Democrats need their ‘own Trump,' podcaster urges in NY Times
A recent opinion piece in The New York Times said that the key to the Democratic Party succeeding again is having their own version of President Donald Trump.
"If the next Democratic nominee wants to build a majority coalition — one that doesn't rely on Republicans running poor-quality candidates to eke out presidential wins and that doesn't write off the Senate as a lost cause — the candidate should attack the Democratic Party itself and offer positions that outflank it from both the right and the left," Galen Druke, host of the "GD Politics" podcast, wrote in a Monday guest essay in The New York Times.
"It may seem like an audacious gambit, but a successful candidate has provided them a blueprint: Donald Trump," Druke added.
Druke noted that the Democratic Party is "historically unpopular," citing a 2025 Pew Research Center's American Trends Panel and saying that "The Democratic Party's favorability rating is 22 percentage points underwater — 60 percent of respondents view it unfavorably, 38 favorably."
He cautioned that Democrats should not look for their own Trump figure who would "violate democratic norms and destabilize American institutions, but rather the one for resetting how Americans view a party and its leaders."
Secrets behind Trump's success, Druke said, included the president bucking his own party's stances from both sides of the spectrum.
Druke also hinted at the trust Democrats need to rebuild within their base after they "stood by a deeply unpopular president despite clear signs that Democratic voters did not think he was suited to another term."
Druke mentioned a recent CNN poll that showed the Democratic Party's favorability rating at a record low among Americans, with 52% to 48% of Democratic-learning voters saying the party is going in the wrong direction.
The poll also showed the favorability rating for the Democratic Party at 29%, calling it a "record low" that goes back to 1992, and saying that it was a 20-point drop from January 2021.
Druke also said that Democrats should take a page from former President Bill Clinton's playbook and be liberal in terms of healthcare policy, where he says the candidate should push for universal healthcare "far more progressive than the Affordable Care Act," but have more right-leaning policies when it comes to issues like government spending and crime.
Democrats should treat social issues similarly, Druke said, adding that the party should "assert that the goal is for all people to be treated with dignity and that Democrats got carried away with ideas that ultimately didn't further that goal."
"To be truly successful, the next Democratic nominee will transform how Americans view the Democratic Party as a whole, leading the way to winning voters not currently viewed as 'gettable' in states that have been written off," Druke wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's choice: Bomb over blather
Winston Churchill could muse about the virtues of diplomacy, reportedly saying 'Jaw, Jaw and War, War' or words to that effect. In the case of President Trump, the decision has been made: war, not jaw, and bomb, not mere blather. The stated reason for the attack on three Iranian nuclear sites was Iran's imminent ability to assemble a nuclear weapon. That danger could not be tolerated. And Israel's evisceration of much of Iran's military leadership and its air defenses created a further opportunity for the U.S. to strike. Regardless of the accuracy of the intelligence, the administration assumed that 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles and 14 'bunker busters' bombs would impose such 'shock and awe' as to force Iran to capitulate. But no matter how well this strike was planned and executed, this relatively small use of force may prove insufficient for Iran to accept the terms of what amounts to a virtual surrender. And while bomb damage assessment will take time, suppose Iran anticipated a strike and moved its fissile material to a safe location. Of course, the Trump administration could be proven correct in its assumptions. Yet, history could be relevant. Preemptive attacks and invasions too often fail. Napoleon and Hitler thought Russia could be brought to its knees and conquered by invading armies. Japan believed that the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor and sinking the battleship fleet would cause the U.S. to negotiate. The reasons for the second Iraq War, fraudulently based on weapons of mass destruction that no longer existed, cannot be ignored. Undeclared or not, the U.S. is now at war with Iran's clerical theocracy. Beyond fog and friction, war is filled with the most deadly of ironies. While, by any measure Israel has exercised an excess of violence against Palestinians in its efforts to destroy Hamas, including the destruction of several hospitals deemed as safe havens for the enemy, after Iran struck an Israeli hospital complex, strong retaliation followed. Gaza does not seem to be an issue as Israel has broadened its offensive against Iran beyond nuclear and missile facilities. A similar irony confronts Trump's decision to enter the war on Israel's side. Having promised not to engage in forever wars, Trump could be consigning America to that fate. While the Fordow complex was the prime target for America's attack, destroying those facilities, even with 30,000-pound 'bunker busters,' cannot be assumed, and without direct physical access, the extent of damage can never be proven. What Iran does next ranges from accepting American demands to launching major strikes against both U.S. forces and Arab oil-producing facilities in the Gulf. Closing the Strait of Hormuz could lead to an economic disaster and