Slovenia Plans to Hike Military Spending to 2% of GDP This Year
Slovenia plans to increase military spending to 2% of economic output this year as NATO members face pressure from the US to increase investment in security.
The ex-Yugoslav country aims to gradually boost defense outlays to 3% of gross domestic product in 2030, Prime Minister Robert Golob's cabinet said in an emailed statement Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Team Trump's new ‘patriotism' tests for federal job-seekers shouldn't fly under the radar
About a month after Election Day 2024, it became clear that Donald Trump's team had embraced a problematic approach to new employee screenings. The New York Times, for example, reportedly spoke to several people involved in the hiring process for high-ranking positions who were asked whether they believed the 2020 election was stolen. The Wall Street Journal reported soon after that the Republican operation was imposing 'loyalty tests' on job applicants, even asking candidates about their views on NATO and tariffs for jobs that had nothing to do with international affairs or economic policymaking. Two weeks after Inauguration Day, The Washington Post reported on similar tests being applied to candidates for top national security positions, including questions about whether the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was secretly 'an inside job.' Against this backdrop Politico reported this week: As President Donald Trump moves to slash the size of the federal workforce, his administration unveiled a plan to ensure that any new hires are 'patriotic Americans' who vow to advance the president's policy priorities. The White House and the agency that serves as the government's human resources arm Thursday released directives for departments to use when recruiting employees in a memo that represents a dramatic shift in federal hiring procedures. At first blush, a story like this might seem dry and bureaucratic. The Office of Personnel Management last week issued a memo outlining the administration's detailed 'merit hiring plan,' and I can appreciate why this could come across as boring. It's not. Under the new policy, everyone seeking a job at the GS-5 pay-grade or above — a group that would include everyone from firefighters to food inspectors to air traffic controllers — will have to submit four essays as part of the application process. The essays are supposed to provide answers to specific questions: 'How has your commitment to the Constitution and the founding principles of the United States inspired you to pursue this role within the Federal government? Provide a concrete example from professional, academic, or personal experience.' 'In this role, how would you use your skills and experience to improve government efficiency and effectiveness? Provide specific examples where you improved processes, reduced costs, or improved outcomes.' 'How would you help advance the President's Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role? Identify one or two relevant Executive Orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired.' 'How has a strong work ethic contributed to your professional, academic or personal achievements? Provide one or two specific examples, and explain how those qualities would enable you to serve effectively in this position.' Imagine people who are applying to be rangers at a national park being asked to write essays about how they'd 'advance' Trump's executive orders. Then imagine the president himself trying to write an essay about his 'commitment to the Constitution' — a document he's talked about 'terminating' in response to one of his election conspiracy theories. The goal, according to the memo, is to recruit 'patriotic Americans' with a 'commitment to American ideals,' which also sets a bar that the incumbent president would likely struggle to clear. In an opinion piece for The New York Times, Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the law school at the University of California, Berkeley, and Catherine Fisk, a professor of labor law at the same school, explained, 'The government can and should ensure that federal employees, from administrative assistants to air traffic controllers, have the skills and aptitude to do their jobs. But their views on the administration's policy priorities are irrelevant, as is their patriotism — however that is defined. Allowing someone in the government to screen applicants for patriotism is reminiscent of the loyalty oaths of the McCarthy era, which were arbitrarily applied to unfairly deny employment to many.' Chemerinsky and Fisk added, 'No modern presidential administration has undertaken such an effort to staff the entire government with political loyalists. It is plainly inconsistent with good government, with federal law and with the Constitution.' There was a time in the recent past that 'patriotism tests' for federal employees would've generated a significant controversy and an intense backlash. But in 2025, against a backdrop of countless other White House outrages, the OPM memo doesn't appear to have made much of a splash. This article was originally published on
Fast Company
20 minutes ago
- Fast Company
WordPress veterans launch FAIR project to tackle security and control concerns
The recent travails of WordPress have caused consternation among the web community that relies on the platform, which powers more than four in ten websites online today. Now, a coalition of prominent WordPress contributors and the Linux Foundation is unveiling a federated update and plugin-distribution network aimed at eliminating what they describe as a critical 'supply chain security' vulnerability at the core of the world's most widely used website system. The FAIR Package Manager project, to be announced at a conference in Switzerland later today, enables web-hosting companies and large organizations to run their own mirrors of WordPress's core update, plugin, theme, and translation servers. This setup would replace reliance on domain controlled by Automattic CEO Matt Mullenweg. Supporters say the new system will strengthen security, reduce costs, and open new commercial opportunities for software that millions depend on for web hosting. The project emerged earlier this year in response to controversial moves by Mullenweg. In September, he cut off access to WP Engine—a popular WordPress hosting provider—accusing it of extracting hundreds of millions of dollars in value from the open-source platform without adequate contributions in return. He also alleged that the company breached WordPress trademarks, creating confusion. Amid the fallout, around 150 employees exited Automattic after Mullenweg offered buyouts to those who disagreed with his handling of the situation. 