Great Barrier Reef records largest annual coral loss in 39 years
But due to increasing coral cover since 2017, the coral deaths — caused mainly by bleaching last year associated with climate change — have left the area of living coral across the iconic reef system close to its long-term average, the Australian Institute of Marine Science said in its annual survey on Wednesday.
The change underscores a new level of volatility on the UNESCO World Heritage Site, the report said.
Mike Emslie, who heads the tropical marine research agency's long-term monitoring program, said the live coral cover measured in 2024 was the largest recorded in 39 years of surveys.
The losses from such a high base of coral cover had partially cushioned the serious climate impacts on the world's largest reef ecosystem, which covers 344,000 square kilometers (133,000 square miles) off the northeast Australian coast, he said.
'These are substantial impacts and evidence that the increasing frequency of coral bleaching is really starting to have detrimental effects on the Great Barrier Reef,' Emslie said on Thursday.
'While there's still a lot of coral cover out there, these are record declines that we have seen in any one year of monitoring,' he added.
Emslie's agency divides the Great Barrier Reef, which extends 1,500 kilometers (900 miles) along the Queensland state coast, into three similarly-sized regions: northern, central and southern.
Living coral cover shrunk by almost a third in the south in a year, a quarter in the north and by 14% in the central region, the report said.
Because of record global heat in 2023 and 2024, the world is still going through its biggest — and fourth ever recorded — mass coral bleaching event on record, with heat stress hurting nearly 84% of the world's coral reef area, including the Great Barrier Reef, according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's coral reef watch. So far at least 83 countries have been impacted.
This bleaching event started in January 2023 and was declared a global crisis in April 2024. It easily eclipsed the previous biggest global coral bleaching event, from 2014 to 2017, when 68.2% had bleaching from heat stress.
Large areas around Australia — but not the Great Barrier Reef — hit the maximum or near maximum of bleaching alert status during this latest event. Australia in March this year started aerial surveys of 281 reefs across the Torres Strait and the entire northern Great Barrier Reef and found widespread coral bleaching. Of the 281 reefs, 78 were more than 30% bleached.
Coral has a hard time thriving and at times even surviving in prolonged hot water. They can survive short bursts, but once certain thresholds of weeks and high temperatures are passed, the coral is bleached, which means it turns white because it expels the algae that live in the tissue and give them their colors. Bleached corals are not dead, but they are weaker and more vulnerable to disease.
Coral reefs often bounce back from these mass global bleaching events, but often they are not as strong as they were before.
Coral reefs are considered a 'unique and threatened system' due to climate change and are especially vulnerable to global warming beyond 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change proclaimed in 2018. The world has now warmed 1.3 degrees Celsius since pre-industrial times. That report said 'tropical corals may be even more vulnerable to climate change than indicated in assessments made in 2014.'
The report said back-to-back big bleaching events at the Great Barrier Reef in the mid 2010s 'suggest that the research community may have underestimated climate risks for coral reefs.'
'Warm water (tropical) coral reefs are projected to reach a very high risk of impact at 1.2°C, with most available evidence suggesting that coral-dominated ecosystems will be non-existent at this temperature or higher. At this point, coral abundance will be near zero at many locations,' the report said.
____
Associated Press Science Writer Seth Borenstein in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Can an AI chatbot of Dr Karl change climate sceptics' minds? He's willing to give it a try
There's arguably no face, voice or collection of exuberant, patterned shirts more recognisable than those belonging to Dr Karl Kruszelnicki. The bespectacled boffin has been answering curly listener questions about science, with characteristic excitement and passion, for more than 40 years. Despite a seemingly tireless work ethic, Kruszelnicki, now 77 years old, can't be everywhere all at once. Those questions now come in waves, across social media platforms at all hours of the day. 'Sometimes I get 300 requests a day on Twitter to answer an involved question about climate change,' Kruszelnicki says. Particularly on X (formerly Twitter), he says he would often engage with users who don't believe climate change is real or urgent. He hoped there might be a way to change the minds of this group of people, who he says have been bombarded by misinformation in places such as the Murdoch press for the past 30 years. After speaking with longtime friend and technology journalist Leigh Stark, the pair settled on an idea: an AI-powered Digital Dr Karl. Using a large language model (LLM), they're creating a chatbot designed to sound like Kruszelnicki that provides users with evidence, backed by trustworthy sources, that the climate crisis is caused by humans and is an urgent problem to solve. 