New Jersey mayor sues Trump officials over arrest at immigration center
By Andrew Goudsward
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The mayor of Newark, New Jersey sued two U.S. law enforcement officials on Tuesday, alleging he was wrongly arrested and prosecuted as part of a politically motivated move by President Donald Trump's administration.
The lawsuit from Democrat Ras Baraka, who is also running for New Jersey governor, alleges he was arrested for trespassing without cause and maliciously prosecuted following a tense confrontation last month at a privately run immigration detention center in Newark.
The encounter drew widespread attention at a time of growing clashes between the Trump administration and Democrats over Trump's hardline approach to immigration.
The complaint names as defendants Alina Habba, the acting U.S. attorney in New Jersey who brought the case and is a former personal lawyer to Trump, and Ricky Patel, a Department of Homeland Security official in Newark, who allegedly ordered the arrest.
In a post on X following reports that Baraka planned to sue, Habba said Baraka should "join me in prioritizing violent crime and public safety."
"Far better use of time for the great citizens of New Jersey," she wrote.
Spokespeople for Habba's office and the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately return requests for comment on Tuesday.
Prosecutors dropped the case against Baraka 10 days after his arrest. Habba said the decision was made "for the sake of moving forward" but offered no further explanation.
Her office then charged Democratic U.S. Representative LaMonica McIver with assaulting and resisting officers who were trying to arrest Baraka. McIver has not yet entered a plea but has denounced the charges as political intimidation.
Baraka was arrested on May 9 after U.S. authorities said he refused to leave the facility, known as Delaney Hall, where McIver and two other Democratic members of Congress from New Jersey were conducting an oversight visit.
Baraka's lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in New Jersey, alleges a guard invited Baraka onto the property and he agreed to leave after he was threatened with arrest.
Stephen Demanovich, one of the prosecutors assigned to the McIver case and the now-dismissed case against Baraka, is not a career member of the office, and was tapped by Habba in May to serve as her counsel. Shortly before joining her office, he moderated a panel hosted by conservative legal group the Federalist Society entitled "The Weaponization of DOJ?"
Baraka's case is likely to face legal barriers given broad protections for U.S. officials acting in an official role. His complaint alleges Habba and Patel acted outside their formal responsibilities.
The lawsuit alleges violations of the U.S. Constitution and defamation. It seeks an unspecified sum in damages for emotional distress, reputational damage and other harms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
42 minutes ago
- New York Times
How Hard Will Musk Fight Republicans' Budget Bill?
Can Musk kill the budget bill? Elon Musk hasn't stopped criticizing the budget bill that he has called a 'disgusting abomination.' In fact, he appears to be just getting started. The debate in Washington now is how far Musk will go to try to defeat a bill that — by the assessment of Musk, several Republicans and now nonpartisan watchdogs — will vastly add to the federal debt. 'KILL THE BILL,' Musk posted on X on Wednesday, a message he urged followers to press with members of Congress. He has turned a majority of his feed into a stream of reposts of content criticizing the legislation and denouncing its effect on the nation's $36 trillion debt load. A string of assessments suggest that the bill will add to the debt. The most consequential, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, estimated that the House version of the plan would add $2.4 trillion over the next decade, given both the roughly $3.8 trillion tax cut at its core and additional spending. (Other estimates are even higher, including the Penn Wharton Budget Model's: $2.8 trillion.) A Republican counter: Attack the messenger. The Trump administration advanced hard-to-believe claims about C.B.O. staff members' partisanship, and arguments that its analysis ignores projected economic growth. That said, a previous nonpartisan analysis of the House bill found that the tax cuts would generate nearly no additional economic growth, and even conservatives found the budget office's analysis credible. 'When all the models are in unison,' Erica York, the vice president for federal tax policy at the Tax Foundation, told The Times, 'it really doesn't make sense to triple down on the strategy to blame the scorekeeper.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
The Hill
42 minutes ago
- The Hill
Ocasio-Cortez endorses Zohran Mamdani in NYC mayor's race
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) on Thursday endorsed socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani in the New York City mayoral race just days before early voting kicks off. 'Assemblymember Mamdani has demonstrated a real ability on the ground to put together a coalition of working-class New Yorkers that is strongest to lead the pack,' Ocasio-Cortez told The New York Times in an interview announcing her endorsement. 'In the final stretch of the race, we need to get very real about that.' The move is sure to buoy those on the left who have coalesced around Mamdani as the best progressive alternative to former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D), the current frontrunner to succeed Mayor Eric Adams (D), who is running for reelection as an independent. Cuomo is seeking a comeback after resigning from his job in 2021 as governor amid sexual harassment allegations. The race also comes as a battle plays out among Democrats over the future of the party following President Trump's victory in November, with Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) representing the progressive wing looking to push the party toward a more populist agenda. Ocasio-Cortez's endorsement comes less than 12 hours after Mamdani squared off with Cuomo and seven other candidates in a rowdy, often chaotic debate that saw no clear winner. Cuomo has maintained a strong lead in polls over the last several months, making him the candidate to beat. But Mamdani, a progressive State Assembly member endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America, has surged into second place in recent weeks. A recent Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill survey had the former governor leading in the primary's first round of voting with 35 percent. Mamdani came in at second with 23 percent. Perhaps in a sign of his newfound momentum, Cuomo focused many of his attacks Wednesday night on the progressive, in multiple instances lambasting Mamdani for past criticism he made about former President Obama. Primary voters will head to the polls in person on June 24. Whoever emerges as the winner of the Democratic primary will be the clear favorite to lead the city. New York City employs a ranked-choice voting system, meaning primary voters will have the opportunity to rank up to five candidates by order of preference. When their top choices are eliminated, those votes are then dispersed to candidates they had ranked lower.
