DEI isn't dead: See the companies standing behind inclusion
At a time when companies are abandoning diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, WinMark Concepts President Andrew Isen said DEI was never meant to be a political statement-it's a smart move for business and company culture.
"It fosters an environment and a camaraderie of teamwork that will lead to a company's positive bottom line, period," Isen said. "It's the complete opposite of what is being sold to America through a system of lies and distortions."
Though this distortion is what led to many companies leaving DEI in the dust, many businesses aren't caving to political pressure and are standing behind their inclusive initiatives, News Is Out says.
DEI was once the standard. Now it's a polarizing statement.
The prominent fight against DEI can be traced to as recently as June 2023, when the Supreme Court ended race-based affirmative action in higher education. But DEI is more than just affirmative action, and many prominent conservative figures took notice.
One year after the Supreme Court's decision, music video producer Robby Starbuck uploaded a video bashing Tractor Supply, a company that sells farm equipment, for its DEI policies.
In the video, Starbuck said the company offered equal health care for trans employees and sponsored Pride events. He called on customers to boycott the company until they changed these practices. It did.
Tractor Supply announced it would pull out of its DEI initiatives shortly after the video was published. Starbuck took credit for the takedown, and called on other companies-like Lowe's, Harley-Davidson and John Deere-to follow suit.
As President Donald Trump took office earlier this year, the DEI debate burst into the mainstream political scene.
He banned transgender people from serving in the military, and slashed multiple federal programs that supported marginalized communities.
Isen said many companies caved to this political pressure and were afraid of being caught in the crossfire of "culture wars."
Just because some companies are backing out doesn't mean DEI is dead.
Numerous prominent businesses have stood up in the face of political and consumer pressure and sustained, if not expanded, their inclusive initiatives.
Apple has kept up its inclusion and diversity page, continued an initiative that creates pathways to engineering for students at historically Black colleges and most recently announced its Pride collection for this year.
Costco has stood firmly behind its DEI initiatives, such as inclusive hiring practices and fair wages. Almost all of the company's shareholders voted against an anti-DEI proposal that would have made Costco review its inclusive practices and the company is thriving.
Here are some of the other major companies that remain committed to DEI:
Ben and Jerry'sCoca-ColaLevi Strauss & Co.Marriott InternationalNFLPinterestSephoraUltae.l.f. BeautyPatagoniaProcter and GambleSouthwest AirlinesDelta AirlinesT.J. MaxxMicrosoftKroger
The list goes on, but the corporate commitment to DEI isn't quite as dead as some may want you to believe.
Isen said DEI is both a smart workplace and economic decision.
"When you become an inclusive company, and you promote fairness and inclusivity and equity within an organization or company, you're fostering an environment where people work closer together," Isen said. "You're creating a professional camaraderie that produces quantifiable business results."
In a 2023 study, consulting firm McKinsey and Company found that companies with greater representation on executive teams were 39% more likely to financially outperform companies with less ethnic and gender representation.
Isen said companies that stray from DEI initiatives, like PepsiCo, Walmart and McDonalds, will face "horrific" consequences. He pointed to Target, which saw a decline in foot traffic during the first quarter of this year after it abandoned its commitment to DEI policies.
Target CEO Brian Cornell said the decline could have been attributed to the combination of consumer fears of Trump's tariffs and boycotts following the company's DEI abandonment.
The fate of DEI isn't predictable.
Isen said the economic state of the country "unfortunately creates a powerless consumer." This is because many people can't afford to boycott brands that abandon DEI, because shopping at certain stores is the only affordable or accessible way to provide essentials for their family.
"Traditionally, the only way to really show their unhappiness was not to patronize the brand or the company or anything associated with it," Isen said. "But many people can't do that."
Though Isen said there are other ways consumers can advocate for DEI-such as contacting their representatives or company management-it's ultimately up to the companies themselves to understand the value inclusion provides to their culture and profitability.
