Shinnecock Nation Asserts Fishing Rights in Long Island Waters
The case, Silva v. Farrish, now before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, could have significant implications for tribal sovereignty and the future of Indigenous-led environmental stewardship in the region.
The Shinnecock Nation argues that their rights to fish in the waters of Long Island, particularly Shinnecock Bay, have never been ceded, relinquished, or extinguished.
Their case contends that, because neither the United States nor the Shinnecock Nation has ever agreed to give up those rights, the State of New York has no authority to criminalize their fishing practices.
'This case is about affirming the continued existence of aboriginal Shinnecock fishing rights that have never been ceded away or extinguished in any manner,' Riley Plumer, attorney for the Shinnecock tribal fishers said in a press release. 'My clients seek to continue exercising their ancestral fishing rights and carry forward Shinnecock traditional ways.'
Never miss Indian Country's biggest stories and breaking news. Click here to sign up to get our reporting sent straight to your inbox every weekday morning.
Support for the Shinnecock comes from national Tribal organizations, including the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) and the United South and Eastern Tribes Sovereignty Protection Fund (USET SPF), both of which filed amicus briefs on May 15, along with the Shinnecock Kelp Farmers.
'For centuries Shinnecock citizens have fished these waters as a rightful lifeway, not a hobby,' NCAI President Mark Macarro said in a press release. 'When states ignore that living history and criminalize traditional harvest, they violate the very principles of Tribal sovereignty on which this Nation was founded.'
The Shinnecock Kelp Farmers, an Indigenous women-led group focused on environmental restoration through sustainable kelp farming, also weighed in, highlighting the connection between Indigenous rights and ecosystem health.
'We have a right to fish, to gather, to hunt, and we never ceded or gave away those rights,' Tela Troge, one of the Kelp Farmers said in a press release.
The Shinnecock have fished, farmed, and stewarded the waters of the Peconic Estuary and Atlantic Ocean for thousands of years. Tribal members continue to rely on those waters for food, cultural practices, and environmental restoration.
'The Shinnecock Indian Nation is an inherently sovereign government that predates the arrival of colonizing forces, and 'Shinnecock's aboriginal fishing rights flow from this inherent sovereignty. Federal Indian law says Shinnecock retains these rights until clearly abrogated by Congress or legally relinquished by the Tribal Nation. USET SPF is proud to stand in support of Shinnecock and its citizens in calling on New York to recognize these inherent rights,' said Kirk Francis, President of USET SPF and Chief of the Penobscot Nation.
However, pollution and state interference have made their efforts harder. Despite these challenges, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has refused to recognize the Nation's fishing rights or work collaboratively to manage local aquatic resources.
About the Author: "Kaili Berg (Aleut) is a member of the Alutiiq\/Sugpiaq Nation, and a shareholder of Koniag, Inc. She is a staff reporter for Native News Online and Tribal Business News. Berg, who is based in Wisconsin, previously reported for the Ho-Chunk Nation newspaper, Hocak Worak. She went to school originally for nursing, but changed her major after finding her passion in communications at Western Technical College in Lacrosse, Wisconsin. "
Contact: kberg@indiancountrymedia.com
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
‘Time for action is now'; Mi'kmaq chiefs want to restart negotiations about on-reserve poverty
Some Nova Scotia Chiefs and negotiators held a press conference earlier this week to call on the Canadian Prime Minister to get a team back to the negotiating table for talks about distressingly low rates of social assistance for clients living on reserves in the province. They met in Eskasoni and included presentations by, left to right, Chief Leroy Denny of Eskasoni; Chief John Leonard Bernard of We'koqma'q; and Canadian Senator J.P. Prosper. ROSEMARY GODIN/Cape Breton Post Potlotek Chief Wilbert Marshall endorses bringing the federal government and Nova Scotia Mi'kmaq back to the negotiating table to discuss inequality between social assistance rates. Extreme poverty and government inaction were the focus Tuesday when several First Nations Chiefs and Senator Paul Prosper met before media in Eskasoni to make a direct appeal to Prime Minister Mark Carney. The chiefs called for Indigenous rights, self-determination and upholding laws and agreements already in place to be honoured as a way of eliminating inequality and insufficiency in social assistance rates between Mi'kmaq living on or off reserves. A single person who is not a homeowner living on-reserve receives $185.32 bi-weekly in assistance, which amounts to less than $14 per day. Someone living off-reserve receives $644 monthly. Neither amount is sufficient, the leaders agreed, but right now they are asking for equality. Eskasoni Chief Leroy Denny read a statement on behalf of Mi'kmaq social assistance recipients and their families in Nova Scotia. 