'I cannot answer all the questions by myself and people want questions answered. The only way I can do it is develop this digital AI,' he says. Kruszelnicki's achievements as a science communicator are unparalleled: in Australia he's considered a National Living Treasure, he won the Unesco Kalinga prize, he wrote dozens of books and is the one and only Julius Sumner Miller Fellow at the University of Sydney, a position he has held since 1993. He believes AI can help convince those who don't believe in the severity and causes of the climate crisis – even if there are outstanding questions around the ethical use of AI, its training data, accuracy and its own environmental impacts. 'I think with climate change, we are at a stage where the perfect is the enemy of the good,' he says. 'We're certainly not going to become unethical or become like the forces of evil.' Digital Dr Karl runs on an open-source LLM developed by Mistral, a French company considered one of Europe's challengers to OpenAI and Google. To create Digital Dr Karl, Stark has taken Mistral's base model, then trained it on a corpus of Kruszelnicki's climate science resources acquired through his own research for his own books and writing on climate. It includes academic papers, consensus statements and original articles from publications including the New York Times, the Guardian and RenewEconomy to build out its knowledge, just like the real Kruszelnicki has. 'This is an AI that's been trained on the 40,000 PDFs I've gathered over the last 40 years,' he says. Stark says questions over copyright are valid, and he would like to ultimately have the chatbot trained exclusively on data, but says 'we're not at that point yet', emphasising 'this is beta, this is really early stuff' and the intent is to build something 'based solely on data'. Taking the Guardian through a demonstration of Digital Dr Karl, Stark reveals the AI interface is similar to ChatGPT, and users can type in a single query about climate change to kickstart a conversation. Stark types in 'climate change is a hoax' and the Digital Dr Karl replies a few seconds later in a stilted and tonally inconsistent recreation of Kruszelnicki's voice. It wants to know if we are suggesting climate change 'is a fabricated idea'. We are only able to answer yes or no. We respond yes, at which point the AI quotes Barack Obama on the effects of climate change. As the conversation continues, Digital Dr Karl displays data, such as graphs showing atmospheric carbon dioxide over the last 170 years. But it also seems to mix metaphors and 'hallucinate' (the terminology used in AI research for 'make up') some of the numbers for atmospheric carbon dioxide rise. Stark describes the AI as both an 'alpha' and 'beta' version, and he is working to improve the AI voice, but expects Digital Dr Karl will release this in October. Kruszelnicki says he has already spent $20,000 of his own money since February to develop the AI: 'This is purely philanthropic – I do this because I see this as my duty, in return for 16 years of free university education that I received.' Sign up to Five Great Reads Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning after newsletter promotion Kruszelnicki plans to run his digital self for 100 days because 'it's a nice round number'. He will also deliver 100 TikToks, one a day, alongside the project and each one will push people to his Digital Dr Karl, Stark says. After 100 days, the pair will switch off their AI and 'work out what the fuck just happened'. At that juncture they will do a survey with the hope that the result is that 'more people are open-minded and believe in climate change', says Stark. Kruszelnicki says they're just 'trying to do the Mark 1' and will see what they find before deciding whether they go on to a Mark 2. There are some hints about what could happen. Mounting evidence – academic and anecdotal – suggests LLMs can influence emotion, opinion and belief. In September 2024, a study in the journal Science showed conversations with a chatbot could reduce participants' belief in their chosen conspiracy theory, including everything from the Kennedy assassination to the illuminati, by around 20% on average. The effect persisted for two months after the conversations took place. Thomas Costello, assistant professor of psychology at American University and lead author of the Science study, says the AI is persuasive because it can rapidly access and strategically deploy information in conversation. 'The back and forth is useful because [reasoned] dialogue and debate is excellent at surfacing the crux of disagreements and kicking the tyres of each side,' he says. Costello has also co-authored another study, yet to be peer-reviewed but available online, suggesting a similar effect is seen when AI models, tailored to respond to specific concerns from a user, address climate scepticism and inaction. One of the key elements though, is that these AI agents are not based on any real person, and to shape belief, users must be willing to engage in conversation. But even if Digital Dr Karl can change minds, it contains the same outstanding issues as other LLMs. Kruszelnicki and Stark hope to alleviate the concerns around AI's environmental impacts. 'We'll run the website entirely off solar panels and you don't need a lot of energy,' says Kruszelnicki. Stark says Digital Dr Karl is running off a very small amount of computer memory on a $12,000 Mac and it theoretically can run on renewables. 'If we can get several of these computers running off of a solar battery or basically solar panel and a large battery, then we can effectively run this on renewables.' However, with more users, Stark says scaling it could be a challenge – he expects up to 2,500 people will be accessing Digital Dr Karl at any time. 'We're going to be keeping an eye on it, on every response that it makes,' Kruszelnicki says. 'And if it goes bad, we'll pull the plug.'
