Fired SpaceX employee alleges Elon Musk's company of neglecting these safety concerns
A former
SpaceX
supervisor has accused Elon Musk's rocket company of "despicable conduct" regarding its safety practices. He claims that chronic understaffing led to severe injuries, which overworked employees were "too fearful to report." Robert Markert, who worked at SpaceX for nearly 14 years before his termination, filed a civil lawsuit, initially in state court and later moved to Los Angeles federal court last week. In the complaint (seen by the Independent), Markert states he raised "strong concerns" about revising a technical process that could
"easily cause serious injury or death."
However, he claimed that SpaceX chose to maintain the existing process because it was deemed
"more economical."
At SpaceX, Markert oversaw a team of 16 technicians responsible for retrieving the company's rockets after their return to Earth and preparing them for reuse. His lawsuit details these alleged safety concerns within the company's operations.
What the former SpaceX employee said in his complaint
In his complaint, Markert alleged that SpaceX declined to ease what he described as an overly demanding launch schedule, which required employees to work for up to three consecutive weeks without time off and limited essential training programs to cut costs.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Luninec: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You)
Unsold Furniture | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
When Markert raised these concerns with management, he says he was told that
'the schedule comes first,'
according to the filing. Efforts to arrange time off for his crew were met with disapproval, as the complaint claims he was
'chastised [by] his leadership team.'
He also reported raising a significant staffing issue involving the ships used by SpaceX to retrieve spacecraft, only to be told he
'needed to bring solutions, not problems.'
In another instance, Markert says he advised company leaders that SpaceX
'needed to prioritise'
more training so workers could obtain necessary certifications. However, the complaint states he was told
'there is no time for that and the company would not spend the money on it.'
Markert, who was dismissed by SpaceX earlier this year, contends that his firing was partly due to his criticism of the company's safety practices. SpaceX has experienced four rocket failures in 2025 so far, according to the complaint.
iQOO Z10R 5G goes on Sale: BEST Budget Phone for Content Creators?
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
With new 40% tariff on transshipments, Trump takes aim at US dependence on China's factories
Ever since President Trump began raising tariffs on goods from China during his first term, Chinese companies have raced to set up warehouses and factories in Southeast Asia, Mexico and elsewhere to bypass US tariffs with indirect shipments to the American market via other countries. But on Thursday, Trump took aim at all indirect American imports, which he blames for part of the $1.2 trillion US trade deficit. Trump imposed 40% tariffs on so-called transshipments, which will take effect in a week. And a senior administration official who briefed reporters said work was under way that could broaden considerably the definition of indirect shipments. The new rules cover indirect shipments from anywhere, not just China. But China, with its massive factory infrastructure and expansive manufacturing ambition, has been the main country to develop a global network for such shipments. Trade experts were quick to predict that China would be the most affected - and the most executive order Thursday created a new category of imports: goods that are transshipped through other countries instead of coming straight from the country of origin. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like They Were So Beautiful Before; Now Look At Them; Number 10 Will Shock You Reportingly Undo The 40% tariffs on these goods will be on top of whatever tariffs would have applied if the goods had come directly from the country where they were originally made. The legal definition of transshipment is narrow: a good that did not undergo a "substantial transformation" in the country through which it was indirectly shipped. Countries in Southeast Asia have long denied that they allow a lot of transshipment. They contend that their soaring imports of Chinese components are being assembled into new and different products that can appropriately be labelled made in their countries, and not labelled "made in China. " Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Docus that hint at Hillary role in plan to tie Trump to Russia false?
The Trump-era special counsel who scoured the Russia investigation for wrongdoing gathered evidence that undermines a theory pushed by some Republicans that Hillary Clinton 's campaign conspired to frame Donald Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election, information declassified on Thursday shows. The information, a 29-page annex to the special counsel's 2023 report, reveals that a foundational document for that theory was most likely stitched together by Russian spies. The document is a purported email from July 27, 2016, that said Hillary had approved a campaign proposal to tie Trump to Russia to distract from the scandal over her use of a private email server. The release of the annex adds new details to the public's understanding of a complex trove of 2016 Russian intelligence reports analysing purported emails that Russian hackers stole from Americans. It also shows how the special counsel, John Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the emails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise. The release of the annex was no exception. John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from "a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump's presidency." Kash Patel, the FBI director, declared on social media that the annex revealed "evidence that the Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Salt Spring: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You) Unsold Furniture | Search Ads Learn More Undo In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Hillary approved a plan to tie Trump to Russia is not credible: Durham concluded that the email from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured. Before the 2020 election, Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence in Trump's first term, had declassified and released the crux of the July 27 email, even though he acknowledged doubts about its credibility. Officials did "not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication," he said. Among some Trump supporters, the message became known as the "Clinton Plan intelligence," as Durham put it in his final report. In his report, Durham used the US govt's knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticise FBI officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more sceptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. Durham's report also mentioned that Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous. But Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign's rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the email he called the "Clinton Plan intelligence" was Russian disinformation. Durham was never able to prove any Clinton campaign conspiracy to frame Trump by spreading information that it knew to be false, but he used court filings to insinuate such suspicions. He brought charges of false statements against two people involved in efforts to scrutinize possible ties between Trump and Russia, which ended in acquittals.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Friend not hubby's relative under Sec 498A: Bombay HC
Nagpur: The Nagpur bench of Bombay high court recently held that a friend of husband cannot be treated as his "relative" under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalises cruelty to a wife by her husband or his relatives. The court quashed criminal proceedings against a Nagpur resident, who was accused of abetting dowry harassment against his friend's wife. A division bench comprising Justices Anil Pansare and Mahendra Nerlikar said the definition of "relative" must be interpreted strictly. "A friend cannot be said to be a relative as he is neither a blood relative nor did he have any relation through marriage or adoption," the bench ruled in its July 29 order. The friend approached the court under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR registered at Chimur police station in Chandrapur district and the pending criminal case before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chimur. The FIR, lodged on June 13, 2022, alleged that the petitioner would frequently visit the couple's home and instigate the husband to demand a plot of land and a car from his wife's family. If the demands were not fulfilled, he allegedly encouraged the husband to send his wife back to her parental home. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo While the counsel for the friend, SA Mohta, argued that he was not related to the husband and hence Section 498A was not applicable to him, the prosecution contended that a broader interpretation of the term "relative" should be adopted to cover such abetment by outsiders. HC relied on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Dechamma IM versus State of Karnataka (2024), where it was held that even a girlfriend or a woman in a romantic relationship with a man cannot be considered a "relative" for the purposes of prosecution under Section 498A. "The word 'relative' brings within its purview a status. Such a status must be conferred either by blood, marriage or adoption," the SC had observed. The Nagpur bench then concluded that the same principle would apply to a friend of the husband. "Therefore, considering the above facts and upon plain reading of Section 498A of the IPC, we conclude that a friend of the husband will not fall under the definition of 'relative'," the bench held. The court clarified that the petitioner's application did not seek relief for the husband, his mother, and his father, and hence proceedings against them would continue.