'Since 2015, we have worked closely with Canada on preparations for our communities to resume the jurisdiction and control of our on-reserve social assistance program,' he said. 'In one month, it will be one year since Canada promised they were committed to addressing adequate resourcing at the Indigenous Service Canada On–Reserve Income Assistance Program.' PEOPLE ARE SUFFERING Denny said there have been negotiations on and off, as well as costly court orders for over a decade. In the meantime, people are suffering and living far below the poverty line. He said it affects people's mental health and well-being. 'Indigenous Services Canada delegates management responsibility to Mi'kmaq band councils in Nova Scotia to deliver its National On-Reserve Income Assistance Program. That federal program is required to be comparable with the Nova Scotia Income Assistance Program, but is not,' said Denny. He said the Mi'kmaq, Canada and Nova Scotia had been negotiating a self-governance agreement for social assistance on reserves since November 2021, but Canada halted negotiations last November after the Mi'kmaq submitted a plan based on provincial comparability. Now, the chiefs see a shift in government priorities away from poverty issues despite a 2019 Poverty Reduction Act brought in by the Liberal government of the time. It appears to have been put in the background by the Carney government's new 'Building Canada Act', also known as Bill C-5. The Building Canada Act was made into law earlier this year and is designed to streamline the approval process for major infrastructure projects. Yet discussions and agreements about poverty issues in First Nation communities have been ongoing since 1964. Canadian Indigenous leaders met with Prime Minister Mark Carney in mid-July in Gatineau, Que., to discuss the lack of consultation with Indigenous communities around the enactment of Bill C-5, which essentially puts infrastructure and building projects under the jurisdiction of a single minister and department to issue permits and approvals. Although provisions were made for addressing First Nation's environmental concerns, communities are fearful that their rights and generational wisdom may not be a priority. 'FRACTION OF RESOURCES' Independent Senator Prosper, a lawyer and former Chief of Paqtnkek Mi'kmaw Nation, accompanied the chiefs at the table on Tuesday. 'There's a distinct need to address poverty within Mi'kmaq communities and all First Nation communities,' he said. 'For far too long First Nations had to manage poverty with a fraction of the resources that exist within all reserves in Nova Scotia. A self-government agreement would deliver much-needed income to support programming at a level comparable to what Nova Scotians receive today.' The senator said he has advocated for poverty-reduction initiatives and included them as part of his pre-Fall budget submission, which he is about to hand in. 'Mi'kmaq leaders are asking for basic human and legal rights – the ability to access poverty-reducing income supports comparable to what other Canadians can access off-reserve.' 'Time for talk is over,' he said. 'Time for action is now. That's why I'm here.' Chief John Leonard Bernard of We'koqma'q said they are trying to end an intergenerational formula from the past that has been forced upon Indigenous people for many years. 'We can do this ourselves,' Bernard said. 'Our chiefs and councils have been governing in our own ways and with our own government structures that we created and feel are right for our own people.' 'We want to negotiate in good faith. We want to negotiate as partners. Our goal is to eliminate poverty.' FAIRNESS SOUGHT Chief Wilbert Marshall of Potlotek (Chapel Island) First Nation was succinct in his remarks. He lamented the fact that court orders and continual negotiations have a financial cost. 'We know our stuff,' Marshall said. 'We weren't born yesterday. Just listen. We just want you to be fair, that's all.' James Michael, the co-lead negotiator for the Mi'kmaq bands said: 'The rule of law is a guiding principle Canadians expect all governments to respect and adhere to. Unfortunately, Canada has not been consistent following the rule of law in matters of poverty reduction for Mi'kmaq individuals and families living on reserve in Nova Scotia.' Michael said Canada is still not in compliance with its own 1964 Treasury Board policy to align assistance rates between on- and off-reserve clients. 'On behalf of our social assistance clients and their families, we're calling on Prime Minister Carnie to re-start formal negotiations with our bands to complete the Mi'kmaq/Canada financial relationship in the sectoral self-government agreement,' said Denny. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
Playbook PM: Trump's last-minute tariff hurdles
