My 7 Expert-Tested Tech Tricks to Stop Porch Pirates in Their Tracks
"Delivery was meant to be convenient -- but with porch theft like it is today, it's anything but," says Hyve Security. "Getting a notification that a package has arrived is supposed to bring peace of mind. Instead, it brings panic."
I don't think you should ever panic about a delivery, so I've tested all kinds of home security devices, many made for your porch and front door, in a quest to find the best proven ways to stop and discourage porch pirates. Along the way I've uncovered some innovative answers -- here are my favorites.
1. Take advantage of package tracking
Every major delivery company and the US Postal Service now gives updates on when a given package will arrive. In most cases, you can track its progress and see when it's been placed on the truck for delivery. Finally, the tracking will be updated when your package has been delivered.
The simplest way to avoid porch pirates is to use this tracking information to quickly retrieve your package once it's delivered. If you're not able to be home during the delivery, you can have someone else keep an eye on your doorstep that day. Limiting the time between delivery and retrieval is a simple, straightforward way to avoid porch piracy.
2. Install a video doorbell
Video doorbells are becoming an increasingly popular way of protecting homes. Brands like Ring, Arlo and Nest sell doorbells that double as home security cameras. When someone rings the doorbell, you can see a live video feed and hear what your visitor is saying. And the camera allows for two-way audio, meaning you can talk to whomever is on your porch.
Having a doorbell security camera can benefit you in a few ways. First, burglars and thieves tend to be discouraged by security alarms. Someone thinking of stealing your package might see the security camera and think again.
Video doorbells can be good deterrents to would-be porch pirates.
Ring
In addition to deterrence, many of these video doorbells come with motion sensors and a notification system, which sends an alert when someone is on your front porch. With AI detection, many can also identify packages and let you know when a package has arrived -- or when a package is suddenly no longer detected -- all seconds after it's happened.
Thanks to how popular these doorbell cameras have become, they're widely available at competitive prices. You can easily find a great one for less than $150.
3. Get your packages delivered to pickup locations
We know it involves an extra trip, but because you can't always be home for a package arrival, arranging for a pickup location instead works well -- especially for more expensive items.
For example, when you order from Amazon, you have the option to choose a pickup location instead of your address, including any available Amazon Lockers, Amazon Counters at participating locations and UPS AccessPoints. Other carriers have their own nearby hubs where you can arrange for pickup too.
Plan a trip when you're out on your daily errands and you can be the one swooping in on your package instead of a porch pirates.
4. Consider buying a porch lockbox
Package lock boxes are a very old solution to a very modern problem.
Felikuk
With porch piracy rates increasing steadily, more people are turning to an old but highly effective answer -- a delivery box for your door like those that Hyve, Adoorn and Keter offer.
When you order an item online, you'll give instructions for the delivery driver to open your porch lockbox. Some have a slot for drivers to drop small items into but require a key to open. Others require a code that you can provide for the delivery driver. The best even offer smart app alerts and remote control over the box.
This type of lockbox isn't necessarily the most affordable option: High-quality lockboxes can easily cost hundreds of dollars. But if you often receive valuable packages or live in an area known for package theft, it might be worth it.
5. Require signature on delivery
In most cases, delivery drivers simply leave packages on porches or at front doors. But that's not the only option. Most companies also give the option to require a signature on delivery. In that case, the driver can't leave the package unless you're there to sign.
This strategy can be inconvenient if you're not often home during the day, and a few missed deliveries can lead to packages being returned to the sender. But for a valuable package, it might be worth waiting to ensure it's not sitting unattended on your porch.
Read more: The Worst Spots to Install Your Home Security Camera
6. Buy a mailbox sensor
A mailbox sensor is a small device that attaches to your mailbox and notifies you when it's been opened. You can find out when your mail is delivered, as well as if someone is opening your mailbox who shouldn't be.
Mailbox sensors can give you more immediate information regarding your deliveries -- especially for smaller parcels.
Megan Wollerton/CNET
Ring is just one of the companies that offers this product and allows you to pair your mailbox sensor with the rest of your home security system. You can arrange it so that when your mailbox is opened, your doorbell camera or another home security camera begins recording.
When you open the video feed, you'll know if someone is opening your mailbox who shouldn't be. And while you may not be able to stop someone from stealing your package, you'll at least have the video evidence.
7. Make it obvious someone is being recorded
Studies have shown that your home is less likely to be subject to theft if it's clear you have a home security system of some kind. According to data collected by a researcher at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 83% of burglars try to determine whether a house has a home security system. If security is present, 87% would move onto another home.
So how do you make it clear your home is secure and encourage potential thieves to move along? Obvious signs such as security cameras on the exterior of your home can be enough. Many home security companies also provide their customers with signs to place on the front yard.
Kasa's very affordable doorbell can keep an eye on all kinds of front door events.
Kasa
Now there's an obvious caveat: Many porch pirates don't notice or care about home security systems and simply try to move so fast that it won't matter (which is why this step is lowest on our list). But making it clear that you have security cameras or video doorbells that are actively recording people can still help. Some settings allow you to turn up the brightness of indicator lights on video doorbells, for example, so someone can clearly see when it pops on.
For more information on protecting your home against burglars and thieves, visit our list of the best home security systems. And if you're looking for home safety tips that go beyond your front porch, check out this guide to prevent car break-ins and these tips for improving your home security now.
