Jakarta plans ban on ondel-ondel buskers, sparking cultural debate
Ondel-ondel is the pride of the native Jakarta tribe, the Betawi people.
Traditional performances were accompanied by instruments for festive and celebratory events, including weddings and welcome ceremonies for honourable guests.
Cyril Raoul Hakim, spokesman for Jakarta Governor Pramono Anung, told AFP the ban was still being drafted with 'the preservation of Betawi culture' in mind and it would be put to legislators soon.
'We hope it will be passed not too long from now,' he said.
Over time, ondel-ondel have been increasingly used by buskers who sway the puppets to music from loudspeakers, seeking money on the roadside, at traffic lights, and in the alleyways of Jakarta's densely populated neighbourhoods.
The city administration has long wanted to ban ondel-ondel busking, arguing that the practice sullies the dignity of the cultural icon.
The ban could leave many buskers, like Adi Sutisna, without income. Photo / AFP
Bureaucrats believe roadside busking undermines the puppets' cultural significance.
But many Jakartans rely on the entertainment to bring in much-needed cash.
According to government data, the number of people living below the poverty line in metropolitan Jakarta – a megalopolis of 11 million people – was up from 362,000 in 2019 to 449,000 as of September 2024.
The Central Statistics Bureau says the poverty line in Indonesia in 2025 is just over US$1 a day.
'The ondel-ondel is heavy; it is very hot inside,' said Adi.
'But I do it anyway because if I don't, my wife and my kid won't be able to eat.'
The planned ban has left authentic ondel-ondel performers and makers torn about the preservation of their culture and the plight of the buskers.
Performers such as Fadillah Akbar believe the cultural symbol must be revered, and should not be used to beg for money.
'The problem is that they beg on the street – that's a disturbance, and it bothers my soul,' the 33-year-old ondel-ondel artist said.
He believes ondel-ondel must come in pairs, a woman and a man, and be accompanied by traditional live music instead of a recorded song playing on loudspeakers.
'Of course, I feel bad for the buskers, especially since I know many of them, but it is a cultural icon whose dignity must be upheld,' he said.
The head of Jakarta's public order agency, Satriadi Gunawan, said ondel-ondel busking disturbed road users with loudspeakers and requests for money.
'In Betawi culture, upholding ondel-ondel's dignity is important, and now it is often used to beg for money,' he said.
But some historians disagree, saying limiting the puppet presence on Jakarta's streets could hurt efforts to keep the dwindling tradition alive.
'Banning ondel-ondel busking in the name of culture signifies their lack of understanding for tradition,' said Jakarta-based historian JJ Rizal.
'It proves that not only does the city government not understand culture, but it also endangers the preservation of art.'
-Agence France-Presse
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
an hour ago
- Newsroom
Crown and council to take voting edge over Māori on Waitakeres body
Joint oversight of the Waitakere Ranges by Māori, Auckland Council and the Crown will not now be through a committee with equal representation after feedback from west Aucklanders, some opposed to 'co-governance'. From initial proposals of an equal five seats for tangata whenua and five representing public bodies, the latest deed to establish the oversight committee has moved to six to five in favour of the council and Crown entities. The change leaves west Auckland-based iwi Te Kawerau ā Maki feeling 'a little bruised, and beaten up' after years of waiting, but accepting it 'could live with' the council's change of representation and wanting to get on and protect the ranges. Iwi chief executive Edward Ashby told Newsroom: 'It was pretty clear there was a fear – and I do think it is an irrational fear because it's an advisory body and we are not the boogie man. But we are really focused on the outcome. We are not too worried by the numbers.' The deed for the Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area Forum, a body to be set up under a 2008 law but only now being finalised, goes before Auckland Council's policy and planning committee on Thursday. The Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act recognised the 27,700 hectares of publicly owned land in the ranges as nationally significant, needing protection. It specified the Crown, council and nominated iwi to develop the deed and oversight body, a non-statutory body to identify areas of cooperation and develop a strategic plan for the area. It aims to identify areas tangata whenua can contribute to the management of public land and to acknowledge their traditional relationship with the ranges. The five seats for Māori are initially to be taken up by Te Kawerau ā Maki, as another iwi