Presented by THE CATCH-UP TRADE WARS: There are just hours to go before President Donald Trump's deadline for scores of countries to strike trade deals with the U.S. or face steep tariffs. The president has managed to bend many trading partners to his will with lopsided (if vaguely sketched) agreements — and largely sidestepped, so far, the negative economic fallout that experts had predicted. But as the clock ticks down, Trump's protectionist agenda is also facing some fresh headwinds. Inflation nation: The Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, a crucial inflation data point and the Fed's preferred metric, rose to 2.6 percent annually in June, per Bloomberg. That was up from 2.4 percent in May and a tick higher than economists expected. And it indicates that the fallout from Trump's tariffs is starting to push up prices for American consumers, even before his most sweeping levies take effect. Inflation remaining stubborn even as the labor market cools will make the central bank's task more difficult. In the courts: At the same time, Trump's tariff regime faces a serious legal threat. Federal appellate judges today sounded dubious of the administration's arguments that Trump has the authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, per CNBC's Kevin Breuninger and Dan Mangan. Judges pointed out that the law doesn't mention tariffs and that Trump is claiming essentially unbounded power to declare an emergency and impose tariffs, regardless of legal restrictions on his authority. The U.S. Court of International Trade has already struck down Trump's tariffs, but that decision is paused as the legal proceedings — which could go up to the Supreme Court — play out on the merits. Not so firm: After Trump insisted there would be no extensions of his Aug. 1 deadline, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum managed to secure one nonetheless. The two leaders spoke this morning, and Trump announced afterward that the U.S.-Mexico status quo will be extended another 90 days to allow for more in-depth talks. That means 25 percent tariffs on Mexican cars and 50 percent tariffs on Mexican metals will remain in place, but Mexico avoids broader 30 percent tariffs that were due to take effect tomorrow. Trump said Mexico agreed to lower trade barriers. Still struggling for deals: South Africa's trade minister said the country was trying one more last-minute offer to reach a deal and avoid 30 percent tariffs, per Reuters. And Indian PM Narendra Modi's government is reeling from Trump's hard line on tariffs despite Modi's efforts to build a relationship with him, NYT's Mujib Mashal reports from New Delhi. The devil in the details: For industry, the specifics of how the tariffs will be implemented remain a question mark, with companies eagerly waiting for the fine print and struggling with chaos in the meantime, Bloomberg's Laura Curtis reports. And there's a corresponding lack of detail on foreign countries' pledges to make big investments in the U.S. and buy American natural gas. Also happening today: Trump will meet with Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon to talk about the economy and geopolitics, Bloomberg's Todd Gillespie and Josh Wingrove report. Good Thursday afternoon. Thanks for reading Playbook PM. Drop me a line at eokun@ 9 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW 1. FITNESS FOR OFFICE: The Presidential Fitness Test is returning to American public schools. Trump plans to make the announcement as he builds out a presidential sports, fitness and nutrition council in an executive order this afternoon, CNN's Alayna Treene and Kyle Feldscher scooped. He'll be joined at the White House by Harrison Butker, Bryson DeChambeau, Annika Sörenstam, Lawrence Taylor and other pro athletes. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will lead the revival of the fitness challenge, as part of an effort to bolster children's health. 2. THE PEACEMAKER: Trump's involvement was pivotal in getting Thailand and Cambodia to back down from a deadly border clash, Reuters' Panu Wongcha-um and Poppy Mcpherson scooped. It was Trump's call to acting Thai PM Phumtham Wechayachai that managed to break through a deadlock where Malaysian and Chinese efforts had fallen short. (Cambodia had already gotten on board with ceasefire talks.) Trump urged Thailand to meet with Cambodia and threatened to stall progress on trade deals if they didn't stop the conflict. The truce is holding for now, though tensions remain high. 3. NO PEACE HERE: As Gaza's humanitarian catastrophe worsens, special envoy Steve Witkoff is in Israel for talks, but Trump still hasn't gotten Israel and Hamas to agree to a ceasefire. Ninety-one more Palestinians have been killed while trying to get aid within just the past day, the Gaza Health Ministry said, per the AP. But Trump made clear that he places the onus on Hamas: 'The fastest way to end the Humanitarian Crises in Gaza is for Hamas to SURRENDER AND RELEASE THE HOSTAGES!!!' he wrote on Truth Social this morning. And the U.S. slapped new sanctions on Palestinian officials, saying they were obstructing peace, per Reuters. 