Weight Loss May Improve Pregnancy Odds
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Weight loss interventions for people who are overweight and obese undertaken before turning to IVF could increase the chances of getting pregnant naturally.
This is the conclusion of researchers from University of Oxford who reviewed 12 past studies involving nearly 2,000 patients from 1980 to May of this year.
They compared a woman's weight to how likely they were to become pregnant either without IVF (unassisted pregnancy), with IVF (treatment-induced pregnancy) and overall (unassisted plus treatment-induced)—as well as whether they delivered a live baby.
"All participants in the included studies were candidates for IVF. Before having IVF, they were offered weight loss support. The women who got pregnant naturally, ended up not needing to have IVF," study author and dietician Moscho Michalopoulou told Newsweek.
Side view pregnant woman with advanced pregnant belly belly in hands.
Side view pregnant woman with advanced pregnant belly belly in hands.Inclusion criteria included studies conducted on women who were at least 18 years old with a BMI of 27 kg/m² or greater who were seeking IVF with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment (ICSI) for infertility.
"IVF and ICSI are assisted reproductive techniques where oocytes [cells involved in reproduction] are fertilized outside the body, before embryos are transferred back into the woman's womb. The key difference is how the fertilization is achieved," Michalopoulou explained.
"Regular IVF egg and sperm are typically mixed in a Petri dish, with ICSI, the sperm is directly injected into the egg."
The researchers found that participants were typically women in their early 30s with a median baseline BMI of 33.6 kg/m².
The weight loss interventions studied included low-energy diets, an exercise program accompanied by healthy eating advice and pharmacotherapy accompanied by diet and physical activity advice.
"Low-energy diets, also known as total diet replacements, typically use liquid formula products to replace real food and induce a much larger energy deficit with total energy intake of no more than 1000 kcal/day, followed by gradual reintroduction of foods for weight stabilization," Michalopoulou explained.
She said these are safe for women when supervised and supported to follow such a program, with a lot of literature on the effectiveness of these diets.
"In this one study, the main intervention being tested was high-intensity interval training (referenced as Kiel 2018 in the paper). At the same time, participants were advised to eat healthy as per national healthy eating recommendations," said Michalopoulou.
In terms of the 'pharmacotherapy' intervention, she added, "Participants were instructed to take weight loss medication which was the main intervention being tested, but at the same time, they were given healthy eating advice or a hypocaloric diet [low in calories], plus advice on how to increase their physical activity, e.g. doing more steps, or doing exercise."
Overall, weight loss interventions before IVF were associated with greater unassisted pregnancy rates, according to the researchers.
"Regardless of weight loss method used, across all studies, women with obesity who participated in a supported weight loss program before IVF had 47 percent higher chances of getting pregnant naturally, compared to women in the comparator groups who typically received standard care," said Michalopoulou.
"Therefore, more women in the intervention than in the comparator groups did not need to have IVF treatment to get pregnant, as they got pregnant naturally."
However, evidence was inconclusive on the effect of weight loss interventions on treatment-induced pregnancies.
Illustration representing IVF process with eggs fertilized with sperm.
Illustration representing IVF process with eggs fertilized with sperm."It is unclear if weight loss interventions before IVF have an effect on the chances of getting pregnant through IVF. In some studies there were more IVF pregnancies in the intervention groups compared to standard care, in some others there were fewer IVF pregnancies compared to standard care—and in some others there was no difference in IVF pregnancy rates compared to standard care," Michalopoulou explained.
"This large variability, combined with other methodological issues of the included studies, prevent us from having a clear conclusion on whether weight loss programs before IVF have an effect on IVF-induced pregnancy success or not."
Evidence on the association between weight loss interventions before IVF and live births was uncertain—mainly because there were fewer studies that reported live birth outcomes—although there was moderate certainty of no association with pregnancy loss.
"Obesity can lead to female infertility through hormone imbalance, insulin resistance, inflammation, and polycystic ovary syndrome. All of these can lead to ovulatory dysfunction," said Michalopoulou.
