Cell tower significantly damaged in Central Otago
Photo:
RNZ
Police are seeking information after a cellular tower in rural Central Otago was significantly damaged.
Damage to the tower along State Highway 8's Lindis Pass-Tarra Road, between Forest Range Station and Goodger Road, was first reported about 10.50am on Monday.
Detective Phill Hamlin said the tower provides cell service to residents and visitors to the area.
"Cellular service is especially critical in this rural and alpine area," he said.
"Rural areas tend to rely on fewer cell towers to cover larger areas, and damage to these towers can cause significant reduction or complete loss of cell service in the area."
Police have asked for anyone who may have seen any suspicious behaviour at or near the tower to contact police immediately.
"We are also asking for anyone who travelled along Lindis Pass-Tarras Road between 7am and 1pm on 6 July, and has dashcam footage, to please get in touch."
Please use the reference number 250707/0047.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
38 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Couple jailed for neglect of 4-year-old were suspected of his murder
Ashton Cresswell, pictured at a birthday party five days before he died. Photo: Supplied A mother and her then partner who were jailed for neglecting a four-year-old boy who died after suffering "non-accidental" head and bowel injuries were initially arrested on suspicion of murder, it can be revealed. However, after continuing to deny their involvement they were jointly charged with manslaughter. The pair would later plead guilty to reduced charges of neglect. Ashton Cresswell died in April 2017. RNZ earlier reported that the cause of his death was deemed to be "non-accidental" head and bowel injuries. A post-mortem found 65 bruises across his small body. Coroner Mary-Anne Borrowdale found the fatal injuries suffered by Asthon were likely inflicted by Ashton's mother's partner Peter Otuszewski, either through misadventure during rough play, or through a more deliberate act of violence. In an exclusive interview with RNZ, Otuszewski denied being responsible for Ashton's death. "It is horrific what happened to him. It is unfair what happened to him. But I didn't cause him to die." RNZ has obtained several statements connected to Ashton's death under the Official Information Act. Do you know more? Email Among them is a statement from the officer in charge of the investigation Detective Sergeant Rochelle Ross. Ross said that after the cause of Ashton's death was established, the investigation moved into a "suspect interview phase". Both Ashton's mother Alesha Cresswell and Otuszewski were interviewed in the hours after Ashton's death. Ross said the pair provided accounts which were "not consistent with the fact that Ashton had been deceased for some time prior to the emergency services arriving". No-one was charged with causing the fatal injuries to Ashton. Photo: Supplied On 18 September 2017, Cresswell was interviewed for a second time for nearly three hours. "Her account differed from her original account and was inconsistent and contrived with her making assertions which were known to be untrue or were later proved to be untrue," Ross said. Six weeks later Otuszewski was interviewed by police. Ross said he changed his account from that which he gave in the hours after Ashton's death. "Neither party could offer any explanation for how Ashton sustained the injuries that ultimately caused his death." The investigation was then summarised and referred to the Crown Solicitor for prosecution advice. On 29 May 2019 the pair were arrested for the murder of Ashton, Ross said. Otuszewski and Cresswell were then interviewed for a third time. Both lasted about 15 minutes. "Both parties continued to deny any knowledge of how Ashton sustained the injuries which led to his death," Ross said. They were then jointly charged with manslaughter. The charge alleged that, without lawful excuse, the pair neglected their legal duty to provide Ashton with the necessities of life. Ross said that following further court appearances and in consultation with the Crown Solicitor's office the matter was resolved with guilty pleas on charges of neglect. Cresswell was sentenced to three years, 11 months imprisonment. Otuszewski was jailed for four years and one month. In response to questions from RNZ, Central District manager of criminal investigations Detective Inspector Craig Sheridan said the investigation team had "good cause" to suspect the couple had committed the offence of murder when they were arrested. Following the third interview the decision was made, in consultation with the Crown, to charge the pair with manslaughter. Charging documents of murder were never filed, he said. He said it was a "robust investigation". Sheridan earlier said the evidence supported the resulting charges of neglect. "Police acknowledge the coroner's findings in relation to Ashton's tragic and entirely avoidable death." He said there was no ongoing investigation. Near the bottom of Coroner Borrowdale's report, she says Ashton Cresswell was not a name "well-known to New Zealanders". "No-one was convicted of causing the non-accidental injuries that led to his death. No government or support agency was involved in the protection of Ashton and his siblings from child abuse. "Ashton was not attending any pre-school when he died. No-one who had contact with Ashton, his mother, or her short-term partner foresaw that Ashton's life was at risk… no-one saw what was coming." Borrowdale made damning remarks about the couple's attempted explanations of Ashton's injuries. "Ashton was 'careless' and 'clumsy' because he was tiny, vulnerable, and had developmental delays. "These characteristics ought to have led to Ashton being treated with kid gloves, receiving even more protection and care than an ordinarily robust four-year-old. It was grotesquely self-serving of his parent and caregiver, who I find were responsible for his death and its concealment, to have excused their violence and neglect by reference to Ashton's frailties." She concluded by saying Ashton's death was a "tragedy". "It is shameful that Ashton died violently and prematurely, in his home and due to the actions - and inactions - of the people who were entrusted with his care and safety. I offer my sincere condolences to those who knew and loved Ashton." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Revealed: Couple jailed for neglect of 4-year-old were suspected of his murder
