
Lotus Emeya: The Hyper-GT Electric Super Sedan To Rule Them All
First, let's get back to those looks. The Emeya could be mistaken for a mid-engined sports car from the front. Someone even thought it was a Lamborghini of Bugatti when walking past in a car park. You only realize that this isn't a two-seater with track pretentions when you move round the side and spot the four doors and just how long it is. It's very, very long. The Emeya is over 5.1m, so not quite as much as the BMW i7, but still huge and the wheelbase is over 3m as well. It's also wider than a BMW i7 (over 2m).
The side profile is sleek, however, evoking speed and aerodynamics (with a drag factor of just 0.21Cd). Lotus has done a brilliant job of making a four-door sedan look incredibly sporty. The ruddy orange of the one I borrowed (a paint called Fireglow) is particularly striking. It's loud but not tasteless, enhancing the impact of the swooping roofline. You can also get Lotus's signature yellow paint, which works well with this car too. In summary, the Lotus Emeya is a beautiful tour-de-force of automotive styling.
Its capabilities are not skin deep, either. Lotus has recently reorganized the range for both the Emeya and the Eletre. There are 600 and 900 versions, and both are incredibly powerful. The two models refer to dual motor configurations with 612hp and 918hp respectively. The 600 comes as a basic version, GT, GT SE, and SPORT SE variants. The 900 only has SPORT and SPORT CARBON options. The car I borrowed was actually the Emeya R from the previous range, but its features are almost identical to the 900 SPORT CARBON.
All cars have a 102kWh battery (slightly smaller than the Eletre's massive 112kWh pack, but still substantial), active air suspension with continuous damping control, LED matrix headlights, a 51in head-up display, and four-zone climate control. So even the basic version is well equipped. Move up to GT and you get the highway assist and parking packages, plus 21in wheels and six-piston brakes (basic wheels are 20in).
The GT SE variant adds an intelligent glass roof, which is rather cool. Not only can you switch the glass from transparent to opaque entirely (a technology I first saw in the BMW iX) but you can also select triangular sections to create a pattern. This is more of 'because we can' feature than being particularly useful, although it would enable a single passenger to be in the shade while others enjoy direct sunlight. The GT SE also gets a hands-free tailgate and some aesthetic lighting additions.
The SPORT SE is where the driving experience gets a real boost, with the Lotus dynamic handling pack, active rear spoiler and diffuser, and active front air dam. Occupant luxury is upgraded with ventilated front seats with massaging, plus soft-close doors. These automatically open with a pull of the handle or push of the interior button, and you don't need to close them fully, as they will finish off the process themselves.
The 900 SPORT doesn't have the seat and door upgrades, nor the diffuser and air dam. But it keeps the dynamic handling pack. The flagship 900 SPORT CARBON has everything the SPORT SE offers plus extensive use of carbon fiber trim inside and out. The 900 also uses a two-speed transmission like the Porsche Taycan, improving acceleration and efficiency at high speed.
The Emeya's sense of occasion on the outside continues inside. Lotus interiors have improved a lot since the time when the Lotus name was jokingly referred to as an acronym for 'Lots Of Trouble Usually Serious'. The Emira I drove a few months ago is a more conventional two-seater and is much more comfortable than previous models. But the Emeya, like the Eletre, is a huge step above that.
This isn't a Rolls Royce inside - there is plenty of plastic trim around. But all the trim is of extremely high quality. The optional Alcantara steering wheel on my test car feels particularly great as you drive. The front seats hug your back, but if you switch to Sports or Track mode, the bolsters narrow to provide an even more bucket-like experience, keeping you from slipping in fast corners. The massage function is also excellent, with a variety of settings that are very good at providing relief on a long trip.
There are two options for rear seating with the Emeya, as with the Eletre. The basic choice is a bench seat for three, but the car I tested had the Executive Pack, which is only available with the 900. This swaps the bench for two rear seats like the front ones. This adds ventilation and massage functions in the rear, with an integrated armrest that includes a control screen for all the seat functions and quad-zone climate control. Although this is a low car, there's still plenty of head and legroom in the rear, thanks to the vehicle length and wheelbase. The Emeya has much more space front and rear than a Porsche Taycan.
There's a huge amount of technology in the Emeya, revolving around the central 15.1in infotainment screen. There aren't that many discrete buttons, although the steering wheel has regular stalks (left for lights and indicators, right for wipers) plus paddles to vary regeneration level and drive modes. There are some controls in the center console for raising the car over particularly high speedbumps plus demisting the windows, but all other climate controls require trip to the central display.