"Obesity has also been associated with lower IVF success for women with infertility, such as requiring higher doses of treatment, reduced response to the medications, reduced chances of getting pregnant, and increased chances of miscarriage if a pregnancy is achieved."
"Maintaining a healthier weight can help improve hormone balance, increase insulin sensitivity, reduce inflammation, and improve ovulation. For women seeking IVF, lowering their BMI to healthier levels may improve sensitivity and response to the treatment, improve egg quality and uterine function, and as a result, increase their chances of getting pregnant."
However, everyone is different, the researcher noted. "Many larger women will have healthy pregnancies. But evidence shows that starting pregnancy carrying too much weight and gaining too much weight during pregnancy are both associated with greater risks of complications. This does not mean that every woman living with obesity will develop these complications—just that there will likely be more complications than in women who start pregnancy in the normal BMI range"
The researchers hope their systematic review and analysis of randomized controlled trials will lead to more advanced trials.
"We already know weight loss can help with fertility, but whether it improves IVF outcomes is far less certain. This review sheds some light, but most of the studies are small and at high risk of bias, so the results need cautious interpretation. IVF bypasses many obesity-related barriers, but what is still unclear is if delaying treatment for weight loss truly boosts success rates," said Ying Cheong—a professor of reproductive medicine of the University of Southampton who was not involved in the present study—in a statement.
"Weight loss interventions before IVF appear to increase the chances of pregnancy, especially through natural conception, which may negate the need for IVF treatment, and does not seem to increase the risk of pregnancy loss. This offers hope to women with obesity and infertility," Michalopoulou said.
"However, the evidence is limited and unclear on whether weight loss interventions before IVF have an effect on live birth rates, and more evidence from larger, high-quality trials is needed to test this."
Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about pregnancy? Let us know via health@newsweek.com.
Reference
Michalopoulou, M., Jebb, S. A., Hobson, A., Khaw, S. C., Stevens, R., Melo, P., Haffner, S. J. P., Clay, K. S., Mounsey, S., Granne, I., Lim, L., Child, T., & Astbury, N. M. (2025). The effect of weight loss before in vitro fertilization on reproductive outcomes in women with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 178(9). https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-01025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Millions Told To Monitor Unusual Fatigue, Palpitations
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Millions of Americans have been urged to watch out for unusual fatigue and palpitations amid concerns over high air pollution levels. The National Weather Service (NWS) issued a series of air quality alerts on Tuesday for large swathes of Minnesota, Wisconsin, New York, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Colorado, Texas and California. The warnings mean ground-level ozone and particulate concentrations are forecast to reach dangerous levels. In some areas, the pollution comes from drifting wildfire smoke. Why It Matters The NWS warned that the general public as well as sensitive groups — children, seniors, and individuals with preexisting respiratory or heart conditions—might experience health effects linked to poor air quality in the affected regions. "People with heart disease: symptoms such as palpitations, shortness of breath, or unusual fatigue may indicate a serious problem. If you have any of these, contact your health care provider," it said. "People with asthma: follow your asthma action plan and keep quick relief medicine handy." It added: "Sensitive groups, such as people with lung disease, heart disease, and children and older adults, should avoid prolonged or heavy exertion." The Statue of Liberty is seen through haze from Canadian wildfires earlier in August. The Statue of Liberty is seen through haze from Canadian wildfires earlier in August. Yuki Iwamura/AP What To Know In Connecticut and Rhode Island, Air Quality Action Days have been issued until 11 p.m. on Tuesday, covering urban areas such as New Haven, Hartford, Providence and Newport. The alerts mean that ground level ozone levels may approach or exceed unhealthy standards. Air quality alerts have been issued in New York and Massachusetts until 11 p.m., covering areas including the Bronx, Queens, Boston and Plymouth. In New Hampshire, an air quality alert has been issued until 10 p.m. In Minnesota, an air quality alert for fine particle pollution has been issued until 9 a.m., and in Wisconsin an air quality advisory has been issued for most northern counties until 3 p.m. Meanwhile in Colorado, an air quality health advisory for wildfire smoke has been issued for a number of western counties until 9 a.m. following the Stoner Mesa fire. In California, an air quality alert has been issued due to harmful levels of particle pollution from windblown dust in the Coachella Valley. And in Texas, an Ozone Action Day has been issued for the Dallas-Fort Worth