listed in the Act, Ngāti Whātua, has declined. Under the deed, there will be no change of ownership of land under the deed or forum structure, and the forum would not be able to direct spending of council or Crown funds, other than its own delegated budget. In April, the New Zealand First party complained the forum would be an example of 'co-governance' with Māori able to set strategy and veto council or government measures related to the ranges. MP Shane Jones said his party would never agree to an iwi having '50 percent sovereignty over the Waitakere forest'. Ashby dismissed the criticisms in April as scaremongering and said the forum as proposed was not co-governance. If it had been, there would have been a different structure and entity established. The deed simply acknowledged tangata whenua's special relationship with the ranges area. Around 2250 people and organisations made public submissions on the heritage forum deed, with 51 percent in favour, 39 percent against and 10 percent recorded as 'other'. Analysis of the submissions by research firm Ipsos said there was concern among those opposed to the deed at the prospect of 50-50 representation on the joint committee giving tangata whenua 'disproportionate influence' over management of the public land. Those in favour of the deed and shared oversight acknowledged the iwi role of kaitiaki or guardian and the importance of tangata whenua having a strong voice and seat at the table. It appears that public feedback, rather than the political claims by NZ First and the Act Party, has now seen the forum membership weighting changed to favour the public bodies. Council staff recommend three seats for the Waitakere Local Board, two for the council governing body and one for the Department of Conservation – and five seats to be occupied by Te Kawerau ā Maki, to be shared with Ngāti Whātua should that iwi choose at a later date to participate. The role of chair would come from the iwi side and deputy chair from the public bodies. Waitakere ward councillor Shane Henderson says the composition of the forum changed 'in response to feedback, not to scaremongering from central government politicians but the voices of West Aucklanders that fed back into the process'. He said the new balance allowed half of the six-member Waitakere local board to join the forum, with two ward councillors. DoC's strong interests in the heritage area also needed representation. 'So the new numbers work a little better on that basis too.' Te Kawerau ā Maki chief executive Edward Ashby. Photo: Supplied Ashby says the change in representation came after the consultation and was put to Te Kawerau ā Maki by the council. 'It's a place the council came to that we could live with at the end of the day. It's about giving these people some certainty that there would not be a super majority of Māori on the committee. There's been a lot of misunderstanding of the original proposal. 'It's good the deed is out there and people can read it; it clearly says it's advisory, about public land, it does not have power to make any decisions about budgets. That's all in there.' He said the political claims from Jones and Act's David Seymour, among others, led to fears among some members of the public. 'I do understand that if you are reading scaremongering headlines on Facebook you might react. It's unfortunate. 'It's just the political reality of the time. The original proposal was for 50-50, not out of any power grab but simply that the Crown and council was on one side of the equation and on the other side was Te Kawerau ā Maki and Ngāti Whātua. It was as simple as that.' He noted much of the feedback against the proposed deed had come from beyond Waitakere and Auckland. 'But, there's this beautiful area. It's our heartland and I'm biased. It really needs to be looked after. We really need to get together on how we make it work.' The six-five composition of the forum was 'at least an outcome that takes some of the edge out of some people's concerns, even though I think they were not well-founded concerns'. He hoped the compromise result did not turn the clock back in other areas of the country. 'I like to think most New Zealanders are fair minded … and I would hope that progress made is not lost. There's been some really good progressive stories.' The council's policy and planning committee considers the proposed deed on Thursday, with the full Governing Body having the final say before the forum is appointed. Ashby says: 'We just want to get on with it.'
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
NZ Embassy makes contact with woman detained in US
crime world 25 minutes ago New Zealand Embassy staff have made contact with a New Zealand woman being detained with her son at a U.S immigration facility. Washington Federation of State Employees Union President Mike Yestramski spoke to Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira.
