Ex-secy HC Gupta acquitted in coal block allocation case
NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Friday acquitted former coal secretary H C Gupta, ex-joint secretary K S Kropha, and former director K C Samaria in a case linked to alleged irregularities in the allocation of the Mahugarhi coal block in Jharkhand. The case dates back to the coal allocation scam that shook the country a decade ago.
For Gupta, this marks a second acquittal in coal block-related cases, though he has been convicted in five others. His appeals in those matters are pending before the Delhi High Court. The CBI, which has filed 19 cases against him, is also contesting his first acquittal. Twelve of those cases remain pending before trial courts.
While the three former officials were cleared on Friday, Special Judge Sanjay Bansal convicted JAS Infrastructure Capital Ltd and its then director, Manoj Kumar Jayaswal, on charges of cheating and criminal conspiracy in relation to the same coal block.
At present, 29 coal scam-related cases filed by the CBI remain pending before two special courts, while 27 have already been disposed of.
Parallelly, the ED earlier this year had informed the Supreme Court that 45 complaints, equivalent to chargesheets under the PMLA, remain pending in connected proceedings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Efforts should be made by police to use tech tools for fairness, efficacy: Delhi HC
In the present case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS) Act, certain contraband was recovered from a vehicle in transit after a chase without any video recording. The court observed that in absence of independent witnesses and videography, there is an added duty upon the court to scrutinise the evidence more carefully. New Delhi, Jun 7 (PTI) While technology enhances transparency of police investigation and ideally every effort should be made to use such aids, adopting the use of video or audio recording might not be feasible in some cases, the Delhi High Court has said while dismissing the bail plea of an accused in a narcotics case. The petitioner, who was allegedly found to be in possession of 10.860 kg of poppy straw, argued that there was a violation of provisions pertaining to entry, search, seizure and arrest under the NDPS Act. Subsequently, several more sacks of the contraband were allegedly recovered at his instance by the police. His counsel argued that the contraband was recovered in a crowded place but no sincere effort was made to join the public persons or to videograph the search and seizure proceedings conducted at the spot. In the judgement passed on June 5 dismissing the bail plea, Justice Ravinder Dudeja said that although there was admittedly no independent public witness of recovery or any photography/videography, it was at best a 'key irregularity' and there was nothing on record at this stage to suggest that the petitioner was not guilty. 'The use of technology certainly enhances the efficacy and transparency of the police investigation and assures fairness, and therefore, ideally, every effort should be made by the investigating agency to use technological means in aid of investigation. However, there may be situations where audio/video recording may not be feasible like the present case,' said the court. 'The absence of independent witnesses and the videography at best may be regarded as a key irregularity in a search and that would cast an added duty upon the court to scrutinise the evidence regarding the search more carefully,' it added. It noted that in the present case, there was information that contraband was being transported in a vehicle from Alwar, Rajasthan, to Azadpur in Delhi via Punjabi Bagh, and at the time when the petitioner and his co-accused were apprehended, they were shifting the contraband from the car to a motorcycle. The court said the period of the petitioner's custody since August 2023 or that the trial had commenced were by themselves not persuasive grounds for granting relief to the petitioner under the NDPS Act. PTI ADS RT RT This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Court orders to fix CLAT PG 2025 answer key, release revised results
The Delhi High Court has asked the consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) to revise the CLAT PG 2025 answer key and release the final results. This came after students filed petitions highlighting errors in the key and demanding fair PG 2025 was conducted on December 1, 2024, and multiple students across the country raised objections regarding the correctness of several answers. After all related pleas were transferred to Delhi by the Supreme Court in February, the High Court has now issued its TO BE RE-EVALUATED FOR TWO QUESTIONSA bench of Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela directed that marks be awarded as per the court's corrections for two questions. However, it rejected challenges to a third question, stating the answer was accurate. The court reviewed each objection in detail before deciding which needed correction. It then directed the consortium to update the answer key accordingly and release the revised results for CLAT PG QUESTIONS RS 1,000 OBJECTION FEEThe bench also flagged concerns about the Rs 1,000 fee charged per question for objections. While it acknowledged the consortium's concern about filtering frivolous claims, it called the fee 'excessive and disproportionate' compared to other court advised the consortium to review this issue with its advisory committee headed by Justice G Raghuram (retd) and take steps to avoid steep charges in future this decision, thousands of law aspirants can now expect their corrected results soon -- possibly giving some a fairer shot at admissions into top NLUs.(With PTI inputs)
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Efforts should be made by police to use tech tools for fairness, efficacy: Delhi HC
New Delhi, While technology enhances transparency of police investigation and ideally every effort should be made to use such aids, adopting the use of video or audio recording might not be feasible in some cases, the Delhi High Court has said while dismissing the bail plea of an accused in a narcotics case. The court observed that in absence of independent witnesses and videography, there is an added duty upon the court to scrutinise the evidence more carefully. In the present case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Act, certain contraband was recovered from a vehicle in transit after a chase without any video recording. The petitioner, who was allegedly found to be in possession of 10.860 kg of poppy straw, argued that there was a violation of provisions pertaining to entry, search, seizure and arrest under the NDPS Act. Subsequently, several more sacks of the contraband were allegedly recovered at his instance by the police. His counsel argued that the contraband was recovered in a crowded place but no sincere effort was made to join the public persons or to videograph the search and seizure proceedings conducted at the spot. In the judgement passed on June 5 dismissing the bail plea, Justice Ravinder Dudeja said that although there was admittedly no independent public witness of recovery or any photography/videography, it was at best a "key irregularity" and there was nothing on record at this stage to suggest that the petitioner was not guilty. "The use of technology certainly enhances the efficacy and transparency of the police investigation and assures fairness, and therefore, ideally, every effort should be made by the investigating agency to use technological means in aid of investigation. However, there may be situations where audio/video recording may not be feasible like the present case," said the court. "The absence of independent witnesses and the videography at best may be regarded as a key irregularity in a search and that would cast an added duty upon the court to scrutinise the evidence regarding the search more carefully," it added. It noted that in the present case, there was information that contraband was being transported in a vehicle from Alwar, Rajasthan, to Azadpur in Delhi via Punjabi Bagh, and at the time when the petitioner and his co-accused were apprehended, they were shifting the contraband from the car to a motorcycle. The court said the period of the petitioner's custody since August 2023 or that the trial had commenced were by themselves not persuasive grounds for granting relief to the petitioner under the NDPS Act.
