Inside the legal fight over the telehealth clinics that help women defy abortion bans
Every month, thousands of women thwart abortion bans in their home states by turning to telehealth clinics willing to prescribe pregnancy-ending drugs online and ship them anywhere in the country.
Whether this is legal, though, is a matter of debate. Two legal cases involving a New York doctor could wind up testing the shield laws some states have passed to protect telehealth providers who ship abortion pills nationwide.
Dr. Margaret Carpenter faces a felony charge in Louisiana for supplying abortion medication through the mail to a pregnant teen in that state. The patient's mother also faces criminal charges. A Texas judge fined the same physician $100,000 after the state accused her of prescribing abortion medication for a woman near Dallas.
So far, the prosecution hasn't progressed thanks to New York's shield law, which has protected Carpenter from extradition to Louisiana. But other telehealth centers operating in states with similar legal protections for abortion providers are watching closely.
"We have great legal counsel who have advised us that what we are doing is legal,' said Dr. Angel Foster, co-founder of The Massachusetts Medication Abortion Access Project, which is among a handful of telehealth providers that facilitate abortions from afar in states with bans.
As more states consider enacting shield laws or expanding existing ones, whether one state can shield providers from liability for breaking another state's laws around abortion is still an unsettled area of law.
Erik Baptist, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which opposes abortion, said shield laws violate a constitutional requirement that states respect the laws and legal judgments of other states.
"What these shield law states are doing are undermining the prerogative of these pro-life states to implement and enforce pro-life laws,' said Baptist, director of the group's Center for Life. 'And so I think the Supreme Court ultimately will want to take this.'
'That is inherently a challenge with shield laws and telehealth,' said Carmel Shachar, faculty director of the Health Law and Policy Clinic at Harvard Law School. 'At a certain point, for the purposes of abortion bans, the courts will need to decide: Do we treat a telehealth abortion as happening within the state of the provider or within the state of the patient?'
Abortion pills sent to your home
Decades ago, the FDA approved the use of two prescription medicines — mifepristone and misoprostol — to terminate pregnancies.
But it wasn't until 2023 that telehealth abortions across states became more popular, after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
The Society of Family Planning, which supports abortion rights, said that between April and June 2024 there were an average of 7,700 telehealth abortions performed each month in states that either ban abortion totally or after six weeks of pregnancy.
The prescribing process at telehealth clinics varies by provider, but usually takes place entirely online, with the patient answering a series of health-related questions and consent forms.
At some telehealth clinics, medical providers don't come face-to-face with patients, even via videoconferencing, and patients don't necessarily know the prescriber's name unless requested.
For instance, when Foster's clinic, also known as The MAP, puts pills in the mail, only the name of the practice appears on the label, as allowed under the Massachusetts shield law. If patients have follow-up questions, they can talk or text the doctor working that day, but may not know that doctor's name either.
Pills can arrive in a less than a week.
'This has been the safety net, post-Dobbs, of allowing people who don't have the ability to travel out of state to get abortion care,' said Greer Donley, a University of Pittsburgh law professor and abortion law expert.
When dealing with medications not related to abortion, doctors are often able to write prescriptions for patients in other states. However, in most states, if the patient is located within its borders, the doctor must have a license issued by that state, according to Mei Wa Kwong, executive director of the The Center for Connected Health Policy.
States with shield laws
Twenty three states and Washington, D.C., currently have shield laws protecting abortion providers.
Of those, eight have specific provisions protecting them from criminal prosecution or civil lawsuits even if the patient is in another state, according to the nonprofit research organization KFF. They include California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
Louisiana's request to extradite Carpenter hit a roadblock when New York Gov. Kathy Hochul rejected it, citing the state's shield law. (A county clerk also cited the shield law as he refused to file the civil judgment from Texas.)
'These are not doctors providing health care. They are drug dealers,' Republican Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill told state lawmakers as she promoted a bill that would expand who can sue and be sued in abortion medication cases. 'They are violating our laws. They are sending illegal medications for purposes of procuring abortions that are illegal in our state.'
Clinics say they will keep prescribing
Julie Kay, the executive director of the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine, the nationwide organization co-founded by Carpenter, said providers won't be 'bullied and intimidated' into ceasing operations.
Other telehealth abortion providers said they also won't be deterred by legal threats.
'I have been working in this field for 25 years and this is part of the work," said Dr. Rebecca Gomperts, founder and director of Aid Access, an abortion pill supplier. 'It's something that we all anticipated would happen," she said of the legal challenges.
A doctor who is part of A Safe Choice, a network of California-based physicians that prescribes abortion pills to women in all 50 states, told The Associated Press he believes he is protected by the state's shield law, but is also taking precautions.
