
Victoria to ‘immediately' ban machete sales after shopping centre clash
The sale of machetes will be banned in Victoria from Wednesday, after a clash involving the weapon between alleged rival groups forced Northland shopping centre into lockdown at the weekend.
The premier, Jacinta Allan, on Monday announced the government will use extraordinary powers to fast-track the machete ban, which will remain in place until a permanent law takes effect on 1 September.
Allan described the alleged incident at Northland as 'appalling' and said it was 'unfathomable as to why anyone would want to come in and disrupt families, disrupt retail workers', many of whom were likely young people in part-time jobs.
'It is just unacceptable for this sort of behaviour to be anywhere on any street. But to disrupt people going about their lives on a Sunday afternoon is just unacceptable,' she said.
'In Victoria, community safety comes first. We must never let places we meet become places we fear. I hate these knives, and I will keep introducing as many laws as it takes to get them off our streets, out of our shops and out of our lives.'
'We have moved immediately to strengthen the Australian-first machete ban that we have introduced here in Victoria to choke the supply of these dangerous weapons even further.'
Allan said the government first announced plans to ban machetes in March, but at the time, Victoria police advised that a six-month implementation period was the 'safest' and 'quickest' approach.
'It took the United Kingdom 18 months to bring about a ban on machetes,' she said. 'That was not a time frame that was acceptable to the government.'
She said following Sunday's incident, she was briefed on powers available under Commonwealth consumer laws, which allow a state minister to impose an interim ban on the sale of certain goods.
Consumer affairs minister, Nick Staikos, said it was the first time these powers had been used to ban machetes.
'This is actually the first ban of the sale of machetes anywhere in Australia, and it follows the decision by this government to implement the first ban on the possession of machetes anywhere in Australia,' he said.
'We are using whatever powers we have under Australian consumer law to ban the sale and the supply of machetes immediately.'
The interim ban will come into effect from 12pm Wednesday and applies to machetes broadly defined as 'knives with a cutting blade longer than 20cm'. It does not include knives primarily used in kitchens.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Allan acknowledged it would affect some 'legitimate users' of machetes but said she prioritised community safety above all.
Retailers have been told to remove machetes from shop shelves and store excess stock in a safe location until the amnesty scheme begins on 1 September.
From that date, machetes will be classified as a prohibited weapon in Victoria. Exemptions will be available only for legitimate uses, such as agricultural work.
An amnesty period run from 1 September to 30 November, allowing Victorians to safely surrender machetes at 40 designated police stations across the state without facing penalties.
After the amnesty ends, anyone found in possession of a machete could face up to two years in prison or fines exceeding $47,000.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Australian mushroom cook Erin Patterson to give evidence in her triple murder trial
Erin Patterson will take the stand to give evidence in her own triple murder trial. Colin Mandy SC, Patterson's defence lawyer, called her as the first defence witness on Monday afternoon. Patterson, 50, faces three charges of murder and one charge of attempted murder relating to poisoning her four lunch guests – relatives of her estranged husband, Simon Patterson – with a beef wellington served at her house in Leongatha on 29 July 2023. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to murdering Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and his aunt Heather Wilkinson, and attempting to murder Ian Wilkinson, Simon's uncle and Heather's husband. Lawyers for Patterson say the death cap mushroom poisoning was a tragic and terrible accident. Det Leading Sen Const Stephen Eppingstall, the informant or officer in charge of the investigation, completed his evidence earlier on Monday. He was the last prosecution witness in the trial. More details soon …


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie is praised for booing at UK comedian after 'deeply sickening' joke sparks heated back and forth in front of audience: 'That was extremely insensitive'
An Aussie disability campaigner has been praised after furiously hitting out at an English comedian over a 'deeply sickening' joke about diabetes. Carmen Azzopardi, a type 1 diabetic, was appalled when Paul Foot launched into a ten minute skit on diabetes sufferers during his show at the Moth Club in Hackney, east London, last Wednesday. Ms Azzopardi called out the comedian on stage but Foot hit back and said he disagreed his comments were 'insensitive'. In the ten minute skit, Ms Azzopardi claimed Foot 'made fun of people' who wear continuous glucose monitors - a device diabetics use to keep track of their blood glucose levels. He then mimicked a diabetic having a hypoglycaemic episode by shaking on stage, before suggesting they die after suffering a heart attack. In footage shared on TikTok by Ms Azzopardi, she could be heard booing and calling out the comedian following the skit. 