logo
Why increasing renewable energy alone can't solve climate crisis

Why increasing renewable energy alone can't solve climate crisis

Indian Express3 days ago
The world added about 582 gigawatts (GW) of renewable energy capacity in 2024, representing an increase of 15% over the previous year, according to a new report by the International Renewable Energy Association (IRENA). This was the largest annual increase in renewable energy capacity in any single year.
Currently, the installed capacity of renewable energy across the globe stands at more than 4,442 GW, and around 30% of the world's electricity is produced from renewable sources.
The new report by IRENA, which was released on July 10, also said that at the current rate of growth, the world would come close to achieving its target of tripling renewable energy installed capacity by 2030. This target is considered crucial for limiting global warming and was part of the agreement made at the COP28 meeting in Dubai in 2023.
The rapid growth of renewable energy might give the impression that the world has made good progress on meeting its climate objectives. However, renewable energy has not even begun to replace fossil fuels at the global level.
As of now, it is catering mainly to the rising electricity demand, which has increased three times since 1990 and is projected to grow even higher.
While only around 10% of new electricity installed capacity in 2024 was fossil fuel-based, the use of fossil fuels, in absolute terms, is still growing, according to the IRENA report.
Between 2012 and 2023, global electricity generation grew by 2.5% every year on average, and renewable energy expanded at a rate of about 6% during the same time. This has led to a steady rise in the share of renewables in the electricity generation mix. However, fossil fuels currently account for more than 70% of global electricity production.
In absolute terms, more fossil fuels are being burned today than 10 years ago to produce electricity. To make matters worse, the increase in the use of fossil fuels is expected to continue for at least a few more years. As a result, greenhouse gas emissions have reached record highs in recent years.
Moreover, electricity is still only a small slice of total energy use. Just 20% to 22% of the total energy consumed in the world every year is in the form of electricity. Only 30% of electricity generation comes from renewable sources. This means that about 6% of the world's energy consumption comes from clean sources. More than 90% still comes from fossil sources.
Note that there are some countries, mainly in the Nordic region, where renewables account for a significantly higher share of total energy consumption. However, the special conditions existing in these countries are difficult to replicate elsewhere. According to projections, by 2050, even in the case scenarios, not more than 40% to 45% of the world's total energy consumption would come from clean sources.
This means that energy transition, which involves moving away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy, on its own, is unlikely to help tackle the climate crisis. That is why carbon removal interventions, which are yet to become viable, assume great importance in the fight against global warming.
Regional imbalance in growth of renewables
There are other concerns with the manner in which the global energy transition is currently taking shape. So far, the bulk of renewable energy deployment has taken place in a handful of countries, while the others have been left behind.
The IRENA report pointed out that while renewable capacity increased by 15% globally in 2024, in Africa it grew by just 7%, and that too from a very low base. Africa is where the largest number of people without access live.
The IRENA report said 71% of the renewable capacity addition last year took place in Asia. This is slightly misleading as China alone accounted for more than 62% of global additions — that is, 364 GW of the 582 GW installed globally. The whole of Africa together got less than 1%.
For the last few years, China has been consistently installing more renewable energy than the rest of the world combined. Apart from developed countries, China, and some large players such as India, the renewable energy footprint has not grown at a fast pace.
It is true that these are the countries that also happen to be the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases. Effective energy transition here would be more consequential from the climate change perspective than in, for example, Africa.
However, this kind of lopsided deployment of renewable energy, coupled with the fact that China has a near monopoly on the production and supply chains of most of the renewable systems, could leave many countries and regions behind once again.
Renewable energy, such as solar and wind, might be available universally — unlike, say, petrol that is found in only limited geographies — but the technologies needed to harness this energy are getting increasingly inaccessible.
China dominates the production and manufacturing of solar PV systems, for example, but also consumes more than half of it. Large buyers such as the United States and India corner most of what is exported. There is little supply for others.
Also, manufacturing outside of China, which could have filled the gap, is struggling. This is because other countries are not able to compete with China's economies of scale, low labour costs, or state subsidies.
China's control over the renewable energy system has begun to appear similar to the OPEC countries' hold over global oil supplies. Energy security has emerged as one of the foremost concerns of countries, pushing many of them to secure whatever option is available to them, irrespective of whether it is clean or not.
The transition to clean and renewable energy systems is not as simple as it is sometimes made out to be. There are several layers of complexity which make the goal of curbing global temperatures below 2 degrees Celsius look increasingly unrealistic to achieve.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The nuclear investment thesis: India's atomic energy expansion story
The nuclear investment thesis: India's atomic energy expansion story