4. THE CHILLING EFFECT: 'How Trump's crackdown on law firms is undermining legal defenses for the vulnerable,' by Reuters' Mike Spector and colleagues: '[T]he aftershocks threaten lasting damage to America's tradition of mobilizing free lawyers to challenge government actions on behalf of the vulnerable. … Dozens of major law firms, wary of political retaliation, have scaled back pro bono work, diversity initiatives and litigation that could place them in conflict with the Trump administration, a Reuters investigation found. Many firms are making a strategic calculation: withdraw from pro bono work frowned on by Trump, or risk becoming the next target.' 5. STAT OF THE DAY: The number of federal employees who took the Trump administration's deferred resignation offer — and are now getting a salary not to work — is greater than 154,000, WaPo's Meryl Kornfield and colleagues scooped. That's about 6.7 percent of the workforce. They'll leave government at the end of the fiscal or calendar year, a pivotal piece of Trump's drive to significantly shrink the civil service. Critics say this is government inefficiency in action, though the administration argues that it will save money on salary costs in the long run. 6. WHAT HAPPENED AT CECOT: ''Welcome to hell': Inside the mega prison where the U.S. deported migrants,' by WaPo's Samantha Schmidt and colleagues: '[Sixteen] Venezuelans, rounded up in President Donald Trump's mass deportation campaign, told The Post they were subjected to repeated beatings that left them bruised, bleeding or injured. They said prison staff restricted medical care for detainees suffering from diabetes, high blood pressure or kidney failure.' The Salvadoran government didn't respond for comment. One attorney said this 'may have violated U.N. conventions against torture,' and an international jurist said the International Criminal Court should investigate. 7. GOING NUCLEAR: Amid clashes with Democrats over stalling tactics to confirm Trump's picks, more and more Senate Republicans want to use a nuclear option to limit debate time for nominees, Semafor's Burgess Everett scooped. Regardless of whether the parties reach a deal to confirm some nominees before the August recess, the GOP could go there in the fall, as Trump and Republican senators grow frustrated with the hold-ups. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Republicans would prefer to make rules changes with Democrats, with considering nominations en bloc as one potential idea, per POLITICO's Jordain Carney. 8. 2026 WATCH: Gallup has more data confirming the strange contradiction for the Democratic Party these days: More Americans consider themselves Democrats or Dem-leaning than Republican/GOP-leaning for the first time in more than a year. But at the same time, perceptions of the Democratic Party have hit a record low, and Americans believe the GOP is better suited to bring changes the U.S. needs. At the same time, Americans for Prosperity is launching a $6 million ad campaign to promote the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, POLITICO's Andrew Howard scooped. Golden State warriors: In the end, Kamala Harris opted against a California gubernatorial run for the simple reason that her 'heart wasn't in it,' POLITICO's Melanie Mason reports. With Harris out, the Democratic primary is now wide open — and our California Playbook colleagues Dustin Gardiner and Blake Jones break down where it stands at the outset. Former Rep. Katie Porter could be a top beneficiary of Harris' decision, having performed strongly in some initial polling. But many other contenders, including Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, could mount strong bids, and Rick Caruso remains a wild card. 9. SIGN OF THE TIMES: The country's beliefs about race and diversity look significantly different now than during the 2020 racial reckoning, AP's Terry Tang and Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux report from a new AP/NORC center survey. 'The new poll finds 45% of U.S. adults think Black people face high levels of discrimination, down from 60% in the spring of 2021. There was a similar drop in views about the prevalence of serious discrimination against Asian people, which fell from 45% in the 2021 poll … to 32% … [L]ess than half of Americans think DEI has a benefit for the people it's intended to help.' TALK OF THE TOWN Josh Hawley said Donald Trump opposed his stock trading ban because other senators told him the bill would make him sell Mar-a-Lago. BOOK CLUB — Kamala Harris is publishing a memoir, '107 Days,' about her abbreviated presidential campaign, per AP's Hillel Italie. Simon & Schuster is putting the book out Sept. 23. In an announcement video, Harris said, 'I've spent a lot of time reflecting on those days and with candor and reflection, I've written a behind-the-scenes account of that journey.' Harris will also appear on 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' tonight for her first interview since leaving office, per POLITICO's Melanie Mason. PLAYBOOK METRO SECTION — 'Sneaking Into the Spy Museum's New Vault,' by NYT's Sopan Deb: 'For years, the more than 10,000 items in the International Spy Museum's collection were stored at a location outside Washington. That changed this summer.' OUT AND ABOUT — Mike Davis and Otto and Mia Heck hosted a celebration honoring newly confirmed U.S. Circuit Judge Emil Bove last night at Butterworth's. SPOTTED: Sarah Samis, Sens. