logo
‘No shoo-in': Westpac cautions homeowners on July rate cut, warns inflation figures ‘still likely to print on high side'

‘No shoo-in': Westpac cautions homeowners on July rate cut, warns inflation figures ‘still likely to print on high side'

News.com.au9 hours ago

One of Australia's big four banks has forecast the Reserve Bank is more likely to move on rates in July – but cautioned this is not the 'shoo-in' everyone thinks.
Westpac chief economist Luci Ellis says Wednesday's softer-than-expected inflation reading is adding to the case for rate relief and is expecting the central bank to move in July instead of August, but she is not prepared to say it is locked in.
'The June quarterly inflation numbers are still likely to print on the high side, so some caution on the inflation outlook is likely and warranted,' she wrote in an economic note.
'One month's data ordinarily wouldn't – and shouldn't – determine the RBA's forecast and decision-making.'
Currently the money market is counting on around an 89 per cent chance of a rate cut in July based on weak CPI data released for May.
Ms Ellis said a high inflation read is not the only issue mortgage holder and investors wanting a rate cut will have to contend with, as the RBA will also need to change its current stance on rates.
'Moving more quickly than the 'cautious and predictable' path flagged in May implies that the RBA's forecasts need to shift,' she said.
'We expect that the inflation evidence will overtake the RBA's thesis of domestic tightness over time.
'But we do not think they are going to start singing from an entirely different song sheet just yet.'
Despite raising concerns, Ms Ellis is still calling four rate cuts between now and May next year.
This would take the current cash rate, which is at 3.85 per cent, to be cut to 2.85 per cent by this time next year.
If Westpac's prediction is correct, it would mean households get six rate cuts in total from the start of the rate cutting cycle, when interest rates were at 4.30 per cent.
Wednesday's consumer price index rose by 2.1 per cent for the 12 months to May 2025, beating expectations of 2.3 per cent.
The all-important trimmed mean inflation rate, which the Reserve Bank considers when making decisions about the cash rate, came in at 2.4 per cent.
This is the lowest level since November 2021.
Off the back of these weaker than expected figures, Commonwealth Bank senior economist Belinda Allen has now updated her rate call, saying interest rates will be slashed in July.
'Based on the data flow we now expect the RBA to cut the cash rate in July,' she said. 'Today's monthly CPI print capped off a flow of data that should provide comfort to the RBA that a swifter return of the cash rate to neutral is both manageable and needed,' Ms Allen said.
Ms Ellis said despite the better than expected inflation read, the central bank is still looking at a number of factors which will determine its decision.
'The RBA's outlook is still shaped by concerns about the tight labour market, slow economy-wide productivity growth and the pricing implications of recovering demand,' she said.
'Thus we expect noncommittal, even grudging, language in the post-meeting communication.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia remains firm on defence spending targets despite US pressure
Australia remains firm on defence spending targets despite US pressure