Time of India

time10 hours ago

  • Time of India

The nuclear investment thesis: India's atomic energy expansion story

India is placing a bold bet on nuclear energy as it races to power its economy while slashing emissions. As the country grows, so does its power demand. The push for clean and renewable energy has brought nuclear energy into focus. Over the past decade, India has made notable progress in expanding its nuclear capacity. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Finance Design Thinking Artificial Intelligence Technology Healthcare Project Management CXO Management Others Operations Management MBA Public Policy Data Science Cybersecurity PGDM MCA Data Science Digital Marketing Product Management others Data Analytics Leadership Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta SEPO - IIMC CFO India Starts on undefined Get Details Fig: India ranks sixth in nuclear capacity addition. Source: Global Energy Monitor The global nuclear story: From boom to bust to bounce-back Nuclear power once promised abundant, low-carbon electricity, leading to a boom in the US, Europe, and Japan during the 1960s and 70s. But disasters—Three Mile Island (1979), Chernobyl (1986), and Fukushima (2011)—soured public opinion, prompting phase-outs in countries like Germany and Italy. A shift is underway. With energy security and climate goals becoming urgent, nuclear is back in favour. At COP28 in 2023, 20 nations pledged to triple global nuclear capacity by 2050. Currently, 69 reactors are under construction and 110 more are planned—mainly in China, India, and Russia. Live Events Global context: Nuclear Energy's strategic resurgence Globally, 439 nuclear reactors supply about 9% of the world's electricity. The US leads in operating reactors, while China dominates new construction. France remains a standout, generating over 67% of its electricity from nuclear power. Economic challenges remain: high upfront costs, long lead times, and public concerns over safety and waste management. However, with climate goals looming and energy security concerns deepening, nuclear's appeal is rising, with governments offering incentives to de-risk investments. India's unique path: Self-reliance in nuclear energy Due to its nuclear weapons programme and refusal to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, India had limited access to international technology and fuel. As a result, it built self-reliance across the nuclear fuel cycle—from uranium mining to reactor design and waste management. India's Atomic Energy Commission formulates nuclear policy, while NPCIL handles construction and operation. The Atomic Energy Act, 1962, restricts plant ownership to government bodies or PSUs. Private sector participation is limited to auxiliary services. Direct foreign investment in generation is prohibited. The plan and recent milestones Under the Viksit Bharat vision, India targets a nuclear capacity of 22.48 GW by 2031–32 and 100 GW by 2047. Recent milestones include: Indigenous 700 MW reactor at Kakrapar began operations in 2024 Kalpakkam's 500 MW Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor achieved commissioning targets New uranium finds in Jaduguda extended fuel availability by 50 years Rajasthan Atomic Power Project Unit-7 achieved criticality in Sep 2024 ASHVINI, a joint venture of NPCIL and NTPC , will develop nuclear sites like the 4x700 MW Mahi-Banswara project Technologies powering India's nuclear expansion PHWRs: Backbone of India's programme; 10 more 700 MW units planned FBRs: Key to India's 3-stage plan; breed more fuel and reduce waste SMRs: Under development by BARC for grid and industrial use Thorium Fuels: With 25% of global reserves, India is testing thorium-HALEU fuel (ANEEL) to cut waste and improve efficiency Challenges and Opportunities Challenges: Public protests have delayed several plants High capital costs require government backing Fuel supply, especially uranium, remains tight Opportunities: Stable baseload for a renewable-heavy grid A powerful tool for decarbonization Indigenous expertise lowers import dependence SMRs may revolutionize industrial energy Companies in India's nuclear value chain– a partial list The road ahead India plans to scale nuclear capacity through indigenous designs, innovative fuels, and collaborative public-sector ventures. For global energy watchers, India's nuclear journey could be a pivotal chapter in the clean energy revolution. ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)

Trump administration plans to deregulate over 60 US labour laws: Is it time for international students to look elsewhere?
Trump administration plans to deregulate over 60 US labour laws: Is it time for international students to look elsewhere?

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Time of India

Trump administration plans to deregulate over 60 US labour laws: Is it time for international students to look elsewhere?