The Hill
42 minutes ago
- The Hill
The parade of presidential pardons is a perversion of justice
There are all sorts of checks and balances baked into the Constitution. But one power sits above the law, untouched by Congress, immune to the courts and utterly unaccountable: the presidential pardon. It is the kind of absolute authority you'd expect in a monarchy, not a democracy. The Founding Fathers thought they were building a system of justice with a human touch — where a president, guided by conscience and compassion, could offer mercy to someone wrongfully convicted or genuinely reformed. The pardon was supposed to heal wounds, not reward political allies or well-heeled donors. Nice idea. Too bad it hasn't always worked out that way. Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon after Watergate to help the country move on. It was controversial, sure, but Ford was acting on principle, not personal gain. Contrast that with Bill Clinton, who — on his way out the door — pardoned Marc Rich, a fugitive tax cheat whose ex-wife just happened to be a generous Clinton donor. That wasn't mercy. That was transactional politics. Joe Biden used his final hours in office to pardon his son, Hunter, and other family members — along with a few preemptive pardons aimed at blunting potential charges from a future Trump administration. That's not justice. That's insurance. And then there's Donald Trump. Where to begin? Trump opened his second term — on the first day, no less — by pardoning about 1,500 people involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Among them were thugs who assaulted police officers. Then came the pardon parade: Reality television fraudsters Todd and Julie Chrisley. Former Rep. Michael Grimm (R-N.Y.), who lied on his taxes. A corrupt sheriff in Virginia. A Nevada politician who pocketed money meant for fallen police officers — and used it to pay for plastic surgery. A nursing home operator who stiffed the IRS out of $10 million. Trump even tossed a pardon to former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D) — the same Blagojevich who tried to sell off Barack Obama's Senate seat like it was a used car on Craigslist. Blago, by the way, was also a contestant on Trump's 'Celebrity Apprentice' show. Imagine that. Trump's pardon lawyer — yes, he has one of those now — summed it up with a slogan that belongs on a bumper sticker: 'No MAGA left behind.' That's not a legal doctrine. That's a loyalty program. When presidents start handing out pardons like party favors to friends, donors or political cronies, it's not only the opposite of what the Founding Fathers had it mind, but it also sends a very loud and dangerous message — that the law doesn't apply equally. That who you know matters more than what you did. That justice is just another game for the powerful to rig. And when Biden pardons his own son and Trump pardons his loyal foot soldiers, what are we left with? A pardoning arms race, a perversion of justice that turns the most sacred executive power into a blunt instrument of politics and payback. So why should we care? Because once the ideals put forth in the Constitution become tainted by raw politics — once they're bent, twisted and ignored by the very people sworn to uphold those ideals — the entire democratic experiment begins to buckle. The presidential pardon was meant to show mercy, not mock the law. But in the hands of men more interested in self-preservation and political payback than in public service, it becomes just another tool for corruption. And telling ourselves that 'both sides do it' doesn't make it any less sleazy. Bernard Goldberg is an Emmy and an Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University award-winning writer and journalist. He is the author of five books and publishes exclusive weekly columns, audio commentaries and Q&As on his Substack page. Follow him @BernardGoldberg.