SBS Australia

time4 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

Australia remains firm on defence spending targets despite US pressure

NATO countries have fallen in line with a request from the United States to increase defence spending. It's a request Australia is familiar with, having been delivered earlier this year by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to Defence Minister Richard Marles. But Mr Marles rebuffed the request then, and says events at the NATO conference in the Netherlands haven't changed the government's mind. He says this government has already lifted defence spending sufficiently. "Obviously, a very significant decision has been made here in relation to European defence spending and that is fundamentally a matter for NATO. We've gone through our own process of assessing our strategic landscape, assessing the threats that exist there, and the kind of defence force we need to build in order to meet those threats, to meet the strategic moment, and then to resource that. And what that has seen is the biggest peace time increase in Australian defence spending that we have seen in our history. Now, that is a story which is understood here." The increase Mr Marles is speaking of involves Australia lifting its defence spending from two per cent of gross domestic product to 2.3 per cent by the 2033-2034 financial year. The US has requested that commitment be lifted to 3.5 per cent. Some experts in Australia are calling for a lift to three per cent. The opposition's defence spokesman, Angus Taylor, hasn't named a number, but says defence spending is still insufficient under this government. "Well, there's a lot of areas in the Defence Strategic Review that are clearly underfunded. Our drone and counter-drone technologies, as the Leader of the Opposition, Sussan Ley, laid out yesterday. Making sure that the Henderson sub facility is properly-funded. The hardening of our northern facilities at a time like this incredibly important. Making sure we've got domestic missile manufacturing capability, as the government said they will do, but there's no sign of making progress on this. All of these are areas that have to be properly funded, alongside AUKUS- the submarines- and frigates. There is no shortage of things that need to be properly executed and properly funded, and they are not being right now under this government." Matthew Sussex is from the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre at the Australian National University in Canberra. He says the events at the conference in The Hague will put further pressure on the government's stance-with one caveat. "This also does increase the pressure on Australia to increase its defence spending. Whether it does or not is something, I think, is still a bit of an open question. And certainly I think there's no harm in waiting until what the American review into the AUKUS program actually says-the 30-day review that is due to report soon." Elsewhere at the NATO meeting, US President Donald Trump didn't show up to a joint meeting of Indo-Pacific partners who were present. Mr Marles says that didn't affect the quality of that meeting. "No, it was a really important meeting with the Secretary-General. And we re-affirmed in the meeting how important the two theatres are to each other. The point is made is that in Japan, in Korea, and in New Zealand, we have three countries which are deeply important in terms of Australia's strategic interests. In respect of all of them, we are really at a high point of our bilateral relationship, and we are working increasingly as a team. But we all see how significantly what is playing out in Europe is influencing the Indo-Pacific." But Mr Trump not showing up does play into the narrative that the government can't get a meeting with Mr Trump, especially after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's meeting with him on the side of the G-7 conference in Canada was cancelled. More than five months into Mr Trump's second term as U-S President, no Australian minister has yet met with him face-to-face. Whether that hurts the government on a domestic political level is a matter in and of itself, but it's something the opposition is nevertheless keen to exploit. Mr Taylor says an Australian Prime Minister must invest time in building a personal rapport with whoever the President of the US happens to be at any given time. "Right now it seems that the Prime Minister is better able to get a meeting with the President of China than the President of the United States. The United States has fought with us in every major war, and that alliance is incredibly important to this country, regardless of who is leading the United States. That alliance really matters. The Prime Minister needs to get serious about the personal relationship that is necessary to nurture that alliance." There were some things proposed at the NATO meeting that Australia has agreed to. Australia will deploy a surveillance aircraft and 100 defence personnel to Poland for three months, ending in November, in order to provide visibility for key supply routes into Ukraine. On that front, the government has also slapped sanctions on a further 37 individuals and seven financial entities linked to key Russian industries, as well as it what it calls promulgators of Russian propaganda. And, Mr Marles has signed an agreement with the NATO Support and Procurement Organisation, which will increase co-operation in non-combat activities, including logistics, and capability acquisition.

'Back to the drawing board': ACT Greens won't support proposed health levy
'Back to the drawing board': ACT Greens won't support proposed health levy

ABC News

time5 hours ago

  • ABC News

'Back to the drawing board': ACT Greens won't support proposed health levy

Labor's budget plans have been thrown into doubt with the ACT Greens announcing they will not support a key proposed revenue-raising measure. ACT Greens Leader Shane Rattenbury said his party would not support the proposed $250 health levy for all ratepayers which he called an "unfair and regressive tax". The proposed levy is expected to raise about $50 million per year for four years. The government is in minority and Labor needs either the support of the Liberals or the Greens to pass budget items through the Legislative Assembly. ACT Greens leader Shane Rattenbury said the levy was unfair and the budget "missed the mark". "A flat levy does not take into account a person's ability to pay and does not reflect the type of city we want to build," he said. Mr Rattenbury said there was definitely a need to raise revenue to be able to pay for services — especially healthcare — but the levy would have a negative impact upon health. Mr Rattenbury said his party would try to be constructive. "We hope to negotiate with the Labor Party on the budget." Mr Rattenbury said the Greens' proposed Big Corporations Tax was a fairer way to raise government revenue. Under the idea, a new, higher tax threshold would be introduced for big corporations like supermarkets, banks and airlines. Mr Rattenbury also said the Greens would oppose the $8 million subsidy for the horseracing industry included in the budget.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store