The politics of compromise and conviction
Tribune News Service
Scott Turner was a Texas House Representative, now serving in the Trump Administration as the Secretary of US Housing & Urban Development (HUD). In the Texas House, he talked about 'being the best we can,' and espoused high standards for himself and his colleagues; however, in his current position, he has voiced no complaints or objections against the administration or the Republican Party. Perhaps for less cynical reasons than power itself, but to pursue his policies on housing and healthcare. Turner is a brilliant case study for how ambition causes politicians to accept feeble attempts to reason away their beliefs or ethics, always for something greater, something they can achieve with one more step. That 'one more step' toward completely surrendering their integrity, confounding their ethical clarity, and adopting whatever means meet their ends. During a keynote address in 2014, he spoke of the duty to break the status quo, Democrat or Republican, he said, 'We need servant leaders.... People who live by conviction and principle, not by the waves of the sea of what's popular today.' He shared his experience growing up in a poor home, and his father working two jobs.
At his confirmation, he talked empathetically about the homelessness crisis and how his family took in his uncle, providing him with the services he needed. Trump has made comments expressing disdain for the homeless; he said these people were hurting the 'prestige' of major cities, and many homeless people might prefer their situation. An NBC affiliate network reported that 1 in 4 low-income households eligible for HUD rental assistance receive benefits. Turner is championing time limits, which means taking away benefits from more low-income households still unable to afford the cost of living. Trump has further plans to remove people from homeless encampments and place them in large camps or tent-cities, where they will be mandated to receive mental health or addiction treatment. Seemingly in conflict with his views on homelessness and background, these policies are consistent with his previous stances representing Texas, for example, restricting welfare, requiring drug testing for unemployment benefits, voting against free-lunch programs in Texas schools, and opposing the Affordable Care Act.
He defined his career as a Texas Representative as an uncompromising advocate for transparency, leading extensive investigations into the conduct of his colleagues, and voting on policies to increase accountability. For example, he voted for HB 1690, which authorized rangers to investigate misconduct of an official or public administration and refer cases to the State Attorney General. He has parted ways with these values, perhaps to advocate for his conservative policies on social programs such as welfare and housing subsidies. However, compromising his fight against improper leadership or self-interested governance — accepting the numerous examples of corruption and secrecy — to achieve an agenda or implement a policy, is not leading on principle or conviction.
The Epstein scandal is a recent example of something that clearly runs against Turner's previous views on government transparency and accountability. The footage and DOJ reports are inconsistent, and the Administration, DOJ, and FBI have refused to comment. For example, the files obtained by the AP provide a Suicide Timeline; at 6:33 a.m., staff found Epstein unresponsive, and at 6:45 a.m., EMS arrived. The DOJ released raw footage from the hallway camera. According to the FBI, anyone entering the cell would have been visible on that camera, but the footage shows no one entering his cell around the provided timeline. More concerningly, Pam Bondi, Trump's Attorney General, has directly undermined the investigation into the Epstein files, ordering thousands of FBI agents to redact files. Bondi allegedly pressured the FBI to recruit 1,000 personnel to review 100,000 files relating to Jefferey Epstein and 'flag' any that mentioned Donald Trump.
It would not be an exaggeration to compare the redaction of the Epstein files to the shredding of papers or deletion of tapes in the Watergate Scandal. Furthermore, his treatment of the press, on the Epstein Scandal and throughout his two terms, displays a hostility not seen since Nixon's 'Enemy List': revoking CNN reporter Jim Acosta's press pass, restricting AP reporters' access to White House events, ending funding for public broadcast stations, suing 60 Minutes, recently launching a $22 billion suit against The Wall Street Journal, and attacking reporters for 'fake news' or calling journalists 'nasty.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
5 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Brazilians burn Trump effigies as tariffs spark anger
Brazilians set fire to effigies of Donald Trump in protests across several cities Friday, denouncing the US president's politically motivated trade tariffs. Anti-Trump protests were held in Brasilia, Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, a sign of souring ties between two of the Americas' largest economies. The demonstrations were modestly attended, but reflected broad anger at Trump's decision to put a 50 percent tariff on Brazilian exports and to sanction a top judge. The mercurial US president has openly admitted he is punishing Brazil for prosecuting his political ally, ex-president Jair Bolsonaro. The far-right Brazilian firebrand is currently on trial for plotting a coup after failing to win reelection in 2022. A demonstrator holds a burning placard depicting Donald Trump during a protest against tariffs on Brazilian products. Reuters Bolsonaro supporters stormed Brazil's congress in January 2023, ransacking the chambers and attacking police, in scenes reminiscent of Trump supporters' attack on the US Capitol two years before. A Brazilian general has given evidence that the alleged plotters also wanted to assassinate leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and several other public officials. Trump has called the trial a "witch hunt" and his Treasury Department has sanctioned Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes in response. Trump also signed an executive order slapping 50 percent tariffs on Brazilian imports, citing Bolsonaro's "politically motivated persecution." The tariff is due to enter into force on August 6. Moraes, in a rare public address, said Friday he pledged to "continue working" despite a US travel ban and assets freeze. Protesters burn effigies of President Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro to protest a 50% US tariff on Brazilian goods in Sao Paulo on Friday. AP "This Court, the Office of the Attorney General, and the Federal Police will not bow to these threats," he said during a court session. And he vowed the court would remain "absolutely uncompromising in defending national sovereignty and its commitment to democracy." Moraes has repeatedly taken aim at the Brazilian far-right and its figurehead Bolsonaro, as well as tech titan Elon Musk, over online disinformation. He is also the presiding judge in the coup trial of Bolsonaro, who risks a 40-year prison sentence. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has accused Moraes of "serious human rights abuses, including arbitrary detention involving flagrant denials of fair trial guarantees and infringing on the freedom of expression." Moraes recently ordered Bolsonaro to wear an electronic ankle bracelet pending the conclusion of his trial, and barred him from leaving his home at night or using social media pending an investigation into potential obstruction of justice. Agence France-Presse