'I'm not going to be traveling outside of California for a very long time,' said the doctor, who spoke with The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he wanted to protect his identity for safety reasons.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The key to being happier, smarter and ageing better, by leading neuroscientist DR JOSEPH JEBELLI. An extraordinary scientfic breakthrough shows what part of modern life is destroying our brains - now his new book has the cure
You're sitting at your desk, trying to look busy, and your work isn't going well. OK, it's time to double down and try a bit harder... but for some reason your brain fails to ignite. It's just one of those things we all experience at work – and until recently, no one really understood how to kick-start the brain back into action.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Quintessential summer drink shockingly linked to aggressive skin cancer
Summer's here, which means millions will be enjoying a glass of wine on a warm evening. But scientists warn that the type of wine you drink could be raising your risk of skin cancer. A new study found that drinking white wine was associated with a 22 percent higher risk of melanomas and other forms of skin cancers compared to drinking red wine. One of the theories is that white wine is often consumed in the sun, which itself is a risk factor for skin cancer. Red wine also contains chemicals that have anti-inflammatory properties which some studies suggest could have a protective effect on cells. Eunyoung Cho, co-lead author of the study and associate professor of epidemiology and of dermatology at Brown University, said: 'We did observe a distinction when it came to skin cancer risk. 'Specifically, the consumption of white wine, but not red wine, was associated with an increased risk of skin cancer.' The American Cancer Society notes all alcohol consumption can lead to cancer and recommends limiting to one drink per day for women and two drinks per day for men. The group of researchers analyzed 42 studies with nearly 96,000 participants to compare the cancer risk caused by both red and white wine. Among the participants, the scientists identified those who drank the most and least white and red wine, respectively, and how much they consumed. Since the analysis pooled data from multiple research papers from across the world, each with its own definitions of consumption levels, it remains unclear how many glasses of wine each participant was drinking. While 'high' consumption usually means around one glass per day, this can vary from country to country. However, the data that was collected by the Brown University researchers was then measured using multiple statistical models to find a link between drinking wine and the probability of developing cancer. Results showed that women who drank white wine were at a greater risk of developing any kind cancer in their body as compared to men who drank white wine. The researchers did not find any link between red wine and skin cancer. It also remains unclear how many glasses of white wine can raise the risk of skin cancer. has reached to Dr Cho for more information. While Dr Cho and her team did not identify a clear reason on how white wine can increase the risk of cancer, they theorized that it was possible that women do not take protective measures against skin cancer when under the influence of alcohol. Skin cancer is usually caused due to a toxic growth of skin cells and can quickly spread across the skin. Normally, as skin cells grow old and die, new cells form to replace them. When this process stops to work as it should due to exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light from the sun, cells grow more quickly and become toxic. The most common form of skin cancer is basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma - both of which can often be cured. Basal cell carcinoma is defined as the cancer that forms in your basal cells in the lower part of the outside layer of the skin while squamous cell carcinoma forms in the squamous cells in the outside layer of the skin. The most dangerous form of skin cancer is melanoma. It is more likely to spread, making it harder to cure. This type of skin cancer forms in cells called melanocytes. Melanocytes produce melanin, a brown pigment that gives your skin its color and protects against some of the sun's damaging UV rays. However, without proper protection such as using sunscreen, UV rays can damage melanocytes and pave the way for the development of melanoma. Previous studies have shown a statistically significant association between alcohol consumption and an increased risk of melanoma. According to Harvard Health, one study found that the risk of basal cell carcinoma increased by seven percent and squamous cell carcinoma increased by 11 percent for every 10-gram increase in intake of alcohol in distilled spirit form (or one standard beer or small glass of wine) each day. Another study also found a 20 percent increase in melanoma in drinkers (compared to those who don't drink alcohol or only drink occasionally) Additionally, it also found that those who drink 50-grams of alcohol (or five beers) per day had a 55 percent increase in risk for melanoma. Numerous researchers believe that drinking alcohol while basking in the sunlight can increase a person's risk of developing cancer. As you drink, the body begins to process and metabolize alcohol which leads to the formation of Acetaldehyde. Acetaldehyde is a known carcinogen - cancer causing substance - that is known to damage cell DNA and can increase a person's chances of having cancer. Coupled with the sun's UV rays that continue to damage the skin, the likelihood to develop the deadly illness increase. The American Cancer Society recommends limiting alcohol consumption to one drink per day for women and two drinks per day for men. But experts say that it is important to consider your underlying risk for developing skin cancer based on sun exposure and ethnicity and then alter your lifestyle.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
This common nut can lower your risk of heart disease, dementia and diabetes
A handful of almonds each day could significantly reduce a condition that has been linked to heart disease, diabetes, and dementia, according to a new study in the journal Nutrition Research. Around one in three Americans are affected by metabolic syndrome, and evidence shows they are 'three times as likely to suffer a heart attack or stroke and twice as likely to die from coronary heart disease compared to people without this condition,' lead study author Emily Ho, director of the Linus Pauling Institute at Oregon State University, said in a statement released in the report. 'Poor diet and inactivity contribute to the development of metabolic syndrome, and gut health and chronic inflammation may also play roles,' she added. But swapping processed snacks for a handful of almonds – about 45 nuts – in your daily diet could help curb some of the most serious chronic health risks facing Americans today. In a 12-week clinical trial, researchers studied adults aged 35 to 60 who had been diagnosed with metabolic syndrome. One group consumed 320 calories of almonds daily while the other group ate the same number of calories from crackers. Those who ate almonds experienced significant health improvements, including reductions in total cholesterol, LDL (bad) cholesterol, and waist circumference. Blood tests also showed increased levels of vitamin E, an antioxidant known to reduce inflammation and support heart, nerve, and muscle function. Participants in the almond group also saw lower levels of gut inflammation — a promising sign, as maintaining a healthy gut microbiome is increasingly recognized as vital to long-term health. 'In addition to vitamin E, almonds have polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fats, fiber, polyphenols, biotin, copper, potassium and magnesium,' said study co-author Laura Beaver, a research associate in the Oregon State College of Health. 'The changes in cholesterol levels we observed suggest a meaningful metabolic shift in those who consumed almonds daily.' The findings align with previous research highlighting the health benefits of almonds.