The infotainment screen layout is fairly logical, with a lot available from the large 3D model of the car that sits centrally on the home page. You press parts of the car to reach functions. You can call up a double-row of built-in apps, which include direct Spotify and TIDAL music service support. The connected satnav is competent and easy to read, with a capable keyword search function. A central cog icon takes you to all the main car settings, which have a consistent layout making it easy to find the parameters you want to change.
You also get that head-up display as standard, which shows ADAS details as well as speed, limit and navigation. There's still a narrow instrument strip behind the steering wheel, but that only provides minimal information, such as speed, regen level, power level, and range / battery percentage – all you need, really.
The Emeya isn't a car meant for doing the shopping in, but there is a decent amount of cargo space in the back if you did want to (or to carry the bags for your passengers on a trip, of course). With the bench seats in the back, you get a decent 509 liters of capacity and you can drop the rear seats forward to make 1,388 liters. This is hardly SUV territory but perfectly adequate for any practical load-lugging you might want to do with your electric hyper-GT. The capacity drops to just 425 liters with the Executive Pack, however, and you can't drop the seats forward. The rear is still deep, so will fit a couple of suitcases. The Emeya can also allegedly tow up to 2,250kg, but I very much doubt anyone will be hooking a caravan up to the back.
When I tested the Eletre, it was dynamically excellent for a large SUV, but not exactly in keeping with the Lotus heritage of light, nimble performance. The Emeya isn't exactly svelte at 2.5 tons either, but it still feels much more like a continuation of what Lotus is all about: driving pleasure. In fact, it's an absolute blast.
The 600 cars take just 4.15 seconds to reach 62mph, and the 900 cars a somewhat bonkers 2.78 seconds, around the same as the Maserati GranTurismo Folgore. The power delivery is incredible, and this is particularly surprising when accelerating from around 50mph on a motorway. This still feels like gunning it off the lights, with that second gear in the 900 kicking in to keep the power delivery relentless. This must be terrific on a German autobahn; on a British motorway you will need to be very careful to stay the right side of the law.
What is even more incredible is how dynamically stable the Emeya is when laying down the power during a maneuver. When you floor the accelerator, there is a little wriggle as the car works out how to keep everything going in the right direction, but the traction and steering control provides handling confidence that matches the brilliant Porsche Taycan, and in my experience is only surpassed by the €2 million ($2.2 million) Rimac Nevera, which is in a different league to any other EV I've ever driven.
I'm sad to say that I haven't had the chance to try the Emeya round a track (although I have tried the Eletre R and it was utterly bonkers). My experience at legal speeds on British A-roads and motorways would imply that it's going to be brilliant, despite the weight. The level of grip and road stability are outstanding, delivering a truly engaging drive. The active air suspension also soaks up bumps incredibly well, making rubbish pothole-ridden London roads comfortable. This ability to provide stiff, level cornering while eating up surface blemishes is exactly what you want in a luxury performance sedan.
There are a couple of caveats. My car had camera-based wing mirrors, which use little screens in the doors. In theory these prevent blind spots compared to regular wing mirrors, but if you're a bit short-sighted like me, they're not so useful, particularly in the dark. The one on the passenger's side is fine, but the one near me is just at the distance someone who uses reading glasses will have trouble focusing on.
Another thing I realized to my cost is that this is not a great car for tight British car parks. The long wheelbase makes getting round corners with high curbs extremely stressful and sometimes impossible to achieve unscathed, particularly with the 22in wheels on my review car. But these are 'first world problems'. If you can afford an Emeya, you can probably afford a mansion with spacious parking.
The Fireglow paint is very orange indeed.
James Morris
Although the Emeya is great for ragging it around an A-road, long distance is really what it's about, and the range it's capable of backs that up. Although the battery isn't quite as big as the Eletre's, with a usable capacity of 98.9kWh, you still get up to 379 WLTP miles with the 600, although this drops to 301 miles with the 900. During my testing I managed 2.3 miles per kWh (I wasn't exactly trying to be frugal, because that's pointless in a car with over 900hp). This would equate to 230 miles of usable real-world range. Still, an 800V architecture has been used and charging has been demonstrated up to 402kW, which means you could charge from 10 to 80% in just 14 minutes. I've charged the Eletre, with the same powertrain, on a 350kW charger and it's incredibly quick. Driving long distances in the Emeya will be a breeze.