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.), Todd and Kristine Blanche, Chad Mizelle, John Sauer, Elliot Gaiser, Jeanine Pirro, Aakash Singh, Ed Martin, Brendan Chestnut, Paul Perkins, David Warrington, Sergio Gor, Gineen Bresso, Steve and Gabi Kenny, Gary Lawkowski, Jacob Reses, Sean Cooksey, Mark and Tricia Paoletta, Jeff Clark, Andrew Ferguson, Gary Barnett, Lucas Croslow, Brendan Carr, Megan Owen, Jennifer and Nick Davis, Ryan Giles, Katie and Bill Lane, Laura Ingraham, Steve Bannon, Jack Posobiec, Alex Swoyer, Caroline Wren, Rachel Brand and Jonathan Cohn, Jill Kozeny, Jason Van Beek, Kat Nikas, Michael Thielen, Bill McGinley, Don McGahn, Rob Luther, James Burnham, Derek and Liz Lyons, Will Levi, Rob Zink and Lanny Davis. TRANSITIONS — Goldman Sachs' top lobbyist, Michael Paese, is leaving the role and will be a senior adviser to the firm, as Republican Michael Thompson replaces him as chief global lobbyist, Bloomberg's Todd Gillespie reports. … Melissa Winter will be a senior adviser to the Obamas' family foundation as the Obama Presidential Center gets ready to open, POLITICO's Shia Kapos reports. She previously was the longtime chief of staff for Michelle Obama. … Raffetto Herman Strategic Communications has added Pheniece Jones as a principal consultant and Christiaan Brown as an SVP. Jones most recently was VP and head of media at the Curley Company. Brown previously was VP of corporate comms and brand at Accolade. Send Playbookers tips to playbook@ or text us on Signal here. Playbook couldn't happen without our editor Zack Stanton, deputy editor Garrett Ross and Playbook Podcast producer Callan Tansill-Suddath.
4 hours ago
What to know about Trump's trade feud with India
President Donald Trump on Thursday sharply criticized India over its trade policy, escalating a series of attacks as the White House readies to ratchet up tariffs on the country. The Trump administration plans to slap 25% tariffs on Indian products and impose additional penalties starting on Friday, the president said on social media. The incendiary rhetoric toward India comes as Trump also prepares to impose new levies on dozens of other countries. The White House has faulted India for high tariffs that Trump views as an effort to shut out U.S. producers. In recent days, Trump has also condemned India over its decision to continue purchasing Russian oil throughout the Russia-Ukraine war. India's tariffs are 'far too high, among the highest in the World,' Trump said on social media. In a statement on Wednesday, the Indian government said it had 'taken note' of Trump's comment and would 'study its implications.' Here's what to know about the U.S.-India trade feud and why it matters: Where does Trump's trade feud with India stand? Trump is set to hike tariffs on India to 25% on Friday, putting them one percentage point below the level of levies threatened in a Rose Garden ceremony on April 2. A 25% tariff would set levies with India at a higher rate than the 15% tariffs placed on the European Union and Japan as part of recent trade agreements. The threatened tariff on India would come in slightly below 30% tariffs slapped on China in May. The proposed levies may complicate ongoing trade negotiations between the U.S. and India, which have sought to reach an agreement over multiple rounds of discussions spanning months. India, the 12th-largest U.S. trade partner, has become a destination for some manufacturers that shifted production away from China in recent years. In May, Apple CEO Tim Cook said the company had moved production of iPhones sold in the U.S. to India as a means of avoiding high tariffs. Overall trade in goods between India and the U.S. last year amounted to about $129 billion, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, or OTR, found. Top imports from India include apparel, chemicals, machinery and agricultural products. Why is Trump targeting India? In recent months, Trump has repeatedly criticized India for elevated tariffs on a range of products, including agricultural and dairy goods. 'We have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high,' Trump said in a social media post on Wednesday. India has sought to protect its domestic industries with elevated tariffs on some goods, including levies exceeding 100%. The U.S. ran a trade deficit in goods of about $45 billion in 2024, which marked a 5.4% increase over the previous year, according to the OTR. By comparison, the U.S. notched a far larger trade deficit with China of $295 billion last year. More recently, Trump has taken issue with India's decision to continue buying Russian oil over the course of the Russia-Ukraine war. India is 'Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE,' Trump said on social media on Wednesday. How has India responded to Trump's threats? In a statement this week, the Indian government struck a measured but firm tone in response to Trump. 'India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months,' the Indian government said on Wednesday. 'We remain committed to that objective.' 'The Government will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest,' the statement added.
