
People's Select Committee: Thousands Of Care And Support Workers Cannot Wait For Justice
The PSA, E tū and New Zealand Nurses Organisation, Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa (NZNO) will speak on key recommendations for the sector, including reversing the Government's recent amendments, sustainable settlement funding, and broader sector reform to properly reflect the value of care and support work.
Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi Assistant Secretary, Melissa Woolley, says care and support workers were shocked and aggrieved when the Government rushed through changes to pay equity overnight.
"They were further insulted when it came to light in the past few weeks that ministers had worked to deliberately conceal the changes they were making and this was a deliberate attempt to stop the care and support workers claim because of the cost. It was also revealed that the contingency from the funded sector was gone," Woolley says.
"We are incredibly thankful that Marilyn Waring and everyone else behind the scenes at the People's Select Committee have provided this opportunity for us to formally consult on pay equity for care and support workers.
"Care and support have been waiting far too long for pay equity, and to be recognised as highly skilled workers who provide real value to their communities," says Woolley who is a former care and support worker herself and joint unions pay equity negotiator.
"The Government's changes to pay equity were a kick in the guts for these workers who are now largely on the minimum wage or close to it. They should not, and cannot, bear the brunt of bad political decisions," Woolley says.
NZNO President Anne Daniels says NZNO was one of the unions who have worked on Care and Support workers' pay equity for many years, including the 2017 Support Workers Settlement.
"We continue to work with our sister unions to see pay justice done for our 6,500 Care and Support members.
"These workers are the backbone of a caring society. Our members worked tirelessly for decades to have their mahi recognised and their skills, knowledge and responsibilities properly valued through the pay equity process.
"Care and Support workers and their whānau shouldn't have to make do with less because of this Government's shameful attack on women. They deserve fair pay for their hard mahi," Daniels says.
The 65,000 care and support workers in New Zealand have been waiting for their pay equity claim to be renewed since 2022. Their original settlement, won in 2017 by worker and E tū delegate Kristin Bartlett, expired after five years in place and has since been eroded by inflation.
E tū National Secretary Rachel Mackintosh says care and support workers are some of the lowest-paid workers in the health system, doing some of our most important work.
"The Government's refusal to deliver pay equity is a political decision to save money at the expense of women, migrants, and our most vulnerable.
"This legislation was meant to finally address very well-known discrimination based on gender. It followed the Supreme Court decision in favour of Kristine Bartlett which was a watershed moment for pay equity. Ripping this away from workers is a clear signal that they do not value women, nor any workers in women-dominated industries.
"Workers, their unions, and the wider community are completely fired up about this, and we will not sit down and quietly accept this discrimination. We'll keep fighting for pay equity - and we will win it," Mackintosh says.
The combined PSA, NZNO and E tū submission details the timeline of the care and support worker pay equity claim, which involved thousands of hours of work between workers, unions, and employers.
"Thanks to the Government's retrospective legislation, all the work that went into the pay equity claim is now in the bin, and care and support workers cannot raise a new claim until 2027," Woolley says.
"This arbitrary and cruel delay is just one reason why we're recommending to the People's Select Committee that the amendments to the Equal Pay Act should go.
"Our other recommendations are focused on the other changes to the Act: the much higher bar to prove the merit of the pay equity claim, the restrictions on finding comparators, and the fact that employers can opt out of the process without giving a reason.