Gulf Today
5 hours ago
- Gulf Today
September could be a decisive moment for Palestine
Next month could be a major turning point for Palestine as France, Britain, Canada and six other countries are set to extend recognition of a virtual Palestinian state. While enjoying three of the four attributes that define statehood — a permanent population, a government and relations with other states — Palestine does not exercise control over sovereign territory. Recognition is to take place at the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly which opens on September 9th with addresses from world leaders. The Trump administration has criticised these countries and tried to punish the Palestinians by imposing sanctions on so-far unnamed Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) officials who could be denied visas to attend the General Assembly. Washington has justified its stand by claiming 'the 'the two Palestinian organisations have 'taken actions to internationalise' their conflict 'with Israel, including through the International Criminal Court, and said both had continued 'to support terrorism.'' On the latter charge, neither the Authority nor the PLO supported Hamas' October 7th, 2023, raid into southern Israel during which 1,139 Israelis and visitors were killed and 250 abducted. The US previously excluded Palestinian leaders from the opening of the annual Assembly session. Although he had addressed the General Assembly in 1974, the US refused PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat a visa for the 1988 opening. A special session was held in Geneva in mid-December to enable Arafat to speak. After this debacle, his successor, Palestine President Mahmoud Abbas, has addressed the opening session of the Assembly for nearly two decades. Palestine has been recognised by 147 of the UN's 193 members, 75 per cent, but the US has vetoed its full membership. Consequently, Palestine has observer status which permits it to attend and participate in General Assembly and Security Council sessions but not to vote. Palestine also has gained membership in UN-related institutions despite US objections. Palestine has sought recognition as a state since November 15th, 1988, when the Palestine National Council, the parliament-in-exile, issued the declaration of independence in Algiers. Written by Palestinian national poet Mahmoud Darwish, the declaration called for a mini state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza occupied by Israelis in 1967 instead of the whole of Palestine. This amounted to a strategic shift in policy by the PLO which had demanded a Palestinian state in the whole of Palestine. The shift was in line with UN Security Council resolution 242 of November 1967 which called for Israel to withdraw from territories seized that June. Following its independence declaration, Palestine was instantly recognised by Algeria, Malaysia, Morocco, Turkey, Yemen, and Somalia. On December 15th, 1988, the General Assembly acknowledged the declaration of independence and recognised Palestine rather than the PLO as representing Palestinians within the UN system. Palestine subsequently gained recognition from states in Asia, Africa, the non-aligned group, and Eastern Europe and by the end of 1989, 94 states had recognised Palestine. EU members Ireland and Spain and Norway recognised Palestine last year. In addition to France, Britain, and Canada, Andora, Finland, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Portugal, San Marino, and Malta are set to recognise Palestine this year. Australia has refused to fix a time while Germany and Italy do not intend to offer recognition. The addition of France and Britain will mean that four of the five permanent UN Security Council members (including Russia and China) will have recognised Palestine. The US is the sole hold-out. The Trump administration has criticised the process of recognition and has threatened to impose high tariffs on Canada for taking this action. Donald Trump has fully backed Israel in its war on Gaza and blockade of the strip which has starved 2.3 million Gazans and has been branded genocide by prominent Israeli human rights groups B'Tselem and Israeli Doctors for Human Rights as well as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and Israeli experts on genocide. B'Tselem dubbed the terrible and tragic situation in Gaza 'Our Genocide' and stated: 'For nearly two years, Israel has been committing genocide in Gaza, acting in a systematic, deliberate way to destroy Palestinian society there through mass killing, causing serious bodily and mental harm and creating catastrophic conditions that prevent its continued existence in Gaza. Israel is openly promoting ethnic cleansing and the destruction of life-sustaining infrastructure for individuals and the group, with 2 million people starved, displaced, bombed, and left by the world to die. The genocide must be stopped.' Israeli Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) presented a position paper entitled 'Destruction of Conditions Of Life: A Health Analysis of the Gaza Genocide.' PHR stated, ' Over the past 22 months, Israel has systematically targeted medical infrastructure across the Gaza Strip, attacking 33 of 36 of Gaza's hospitals and clinics depriving them of fuel and water. More than 1800 of Gaza's medical staff have been killed or detained.' PHR argued that this assault is 'a deliberate, cumulative dismantling of Gaza's health system, and with it, its people's ability to survive. This amounts to genocide.' Haaretz reported in a podcast that the 'mass starvation and death in Gaza seems to have finally cut through the layers of denial and media self-censorship in Israel – and in both Arab and mixed cities – demonstrations against the horrifying humanitarian situation are drawing thousands of protesters.' Haaretz said three out of four Israelis want to end the war which Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu prosecutes to maintain his fragile coalition. It is now a minority government since two ultra-Orthodox religious parties have exited because he did not pass a law granting military exemption to their youths. Israel's war on Gaza propelled France and Saudi Arabia to hold a conference in New York last week to urge countries round the world to recognise the Palestinian state and press for the two-state solution. The conference, attended by 125 countries, issued a call for a ceasefire in Gaza, Hamas' handover to a new administration, and a roadmap for the step-by-step establishment of a Palestinian state.
