition to Louisiana. But other telehealth centers operating in states with similar legal protections for abortion providers are watching closely.
"We have great legal counsel who have advised us that what we are doing is legal,' said Dr. Angel Foster, co-founder of The Massachusetts Medication Abortion Access Project, which is among a handful of telehealth providers that facilitate abortions from afar in states with bans.
As more states consider enacting shield laws or expanding existing ones, whether one state can shield providers from liability for breaking another state's laws around abortion is still an unsettled area of law.
Erik Baptist, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which opposes abortion, said shield laws violate a constitutional requirement that states respect the laws and legal judgments of other states.
"What these shield law states are doing are undermining the prerogative of these pro-life states to implement and enforce pro-life laws,' said Baptist, director of the group's Center for Life. 'And so I think the Supreme Court ultimately will want to take this.'
'That is inherently a challenge with shield laws and telehealth,' said Carmel Shachar, faculty director of the Health Law and Policy Clinic at Harvard Law School. 'At a certain point, for the purposes of abortion bans, the courts will need to decide: Do we treat a telehealth abortion as happening within the state of the provider or within the state of the patient?'
Abortion pills sent to your home
Decades ago, the FDA approved the use of two prescription medicines — mifepristone and misoprostol — to terminate pregnancies.
But it wasn't until 2023 that telehealth abortions across states became more popular, after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
The Society of Family Planning, which supports abortion rights, said that between April and June 2024 there were an average of 7,700 telehealth abortions performed each month in states that either ban abortion totally or after six weeks of pregnancy.
The prescribing process at telehealth clinics varies by provider, but usually takes place entirely online, with the patient answering a series of health-related questions and consent forms.
At some telehealth clinics, medical providers don't come face-to-face with patients, even via videoconferencing, and patients don't necessarily know the prescriber's name unless requested.
For instance, when Foster's clinic, also known as The MAP, puts pills in the mail, only the name of the practice appears on the label, as allowed under the Massachusetts shield law. If patients have follow-up questions, they can talk or text the doctor working that day, but may not know that doctor's name either.
Pills can arrive in a less than a week.
'This has been the safety net, post-Dobbs, of allowing people who don't have the ability to travel out of state to get abortion care,' said Greer Donley, a University of Pittsburgh law professor and abortion law expert.
When dealing with medications not related to abortion, doctors are often able to write prescriptions for patients in other states. However, in most states, if the patient is located within its borders, the doctor must have a license issued by that state, according to Mei Wa Kwong, executive director of the The Center for Connected Health Policy.
States with shield laws
Twenty three states and Washington, D.C., currently have shield laws protecting abortion providers.
Of those, eight have specific provisions protecting them from criminal prosecution or civil lawsuits even if the patient is in another state, according to the nonprofit research organization KFF. They include California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
Louisiana's request to extradite Carpenter hit a roadblock when New York Gov. Kathy Hochul rejected it, citing the state's shield law. (A county clerk also cited the shield law as he refused to file the civil judgment from Texas.)
'These are not doctors providing health care. They are drug dealers,' Republican Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill told state lawmakers as she promoted a bill that would expand who can sue and be sued in abortion medication cases. 'They are violating our laws. They are sending illegal medications for purposes of procuring abortions that are illegal in our state.'
Clinics say they will keep prescribing
Julie Kay, the executive director of the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine, the nationwide organization co-founded by Carpenter, said providers won't be 'bullied and intimidated' into ceasing operations.
Other telehealth abortion providers said they also won't be deterred by legal threats.
'I have been working in this field for 25 years and this is part of the work," said Dr. Rebecca Gomperts, founder and director of Aid Access, an abortion pill supplier. 'It's something that we all anticipated would happen," she said of the legal challenges.
A doctor who is part of A Safe Choice, a network of California-based physicians that prescribes abortion pills to women in all 50 states, told The Associated Press he believes he is protected by the state's shield law, but is also taking precautions.
'I'm not going to be traveling outside of California for a very long time,' said the doctor, who spoke with The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he wanted to protect his identity for safety reasons.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Mysterious tick-borne illness forces island getaway loved by the wealthy to go VEGAN
Martha's Vineyard has been forced to go vegan due to an explosion of tick-borne illnesses this summer. The island, which sits off the coast of Massachusetts and serves as a getaway for celebrities and wealthy New Englanders, is known not only for its picturesque beaches but also its fresh seafood, meat and soft cheeses. However, these upscale staples have been ousted from menus at the island's busiest restaurants as a tick-borne disease that makes people allergic to animal products surges on the island. The lone star tick, or Amblyomma americanum, is an aggressive tick found in the Northeast, South and Midwest, distinguished by a signature white 'lone star' on its back. Just one bite from it can cause people to become deathly allergic to meat and dairy, a condition called alpha-gal syndrome. When a person eats these foods, the body detects alpha-gal molecules in them and attacks, leading to a life-threatening immune response. Cases of alpha-gal syndrome are 'skyrocketing,' experts have warned, with data from Martha's Vineyard Hospital showing 532 out of 1,254 tests, or 42 percent, resulting positive for the condition last year. This is a stark difference from just five years ago, when two out of nine total tests - 22 percent - were positive. Dr Ed Caldwell, an ear, nose and throat doctor and allergist on Martha's Vineyard, told 'I have it, my sister has it and I see on average three to four patients a day with it, which has rapidly increased from about one a week a couple of years ago. 'Martha's Vineyard has always been an epicenter for tick-related diseases but now has become an epicenter for alpha-gal sensitivity. This seems to be directly related to the expansion of the Lone Star tick here. 