Rajasthan MLA urges PM to rescind order on deporting Pakistani refugees
Ravindra Singh Bhati, an Independent MLA from Sheo constituency of Rajasthan, on Monday (April 28, 2025) wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi requesting him to reconsider the decision of sending back the Pakistani refugees and family members who came to India, especially in the western part of his State.
Expressing deep anguish over the Pahalgam terror attack, Mr. Bhati said it was 'very unfortunate' and India's response in putting Indus treaty on hold and other security measures had the wholehearted support of the entire country.
Under these circumstances, the new guidelines issued by the Government of India regarding refugees and newly married families had become a matter of deep humanitarian concern, said Mr. Bhati.
'The process of sending back refugees from the neighboring country, who have not yet received formal recognition, and those newly married couples who have recently come to India after marriage, is being started. This decision has created deep fear and despair in thousands of families, which is extremely worrying from a humanitarian point of view,' he wrote to the PM.
Mr. Bhati, in his letter, said that many families residing in the neighbouring country were connected to one another by the same gotra (lineage) and all these families had religious, social, and cultural ties with India. And at the time of Partition, many families got separated, some of whom settled in India and the rest remained in Pakistan.
'At present, families residing in Pakistan are being forced to come to our country due to religious persecution and insecurity. There are many examples in which half the family has settled in India while the other half had been living on visa for years and are waiting to get Indian citizenship,' he said.
Requesting the Prime Minister to reconsider these new guidelines keeping in view the above human, social and constitutional aspects, Mr Bhati added that some special rehabilitation facility should be provided to the refugees living peacefully in India for a long time and the members of Western Rajasthan who had come under family relations.
'This will ensure the safety of faith, respect, and life of those refugees and their families towards India. There is full hope that India will do justice to these helpless families in keeping with its historical generosity, human values, and the spirit of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
30 minutes ago
- India Today
India rejects UN help in Air India crash probe: Report
India would not allow a UN investigator to join a probe of a crashed Air India jet that some safety experts had criticised for delays in analysis of crucial black box data, two senior sources familiar with the matter told this week, the United Nations aviation agency took the unusual step of offering India one of its investigators to provide assistance following the Boeing BA.N 787-8 Dreamliner crash, killing 274 people in Ahmedabad on June the International Civil Aviation Organisation has deployed investigators to help with certain probes, such as the downing of a Malaysian plane in 2014 and a Ukrainian jetliner in 2020, but those times the agency had been asked for assistance. ICAO had asked the investigator, who was in India, to be given observer status, but Indian authorities refused the offer, the sources said. The news was first reported on Thursday by the Indian news channel Times Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), which is leading the probe into the world's deadliest aviation accident in a decade, did not return a request for comment. ICAO was not immediately available for civil aviation ministry said on Thursday that investigators downloaded flight recorder data around two weeks after the safety experts had questioned a lack of information about the probe, including the status of the combined black box unit recovered on June 13, along with a second set that was found on June were also raised on whether the recorders would be read in India or in the US, since the National Transportation Safety Board is participating in the investigation. The Indian government held only one press conference on the incident, and no questions were international rules known throughout the industry by their legal name "Annex 13," the decision of where to read flight recorders should be made immediately in case the evidence obtained could avert future this week, an Indian aviation ministry official who declined to be named said the department has been "following all the ICAO protocols." The official added that media representatives have made updates on important air crashes are caused by multiple factors, with a preliminary report expected about 30 days after the accident.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Congress: Election Commission move to revise rolls an admission that all not well
The Congress on Thursday said the Election Commission's announcement of a special intensive revision (SIR) of the voting lists in poll-bound Bihar is a 'clear and explicit admission… that all is not well with India's electoral rolls'. Other Opposition parties, too, objected to the move, arguing that the month-long exercise will disenfranchise lakhs of vulnerable voters ahead of elections this year. The EC had said Tuesday that all existing electors in Bihar who were not on the rolls in 2003 would have to again provide documentation proving their eligibility. This was to be the beginning of a nationwide exercise. A Congress committee tasked with looking into elections said in a statement Thursday: 'In simple terms, the EC wants to discard the current electoral rolls entirely and create a fresh new electoral roll for the state… This is a clear and explicit admission by the EC that all is not well with India's electoral rolls. Exactly what the Congress party and the Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi have been repeatedly pointing out with evidence from Maharashtra.' The eight-member EAGLE committee said: 'Lakhs of Union and state government officials will now control and dictate who has correct documents and who doesn't, who gets to vote in the upcoming Bihar elections etc. This carries a huge risk of willful exclusion of voters using the power of the state machinery.' At a meeting of political parties with Bihar's Chief Electoral Officer Wednesday in Patna, representatives from the INDIA bloc — including the RJD, Congress, CPI(ML) Liberation and CPI(M) — unanimously rejected the SIR, calling it a ploy to exclude poor, rural and minority electors. RJD Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Kumar Jha told The Indian Express that the party would go to the EC. 