Ukraine downs Russian guided bomb near Zaporizhzhia, Air Force says
Ukrainian forces shot down a Russian guided aerial bomb near the front-line southern city of Zaporizhzhia on Feb. 7, Air Force spokesperson Yurii Ihnat told Interfax-Ukraine.
Guided aerial bombs (KABs), while having a shorter range than missiles, are cheaper to produce and are launched from aircraft within Russian territory or Russian-occupied territories, beyond the reach of Ukrainian air defense.
They are nearly impossible to shoot down because they have heavy iron structures, and come in extremely fast from high altitudes, unlike cruise missiles or drones, according to experts.
According to Ihnat, it was not the first time Ukraine downed a guided bomb.
"To counter this threat, we need a comprehensive approach — both the use of ground-based air defense and aviation components to drive the carriers of these KABs as far as possible," the spokesperson said, without specifying how the target was shot down.
His remarks came after Telegram channels reported that Ukrainian soldiers had down the guided aerial bomb on the morning of Feb. 7, allegedly using experimental weaponry.
Russia regularly attacks Ukrainian front-line settlements with guided bombs. Over the past week, a total of 760 such bombs were launched at Ukraine, President Volodymyr Zelensky said.
According to the U.N. Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, Russian glide bombs killed 360 Ukrainian civilians in 2024, and injured 1,861, a threefold increase in fatalities, and a sixfold increase in injuries compared to 2023.
Read also: Russia's primitive glide bombs are still outmatching Ukraine's air defenses, killing more civilians
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Let Trump and Musk ‘fight for a while'
President Trump recently compared the Russo-Ukrainian war to a quarrel between children in a playground. 'Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy,' he said. 'They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don't want to be pulled, sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while.' The comparison is obscenely inappropriate, of course — reducing Russia's genocidal aggression to 'fighting like crazy' and Ukrainian resistance to complicity in the fisticuffs. To get a sense of how profoundly disturbing the comparison is, apply it to Hitler's 'fight' with Europe's Jews. That said, it's obviously pointless to accuse Trump of historical ignorance or moral obtuseness. Both features define his core of advisors — a cynical analyst might even suggest this is part of their job description. What is less obvious is the fact that the comparison is spot-on with respect to Trump's relations with his newfound frenemy Elon Musk. The Trump-Musk breakup was predictable. The White House isn't big enough for two self-styled geniuses. The form the breakup assumed was equally predictable, at least in retrospect. Mudslinging, slurs and insults are part of each man's rhetorical arsenal. Musk, however, made the most damaging accusation, claiming that Trump was 'in the Epstein files,' a reference to the prominent men named in legal documents linked to Jeffrey Epstein, the high-society millionaire accused of sex-trafficking underage girls for the rich and famous. Like Trump and Vice President JD Vance's coordinated Oval Office ambush of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump's spat with Musk made for 'great television.' It also made for dreadful reality. It is deeply worrisome for two of the most powerful men in the world, on whom the fate of billions of people arguably depends, to behave like playground brats. Children shouldn't be running countries, corporations or departments of government efficiency. But again, this observation is nothing new, having been made thousands of times with no appreciable effect. Unfortunately, the world cannot follow Trump's advice with respect to Russia and Ukraine: 'Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while.' Russia's genocidal war is no children's quarrel. It can be stopped only if Trump's and Steve Witkoff's good friend Vladimir Putin is made to stop it. Walking away and 'letting them fight for a while' isn't just morally obscene. It's also politically suicidal for the world, the U.S. and Russia included. Allowing nations to gain territory through force would open a Pandora's box of instability and war, which, given America's presence in much of the world, will inevitably drag it in. Encouraging Russia to pursue imperialism in its backyard is to involve Putin's realm in fighting for a very long while. But the world can follow Trump's advice with respect to Trump and Musk. The longer and nastier their relations, the worse for both — and the better for America and the world. The spat has revealed the many cracks in Trump's seemingly monolithic administration. After Musk demonstrates that opposition is possible, these cracks will only multiply and grow larger, thereby hamstringing the White House and preventing it from pursuing its revolutionary agenda at home and its counterproductive foreign policy abroad. One could almost sympathize with Trump's movement supporters, were it not for their complicity in Trump's policies. They thought that their omniscient and omnipotent hero was anointed by none other than God. And instead of behaving like an adult missionary, he's behaving like a frustrated toddler. Alexander J. Motyl is a professor of political science at Rutgers University-Newark. A specialist on Ukraine, Russia and the USSR, and on nationalism, revolutions, empires and theory, he is the author of 10 books of nonfiction, as well as 'Imperial Ends: The Decay, Collapse, and Revival of Empires' and 'Why Empires Reemerge: Imperial Collapse and Imperial Revival in Comparative Perspective.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia launched largest drone attack of the war, Ukraine says