area. What People Are Saying The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment said: "If smoke is thick or becomes thick in your neighborhood you may want to remain indoors. This is especially true for those with heart disease, respiratory illnesses, the very young, and older adults. Consider limiting outdoor activity when moderate to heavy smoke is present. Consider relocating temporarily if smoke is present indoors and is making you ill." California's South Coast Air Quality Management District said: "Particle pollution can get deep into the lungs and cause serious health problems such as asthma attacks, heart and lung disease symptoms, and increased risk of lung infections. Everyone can be affected, but sensitive groups such as people with lung or heart disease, older adults, people who are pregnant, children, and those who spend a lot of time outdoors are at greater risk." Jonathan Grigg, a professor of pediatric respiratory and environmental medicine at Queen Mary University of London, previously told Newsweek that there are "very clear links" between inhaling particles and earlier death from both respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. He added: "There are vulnerable groups and classically they are children because they've got an extra issue to do with their lungs developing, whereas our lungs are not developing as adults." What Happens Next The majority of the air quality alerts are currently set to remain in force until late Tuesday. Regular updates regarding air pollution levels are issued on the NWS website and on the Environmental Protection Agency's AirNow interactive map.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Plant Owner Accidentally Feeds It Creatine—Internet Wants Answers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Creatine is a popular performance enhancer for athletes, known for helping muscles power through short bursts of activity. But what happens when you give it to a plant instead? One Reddit user who goes by Best_Sheepherder5438 shared a photo of a plant on a table. The August 6 post, titled "I accidentally put creatine in my plant," quickly gained traction, earning 1,200 upvotes and a flood of comments from amused and curious gardeners. To get to the root of the matter, Newsweek spoke with Mike Carthew, a geography specialist focusing on ecology and climate change, and owner of the gardening education site Garden Footprint. He said: "Spraying a plant with creatine is a creative experiment, but it probably won't smash out a personal best on the bench press. Creatine enhances the fueling of muscle cells, but plants run on an entirely different energy system—they make their own energy from sunlight, CO₂, and water via photosynthesis." He added: "They have no pathways to use creatine directly, so the most that might happen is soil microbes metabolizing it into nitrogen compounds. In short: you won't have done any harm, but stick to liquid seaweed fertilizer in future and keep the creatine for yourself." Reddit Reacts Many users leaned into the humor of the situation. "You are going to walk in one day and hear a deep voice say, 'Bro, can you spot me?' In all seriousness, flush the soil out and hope for the best," one commenter wrote. "Ok here's a more important question. Did you drink miracle grow? Is it working better then creatine? Let me know!" asked another. A third commenter shared a story: "My nan had an orchid on her window, and honestly I'd never seen one as plentiful or luscious as it. It easily had 40 flowers on its stems. I asked what she did that kept it so amazing. 'When I finish my redbull I rinse the can with water and water the plant.' Never had the guts to try it myself." "My husband's grandma has the same luscious orchids and she told me her secret was to give them black coffee once in a while. Just a drip of black coffee mixed with water," another user revealed. Coffee Grounds and Plant Growth A stock image of a man watering his indoor plants. A stock image of a man watering his indoor plants. Ольга Симонова/iStock / Getty Images Plus Coffee in the garden isn't just an old wives' tale. In fact, science suggests it can have real benefits. Overusing chemical fertilizers can harm soil, making it harder for plants to grow naturally. The coffee industry, however, produces a significant amount of waste—particularly used coffee grounds—that could help fix this problem. These grounds are rich in natural compounds that improve soil structure, boost nutrients, and support plant growth, while also reducing food waste and environmental pollution. In a 2024 study, researchers tested how different treatments—chemical fertilizer, worm compost (vermicompost), and used coffee grounds—impacted the growth of red radishes and soil quality. They experimented with coffee grounds mixed into fertilizer at various levels (5 percent, 10 percent, 25 percent, and 50 percent) and as a top dressing in doses of 0.5 g, 1 g, and 2.5 g. The findings were striking: the 0.5 g coffee ground top layer produced the tallest plants (average 18.47 cm) and heaviest weights (average 27.54 g), while the 50 percent vermicompost treatment yielded the largest leaves (average 58.32 cm²). The researchers concluded that used coffee grounds could be an eco-friendly alternative to chemical fertilizers, boosting both plant growth and soil health while promoting sustainable agriculture and recycling.