'This is a massive exercise, and with the Bihar election notification expected in just two-and-a-half months, the timing is questionable. This process could have started much earlier. We feel very strongly that this entire exercise, is it a kind of cover? Cover to make sure that people from subaltern classes and minorities, backward and Dalits, are you going to invisibilise them?' he said. Opposition parties flagged concerns on the commission's stringent documentation requirements. The new rules set different proof thresholds by birth cohort. Voters born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, are required to provide proof of either parent's Indian citizenship, while those born after December 2, 2004, need documentation for both parents. West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said the EC was 'acting like a stooge of the BJP' and asked whether the move was a backdoor attempt to implement the NRC. 'I don't understand the reason behind the EC move or the rationale behind selecting these dates. This is nothing short of a scam. I seek clarification from the Commission on whether they are trying to implement the NRC through backdoors. In fact, this looks to be more dangerous than the NRC which every political party in opposition must resist,' she told reporters. The Congress statement said the EC rules on birth certificates are 'arbitrary, whimsical and onerous on the estimated 8.1 crore eligible voters in Bihar in 2025'. CPI(ML) Liberation General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya, too, drew parallels with Assam's NRC exercise and argued in a letter to the Chief Election Commissioner that completing the verification of '78 million voters' in one month was 'logically absurd and a logistical nightmare'.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
India refuses to sign SCO statement over Pahalgam
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) defence ministers' meeting couldn't issue a joint communique on Thursday after India refused to endorse the document because it didn't address its terrorism-related concerns, officials aware of the matter said. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh during the SCO Defence Ministers' Meeting, in Qingdao, China. (@rajnathsingh) Defence minister Rajnath Singh, who attended the meeting at Qingdao in China, refused to sign the joint communique as it was silent on the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed but mentioned Balochistan and the hijacking of the Jaffer Express by Baloch militants in March, the officials said, asking not to be named. Pakistan's insistence on not having any reference to the Pahalgam attack, while retaining the reference to the situation in Balochistan, stymied the finalisation of a joint statement, the officials said. The SCO works by consensus and a joint communique cannot be issued if even one member state doesn't endorse it. China, the current president of the SCO, has deep military and strategic ties with Pakistan, which it strongly supported during the recent four-day clashes with India under Operation Sindoor. The operation was India's direct military response to the Pahalgam terror strike, the worst attack on civilians since the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal responded to a question about the SCO meeting's failure to issue a joint communique by tacitly pointing to Pakistan's role in the matter. 'I understand [the meet] could not adopt a joint statement. I also understand that certain member countries could not reach consensus on certain issues and hence the document could not be finalised. On our side, India wanted concerns on terrorism reflected in the document, which was not acceptable to one particular country, and therefore the statement was not adopted,' he said. A press release issued by the Indian side is 'very instructive in how we look at the threat of terrorism', he said. 'The defence minister, in his address, called upon these 11 countries to come together to fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations... He also reiterated the need to uphold that the perpetrators, organisers, financers, sponsors of reprehensible acts of terrorism, including cross-border terrorism, need to be held accountable and brought to justice,' Jaiswal said. Singh further said SCO members must be 'in lockstep in our endeavour in strengthening stability and security in our neighborhood', he added. In his address, Singh said every act of terrorism was criminal and unjustifiable, and the bloc must unite in eliminating the menace for collective safety and security. He said India launched Operation Sindoor, exercising its right to defend itself against terrorism and pre-empt and deter further cross-border attacks. During the Pahalgam terror attack, victims were shot after they were profiled on religious identity, and the The Resistance Front --- a proxy of UN-designated terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) --- claimed responsibility for it, Singh said. 'The pattern of Pahalgam attack matches with LeT's previous terror attacks in India. India's zero tolerance for terrorism was demonstrated through its actions. We have shown that epicentres of terrorism are no longer safe and we will not hesitate to target them.' India launched the Operation Sindoor in the early hours of May 7 and struck terror and military installations in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), It triggered a four-day military confrontation with Pakistan involving fighter jets, missiles, drones, long-range weapons and heavy artillery before the two sides reached an understanding on stopping all military action on May 10. The biggest challenges faced by the region were related to peace, security and trust-deficit, with increasing radicalisation, extremism and terrorism being the root cause of these problems, Singh said. 'Peace and prosperity cannot co-exist with terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of non-state actors and terror groups. Dealing with these challenges requires decisive action.' On May 15, Singh questioned if nuclear weapons were safe in Pakistan's control and custody and demanded that its arsenal be placed under the supervision of global nuclear watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), calling the neighbour 'irresponsible and rogue'. 'It is imperative that those who sponsor, nurture and utilise terrorism for their narrow and selfish ends must bear the consequences. Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards. SCO should not hesitate to criticise such nations,' Singh said in Qingdao. Singh called for proactive steps to check the spread of radicalisation among the youth, acknowledging the significant role of the RATS (regional anti-terrorist structure --- a body under the SCO) mechanism in tackling the challenge. 'The joint statement of the Council of SCO Heads of State on 'Countering Radicalisation leading to Terrorism, Separatism and Extremism' issued during India's chairmanship symbolises our shared commitment.' SCO is a 10-nation Eurasian security and political grouping whose members include China, Russia, India, Pakistan, and Iran. Their defence ministers' meeting was held as a precursor to the annual summit of its leaders set for the autumn.