'The incidence of the number of people who have this allergy is expanding exponentially.' Alpha-gal syndrome is an allergy to alpha-gal, a molecule naturally produced in the bodies of most mammals except humans, as well as saliva of the lone star tick. When a tick bites, it transfers alpha-gal into a person's blood, which sets off an immune reaction. People with the condition then suffer severe allergic reactions when they eat products made from mammals like red meat and some forms of dairy like milk and cheese. Dr Maria Knobel, co-founder and medical director of Medical Cert UK, told 'In alpha-gal syndrome, a small amount of mammalian elements can set off a response hours after.' Typical symptoms of reactions include hives or rashes, nausea or vomiting, stomach pain, heartburn, diarrhea, trouble breathing, low blood pressure, dizziness or fainting and swelling of the lips, throat, tongue or eye lids. Dr Gerry Yukevich, an internist at Martha's Vineyard Medical, told this website: 'The rapidity of alpha-gal is astounding. 'Most often, the reaction comes between three and six hours after the meal, which makes it hard to connect to the that they may have contracted alpha-gal.' The CDC identified about 110,000 cases of alpha-gal syndrome from 2010 to 2022, the latest data available, though cases are not strictly tracked. The agency estimates roughly 450,000 Americans may actually be affected. Martha's Vineyard is already a hotspots for deer ticks, which spread Lyme disease, but one-eighth inch long lone star ticks can live in more areas like beaches and freshly mowed lawns, given them a wider reach. And because alpha-gal is naturally found in lone star tick saliva, a bite from all stages of the tick life cycle pose a risk. Lyme disease, on the other hand, only spreads from deer ticks to humans after a tick has had its first blood meal from an infected host. Carla Cooper, an ecologist on Martha's Vineyard, learned she had contracted alpha-gal syndrome in the summer of 2023 when she ate a hamburger and ice cream from a local restaurant and suddenly couldn't breathe. The shortness of breath persisted for weeks after. She told Martha's Vineyard Magazine: 'I couldn't walk to the end of my driveway.' Jannette Vanderhoop also developed an alpha-gal syndrome reaction from a hamburger. She told Martha's Vineyard Magazine that she can still have dairy, but Cooper has had to swear off both dairy and red meat. Vanderhoop, who cut out red meat and pork, said: 'My diet is definitely different. I'm so sick of chicken and turkey.' Restaurant owners on the island also have to be hypervigilant, Johnny Graham, founder of Revel Catering & Events, told Graham said: 'Running a busy catering company on Martha's Vineyard, we have seen a drastic upturn in requests for alpha-gal friendly menus in all departments, especially over the last two years. 'Cocktail parties, weddings, platter service, dinner parties, everything. 'We are in the midst of rewriting the entire library of menu items in our software database to acknowledge alpha-gal friendly items right alongside other dietary restrictions such as peanuts, gluten intolerance, dairy free, vegan, etc.' The condition can even make grocery shopping in general more difficult. Dr Knobel told this website: 'Food manufacturers occasionally alter a recipe without notice and I have found vegetable soup mixes that suddenly contained beef extract. 'This may put an individual in great danger when he/she orders a dish he/she has already consumed before and has confidence that it has not been contaminated.' She urges restaurants to keep a running list of all ingredients used by all food suppliers and review it monthly to see if anything additional that is meat or dairy-based has been added, similar to measures Graham has put in place. Dr Yukevich told this website: 'One of our main efforts now is to educate the public on how prevalent this problem is and how they should take precautions in avoiding tick bites and get medical attention immediately if they detect a sensitivity to meat or dairy products in their diet.'
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
US judge blocks Trump religious exemption to birth control coverage
Aug 13 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Wednesday struck down rules adopted during President Donald Trump's first term that exempt employers with religious or moral objections from having to provide workers with insurance coverage for birth control. U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone in Philadelphia said the 2018 rules were not justified, rejecting the Trump administration's claims that they were necessary to protect the rights of religious employers. The ruling came in a lawsuit by Pennsylvania and New Jersey that reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 2020 upheld the rules on technical grounds but did not address their merits. The U.S. Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Little Sisters of the Poor, a Roman Catholic order of nuns that intervened in the case to defend the rules, will appeal the ruling, according to the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a nonprofit that represents the order. The federal Affordable Care Act requires employers to provide insurance coverage for contraception but allows those with religious objections to seek exemptions. The 2018 rules created a blanket exemption for employers with religious or moral objections to contraception. The Trump administration said that even requiring employers to apply for an exemption could burden their religious practice, in violation of federal law. But Beetlestone on Wednesday said there was a mismatch between the vast scope of the exemption and the relatively small number of employers who may need it. That "casts doubt on whether ... there is a rational connection between the problem the Agencies identified and the solution they had chosen," wrote Beetlestone, an appointee of President Barack Obama, a Democrat. The administration of President Joe Biden, a Democrat, had proposed withdrawing the Trump administration rules in 2023 but that proposal was withdrawn weeks before Biden left office in January.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Colorado residents alarmed as rabbits with black horns and mouth tentacles keep appearing
Rabbits in Fort Collins, Colorado, have been observed with eerie black growths resembling tentacles or horns, causing alarm among residents. Colorado Parks and Wildlife officials have identified the cause as Shope papillomavirus (SPV), a rabbit-only virus that produces wart-like tumours, particularly around the face and head. SPV, a relative of human papillomavirus, is spread among rabbits by biting insects but is not harmful to humans, pets, or other wildlife. Officials advise the public to avoid approaching or touching affected rabbits, noting that the growths often disappear naturally and most wild rabbits manage well. The unusual appearance of these rabbits has gone viral online, with many comparing them to "zombies" or "Frankenstein bunnies", and some researchers linking them to the jackalope legend. 'Zombie' rabbits with black horns and mouth tentacles are invading Colorado backyards