This story was produced by News Is Out and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
© Stacker Media, LLC.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
an hour ago
- Black America Web
White Woman Jillian Michaels Blasted On X After Downplaying Slavery & Defending Donald Trump's Obvious Attempt To Whitewash American History
Source: Ivan Apfel / Getty / Jillian Michaels Former star of The Biggest Loser , nutritionist and fitness instructor Jillian Michaels earned herself a social media dragging following some heada** comments she made about slavery during a panel on CNN's NewsNight with Abby Phillip . On Thursday, August 14, Jillian Michaels hopped off the treadmill to put on her cape to somehow contort and twist herself into defending Donald Trump and his administration's obvious whitewashing of America's history regarding slavery as it pushes to review Smithsonian Museum content. In her argument, she said, 'He's not whitewashing slavery,' referring to Orange Mussolini, aka Donald Trump, while adding, 'you cannot tie imperialism and racism and slavery to just one race, which is pretty much what every single exhibit does.' We care about your data. See our privacy policy. She went on to defend her ridiculous stance, adding that slavery is only 'thousands of years old' while suggesting that slavery is sometimes overblown in because 'only a small percentage' of white Americans owned slaves. Phillips did push back, 'I'm surprised that you're trying to litigate who was the beneficiary of slavery.' Yikes. Social Media Had Time For Jillian Michaels It didn't take long for the clip to go viral, with many dragging Michaels and pointing out that it's disgusting she would even say something like that because she adopted a Black child. ' White people, please do not cancel me for saying this, but Jillian Michaels is exactly the reason why I sometimes have an issue with transracial adoption: ~if & when the white parent is a bigoted conservative, they have no business adopting a Black or POC child,' one post on X, formerly Twitter, read. Another post debunked her 2% argument, stating, '2% is from data that uses a metric counting EVERYONE from the 1860 census—including children & enslaved (counted as 3/5)—and is downright dishonest, disrespectful, and offensive. The truth: 8% of ALL American families, 40-50% white southern families & 50-60% landowners had 'slaves.' No lies detected. We fully expect Michaels to land on FOX News and Sage Steele's podcast to defend herself. You can see more reactions in the gallery below. White Woman Jillian Michaels Blasted On X After Downplaying Slavery & Defending Donald Trump's Obvious Attempt To Whitewash American History was originally published on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-UK motor finance ruling could fuel M&A
By Charlie Conchie LONDON (Reuters) -A ruling from the United Kingdom's top court that will likely save car finance companies billions in compensation payouts could clear the way for a wave of consolidation in the sector. The Supreme Court this month overturned much of a lower court ruling on car loan sales practices, leading some industry experts to say the compensation bill could be less than half of initial estimates of about 30 billion pounds ($41 billion). The lower cost - coupled with the fact that many private equity firms have owned car finance companies beyond their typical investment horizons - could help trigger a spate of dealmaking in a sector that has been in limbo for about 18 months. "I think it's the real activity that will start now," said Hyder Jumabhoy, a partner at law firm White & Case. The owners of car finance lenders have enough clarity to begin preparing them for sale as they await full details of the redress scheme, he added. Jumabhoy's view was echoed by three other corporate advisers contacted by Reuters, although another three cautioned that uncertainty could hold back dealmaking until at least next year. London-based private equity firm Cabot Square Capital has hired BNP Paribas to handle a sale of Blue Motor Finance, two people familiar with the matter said. Blue Motor made a loss of 8.5 million pounds in 2023 on revenue of 53 million pounds, according to its latest full-year accounts. Startline, owned by U.S. hedge fund The Baupost Group, could also come to market in the coming months, advisers said. Startline reported 100.3 million pounds of interest receivable and other income in 2023 and a loss of around 4.25 million pounds, according to its latest accounts. "There's a series of highly attractive assets which have sat in private equity portfolios for longer than most would have expected, more for regulatory or macro reasons as opposed to anything else," said Elliot Reader, a director at investment bank Houlihan Lokey. "Now is a period of time where there is some more certainty and these assets can start to come to market." Cabot Square Capital, Blue Motor and Startline did not respond to requests for comment. The Baupost Group declined to comment. To be sure, there are still uncertainties for the industry. Some advisers said the lack of clarity around the final redress bill could dampen deals until later next year. "Does it (the Supreme Court ruling) pave the way for future M&A activity in the motor finance space given recent inactivity? Yes, but I'd expect any meaningful movement to emerge throughout 2026," said Antony Walsh, partner and international head of corporate at Eversheds Sutherland. GROWING MARKET Following the court ruling, Britain's financial watchdog is working on a compensation scheme for car loans that included so-called discretionary commission arrangements - those where the broker could adjust the interest rate offered to a customer - if they were not properly disclosed. The regulator said this month that it was hard to predict the cost of the scheme, but that estimates in the middle of a 9 billion to 18 billion pounds range were "more plausible". Despite the spectre of hefty payouts, advisers said there was likely to be interest from potential buyers in a growing market that underpins much of Britain's automotive industry. Around 80% of all new cars sold to consumers in Britain in the 12 months to April were bought using a form of motor finance, according to the Finance & Leasing Association. New business rose 6% in value in the first six months of 2025, bringing the total size of the point-of-sale consumer car finance market at the end of June to about 86 billion pounds in terms of the value of outstanding contracts, it added. Potential bidders