Sadiq Khan is allowing criminals to rampage through London
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
Lawfare is the SAS's most dangerous enemy
It might at first glance appear odd that this deeply unpopular government is determined to repeal the Northern Ireland Legacy and Reconciliation Act. Britain's armed forces are one of the last institutions of which the nation is overwhelmingly proud. Why pursue its veterans at the risk of making itself even more unpopular? 'We want to be recruiting into the Armed Forces and we have a government who are about to reopen lawfare against our veterans,' remarked shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge. 'It is crazy.' The government say that they will repeal the Act, which was passed by the Tories in 2023, because it is incompatible with human rights legislation. Their other reasoning is that it is opposed by some of Northern Ireland's political parties as well as relatives of IRA terrorists. One of those relatives is the sister of an IRA terrorist who was killed by the SAS at Loughgall in 1987 along with seven other members of a cell that was en route to attack a remote police station. She and other relatives of the dead terrorists met Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn earlier this year and received a 'reassurance' that a legacy inquest will proceed. The Loughgall ambush was referenced by David Davis during last week's parliamentary debate about the intention to repeal the Legacy Act. The Conservative MP (a former SAS reservist) said that Sinn Féin were trying to portray themselves as victims and the British army as villains. 'That is why battles such as Coagh, Clonoe and, very likely soon, Loughgall feature so large in the demands for inquiries and the prosecution of long-retired, innocent British soldiers,' said David. 'All three of those actions were humiliating defeats for the IRA.' All three battles involved the SAS and, according to another Tory, Mark Francois, the possibility of future prosecutions is 'having an adverse effect on morale in the special forces community'. It is unlikely that will much bother the left. In May this year, Richard Williams, who commanded 22 SAS from 2005 to 2008, wrote a piece for this magazine entitled 'The BBC's War on the SAS'. It was a defence of the regiment against allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan. But the 'war' on the SAS isn't just being waged by elements within the BBC; it is part of a wider attack from a British left that has long loathed the regiment. This animosity stretches back to July 1945. Winston Churchill could in many ways be regarded as the founding father of Britain's special forces. It was his idea to raise the commandos in 1940, and he was an enthusiastic supporter of the SAS when they were formed the following year. His son, Randolph, served for a brief spell in the SAS in 1942 and was a friend of David Stirling, the founder of the regiment. When Churchill lost the 1945 general election, the SAS lost their principal backer. Within weeks they were disbanded, despite the best efforts of Stirling and other senior officers to persuade Clement Attlee's government that the SAS had a role to play in the post-war period. There were several reasons for the regiment's abolition: Attlee's naive belief that the future would be largely peaceful, the government's disapproval of the SAS's irregular nature and the fact that many of its senior officers were upper-class conservatives. Three of them, Lord George Jellicoe, Carol Mather and Stephen Hastings, would have distinguished post-war careers in the Tory party. Although the SAS were reformed as a regular regiment in 1952 – the year after Churchill had returned to power – David Stirling never forgave the Labour government for what he regarded as an act of betrayal. His grievance returned when Harold Wilson was elected PM in 1964, and by the time of his second administration in 1974 Stirling was convinced that Socialism was a clear and present danger to Britain. That year he formed an organisation called GB75, what he told the Times was a core of 'apprehensive patriots' ready to defend Britain against the 'chaos' of hard-left trade unionists and other activists. There was uproar among the Labour party and its media supporters. Stirling was accused of raising a 'private army', described by Defence Secretary Roy Mason as 'near-fascist'. Stirling retorted: Our motivation is to reinforce parliamentary authority in the country whereas Mr Mason is associated with a political party, the left-wing of which can be genuinely stated to be thoroughly undemocratic. GB75 was disbanded but the left-wing press had Stirling and the SAS in their sights. The smear campaign against them reached its height in 1978 and 1979, a time when the regiment was fighting a bloody war with the IRA. Time Out magazine, then a radical left publication, described the SAS as 'Pedigree Dogs of War' and accused them of being guns for hire. In March 1979 Major General Peter de la Billiere, Director of the SAS, took the unprecedented step of writing to the Daily Telegraph to defend the regiment. He was 'disturbed' at their media portrayal, 'as if it were some secret undercover organisation'. This is how the SAS is still regarded by some on the British left, whether politicians, journalists or lawyers. As Richard Williams wrote in these pages, 'the SAS is under fire' but not from terrorists or insurgents. Their adversary is 'lawfare' and it might be their most dangerous enemy yet.