You will not be surprised to hear that the Emeya isn't a cheap car. The basic 600 starts at £84,990 ($113,000), then it's £5,000 ($6,600) more for the 600 GT, another £5,000 for the GT SE, and £10,000 ($13,000) on top of that for the SPORT SE, making £104,990 ($139,000). The 900 SPORT is £129,990 ($172,500), and the 900 SPORT CARBON £139,990 ($186,000). Then there are plenty of extras you can add, and I calculated that my test car would cost more than £162,000 ($215,000).
That's a lot of money, but then this is a lot of car, with no real downsides in its genre. If this review seems glowing (or fireglowing, if you consider the paint color), that's because the Lotus Emeya deserves its praise. Yes, it's very expensive, even beating the top echelons of the Porsche Taycan Turbo S or BMW i7 on price, and well ahead of a Tesla Model S Plaid. But the driving experience is brilliant, the comfort is exquisite, and it looks even more expensive than it is. If you've got the money and want fast transport for more than two people that turns heads everywhere, buy one.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
32 minutes ago
- The Verge
When will the US get the three-row Tesla Model Y that just launched in China?
Posted Aug 20, 2025 at 1:21 PM UTC When will the US get the three-row Tesla Model Y that just launched in China? Either the end of 2026, or not at all, according to Elon Musk. The new six-seater Model Y L variant is creating some buzz after just launching in China, but Musk said that the rise of autonomous vehicles may preclude its arrival in the US. Whatever that means. Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Andrew J. Hawkins Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Andrew J. Hawkins Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Electric Cars Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tesla Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Transportation


Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
11 Years Later, Elon Musk Is Floating the Flying Car Scam Again
'Maybe we'll make a flying car, just for fun,' Elon Musk told the Independent back in 2014. The news outlet insisted at the time that Musk wasn't joking and that he should be taken seriously, given his success with other companies like PayPal. At the time, the Tesla CEO was worth a measly $8.4 billion according to Forbes, a fraction of the $413 billion he currently holds on paper. But when a billionaire CEO says he's going to do something, you're supposed to hear him out. 'We could definitely make a flying car—but that's not the hard part,' Musk was quoted as saying in 2014. 'The hard part is, how do you make a flying car that's super safe and quiet? Because if it's a howler, you're going to make people very unhappy.' Well, Musk never built a flying car. Probably because there are many more hurdles beyond making them quiet. Piloting them, for instance, poses a huge problem since most people aren't trained to fly. But Musk clearly hasn't given up the dream. Or he hasn't given up the hype, to be more precise. Because Musk loves to toss out wild ideas to get attention and suggested in a new tweet Tuesday that Tesla might be taking up the challenge of flying cars, writing, 'Maybe Tesla should make this.' Musk was quote-tweeting an AI-generated video of a Cybertruck outfitted with wings. The vehicle is seen flying among a post-apocalyptic wasteland 'run by robots,' which seem to be hulking around with no real purpose. Maybe Tesla should make this — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 19, 2025Can Musk pull it off? We're not going to hold our breath. Flying cars have been imagined for well over a century, with inventors and popular tech magazines insisting they were always just around the corner. There was the flying car of 1923, imagined in Science and Invention magazine for 50 years into the future. There were the flying cars of the 1950s, including a prototype that actually flew. And there was good ol' George Jetson in the 1960s, signalling to young baby boomers of the time that a wondrous, shiny future awaited them by the time they got older. The flying car felt inevitable for just about every generation of the 20th century. But nobody could quite pull it off. One of the most infamous flying cars was the flying Pinto of 1973. Two guys founded a company in 1968 called Advanced Vehicle Engineers, abbreviated as AVE, with the dream of mass-producing flying cars in California. The men strapped the wings and rear engine mount of a Cessna plane onto a Ford Pinto, a car that was known to explode even when it stayed safely on the ground. The company founders took off in the vehicle from Ventura County Airport on Sept. 11, 1973, and crashed, killing both men. And yet, flying cars are always just a little beyond the horizon. If you take a close look at the headlines, flying cars are often promised to be just two years away. It's a trend I noted back in 2015 when AeroMobil said their flying car would be released by 2017. I promised at the time that I would literally eat the sun if that car was released to the public. Needless to say, I didn't have to attempt such a feat. It didn't help that AeroMobil crashed during a test flight, though no one died. The company closed down for good in 2023. I'm not going to say that Musk will never create a flying car. They've been built before, and they exist in some form. The thing that doesn't exist is a market for them. People need to get a pilot's license to fly a roadable aircraft. Musk, as the wealthiest person in the history of the world, could easily use some of his $413 billion to build a plane that looks like a Cybertruck. The question is whether he could mass-produce one that people would actually buy. Tesla has sold just 52,000 Cybertrucks since they were released in November 2023, according to CNBC, far short of the 1 million preorders the company got when the truck was first announced in 2019. Part of that might have something to do with the fact that the Cybertruck is much more expensive than what was promised. Or it could be that it doesn't have the range or towing capacity that was initially advertised. Those pathetic sales might also have something to do with those two Nazi-style salutes Musk gave on the day of President Trump's inauguration back in January. Who knows for sure? Whatever it is, building a flying Cybertruck for mass adoption seems extremely unlikely right now or any time in the foreseeable future. Unless Musk was talking less about the flying Cybertruck in that AI-generated video and was referring to the apocalypse part. That seems very doable.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