The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
A huge stick insect has been discovered in Australia. Here's why that's important
Scientists recently announced they had found an enormous new stick insect in Australia. At 41cm in length and weighing 44g, the main question I heard was: 'Why didn't scientists notice something that big before now?' The short answer is: it's a stick. Stick insects spent over 100m years perfecting their cosplay as leaves, branches and moss. They are diabolically difficult to spot, even with fairly acute human vision. If you disturb a stick insect, its usual response is to fall to the ground and lay still. So now you are looking for a stick lying on the ground … among all the other sticks. Scientists were alerted to the presence of this new insect, Acrophylla alta, by a photo posted on iNaturalist, the community science sharing site. Based on that image, they spent several nights tramping through a rainforest with headlamps and flashlights, hoping for a glimpse of this rare new beast. They eventually located and knocked the stick insect off of its perch, which can be 30 metres up in the tree canopy, with a long (actual) stick. Phasmids (stick and leaf insects) are an incredible example of natural selection at work. As herbivores quietly munching leaves, stick insects are a delicious snack for many other animals. Evolution shaped the 3,500-plus described species of phasmids into stunning examples of camouflage, usually by pretending to be objects that are irrelevant to predators: sticks, bark and leaves. They solved the problem of hiding in plain sight through a variety of forms most beautiful and wonderful; their bodies range from long skinny tubes to wide and flattened leaf shapes. Stick insects are grouped into delightful categories with names like broad prickly sticks, winged bark huggers, stout crawlers, narrow leaf mimics and tree lobsters. The last is a group best described as insects that gave up on the whole delicate leaf and twig act to become heavily armoured, spiny tanks – determined to make a predator profoundly regret ever trying to eat them. As a former keeper of stick and leaf insects in a bug zoo, I can attest to just how good these animals are at being invisible. Even when you knew there were exactly 10 leaf insects in a cage, finding numbers 9 and 10 always involved a long manual search of every single branch and leaf, sometimes requiring multiple people. Jungle nymphs (Heteropteryx dilatata) are 17cm lime-green spiky monsters that somehow manage to disappear into foliage despite their size. Often you only discovered one by getting a painful kick from a spiny leg. The recently described Australian stick insect also lives in a rainforest tree canopy, so it's not surprising it remained hidden for so long. Insects and their relatives are the animals science knows the least about, despite being some of the most abundant organisms on Earth. After almost three centuries of taxonomic research, scientists have only described and named about 1m insect species; thousands of new species are added to that total yearly. The question is not why weird new insects keep getting described by science, but why there aren't more strange insects, spiders and other relatives with extra legs being discovered daily. Research suggests that at least 5m insect species exist, and insects and their relatives (arthropods) make up 85% of all known animal species. To put that in context, there are as many species of just ladybirds as there are of all mammals combined. The International Union for Conservation of Nature's (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species is a good benchmark to get a sense of how little we know. IUCN is the primary information source on the global conservation status of animal species, but its database lists only 1.3% of known insect species for evaluation. For the entire category of insects, the most species-rich animals on our planet, IUCN's data table simply says 'insufficient coverage'. It simply doesn't have enough data to estimate the percentage of threatened insect species. Naming and describing is just the first step of understanding and preserving our biological diversity. For many species, we have no idea where they live, what they eat, or what their lives are like. Of the insects listed in the IUCN database, 26% are listed as 'data deficient'. This adorable little willowherb leafcutter bee is extinct in the UK, and we don't know enough about it to say much more than that. By focusing on large, charismatic animals, we miss understanding the little animals that run our world and provide essential ecosystem services. It's little invertebrates that pollinate plants, feed birds and other animals, and keep soils healthy. They deserve to be studied as much, or more, than their bigger vertebrate kin. Concentrating on common threats to animals, big and small, can help us make better choices about prioritising research and conservation. Gwen Pearson is adjunct faculty at Michigan State University Department of Entomology. She received the Entomological Foundation Medal of Honor for her work in education and science communication
BreakingNews.ie
a day ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Astronauts return to Earth with SpaceX after five months at ISS
Four astronauts returned to Earth after hustling to the International Space Station five months ago to relieve the stuck test pilots of Boeing's Starliner. Their SpaceX capsule parachuted into the Pacific off the Southern California coast a day after departing the orbiting lab. Advertisement 'Welcome home,' SpaceX Mission Control radioed. A SpaceX capsule carrying four astronauts parachutes into the Pacific Ocean off the Southern California coast (Keegan Barber/Nasa via AP) Splashing down were Nasa's Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, Japan's Takuya Onishi and Russia's Kirill Peskov. They launched in March as replacements for the two Nasa astronauts assigned to Starliner's botched demo. Starliner malfunctions kept Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams at the space station for more than nine months instead of a week. Advertisement Nasa ordered Boeing's new crew capsule to return empty and switched the pair to SpaceX. They left soon after Ms McClain and her crew arrived to take their places. Mr Wilmore has since retired from Nasa. Before leaving the space station on Friday, Ms McClain made note of 'some tumultuous times on Earth' with people struggling. Advertisement A SpaceX capsule carrying four astronauts parachutes into the Pacific Ocean off the Southern California coast (Keegan Barber/Nasa via AP) 'We want this mission, our mission, to be a reminder of what people can do when we work together, when we explore together,' she said. Ms McClain looked forward to 'doing nothing for a couple of days' once back home in Houston, US. High on her crewmates' wish list were hot showers and juicy burgers. It was SpaceX's third Pacific splashdown with people on board, but the first for a Nasa crew in 50 years. Advertisement Elon Musk's company switched capsule returns from Florida to California's coast earlier this year to reduce the risk of debris falling on populated areas. Back-to-back private crews were the first to experience Pacific homecomings. The last time Nasa astronauts returned to the Pacific from space was during the 1975 Apollo-Soyuz mission, a detente meet-up of Americans and Soviets in orbit.