ITV News
3 days ago
- ITV News
Sadiq Khan defends plans to shut Met Police station front counters, despite election promise
Sir Sadiq Khan has defended plans to shut police station front counters across London, despite an election promise he made last year. The Metropolitan Police Service wants to cut the number of police stations open to the public 24 hours a day in a bid to save money. The force is facing what it called 'tough choices' after government spending plans left it a £260m budget shortfall. There are 32 police stations open 24/7 - one in each London borough. But the proposals would see just eight front counters staffed around the clock - one for every three boroughs. Eleven of the 32 stations would switch to reduced opening hours but 13 would shut their front counters. Sir Sadiq pledged in his 2024 election manifesto: 'I'll continue to ensure the Met is able to effectively respond to the public, including maintaining a 24-hour police front office counter in every borough.' But today he told ITV News: "The commission's got three criteria when it comes to front counters - resources, funding, and the demand of the front counts. "Some front counters will stay open 24 hours a day in some boroughs in London where there is a demand, resources and funding. "Some boroughs, frankly speaking, nobody uses the front counters after office hours, they'll stay open during office hours, but after office hours there will be other ways." The Met said there was no decision yet on which police stations will lose their front counters. A spokesperson said: 'Just five per cent of crimes were reported using front counters last year, with the vast majority of Londoners doing it over the phone, online, or in person with officers elsewhere. "Given the Met's budget shortfall and shrinking size, it is no longer sustainable to keep all front counters open.' But the proposed cuts were criticised by the Conservative rival Khan defeated in the election. Susan Hall, leader of the Greater London Authority Tories, said: "Sadiq Khan is keeping Londoners completely in the dark about which police counters will be axed from their communities. 'This secrecy is utterly unacceptable when people are genuinely worried about losing this vital lifeline to report crimes and access police services. The Mayor has broken his manifesto promise and now he won't even have the decency to tell 'Londoners which areas will be worst hit by his failures. We will fight these closures tooth and nail, but we can't do that whilst Khan continues to hide behind this wall of silence. What does he have to hide? What wasn't he told? This is a disgrace."
BBC News
4 days ago
- BBC News
Controversial Kings Heath low traffic scheme set for expansion
Birmingham City Council is pushing ahead with the second phase of a divisive Kings Heath traffic scheme, with new 20mph speed limits and one-way streets suburb's Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) has previously split opinion, with restrictions banning through traffic on certain streets proving particularly council said it wanted to reduce traffic in residential neighbourhoods to try to make it safer for people to walk and it also acknowledged the scheme had been "controversial" and there were "strong feelings both in favour and against." So far, so-called modal filters have been introduced to the west of Kings Heath High Street and a section of York Road has been proposed second phase of the scheme would deliver the "planned full expansion" to the east of the High Street and into south would also mitigate the displacement of traffic caused by the "previous partial implementation of the scheme".According to a council report, the second phase would be split into four packages:Revision and consolidation of the temporary measures located mostly to the west of the High measures to the east of the High Street including new modal filters, one-way streets, and traffic calming.20mph speed limit across the project area, including all boundary roads, and traffic calming measures along Coldbath of a bus gate on Addison Road and reinstatement of the right turn from Vicarage Road onto A435 Alcester Road. 'Strong opinions' At a meeting on Tuesday, cabinet members at the Labour-run council agreed to approve the full business case for the first two MacDonald, an NHS doctor appointed road safety commissioner by West Midlands mayor Richard Parker, welcomed the leader at Birmingham City Council, Sharon Thompson added "I think everybody is broadly in agreement that to do nothing is not an option."But the Birmingham Conservative Group said it would scrap the LTN in Kings Heath if it took control of the council, saying the scheme made it harder for many residents to visit high street cabinet member for transport, Majid Mahmood, acknowledged the project had "sparked strong opinions", adding that was why the council had "held seven rounds of consultation, listened to feedback and crucially made changes to the design." This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