could include bigger banks or private equity and private credit funds, Reader and Jumabhoy said. Britain's banking sector has already seen a flurry of deals, including Santander UK's recent swoop on TSB. Analysts at credit rating agency Moody's said in a June note that the focus could now turn to specialist lenders, with larger motor finance-exposed firms like Aldermore and Close Brothers among potential targets. Aldermore's owner, South Africa's FirstRand, and Close Brothers led the legal challenge that culminated in the Supreme Court ruling on Aug. 1. Close Brothers, whose shares are up around 25% since the ruling, declined to comment. "I've spoken to CFOs of other banks who tell me that they think that Close Brothers is a good business, but they would not touch it with a barge pole until motor finance is well and truly dusted," said RBC Capital Markets analyst Benjamin Toms, referring to certainty over the eventual compensation costs. A FirstRand spokesperson said it was not considering a sale of Aldermore and the ruling would have no impact on its strategy for the unit. ($1 = 0.7385 pounds) Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
The plot to destroy Black political power
Get ready for the rage: The conservative majority on the Supreme Court looks likely to gut the last remaining parts of the Voting Rights Act. Prompted by a Black conservative, Justice Clarence Thomas, the high court will consider in October a question that answers itself — whether it is wrong to stop openly racist tactics in drawing congressional districts. Even if the right-wing justices manage to close their eyes to the racial politics involved, they will feel the heat and hear the explosive impact of the backlash to a one-sided ruling. The fuse will be lit in several Republican-controlled states, largely in the South, as white politicians begin diluting votes in Black-majority districts to silence Black voices in Congress. Deep-red state legislatures — think of South Carolina, Alabama and Mississippi — will be free to demolish their Black-majority congressional districts. Those white-majority, Trump-backing state legislatures aim to bring an end to the careers of several Black Democrats in Congress, such as Reps. Cleo Fields (D-La.), Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), Terri Sewell (D-Ala.) and Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.). As a purely political exercise, Trump and his Republican allies have wanted to eliminate these districts for years, because Black voters are key to the Democratic Party's congressional strength. The Voting Rights Act allows for federal courts to look for racial damage done by gerrymandering districts. In the case now before the high court, involving redistricting in Louisiana, the state was forced to add a second Black-majority district. A federal court ruled that, with 33 percent of the state being Black, it was wrong for only one of its six congressional districts to be majority Black. But that led to a lawsuit over the new map. Along the lines of Thomas's recent call for a total end to the Voting Rights Act, the challengers contend that the law — which was created to protect equal voting rights for Black Americans — now prohibits the court from stopping white Republicans from playing politics and crushing Black power as a proportional representation of a state's racial makeup. Thomas makes the case that attention to 'race-based' construction of congressional districts is out of touch with recent history. He argues that 'specific identified instances' of racial bias, including violent voter suppression, are now distant and amount to relics of the nation's past. Last week, a federal appeals court disagreed. The Fifth Circuit ruled that Louisiana's congressional district map 'packed' and 'cracked' Black populations to limit their political power. The ruling stated there are 'decades of binding precedent' under the 15th Amendment allowing Congress to contest racial bias in redistricting. The 1965 Voting Rights Act was written in response to the nation's long history of keeping political power in white hands. Even after Black men gained the right to vote, it was common for that vote to be suppressed through violence. For perspective, South Carolina is 26 percent Black and 67 percent white. But white-majority Republican congressional districts are 86 percent of South Carolina's seven congressional districts. Only one of seven districts has a majority of Democrats and Black voters — Clyburn's district. The Supreme Court plans to hear arguments on racial redistricting on Oct. 15 — early enough for a decision that could affect the 2026 midterms. If the Black vote is diluted, the Democratic Party's ability to win seats in Congress shrinks, increasing Republican chances of retaining majorities in the House and Senate in 2026. That would keep Trump from becoming a lame duck facing a divided Congress. The Republicans' goal is to maintain majorities in Congress for Trump's last two years in the White House. Then Republicans can appoint more judges to issue more rulings that further weaken Democrats. The downward spiral for Black political power will go on and on. Trump is not hiding his interest in the outcome of gerrymandering efforts in Texas. 'We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats,' Trump told CNBC earlier this month. 'We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas … and we are entitled to five more seats.' Excuse me, Mr. President? Neither you nor the Republican Party is entitled to any seats. Those seats belong to Americans of all colors and parties. Texas Republicans' threats to send law enforcement to forcibly return Texas Democratic legislators to the state capitol to provide a quorum for passing gerrymandered maps are a sideshow. They distract from the real effect that racially-designed gerrymandering can have on race relations and politics for decades to come. Comedian Dave Chappelle famously called Trump 'an honest liar.' In the fight over Texas redistricting, the 'honest liar' is saying that the people looking at redistricting's racial impact are themselves racist. Don't let Trump or his partisans on the high court fool you. Racial justice in Congress is at stake. Democrats will have to fight fire with fire to prevent Trump from diminishing Black voting power. Democrats owe that much to Black voters, who have carried them to electoral victories over the last 60 years. They owe it to the memory of the brave people who marched, were beaten and even died to demand voting rights only 60 years ago.