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Embassy staff in contact with Kiwi woman detained in US immigration facility
A GoFundMe has been set up for New Zealand woman Sarah Shaw and her six-year-old son Isaac. Photo: GoFundMe New Zealand Embassy staff have made contact with Sarah Shaw, the New Zealand woman being detained with her son at a US immigration facility. The pair were bundled into a van at the Canadian border three weeks ago . The public servant was being held at a South Texas facility in what her union the Washington Federation of State Employees called "horrible conditions". RNZ learned on Wednesday morning the New Zealand Embassy was now involved, and that it was only made aware of the case through media reports. Foreign Minister Winston Peters' office said nobody made contact before then. While the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade confirmed it had been in contact with Shaw, it said it would not release further information for privacy reasons. Shaw's lawyer Minda Thorward on Wednesday told RNZ her detention was legal, but unreasonable and unnecessary, and her son Isaac's detention was not legal at all. They had gone to Vancouver to drop two other children off for a flight back to New Zealand on 24 July. Vancouver is about a 2.5-hour drive away from where they live in Everett, Washington State. Thorward said Shaw used to have a spouse petition but her marriage ended amid allegations of domestic abuse. Shaw filed an application for her status to be adjusted. Thorward said that application has been pending since 2022, but she was eligible to work in the US and travel during this time. "She received what is called a combination card. It's one physical card that looks like a work permit but it also says it functions as a travel document," she said. The card expired in May, but before then Shaw and her lawyer submitted a renewal application in March. A receipt of that was issued and Thorward said once that happened, the validity of the work permit was extended. "Miss Shaw mistakenly believed that the entire card, both her travel document and her work permit, had been extended," Thorward said. "She did not have a valid travel document, so she left the US to take her kids to the airport to fly direct to New Zealand to see their grandparents. "And then realised once she was out of the country that she may not actually have a travel document that will allow her to re-enter." Shaw alerted her lawyer to this, and Thorward told her to tell immigration officials at the border about it and that she had a pending application. She told her to ask for "humanitarian parole" under the regulations. "And that is something that is routinely used in situations like this, or at least prior to the Trump administration," Thorward told RNZ. She said immigration officials refused and detained Shaw and her son, and transferred them to the family detention centre in Texas. Thorward said the detention did not surprise her. "Unfortunately, no, especially under this administration. I mean we see abuses by Border Patrol and ICE and just sort of a very draconian abusive enforcement of immigration law, especially now," she said. "And so, I was disheartened and I was upset that she had been detained because it was completely unnecessary - but I was unfortunately not surprised." Foreign Minister Winston Peters. Photo: RNZ/Calvin Samuel Thorward said she and Shaw were waiting to hear back about whether a petition to US Citizenship and Immigration Services was approved and if removal proceedings could be terminated. "And if it is approved then she is immediately eligible to address her status and her kids who have separate applications, their applications should be approved simultaneously with her petition," she said. "Then we'll just have to figure out whether or not she'll have to address her status in court or if we can terminate her removal proceedings affirmatively." Thorward has also filed a motion to terminate Shaw's son's proceedings because he had a lawful travel document. "He is admissible and he is unlawfully detained in a removal process. I am very hopeful that we will be able to resolve all of this." Thorward hoped for adjudication "within the next couple of weeks" given what she said was pressure from the media coverage and elected officials. Peters' office told RNZ embassy staff learned of the case through the media and nobody had made contact beforehand. Shaw's friend Victoria Besancon told RNZ the New Zealander was absolutely terrified when she and her son were bundled into a giant white van with no markings. She said conditions at the detention facility were "very similar to a prison". "She is in a locked room with five bunk beds, she is allowed to walk around the facility from 8am to 8pm, but outside of that she is locked in a cell with other families." They were among the only English speakers at the facility. "I remember her on the phone being absolutely panicked. She originally thought she was being kidnapped, she did not even realise she was being detained originally." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