Russia launched the largest drone attack of the war in Ukraine on Monday, firing almost 500 drones and missiles overnight according to Kyiv. The massive aerial assault came ahead of a prisoner exchange of hundreds of soldiers between the two countries that began Monday. The swap is the most tangible result of the ongoing negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow, but there are few signs the talks have brought the two parties closer to reaching any long-term settlement to end the war. On the ground, Russian soldiers are preparing 'one last push' to break Ukraine's morale and claim more territory, The Economist reported; Ukrainian soldiers are divided about whether Moscow's forces will be able to break through their heavily fortified lines.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Internet System Elon Musk Installed at the White House Is Causing Concerns
Elon Musk's lackeys at his so-called Department of Government Efficiency installed a Starlink terminal on the roof of the White House — and then totally blew off the major security concerns raised by communications experts, the Washington Post reports. This is the latest example of the security risks arising from DOGE's sweeping access to federal systems, alongside the high-profile blunders made by key figures in Trump's cabinet. According to insiders, it sounds like the White House communications experts were totally circumvented by Musk's group: they were given no notice that DOGE was installing the Starlink terminal — and once the satellite-based internet service was online, they had no way of actually monitoring the connections. When they voiced these concerns, the communications experts were ignored. At one point, things got heated. The installation of the Starlink roof terminal caused a confrontation between DOGE staffers and the Secret Service, according to WaPo. There was a lot for them to complain about. According to WaPo sources, a "Starlink Guest" WiFi network that first appeared in February is still active. It asks only for a password, with no username requirement or other form of authentication. This is not — or at least, shouldn't be — standard practice. Personal phones on a guest network at the White House typically need a username and a password, which are tracked and expire after a week, per WaPo. Starlink's network, by contrast, sounds more like the free Wi-Fi at Starbucks. "Starlink doesn't require anything. It allows you to transmit data without any kind of record or tracking," an insider told WaPo. "White House IT systems had very strong controls on network access. You had to be on a full-tunnel VPN at all times. If you are not on the VPN, White House-issued devices can't connect to the outside." "With a Starlink connection, that means White House devices could leave the network and go out through gateways. … It's going to help you bypass security," another insider told WaPo. Starlink is generally considered more secure than traditional telecommunication networks in the US, according to the reporting. But they're not impenetrable, and security experts aren't relishing the fact that they're being kept in the dark about what data is being transmitted in and out of the White House via the satellite network. It's unclear if the rooftop terminal remains installed, or if anything will change now that Musk has stepped back from his role as a "special government employee." That's a substantial loose end, because Musk has recently demonstrated a legendary petty streak that saw him lash out at Donald Trump and seemingly burn all bridges with the administration. If Musk is willing to threaten to cut off the US government's space access using his company's spacecraft, what else would he be willing to do? We've seen Musk personally intervene in Starlink's operations in the past for political reasons. When the Ukrainian military launched an ambush on the Russian naval fleet stationed near the Crimean coast, the billionaire ordered his engineers to shut down Starlink in the region to disrupt the attack. Starlink did not respond to WaPo's request for comment. The Secret Service said it could not discuss specific technology systems for security reasons. "We were aware of DOGE's intentions to improve internet access on the campus and did not consider this matter a security incident or security breach," Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi told WaPo. More on Elon Musk: Trump Confronted Musk in Private Before Their Blowout Public Fight