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
Canada Helps US Keep Tabs on China Near Alaska
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Canada—a key United States ally in the Arctic and NATO—is actively monitoring vessels and has been tracking five Chinese research ships operating around Alaska since last week. China's Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a written request for comment. Why It Matters The presence of the Chinese research fleet comes as China—which has long described itself as a "near-Arctic state" and an important stakeholder in the region's affairs—expands its activities in the Arctic, including scientific research with potential military applications. Canada is part of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), which provides maritime warnings for North America. In July last year, a Canadian warship carried out an "Arctic awareness and sovereignty" mission to shadow a Chinese research vessel. What To Know In a written response to Newsweek on Monday, the Canadian Joint Operations Command said the Chinese vessels are not in Canada's territorial waters, which extend up to 13.8 miles from the coastline, according to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. According to the command, it has deployed a CP-140 patrol aircraft around Alaska to monitor vessels and approaches. The aircraft was previously tracked flying out of Anchorage as the Xue Long 2, a Chinese icebreaker capable of conducting research, reached the Arctic Ocean. A Royal Canadian Air Force CP-140 patrol aircraft arrives at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii on July 3, 2024. A Royal Canadian Air Force CP-140 patrol aircraft arrives at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii on July 3, 2024. Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class William Sykes/U.S. Navy The long-range patrol aircraft—also known as Aurora—is capable of conducting maritime intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; anti-submarine and anti-surface warfare; strike coordination; and search and rescue, according to the Royal Canadian Air Force. "The top priority of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) is the defense of Canada and Canadians, and we will continue to conduct activities needed to detect, deter, and defend against potential threats in, over, and approaching Canada," the command told Newsweek. The U.S. Coast Guard said on Friday that its Arctic District works with international partners, the U.S. Northern Command, and the Alaskan Command to "constantly monitor" foreign ships operating near U.S. sovereign waters to ensure homeland security and defense. While China dispatches research vessels to the Arctic, the Canadian Coast Guard's annual Arctic summer operational season is underway, with seven of its icebreakers set to deploy between June and November to conduct a range of missions, including "Arctic security." One of the deployed Canadian icebreakers, CCGS Sir Wilfrid Laurier, has been conducting icebreaking and science support missions since July 17. According to a Newsweek map, it was tracked sailing eastward along the northern coast of Alaska and Canada as of August 6. What People Are Saying The Canadian Joint Operations Command told Newsweek on Monday: "Competitors are exploring Arctic waters and the seafloor, probing our infrastructure, and collecting intelligence using dual-purpose research vessels and surveillance platforms. The [Canadian Armed Forces] will continue to actively monitor vessels that continue to operate near Canadian territorial waters." The U.S. Coast Guard said in a press release on Friday: "The presence of these vessels is consistent with a three-year trend of increased activity from Chinese research vessels operating in the U.S. Arctic. Last year, three Chinese research vessels conducted research operations north of the Bering Strait." China's Embassy in Washington, D.C., previously told Newsweek: "China has always conducted normal maritime activities in relevant waters in accordance with international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. We hope the parties concerned will view this matter in a proper manner, without undue suspicion or groundless speculation." What Happens Next It remains to be seen whether the Canadian military will deploy naval vessels alongside patrol aircraft to enhance surveillance of Chinese research vessels operating in the Arctic.