Don't miss any of CNET's unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add us as a preferred Google source on Chrome.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Equity Indexes Close Mostly Lower as Technology Weighs, Home Depot Results Support Dow
US equity indexes ended mixed on Tuesday as a drop in the so-called Magnificent 7 stocks pushed tech Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nexstar's $3.5B Power Grab: The Local TV Takeover That Could Rewrite Broadcast History
After years of industry head-fakes, Nexstar Media Group (NASDAQ:NXST) is finally pulling the triggeracquiring Tegna for $3.5 billion in cash, or $22 a share. That's a 44% premium from where Tegna was trading in early August, when whispers of the deal first surfaced. The all-in transaction value comes to $6.2 billion when debt and fees are stacked in, making this one of the largest broadcast rollups in recent memory. If it closes, Nexstar could control stations reaching 80% of U.S. homesa scale that would've been unthinkable under prior FCC rules. But in July, a key appeals court nuked the long-standing top four ownership cap, opening the floodgates for moves just like this. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Signs with NXST. Tegna's stock jumped as much as 4.8% to $21.14 after the announcementjust shy of the deal price, signaling market confidence in the close. The deal marks a comeback bid for Tegna, whose earlier $5.4 billion sale to Standard General imploded under regulatory pressure. Now the question shifts to whether this administration is willing to greenlight a megamerger that effectively consolidates swaths of the U.S. broadcast landscape. Nexstar says it already has financing lined up from multiple banks and expects to close the deal in the second half of 2026, pending regulatory and shareholder approvals. Behind the scenes, Sinclair had also reportedly courted Tegna. But in a dramatic reversal of roles, Nexstaronce the seller of 11 stations to Tegna in 2019 for $740 millionis now the heavyweight. Its market cap now towers at 6x Sinclair's. The strategic logic? Scale buys time. As audiences shrink and ad dollars chase TikTok and YouTube, owning more local stationsand the retransmission fees that come with themcould help Nexstar weather the storm. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US Eyes Non-Governance Role in Intel
00:00 Is this a good thing for Intel? It's a life saver. They were on an unclear path before the government decided to renegotiate its deal. Let's not forget that the U.S. government already had a deal with Intel. It's we're going to give you $6 billion and we're going to get a colored profit share down the line. What this administration is doing is just renegotiating the deal. It's saying that's not good enough. We want to take an equity stake. And by the way, Intel is different because part of this deal is a big Department of Defense component. Let's not forget, we're we're going to want Intel to manufacture chips for our F-35 and other important weapons systems. So the government has a different type of relationship, for instance, than it does with TSMC, where we're just talking about making chips for data centers. So the government renegotiated the deal and now when it's done that it's not a coincidence that Lee Boutin can go to his friend, his son, and say, okay, this is the time for SoftBank to invest as well and maybe line up some arm demand for those 14 chips down the line. I'm so interested in the ARM architecture side of this. How do you see these working hand in hand going forward? How more cemented could a relationship become? Well, clearly, it could be part of the deal. And more importantly for Intel, as of a week ago, they had no customers for a for the 14 architecture. And they said they may not even proceed with it. Now, they might have one lined up. Let's not forget, the Department of Defense is a customer that's now more likely to be lined up for that, and then they can go and talk to the other companies. And even if the government doesn't have it doesn't go ahead and twist some arms, let's not forget. And Nvidia has committed half a trillion dollars of investment in the US. So can the government now can President Trump call Jensen Huang and say, Hey, this is part of how I want to see the investment play out. I need for you to be a customer of 14. That's not inconceivable at this point. And again, remember, this is national security. So the rules of the game change. Once we say this is national security, the rules of the game are often blurred by frenemy lines. Gil And what's so interesting is Masa has had a long term relationship with the CEO of In Video. Of course, Jensen Huang. But also in some ways wants to build a competing architecture in some ways. What's the take on NVIDIA in terms of A.I. chips? Could he do that with Intel's help? It's one way for him to participate in an even more broad fashion in the growth of AI, which he's doing now. He he regrets selling in video when he did. He's buying some of it back, but he's also making a set of other investments in air infrastructure. Let's not forget, Stargate is probably the the flag bearer of of his effort combining with open A.I. and Oracle to build again at least $100 billion worth of datacentre capacity. And for that it would make sense to diversify and not only buy in video chips. Now that's going to take a while. And Nvidia not only has a lead, but continues to extend its lead every year. But it does make sense for for him and for other companies to try to diversify away from in video. What's interesting is how a lot, Nic, the commerce secretary had said, look, we will be we confirm that we're looking at taking an equity stake, didn't say how much, but it wouldn't be with a governance role. Now, more broadly, how are you starting to analyze companies that are getting closer and closer to the US government and how much well, is it interference or is it positive help that is being led by a US government here? Well, the U.S. government has an ability to to make to give preferential treatment to some of these companies to to change the rules of the road. And it wants equity participation when it does that. And again, it's not doing it broadly. It's doing it when it's a matter of national security. Let's not forget, it's already very involved with Nvidia. It's limiting their chip sales to China. It's already very involved with open air. This may be quiet, but it's pretty safe to assume the Department of Defense gets briefs from open air very frequently about where the models are. So the government is involved because it's national security. In Intel's case, it's a matter of if this is this century's nuclear arsenal, we need somebody to make the shell casings domestically. We have. We can't have a Taiwanese company and a Korean company make our shell casings for our nuclear arsenal. So in Intel's case, it's a much deeper involvement. And I wouldn't be surprised if there are if there is input into where the investments go, what the governance is, even if it's not explicit.