3 Serious Tesla Problems Investors Aren't Talking Enough About
Key Points Lawsuits continue to mount for Tesla and Elon Musk. There has been a flurry of executive departures from the company. Losing revenue from zero-emission credit sales is a big blow to EV makers. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › It's been a bumpy ride for Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) investors in 2025. The EV maker is feeling the heat from all angles: media, consumers, analysts, you name it. But for all the consumers leaving the brand, and the media frustrated with Elon Musk's political antics, there are a few problems that have gone unnoticed. Let's take a look at recent lawsuits, the talent exodus, and the loss of valuable zero-emissions credit sales. 1. Lawsuits keep mounting Just earlier this month, Elon Musk and Tesla were sued by shareholders who accused them of securities fraud for hiding the serious risk its self-driving vehicles posed. The proposed class action lawsuit was filed earlier this month and was a black eye after the automaker's first public test of its robotaxis in late June in Austin, Texas. These lawsuits have a wide range of driving forces, many seemingly from the actions of Musk himself. In fact, as of August 2023, Tesla was already party to over 1,750 lawsuits, a big chunk of them in China, where the company is already struggling to protect market share and profits amid a brutal price war and increased competition from domestic Chinese automakers. Also earlier this month, a federal jury found Tesla partly liable in a 2019 car crash that killed a pedestrian and left another badly injured while the automobile was on Autopilot. The jury awarded the plaintiffs $43 million in compensatory damages for pain and suffering, plus another $200 million in punitive damages. These lawsuits are certainly difficult to keep track of, but investors would be wise to remember that these lawsuits are adding up, and some can be very costly in brand image or directly through damages. 2. A concerning talent exodus Amid the flurry of negative news facing Tesla, many investors brushed off the peppering of executive departures throughout the year. But this is a talent exodus that has become, and should be, concerning to investors. Here's a look at key departures, to name a few: Omead Afshar (VP/Head of Sales and Manufacturing, North America/Europe) Milan Kovac (Head of Optimus Humanoid Robot Team) Vineet Mehta (Head of Battery Architecture) Troy Jones (VP of Sales, Service, and Delivery, North America) Pete Bannon (VP of Hardware Engineering, Chip Tech, and Dojo Supercomputer) Piero Landolfi (Director of Service, North America) Those were just a handful of high-profile executives and key personnel departing, and its leaders in key areas such as service, sales, engineering, and even the robotics team. The departures raise concerns about Tesla's leadership, operational challenges, and its current ability to remain competitive. 3. Companies in this space are losing valuable revenue To say that Tesla and some of its EV competitors are about to lose a significant revenue source is putting it lightly. That's right: Tesla, Lucid, and Rivian, among others, are about to see billions of dollars in revenue disappear seemingly overnight as U.S. policy essentially ends the zero-emission credit market. Essentially, the government formerly penalized automakers with lower average fuel economy, or those that produced more gasoline-guzzling vehicles and fewer EVs, but that is no longer. Without penalties being enforced, those companies failing to meet emissions standards are no longer incentivized to purchase zero-emission credits from EV makers to meet standards. And as the market for those zero-emission credits dried up, so too did a significant chunk of revenue for EV makers with a surplus of such credits. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has already stopped issuing compliance letters to automakers that violate the fuel economy standards. What it all means When it rains, it pours -- at least that's how it seemed for most of Tesla's developments this year. But savvy investors would be wise to keep abreast of developments with Tesla lawsuits and its massive talent exodus, in addition to losing valuable revenue from zero-emission credits. These haven't been covered enough and raise uncertainty surrounding the EV maker. Long-term investors should try and weather the storm and stay focused on the company's business long term. But it's also fair to say Tesla is at a crossroads with its future strategy, and investors will have to revisit their investment thesis to see if they are still aligned. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $472,031!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $43,882!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $671,466!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 Daniel Miller has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Serious Tesla Problems Investors Aren't Talking Enough About was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data