Economy ME
8 hours ago
- Economy ME
Crude oil prices decline to $69.4 as OPEC+ increases production levels
Oil prices continued their downward trend on Monday following OPEC+ 's decision to implement another significant production increase in September. Concerns regarding a slowing economy in the U.S., the world's largest oil consumer, are compounding the pressure. Brent crude futures dipped by 40 cents, or 0.57 percent, settling at $69.27 a barrel by 01:15 GMT (currently trading above $69.4). In contrast, U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude stood at $66.96 a barrel, down 37 cents, or 0.55 percent (currently trading above $67.15), after both contracts had closed around $2 a barrel lower on Friday. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies, collectively known as OPEC+, reached an agreement on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September. This decision is part of a series of accelerated output increases aimed at regaining market share, citing a robust economy and low stockpiles as the rationale behind this move. This action, which aligns with market predictions, represents a complete and early reversal of OPEC+'s largest set of output cuts, along with a separate increase in production for the United Arab Emirates, totaling about 2.5 million barrels per day, or approximately 2.4 percent of global demand. Investor caution amid sanctions Nevertheless, investors are cautious about potential further U.S. sanctions on Iran and Russia, which could disrupt supplies. U.S. President Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent secondary tariffs on Russian crude buyers in an effort to pressure Russia into ceasing its military actions in Ukraine. At least two vessels loaded with Russian oil, destined for refiners in India, have diverted to alternative destinations in light of the new U.S. sanctions, according to trade sources reported on Friday, along with LSEG trade flow data. Concerns regarding U.S. tariffs affecting global economic growth and fuel consumption continue to loom over the market, especially following U.S. economic data indicating jobs growth on Friday fell short of expectations. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated on Sunday that the tariffs imposed last week on numerous countries are likely to remain in effect rather than be reduced amid ongoing negotiations. Read more: Crude oil prices rise above $71.8 amid new tariffs impacting Russian supply U.S. oil consumption projections According to the latest official data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. oil consumption in 2025 is projected at 20.4 million barrels per day, up from 20.3 million barrels per day in 2024, while U.S. oil production is anticipated to reach 13.37 million barrels per day in 2025—slightly below previous estimates due to lower oil prices and ongoing economic unpredictability stemming from shifting U.S. tariff policies. Globally, oil demand is forecast to exceed 105 million barrels per day in 2025, according to Statista, marking a new high in global consumption. OPEC+'s announcement on Sunday, formalizes a full reversal of output cuts initially implemented in 2023, with the latest meeting attended by major producers such as Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, UAE, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria, and Oman. The monthly production adjustments began in April 2025, and Brent crude prices have remained close to $70 a barrel, rebounding from lows in April. Decline in Russian oil exports Recent shifts in Russian oil exports, according to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, show that Russia exported 24.8 million tonnes of oil by sea in June 2025, a 5 percent month-on-month decline, with over half of these volumes now transported on G7+ tankers (representing 56 percent of exports, up from 36 percent in January). The U.S. Department of the Treasury intensified sanctions in early 2025, targeting two major Russian oil producers, over 180 vessels, oil traders, and oilfield service providers, substantially increasing sanctions risks for the Russian oil trade. These actions are underpinned by determinations made under Executive Order 14024 and accompanied by parallel measures from the United Kingdom. Meanwhile, President Trump's new tariff schedule imposes duties ranging from 10 percent to 41 percent on goods from several countries including India and Indonesia, and he continues to threaten even higher tariffs on countries that import Russian oil. Experts warn that continued tariff uncertainty could constrain global economic growth and potentially curtail future oil demand. The Energy Information Administration recently lowered its global oil demand growth forecast for 2025 by 400,000 barrels per day, attributing the cut to economic uncertainty and trade tensions.