bring U.S. forces in harm's way, should opening the strait be ordered. The strait is about 35 miles wide, bringing the U.S. Navy close to Iran's large supply of short-range missiles. More likely will be measured attacks, including cyber. And do not be surprised if Iran suspends the Non-Proliferation Treaty to which it is a signatory, signaling it may build nuclear weapons after all. Despite the euphoria accompanying the attack, what could prove worrying is the advice Trump was given, assuming he listens. First, his administration has not been in office long enough for his national security team to come together. Second, while Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Marco Rubio has served in the Senate, his wartime credentials are slim. And who would trust the secretary of Defense in these circumstances, although the news initially reported he was bypassed? The new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General Dan Caine, has no experience or background in dealing with strategic events, only those at the tactical and operational levels. Vietnam may be relevant. If in August 1964 Lyndon Johnson had not pushed for the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, which was a de facto declaration of war in Vietnam and allowed the retaliatory air strikes against North Vietnamese targets to be sufficient warning, the catastrophe that followed would have been averted. Trump could proclaim victory and leave the scene of battle to the Israelis to finish the job —whatever that means. Has anyone reminded the president of that example? What next? No one can predict. But in these circumstances, be warned. This could be the beginning and not the end of the campaign to deprive Iran of its nuclear aspirations. Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., (@harlankullman) is UPI's Arnaud deBorchgrave Distinguished Columnist, a senior advisor at Washington, D.C.'s Atlantic Council, the chairman of two private companies and the principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. He and David Richards are authors of a forthcoming book on preventing strategic catastrophe.
San Francisco Chronicle
35 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Life on the other side: Refugees from 'old media' flock to the promise of working for themselves
NEW YORK (AP) — Six months ago, Jennifer Rubin had no idea whether she'd make it in a new media world. She just knew it was time to leave The Washington Post, where she'd been a political columnist for 15 years. The Contrarian, the democracy-focused website that Rubin founded with partner Norm Eisen in January, now has 10 employees and contributors like humorist Andy Borowitz and White House reporter April Ryan. Its 558,000 subscribers also get recipes and culture dispatches. In the blink of an eye, Rubin became a independent news entrepreneur. 'I think we hit a moment, just after inauguration, when people were looking for something different and it has captured people's imaginations,' she says. 'We've been having a ball with it.' YouTube, Substack, TikTok and others are spearheading a full-scale democratization of media and a generation of new voices and influencers. But don't forget the traditionalists. Rubin's experience shows how this world offers a lifeline to many at struggling legacy outlets who wanted — or were forced — to strike out on their own. Tough business realities, changing consumer tastes The realities of business and changing consumer tastes are both driving forces. YouTube claims more than 1 billion monthly podcast views, and a recent list of its top 100 shows featured seven refugees from legacy media and six shows made by current broadcasters. Substack, which launched in 2017 and added live video in January, has more than doubled its number of paid subscribers to participating content creators to 5 million in less than two years. Almost immediately after he was cut loose by ABC News on June 10 for an anti-Trump tweet, Terry Moran headed for Substack. Two former hosts of NBC's 'Today' show — Katie Couric and Hoda Kotb — announced new media ventures on the same day last month. 'I think you've seen, really in the last six months for some reason, this whole space explode with people who are understanding that this is a really important way to convey information,' says Couric, who's been running her own media company with newsletters, interviews and a podcast since 2017 and recently joined Substack. Among the most successful to make transitions are Bari Weiss, the former New York Times writer whose Free Press website celebrates independent thought, the anti-Trump Republicans at Bulwark and ex-MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan, who champions 'adversarial journalism' on Zeteo. Television news essentially left Megyn Kelly for dead after her switch from Fox News to NBC went bust. She launched a podcast in 2020, at first audio only, and SiriusXM picked it up as a daily radio show. She added video for YouTube in 2021, and gets more than 100 million viewers a month for commentary and newsmaker interviews. This year, Kelly launched her own company, MK Media, with shows hosted by Mark Halperin, Maureen Callahan and Link Lauren. While they thrive, the prospect of layoffs, audiences that are aging and becoming smaller and constant worry about disappearing revenue sources are a way of life for legacy media. Moving to independent media is still not an easy decision. Taking a deep breath, and making the leap 'If I'm going to jump off a cliff, is there water or not?' former 'Meet the Press' moderator Chuck Todd says. 