Ashton Cresswell, pictured at a birthday party five days before he died. Photo: Supplied A mother and her then partner who were jailed for neglecting a four-year-old boy who died after suffering "non-accidental" head and bowel injuries were initially arrested on suspicion of murder, it can be revealed. However, after continuing to deny their involvement they were jointly charged with manslaughter. The pair would later plead guilty to reduced charges of neglect. Ashton Cresswell died in April 2017. RNZ earlier reported that the cause of his death was deemed to be "non-accidental" head and bowel injuries. A post-mortem found 65 bruises across his small body. Coroner Mary-Anne Borrowdale found the fatal injuries suffered by Asthon were likely inflicted by Ashton's mother's partner Peter Otuszewski, either through misadventure during rough play, or through a more deliberate act of violence. In an exclusive interview with RNZ, Otuszewski denied being responsible for Ashton's death. "It is horrific what happened to him. It is unfair what happened to him. But I didn't cause him to die." RNZ has obtained several statements connected to Ashton's death under the Official Information Act. Do you know more? Email Among them is a statement from the officer in charge of the investigation Detective Sergeant Rochelle Ross. Ross said that after the cause of Ashton's death was established, the investigation moved into a "suspect interview phase". Both Ashton's mother Alesha Cresswell and Otuszewski were interviewed in the hours after Ashton's death. Ross said the pair provided accounts which were "not consistent with the fact that Ashton had been deceased for some time prior to the emergency services arriving". No-one was charged with causing the fatal injuries to Ashton. Photo: Supplied On 18 September 2017, Cresswell was interviewed for a second time for nearly three hours. "Her account differed from her original account and was inconsistent and contrived with her making assertions which were known to be untrue or were later proved to be untrue," Ross said. Six weeks later Otuszewski was interviewed by police. Ross said he changed his account from that which he gave in the hours after Ashton's death. "Neither party could offer any explanation for how Ashton sustained the injuries that ultimately caused his death." The investigation was then summarised and referred to the Crown Solicitor for prosecution advice. On 29 May 2019 the pair were arrested for the murder of Ashton, Ross said. Otuszewski and Cresswell were then interviewed for a third time. Both lasted about 15 minutes. "Both parties continued to deny any knowledge of how Ashton sustained the injuries which led to his death," Ross said. They were then jointly charged with manslaughter. The charge alleged that, without lawful excuse, the pair neglected their legal duty to provide Ashton with the necessities of life. Ross said that following further court appearances and in consultation with the Crown Solicitor's office the matter was resolved with guilty pleas on charges of neglect. Cresswell was sentenced to three years, 11 months imprisonment. Otuszewski was jailed for four years and one month. In response to questions from RNZ, Central District manager of criminal investigations Detective Inspector Craig Sheridan said the investigation team had "good cause" to suspect the couple had committed the offence of murder when they were arrested. Following the third interview the decision was made, in consultation with the Crown, to charge the pair with manslaughter. Charging documents of murder were never filed, he said. He said it was a "robust investigation". Sheridan earlier said the evidence supported the resulting charges of neglect. "Police acknowledge the coroner's findings in relation to Ashton's tragic and entirely avoidable death." He said there was no ongoing investigation. Near the bottom of Coroner Borrowdale's report, she says Ashton Cresswell was not a name "well-known to New Zealanders". "No-one was convicted of causing the non-accidental injuries that led to his death. No government or support agency was involved in the protection of Ashton and his siblings from child abuse. "Ashton was not attending any pre-school when he died. No-one who had contact with Ashton, his mother, or her short-term partner foresaw that Ashton's life was at risk… no-one saw what was coming." Borrowdale made damning remarks about the couple's attempted explanations of Ashton's injuries. "Ashton was 'careless' and 'clumsy' because he was tiny, vulnerable, and had developmental delays. "These characteristics ought to have led to Ashton being treated with kid gloves, receiving even more protection and care than an ordinarily robust four-year-old. It was grotesquely self-serving of his parent and caregiver, who I find were responsible for his death and its concealment, to have excused their violence and neglect by reference to Ashton's frailties." She concluded by saying Ashton's death was a "tragedy". "It is shameful that Ashton died violently and prematurely, in his home and due to the actions - and inactions - of the people who were entrusted with his care and safety. I offer my sincere condolences to those who knew and loved Ashton." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Rereamanu Ronaki-Wihapi named as murderer who twice ran down Taku Manu Paul in Te Puke