'That was a s*** joke. I have type 1 diabetes, that was extremely insensitive and mis-informative,' she said. Foot hit back and said he didn't believe he was being insensitive as he attempted to continue his set. 'I don't think it's up to you to decide if it's insensitive or not,' Ms Azzopardi said. The pair continued to clash in a tense exchange as the comedian argued 'comedy is subjective' while the audience could be heard nervously laughing intermittently. Foot went on to blame her for the show's 'awkward' ending. 'Due to the failure of you to grasp that simple intellectual point, cause you fail to grasp the difference between these issues, cause of that it's ending in an awkward way,' he said. Ms Azzopardi said her friends urged her to leave the gig, but she wanted to stand her ground and avoid the comedian making fun of her once she had left. Foot then called out Ms Azzopardi for talking while he was finishing up his set and said they would never agree over his comments as he was sharing 'an intellectual argument' while she was on 'the emotional side'. The disability campaigner explained why she was angered by Foot's comments in a video following the exchange. 'All in all, deeply embarrassing for him, deeply deeply sickening to witness as someone who is living with that disease,' Ms Azzopardi said. 'It's probably one of the most blatant acts of ableism that I have ever personally experienced since being diagnosed with this illness, because that's what it is, it's an illness, not a punch line to a joke.' Social media users overwhelmingly agreed with Ms Azzopardi. 'Is the joke in the room with us? I don't understand which part is meant to be funny. Well done for calling him out!' one said. 'This is so weird? Did someone with diabetes break up with him? This is such a random gripe to have,' another wrote. 'Why were people laughing? Not a single thing in this clip was funny,' a third added. 'I have type 1 diabetes and I used to do stand up and there is a way to make tasteful jokes about YOUR own illness and experience but this ain't it,' a third said. However, disagreeing with the campaigner, one wrote: 'God forbid a comedian tells a joke.'


Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
PETER VAN ONSELEN: All of the hints Zoe Daniel could have escaped a humiliating loss to Tim Wilson were in her five minute concession video
Former teal independent MP Zoe Daniel has finally conceded defeat. After celebrating her 'victory' on the night of the election - including with ecstatic dancing - before demanding a recount despite the win falling outside the margin that requires one, Daniel has eventually acknowledged that she lost. The Liberal win in the electorate of Goldstein was the only seat anywhere in the country picked up by either of the Coalition parties. The Nationals didn't win a single seat off Labor or regional independents. Beyond defeating Daniel in Goldstein the Liberals didn't defeat a single sitting Labor, Green or teal MP. No other teals lost their seats. On any estimate, Daniel's failure was an isolated incident. It speaks to both the failure of the one term MP and the success of the campaign returning MP Tim Wilson ran against her. Far from being a blueprint for success, Daniel's loss was a sure sign that something wasn't right about her foray into parliamentary politics. Not that you'd know it if all you heard about the Goldstein showdown was Daniel's five minute concession video posted to social media. So far as ungracious defeats go, it was right up there. Perhaps not analogous with Donald Trump's reaction to losing the 2020 US Presidential election - but not as far off as you might have expected given the scathing commentary Daniel delivered Trump's way soon afterwards, accusing him of struggling to accept the reality of his loss. It took an unnecessary recount demanded by Daniel and weeks of denial to pass before the loser eventually reversed her election night victory dance and called Wilson to concede. The concession video including everything from claims about supporting lower taxes (Daniel voted for cancelling the legislated stage three tax cuts and once argued for a higher GST) to complaints about dirty tricks on the campaign trail. Daniel even delivered a statement directly to Vida Goldstein whom the seat is named after ('Vida, it's a mission') despite the pioneering feminist and suffragette passing away 76 years ago. There were hints in the concession speech that Daniel might run again, but no guarantees. If she does do so, she'll need to adopt a more conciliatory style to make a better fist of it. Despite Daniel's strong advocacy for the Palestinian cause, her concession video also included claims that she worked hard for both Jewish and pro-Palestinian constituents. During the course of the campaign, however, Jewish advocacy groups were critical of the stance Daniel took. It is highly likely that the Jewish vote in Goldstein was of itself enough to flip the seat given the seat has one of the highest Jewish populations of any electorate. While Daniel can be proud of winning the seat in 2022, there is little doubt that her ungracious failure to admit defeat before this weekend is a blight on her time in office. Whether it also turns out to be a nail in the coffin of any future ambition to return to parliament remains to be seen.