"Our view is that these changes are designed to make the care and support pay equity impossible to achieve," Woolley says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
40 minutes ago
- Scoop
Government Moves To Strip Protections For Water Quality
The Environmental Law Initiative says last-minute Government amendments would gut core protections for New Zealand's rivers, lakes, and streams. Minister Chris Bishop today released an amendment to the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill, consisting of changes that were never scrutinised by a Select Committee. "They include sweeping changes to section 70 of the Resource Management Act that will make it easier for polluters to continue damaging our most degraded waterways — and to start degrading clean ones," says ELI's Senior Researcher, Anna Sintenie. For decades, New Zealand law has set clear bottom lines for water quality — limits on oil slicks, foams, scums, suspended materials, colour changes, odour, farm animal drinking safety, and harm to aquatic life. The new amendments would: Allow regional councils to permit ongoing pollution where rivers are already degraded, including where there, conspicuous colour changes, or rendering of water that unsafe for livestock drinking. Completely remove the prohibition on discharges that create floatable or suspended materials, enabling councils to allow new pollution even in pristine waters. 'These are not minor tweaks — they are the removal of safeguards that have been in place for decades, and developed over generations,' says Sintenie. 'Where pollution has gone too far, the answer is to fix the pollution, not change the law so it becomes legal.' Industry lobby groups, including DairyNZ and Federated Farmers, previously asked for these changes during the Select Committee process, and were turned down. The Government is now handing them back these concessions at the eleventh hour, without public scrutiny. 'It is a conspicuous example of how far vested interests are controlling this Government. 'This is not democracy, and it is certainly not law making for the public good.' says Sintenie. The amendments to section 70 apply to proposed plans notified before, on, or after amendment comes into effect, including plans that are subject of an appeal and or ongoing court proceedings. ELI has taken a series of legal proceedings tackling what is says is unlawful allowances of nitrogen pollution to freshwater. 'The Government has introduced an amendment that will lock in pollution in some of our dirtiest rivers and open the door to new degradation elsewhere. "New Zealanders expect their government to protect freshwater, not weaken the rules to appease polluters,' says Sintenie.

1News
8 hours ago
- 1News
Plan to seize Gaza City tipped Australia's hand on state recognition
Israel's plan to take over Gaza City helped spur Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state, the Prime Minister has revealed. Anthony Albanese on Monday confirmed Australia would join the UK, France and Canada in recognising Palestine at a United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York in September, following mounting pressure to take action to support the suffering people of Gaza. While the Federal Government had previously insisted that the recognition of Palestine was a matter of "when, not if", the announcement was a shift from those comments made less than two weeks prior. This was because Australia's decision was partially fuelled by the Israeli Government's decision on Friday to approve a plan to seize Gaza City, Albanese said. "We make assessments based upon the totality of what is before us," he told reporters in Melbourne on Tuesday. ADVERTISEMENT "The other thing that is occurring is... the decision by the Israeli Government to double down on its military solution... with the decision that they've made to go in and to occupy Gaza City. "We have seen too many innocent lives being lost. "The international community is saying that we need to stop the cycle of violence." In late July, Albanese stressed he would not be "driven by a time frame" on the recognition issue. But less than a week later, Foreign Minister Penny Wong revealed Australia was co-ordinating with other countries on the issue amid concerns "there will be no Palestine left to recognise". Recognition could be used to "isolate Hamas" — a line the Government has continued to lean on — she added, referring to the designated terrorist group that controlled Gaza and was in a fight to the death with Israel. Senator Wong has said practical steps for recognition would be tied to commitments made by the Palestinian Authority, which exercised partial civil control in the West Bank. ADVERTISEMENT The commitments included assurances that Hamas would play no role in any future government. More than 140 of the 193 United Nations member states already recognised Palestine. Australia Palestine Advocacy Network president Nasser Mashni has warned recognition was "nothing but a veneer that allows Israel to continue brutalising Palestinians". Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the decision "does not deliver a two-state solution, it does not improve the flow of aid, it doesn't support the release of the hostages and it certainly doesn't put an end to the terrorist group Hamas". Former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison, whose government controversially recognised West Jerusalem as Israel's capital before Labor reversed the decision, branded any recognition of Palestine as a "hollow gesture". The crisis in Gaza began when Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1200 people and taking about 250 hostage. Israel's military response has since killed more than 61,000 people, according to Gaza's health authorities. ADVERTISEMENT French President Emmanuel Macron praised Australia's decision. But Israel said recognition would be counterproductive to peace in the Gaza Strip and its demands for the release of the remaining hostages. More than two million Palestinians faced severe food insecurity, based on UN projections. Israel has denied the Gazan population was suffering or dying from starvation, even though it throttled the flow of aid to Gaza for months, international human rights groups have said.

RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
The House: Bills this week
Debating Chamber in Parliament Photo: RNZ / Diego Opatowski After a week off, MPs are back in the capital for a two-week sitting block, in which a smorgasbord of bills are scheduled to be debated. To make up time, there is another extended sitting on Thursday morning from 9 am (earlier than the normal 2pm start). Parliament's agenda this week is a hodgepodge of bills at different stages in their legislative journey. Let's start with the new bills. The first bit of Government business up for the week is the Regulatory Systems (Internal Affairs) Amendment Bill, which the House got its first go at debating last week, before the first reading was interrupted with five speeches still remaining. Regulatory Systems Amendment Bills are omnibus bills, which means they amend a suite of relevant legislation rather than just a single Act. They are a way for government agencies (in this case, Internal Affairs) to make small technical changes to regulatory systems that those agencies oversee. For Internal Affairs, these include things like gambling; births, deaths and marriages; and censorship of objective material. The bill has the tentative support of the opposition Labour and Green parties, with Te Pāti Māori yet to speak on the bill. The Antisocial Road Use Legislation Amendment Bill aims to discourage road users from participating in, as the name of the bill suggests, 'antisocial' conduct while operating a vehicle. This could include intimidating convoys, boy-racer meet-ups, fleeing from police, or dirt-bike gatherings, which are apparently becoming more common. Tuesday's first reading is the first chance the public gets to hear what MPs have to say about it. The final first reading of the week is the Constitution Amendment Bill, which is the less contentious bill relating to elections in recent weeks. This bill follows a recommendation from both the Electoral Commission and the Justice Committee (from their inquiry into the 2023 General Election), to remove the '28 day rule' - the period in which Ministers of the Crown can continue to remain in office even after they cease to be MPs (at the close of polling day). In the unlikely event of a delayed return of the writ (the official election results), this change would allow continuity of Government. The Public Works (Critical Infrastructure) Amendment Bill is back in the House after being examined by the Transport and Infrastructure Committee for just shy of three months. It seeks to simplify the process whereby the Crown, local authorities, and network utility operators acquire land for 'critical' infrastructure projects that fall under either Schedule 2 of the Fast-Track Approvals Act 2024, or the list of Roads of National Significance. During the first reading, Labour cautiously lent its support to the Bill, while the Greens and Te Pāti Māori voted against it, citing concerns about Māori and other land owners potentially having fewer rights to appeal an acquisition. The Customs (Levies and Other Matters) Amendment Bill is an omnibus bill that intends to improve the collection of revenue from goods crossing our borders. It would replace the current fee-based regime with a levy payment system. Customs Minister Casey Costello said the change would "provide a more balanced approach that reflects the risks and costs that classes of levy payers create". Being quite an esoteric, technical change, it's relatively uncontroversial. The second reading debate of the Crimes (Countering Foreign Interference) Amendment Bill will pick up from where it left off, with nine speeches remaining. The bill addresses gaps in criminal law concerning foreign interference intended to harm New Zealand. Spy novel ideas like treason, and inciting mutiny or espionage-all on behalf of foreign actors-would be introduced as new offences. Only the Green Party voted against the Bill at its first reading, although Te Pāti Māori were absent for the vote. The Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill is the second of the government's three-phased approach to replacing the Resource Management Act. This Bill would make changes in the areas of infrastructure and energy, housing growth, farming and the primary sector, natural hazards and emergencies, seeking to streamline consenting and investment. Wellingtonians in particular may also be interested to hear that it streamlines the listing and delisting of heritage buildings. In fact, the Minister in Charge of the Bill, Chris Bishop, said an amendment paper would be put forward during the committee stage this week that would specifically make the demolition of the Gordon Wilson Flats on The Terrace a permitted activity. While the RMA was well-intentioned, most MPs agree that over time it became unfit for purpose. Opinion diverges over what to replace it with (this being the second attempt in two Parliaments). Labour supported this bill to committee, albeit with reservations. The Greens and Te Pāti Māori reckon this isn't the right approach to RMA reform - expect opposition filibustering practitioners to try and drag this one out. The Local Government (Water Services) Amendment Bill will resume its committee stage this week. The Bill is part of the scrapping of the sixth Labour Government's Three Waters policy, and sets up a new regulatory framework for water services delivery. All three opposition parties are against the bill, with the House still yet to debate parts 4 and 5. Interestingly, the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Bill is collaborative in that it was introduced by the previous government, and continued by the current one. It aims to promote the restoration of the Hauraki Gulf, which has been facing recent ecological decline. Te Pāti Māori did not support the Bill at its second reading. The Privacy Amendment Bill reaches the end of its legislative journey on Thursday, with nine speeches to go in its third and final reading. It has unanimous support. It seeks to improve public transparency regarding the gathering of private information, notably requiring agencies to notify someone when it collects their personal information indirectly. The Leader of the House's office also intends to get to the third reading of the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill this week following Tuesday evening's committee stage, which they hope will be completed before the House adjourns. RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, its legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.