'I didn't know until I left NBC. Everybody told me there would be water. But you don't know for sure until you jump.' It takes some adjustment — 'At first I was like, 'do you know who I used to be?'' Couric jokes — but some who have made the jump appreciate the nimbleness and flexibility of new formats and say news subjects often respond to the atmosphere with franker, more expansive interviews. Jim Acosta, who traded a CNN anchor desk for a video podcast he does from his home after deciding not to make a move he considered a demotion, says he's been surprised at the quality of guests he's been able to corral — people like Hakeem Jefferies, Pete Buttigieg and Sean Penn. Many podcasters succeed because they communicate authenticity, former Washington Post editor Marty Baron said in an interview at the George W. Bush Presidential Center. Traditional journalists trade on authority at a time people don't trust institutions anymore, he said. Couric has seen it in some of the feedback she gets from subscribers. 'There's some disenchantment with legacy media,' she says. 'There are certainly some people who are frustrated by the capitulation of some networks to the administration, and I think there's a sense that when you're involved in mainstream media that you may be holding back or there may be executives who are putting pressure on you.' Is there an audience — and money — on the other side? Substack says that more than 50 people are earning more than $1 million annually on its platform. More than 50,000 of its publishers make money, but since the company won't give a total of how many people produce content for the platform, it's impossible to get a sense of the odds of success. Alisyn Camerota isn't making money yet. The former CNN anchor left the broadcaster after she sensed her time there was running out. Blessed with a financial cushion, she's relishing the chance to create something new. She records a video podcast, 'Sanity,' from her basement in Connecticut. A former Fox colleague who lives nearby, Dave Briggs, joins to talk about the news. 'It's harder than you think in terms of having to DIY a lot of this,' Camerota says, 'but it's very freeing.' Different people on the platform have different price points; some publishers put everything they do behind a pay wall, others only some. Acosta offers content for free, but people need to pay to comment or discuss. Zeteo charges $12 a month or $72 a year, with a $500 'founding member' yearly fee that offers access to Mehdi. The danger for independent journalists is a market reaching a saturation point. People already stress over how many streaming services they can afford for entertainment. There's surely a limit to how many journalists they will pay for, too. 'I hope to make a living at this,' Acosta says. 'We'll see how it goes. This is a bit of an experiment. I think it's a valuable one because the stakes are so high right now.' A strong point of view is one route to success To succeed in independent media, people need a strong work work ethic, self-motivation and an ability to pivot quickly to deal with changing markets, says Chris Balfe, founder of Red Seat Ventures. He has created a thriving business ushering conservative media figures into the new world, including Kelly, Bill O'Reilly, Tucker Carlson and Piers Morgan. Balfe's clients all have strong opinions. That's a plus for consumers who want to hear their viewpoints reflected back at them. 'I think you need a point of view and a purpose," Rubin says. "Once you have that, it helps you to organize your thinking and your selections. You're not going to be all things to all people.' That's one of the things that concerns Acosta and Todd. They're looser, and they certainly say what they think more than they felt free to do on television; a remark Acosta made on June 17, while appearing on Rubin's podcast, about Trump marrying immigrants was criticized as 'distasteful' by the White House. But at heart, they consider themselves reporters and not commentators. Is there enough room for people like them? Todd has a podcast, a weekly interview show on the new platform Noosphere and is looking to build on an interest in improving the fortunes of local news. He believes that opinion can help someone build an audience quickly but may ultimately limit growth. As Rubin did, they will find out soon enough. 'As it turned out," she says, 'what was on the other side was much more exciting and successful and absorbing than I could ever have imagined.' ___
Los Angeles Times
35 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Enraged Trump blasts Israel and Iran over ceasefire violations
BEIRUT — President Trump excoriated both Israel and Iran over what he said were violations of the surprise ceasefire between the two nations and that was set to begin Tuesday morning, underscoring the tenuousness of a deal meant to bring a denouement to the fiercest confrontation in the belligerents' decades-long enmity. 'We have two countries that have been fighting for so hard and so long they don't know what the f—they are doing,' said Trump in an enraged briefing to journalists ahead of his trip to the NATO summit. The details of the ceasefire — which was brokered by Trump and Qatar's leadership hours after a limited volley of Iranian ballistic missiles targeted the United States' Al Udeid Air Base on Monday — remain unclear, but it had spurred cautious optimism across the Middle East. Yet its fragility was emphasized when Israel accused Iran of breaking the agreement mere hours after it was supposed to take effect, with the Israeli military saying it intercepted a pair of ballistic missiles fired from Iran and that it would respond. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said in a statement he instructed the Israeli military 'to continue the intensive operation to strike in Tehran and thwart regime targets and terror infrastructure in Tehran.' Iran's General Staff of the Armed Forces Abdolrahim Mousavi denied any launch after the truce's beginning according to Iranian official media. A later IRGC statement said 14 missiles were fired 'in the last minutes' before the ceasefire. A visibly enraged Trump castigated both sides for the violations, saying he was not happy with either country. 'These guys gotta calm down,' he said in a briefing to journalists before flying out to the NATO summit in Europe. 'I don't like the fact that Israel went out this morning at all, and I'm going to see if I can stop it.' Shortly after, he took to Truth Social to tell Israel to 'BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW!' Later he wrote from Air Force One that 'all planes will turn around and head home, while doing a friendly 'Plane Wave' to Iran. Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect! Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Israeli officials later told reporters that warplanes carried out a small strike against an Iranian radar north of Tehran around the time Trump was talking to reporters. 'Following President Trump's conversation with Prime Minister Netanyahu, Israel refrained from additional attacks,' said a statement from the office of the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The war began June 13, when Israel launched a wide-scale campaign targeting Iran's military leadership and nuclear facilities, in a bid to destroy what it said was the existential threat of a nuclear-armed Iran. Iran has long maintained its nuclear program is for purely peaceful purposes. The Israeli government confirmed its agreement to the ceasefire proposal on Tuesday morning, saying in a statement it had fulfilled its objectives to eliminate 'dual immediate existential threats from itself — both in the nuclear and ballistic missile fields.' 'In Operation Rising Lion, the State of Israel achieved great historical achievements and placed itself on par with the world powers,' the statement said. Iran's Supreme National Security Council, the governmental body in charge of military affairs, took a similarly triumphant tone in its statement agreeing to the ceasefire, saying that Iran's victory 'forced the enemy to regret and accept defeat and unilaterally halt its attack.' It added that Iranian forces will remain 'with their hands on the trigger, ready to deliver a decisive and regrettable response to any act of aggression by the enemy.' Both sides took the opportunity to land powerful blows before the scheduled start of the cessation. Israel pounded the Iranian capital with a massive barrage against multiple neighborhoods that residents said was unprecedented in its ferocity over the 12-day war. That tactic — to launch a major attack at the 11th hour before a ceasefire — has been employed by Israel in past conflicts, but which infuriated Trump, who said he 'didn't like the fact that Israel unloaded right after I made the deal' and blamed Israel for violating it. 'They didn't have to unload... You know, when I say OK now you have 12 hours, you don't go out to the first hour, just drop everything you have on,' he said. Iran gave in kind and dispatched waves of missiles. One hit an apartment block in southern Israel, killing at least four people, according to Israeli health authorities. That too drew Trump's ire. 'I don't like the fact that the retaliation was really strong. But in all fairness, Israel unloaded a lot,' he said. Iran's attacks on Israel have killed 28 people and wounded more than 1,000 others, including the victims of Tuesday's strike. Israel's campaign on Iran has killed 610 people and wounded 4,746 since the war began, according to Iran's health ministry. That a ceasefire was brokered at all came as a surprise. In the hours before Trump's announcement, Iran lobbed missiles at the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, the largest U.S. military installation in the region with some 10,000 U.S. troops and its Central Command headquarters But although it initially triggered fears of a rapid expansion of the conflict, Iran's attack proved to be relatively subdued, less the 'mighty and powerful response' it vowed before the barrage than a pre-choreographed, face-saving gesture designed to be largely symbolic. Trump said Monday that Iran had actually warned the U.S. of the attack in advance. Qatar said the attack was a 'flagrant violation' of its sovereignty and airspace, and promised it would respond in an appropriate manner. Instead, in a measure of the urgency felt by Persian Gulf nations to prevent a wider conflagration, the Qatari emir, Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani coordinated with Trump and Vice President JD Vance to end the hostilities, according to an official briefed on the talks and who requested anonymity to be able to speak freely. Around 6 p.m. Eastern, Trump posted on his social media platform there would be a ceasefire and 'an Official END to the 12 DAY WAR.' 'This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn't, and never will! God bless Israel, God bless Iran, God bless the Middle East, God bless the United States of America, and GOD BLESS THE WORLD!' In Tehran on Tuesday, there was a mood of tentative joy at the end of what had been a bruising few weeks for the capital. Still, many expressed the feeling of being betrayed by the international community. 'Iran was left with very few options,' said Venus Shahri, a 40-year-old teacher from Tehran. Others said that although they were disappointed by the defensive capabilities of Iran's army, they wanted to double down on the fight. 'We shouldn't have accepted the ceasefire offer at all,' said Jaber Khadiri, 55. 'We must have nuclear weapons. There's no other choice.'