'In October, when Automattic took over the slug of WP Engine's product within the ecosystem, we received phone calls from the chief legal counsels of some of our clients—these are large corporations—saying, 'this is a supply chain security issue,'' says Karim Marucchi, CEO of enterprise agency Crowd Favorite and one of the project's initiators. Around the same time, Joost de Valk, founder of Yoast SEO, was attempting to communicate with Mullenweg. While de Valk shared the view that more equitable contributions to WordPress were needed, he disagreed with Mullenweg's methods. 'We stopped talking pretty much after that, because I didn't agree with him,' de Valk says. One central concern is that every WordPress site depends on for updates and extensions. 'When we started looking at this, we realized there's a lot of things in this whole ecosystem that we don't control,' de Valk says. 'One of the things that everybody's eyes were opened on was that was, in fact, not part of the WordPress Foundation, but owned by Matt privately, and that he used it as his private website in many ways.' WordPress executive director Mary Hubbard notes that users have always had control over how their sites are updated and where updates originate—flexibility that has existed since WordPress's early days. 'The beauty of WordPress and open source is that people have complete control to run it how they please and modify how it works,' she tells Fast Company. The FAIR system offers an alternative that remains fully compatible with WordPress but operates independently from 'It's still all WordPress,' says de Valk. 'It's just a different distribution.' Rather than forking WordPress, FAIR provides server components that anyone can run. Over 100 contributors from more than 10 organizations have been involved in building it over the past six months, according to Marucchi. The group has asked the Linux Foundation to provide neutral oversight. Hubbard pointed out that some large hosts like Newfold/Bluehost have implemented custom mirrors in the past, and emphasized that WordPress's update system has always allowed users to modify where their updates come from. 'The important thing is that users know where their updates are coming from and have a choice to change it, regardless of their host,' she says. 'WordPress is a critical piece of infrastructure for communication and for organizations that rely on it for their website, for content management, for blogs and media,' says Mike Dolan, SVP of legal and strategic programs at the Linux Foundation. 'And in order to sustain something like that, you need to have a reliable backend behind it.' To avoid centralization, the Linux Foundation has created a technical steering committee cochaired by long-time WordPress leaders Carrie Dils, Mika Epstein, and Ryan McCue. McCue, the architect of the WordPress REST API, called FAIR 'a platform to power the next decades of WordPress,' and noted that the community had 'fractured' and needed to be brought back together. Dolan echoed the sentiment. 'I think the interesting part about this is the organic nature of this,' he says. 'This is something that is coming out of the community. It's people who have lifelong and career-long engagement in the WordPress community who are saying we need to go and build this, and they want to work on it together.' Jory Burson, VP of standards at the Linux Foundation and a participant in the project, hopes it will lead to a 'reintroduction and reenergization of the community.' She adds that morale is currently low. 'I think this is going to be very exciting for people, and hopefully move some folks past this negativity and drama. We want to get people focused on the very positive future that we think WordPress still has.' Although FAIR was created out of frustration with Automattic's control over its backers insist it's not a competing fork. 'When we get up on stage on Friday, literally the words that are going to come out of our mouth are: 'We're offering this code to Automattic, WP Engine, GoDaddy, Newfold—everyone,'' says Marucchi. If widely adopted, the network could allow developers to ship both free and premium versions of plugins in a single signed package—something currently prohibited by the official WordPress repository. 'That opens up innovation,' de Valk says, 'making it easier to build businesses around plugins and to provide good user experiences.' Still, Hubbard emphasizes that fragmentation of WordPress's core infrastructure could create more problems than it solves—disrupting update processes, inflating server loads, and breaking plugin telemetry used for ensuring compatibility. 'If this work leads to improvements like signed updates or better fallback systems, we're open to that,' she says. 'But it has to be done with the same long-term care that got us here.' The FAIR repository is already live on GitHub and accepting contributions. Whether Automattic will participate remains uncertain; regardless, the project team plans to move forward. 'You're dealing with a community that has had some trust challenges in the past, and they're looking for stability,' says Dolan. 'They're looking for neutrality. They have business that they want to get done.'
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Tesla Shares Caught in the Middle of Musk-Trump Bromance Breakup
When President Donald Trump won the election in November, investors viewed Tesla Inc. as one of the biggest winners. That bet now seems to be on shaky ground after investors watched the once formidable alliance dissolve in real time. Simmering tensions over Trump's signature tax-and-spending bill erupted into a public war of words on Thursday, with Trump mulling an end government contracts and subsidies for Tesla and Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Musk said he would decommission a SpaceX aircraft used by the US, only to walk back his threat later in the day.