The Trump administration has announced a sweeping plan to deregulate over 60 US labour laws, signalling a significant shift in how the country governs worker rights and workplace protections. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The proposed rollback, aimed at eliminating what the Department of Labor calls 'outdated and burdensome' rules, covers a wide range of provisions, minimum wage thresholds, safety regulations, overtime protections, and union-related rules. While the administration frames the move as pro-growth and business-friendly, global observers warn that it could further erode the United States' standing as a top destination for international students and skilled workers. What's changing? The proposed changes target core federal protections that govern the American workplace. Among them: Weakening of minimum wage and overtime rules for specific job categories Relaxation of workplace safety standards across high-risk industries Reduction in oversight of employer violations and worker grievances Rollback of certain union and collective bargaining rights The Labor Department claims the deregulation will streamline compliance and stimulate job creation. However, critics argue it opens the door to increased exploitation, especially in sectors employing temporary, immigrant, or entry-level workers. Global gap widens Even before the proposed deregulation, the United States already lagged behind most developed nations in labour protections. In contrast, the European Union enforces bloc-wide standards on critical issues like working hours, paid leave, occupational safety, and employee participation in workplace decisions. Countries such as Germany, Canada, Australia, and the Nordic nations go further, offering: Stronger social safety nets Faster grievance redressal mechanisms National minimum wage guarantees Universal healthcare access, often tied to employment By comparison, the US approach is more fragmented and employer-driven. The country has ratified fewer than 15 International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions, well below the average for advanced economies—particularly in areas like freedom of association, collective bargaining, and worker safety. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The proposed rollback of over 60 labour protections would only widen this divide, raising concerns about how the US is positioned in the global education and employment ecosystem. For international students weighing their options, a less protected labour market could make the US less attractive for post-study careers and long-term settlement. Implications for international students For international students, especially those pursuing degrees with plans to work in the US through programs like OPT (Optional Practical Training) or H-1B visas, the changes could significantly alter expectations. A deregulated labour market could lead to: Weaker job security after graduation Reduced workplace safety and protection, especially in STEM and industrial fields Increased difficulty in reporting violations or securing fair treatment While US universities remain globally respected, the long-term value of an American education is increasingly tied to post-study work opportunities. With diminished labour protections, the pathway from student to skilled professional may become more precarious. Shifting student preferences Amid changing US policy, many international students are looking toward alternative destinations that offer both educational quality and worker-friendly environments. Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, and Australia have gained traction for combining post-study work rights with clearer pathways to permanent residency and better labour conditions. Recent years have seen a measurable uptick in international student interest in countries with more stable immigration systems and higher labour protections. The proposed US deregulation may accelerate this shift. Strategic risk for the US Labour deregulation may lower costs and increase flexibility for employers, but it also raises reputational concerns for the United States. Countries perceived to have lax worker protections risk trade friction, ethical sourcing bans, and a decline in global talent inflows. In a globalised education market where students factor in long-term outcomes, such shifts can influence university application trends, talent retention, and economic competitiveness. The Trump administration's labour deregulation drive marks a turning point in U.S. workplace policy. While it may appeal to business interests, it also introduces uncertainty for those planning to build a future in the country. For international students weighing their options, the message is increasingly clear: academic excellence alone is no longer enough—labour protections matter too. As other nations expand both student-friendly and worker-protective policies, the United States risks losing ground in the global race for education, talent, and innovation. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us .

Nordic Bank Leads Europe IPO Arrangers as Local Listings Boom
Nordic Bank Leads Europe IPO Arrangers as Local Listings Boom

Mint

timea day ago

  • Mint

Nordic Bank Leads Europe IPO Arrangers as Local Listings Boom

(Bloomberg) -- A regional investment bank has become Europe's most prolific underwriter of initial public offerings, tapping a rich vein of listings in the continent's northernmost corner. Nordic-focused DNB Carnegie worked on five IPOs so far this year that raised roughly $2 billion in proceeds, accounting for about a third of all European volumes for the period, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The deals have catapulted the bank to the number one spot for European IPOs thus far in 2025, and number two for the wider Europe, Middle East and Africa region after Citigroup Inc. DNB Carnegie's dominance illustrates how Scandinavian bourses, particularly Stockholm, have been gaining traction since the second half of 2024. Meanwhile, financial centers like London, Milan and Paris have lagged behind. The trend reached a zenith with the roughly $1 billion listing by Stockholm's Asker Healthcare Group AB in March — the biggest European IPO so far in 2025. 'The Nordic IPO market has been very busy the last three quarters compared to the rest of Europe, and we've been executing all the sizable IPOs,' Jens Plenov, DNB Carnegie's global head of equity capital markets, said in an interview. Verisure's planned Swedish listing could provide an even bigger boost in the coming months, as the alarm company and its backers are eyeing raising about €3 to €4 billion, people familiar with the matter have said. DNB Carnegie is acting as a global coordinator on the float, Bloomberg News has reported. Dealmakers credit the strength of the Nordic market to its local community of asset managers and pension funds that regularly invest in IPOs. Retail investors are also keen to participate directly in deals, making up around 10% of allocations on average, Plenov said. To mitigate risks, newly listed companies have generally opted for smaller free-floats and shorter offering periods, sounding out investors extensively before officially launching the IPO, Plenov said. For instance, serial acquirer Roko AB sold roughly 95% of its 5.3 billion Swedish krona ($560 million) offering to cornerstone investors before opening it to the public in March. But the region hasn't been completely immune to market volatility. Investment firm Greenbridge SA and NOBA Bank Group AB, a consumer lender backed by Nordic Capital, postponed plans to go public before the summer to hold out for calmer markets. DNB Carnegie was established in May, after Norway's DNB Bank ASA bought Carnegie Holding AB, a boutique investment bank with origins dating back to the early 19th century, for more than $1 billion from Altor Equity Partners. Carnegie was the sixth-biggest underwriter in all of EMEA during the IPO boom of 2021, but slumped in the rankings when the Nordic market slowed down. Its rise in the standings isn't just a factor of the tie-up — combined deal volumes for both banks last year would not have been in the top 20 firms, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Asked if DNB Carnegie would lean on DNB's large balance sheet to win more mandates, Plenov said the bank wants 'to continue winning IPO mandates on merit.' However, 'the ability to apply our balance sheet to support our clients will be a great benefit.' More stories like this are available on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store