By Ric Stevens, Open Justice reporter of Rereamanu Ronaki-Wihapi was found guilty of murder for the death of his mother's partner, Taku Manu Paul, on Boxing Day 2022. Photo: NZ Herald / Belinda Feek A teenager who ran down his mother's partner with a car and killed him can now be named as Rereamanu Ronaki-Wihapi. Ronaki-Wihapi is serving a 17-year prison sentence for murdering Taku Manu Paul, with no prospect of parole for seven years. He was just 17 at the time and sitting next to his mother Ephron Ronaki, who was Paul's partner and arguing with him on the phone about missing Christmas money. Ronaki-Wihapi was sentenced in October last year but can only now be named and identified as Ronaki's son, after the release of a Court of Appeal decision. The ruling turned down his lawyer's attempt to win him permanent name suppression and quashed one of his two convictions. Ronaki-Wihapi and his mother went looking for Paul on Boxing Day 2022 because she believed her partner had taken $500, which had been a Christmas present to her. The teenager was driving because Ronaki was very drunk. They spotted Paul on a Te Puke street and, with his mother initially egging him on, Ronaki-Wihapi ran into Paul, then turned around and deliberately drove over him as he lay on the ground. In an unusual result which was due to a charging error, Ronaki-Wihapi received two different convictions for culpable homicide - one for murder and one for manslaughter - in relation to the same victim. The Court of Appeal has now quashed the manslaughter count, saying the two convictions cannot stand together. Ronaki-Wipahi, now 20, had no criminal history before the night he killed Paul. However, court documents say that he had a history of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. At trial, his defence counsel, Ron Mansfield KC, said he had been "a traumatised teen put in a situation of extreme stress". The trial was told that Ronaki told her son to "hit him, do it now, run him over" when they spotted Paul. The teenager hit Paul with the car twice, the first time on the left side with such force that Paul was thrown on to the windscreen before landing on the road. With chaos breaking out among the people in the vehicle, Ronaki-Wihapi then did a U-turn and aimed the Nissan Teana directly at Paul as he was lying on the road, driving over his chest, and away from the scene at speed. Ronaki-Wihapi said he was "in the moment" when he lined up on the prone man's head "and just boosted it", as his mother reached across and grabbed the steering wheel in an unsuccessful attempt to alter his course. Pathologists could not say for sure which of the two strikes, which could have been as little as 13 seconds apart, killed Paul. The whole incident, including the two impacts, was over within a minute and 14 seconds. Ronaki-Wihapi was charged with murder separately for each impact. At a jury trial, he was found not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter for the first hit, and guilty of murder for the second strike. He was sentenced to 17 years' imprisonment with no parole for seven years on the murder charge, and a lesser concurrent sentence for manslaughter. His mother was sent to prison for four years and three months after being convicted of manslaughter for her part in Paul's death. She was also convicted of attempting to pervert the course of justice by claiming she had been the driver. Mansfield appealed Ronaki-Wihapi's murder conviction to the Court of Appeal, along with the High Court's refusal to grant his young client permanent name suppression. Before hearing the matter, the Court of Appeal advised him that it believed Ronaki-Wihapi could not be convicted twice of a culpable homicide relating to the same victim. Ephron Ronaki (centre) was sentenced to four years and three months for manslaughter of her part in the death of her partner, Taku Manu Paul. Photo: NZ Herald / Belinda Feek In its decision, it held that Ronaki-Wihapi should have either faced a single charge to cover both impacts, or two charges laid in the alternative. "The short point is that there was a charging error in this case," the Court of Appeal justices said. "Mr Ronaki-Wihapi should not have faced two cumulative charges of murder for the death of Mr Paul. "He should either have faced a single charge, particularised in a way that alleged that it was satisfied either by the first impact or alternatively by the second impact, or two charges of murder advanced in the alternative," the appeal court decision said. "The verdicts of manslaughter and murder cannot stand together." The appeal court determined that as the jury found Paul was still alive at the moment of the second impact, the manslaughter conviction should not stand in relation to the first hit. The murder conviction, which related to the second impact, was upheld. The Court of Appeal decision also said the threshold that an offender would suffer "extreme hardship" if his identity was published was not met in relation to name suppression. There was no presumption in favour of suppression outside the Youth Court, youth was not a particularly relevant factor in this case, and any effect on Ronaki-Wihapi's future employment prospects would be a consequence of the conviction, not the publication of his name. There was also a high public interest in identifying those convicted of murder, the Court of Appeal said. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
