UN experts accuse Israel of 'extermination' in Gaza attacks
GENEVA: An independent United Nations commission said on Tuesday Israeli attacks on schools, religious and cultural sites in Gaza amount to war crimes and the crime against humanity of seeking to exterminate Palestinians. "Israel has obliterated Gaza's education system and destroyed over half of all religious and cultural sites in the Gaza Strip," the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory said in a report.
It accused Israeli forces of committing "war crimes, including directing attacks against civilians and wilful killing, in their attacks on educational facilities that caused civilian casualties. "In killing civilians sheltering in schools and religious sites, Israeli security forces committed the crime against humanity of extermination," the report said. It noted: "While the destruction of cultural property, including educational facilities, was not in itself a genocidal act, evidence of such conduct may nevertheless infer genocidal intent to destroy a protected group."
Commission chair Navi Pillay said in a statement accompanying the report: "We are seeing more and more indications that Israel is carrying out a concerted campaign to obliterate Palestinian life in Gaza." "Children in Gaza have lost their childhood," the senior South African judge said. "They are forced to worry about survival amid attacks, uncertainty, starvation and subhuman living conditions." The three-member commission said Israeli attacks "targeted religious sites that served as places of refuge, killing hundreds of people, including women and children".
The commission was set up by the UN to investigate violations of humanitarian and human rights law in the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories. In May, UN humanitarian relief chief Tom Fletcher urged the countries of the UN Security Council to take action "to prevent genocide" in Gaza. Israel has denied committing genocide.
The UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs demanded that Israel lift its aid blockade on Gaza, where the UN says the entire population of more than two million people is at risk of famine. "For those killed and those whose voices are silenced: what more evidence do you need now?" Fletcher said on May 14. "Will you act — decisively — to prevent genocide and to ensure respect for international humanitarian law?"
The UN commission's report paid special attention to Gaza but also focused on Israeli attacks on civilians in the occupied Palestinian territories as a whole, including East Jerusalem, and in Israel itself. It said Israel had "done little" to prevent or prosecute Jewish settlers in the West Bank who "intentionally targeted educational facilities and students to terrorise (Palestinian) communities and force them to leave their homes". The report said Israeli authorities had intimidated and, in some cases, detained Israeli and Palestinian teachers and students who "expressed concern or solidarity with the civilian population in Gaza".
The panel urged the Israeli government to stop attacking cultural, religious and education institutions, "immediately end its unlawful occupation of Palestinian territory" and cease all settlement activity. It said the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should comply fully with provisional measures ordered by the International Court of Justice.
The court has ordered Israel "to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide against people in Gaza" and allow humanitarian aid to get through. It also urged Hamas, the Islamist militant group that runs Gaza, "to cease using civilian objects for military purposes". The commission is to present its findings to the UN Commission on Human Rights on June 17.
Meanwhile, more than 300 civil servants at Britain's foreign ministry have written to Foreign Secretary David Lammy expressing concerns about Israel's conduct of the war in Gaza, the BBC reported on Tuesday. The officials warned of potential UK "complicity" in what they called "Israel's violations of international humanitarian law" during the conflict in the Palestinian territory. The letter dated May 16 questioned the continuation of some UK arms sales to the country, according to the broadcaster. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
17 hours ago
- Observer
This Israeli govt a danger to Jews everywhere
Israelis, diaspora Jewry and friends of Israel everywhere need to understand that the way Israel is fighting the war in the Gaza Strip today is laying the groundwork for a fundamental recasting of how Israel and Jews will be seen the world over. It won't be good. Police cars and private security at synagogues and Jewish institutions will increasingly become the norm; Israel, instead of being seen by Jews as a safe haven from antisemitism, will be seen as a new engine generating it; sane Israelis will line up to immigrate to Australia and America rather than beckon their fellow Jews to come Israel's way. That dystopian future is not here yet, but if you don't see its outlines gathering, you are deluding yourself. Fortunately, more and more retired and reserve duty Israeli air force pilots, as well as retired army and security officers, are seeing this gathering storm and declaring they will not be silent or complicit in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ugly, nihilistic policy in Gaza. They have begun to urge Jews in America and elsewhere to speak up — SOS: Save Our Ship — before the widening moral stain of Israel's military campaign in Gaza becomes irreversible. The Netanyahu government should be telling the Trump administration and Arab mediators that it's ready to withdraw from Gaza in a phased manner and be replaced by an international/Arab/Palestinian Authority peacekeeping force — provided that the Hamas leadership agrees to return all remaining living and dead hostages and leave the strip. If instead, though, Israel goes ahead with Netanyahu's vow to perpetuate this war indefinitely — to try to achieve 'total victory' over every last Hamasnik, along with the far right's fantasy of ridding Gaza of Palestinians and resettling it with Israelis — Jews worldwide better prepare themselves, their children and their grandchildren for a reality they've never known: to be Jewish in a world where the Jewish state is a pariah state — a source of shame, not of pride. Because one day, foreign photographers and reporters will be allowed to go into Gaza unescorted by the Israeli military. And when they do and the full horror of the destruction there becomes clear to all, the backlash against Israel and Jews everywhere could be profound. Do not confuse my warning to Israel for a shred of understanding for what Hamas did on October 7, 2023. What society in the world would not see its heart grow cold by such brutality? But as a Jew who believes in the right of the Jewish people to live in a secure state in their biblical homeland — alongside a secure Palestinian state — I am focused right now on my own tribe. And if my own tribe does not resist this Israeli government's utter indifference to the number of civilians being killed in Gaza today — as well its attempt to tilt Israel into authoritarianism at home by moving to sack its independent attorney general — Jews everywhere will pay dearly. Don't just take that warning from me. Last week two respected former Israeli air foce pilots, Brig Gen Asaf Agmon and Col Uri Arad, published an open letter in Hebrew in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, addressed to their colleagues still serving in the air force. Both men are members of Forum 555 Patriots, an impressive group of around 1,700 Israeli air force pilots, some retired and some still serving as reservists, which originally formed to resist Netanyahu's efforts to undermine Israeli democracy with a judicial coup. They wrote: 'We do not seek to downplay the monstrous nature of the massacre committed by Hamas terrorists on that cursed Saturday. We believe the war was fully justified... 'However, as the war in Gaza dragged on, it became clear that it was losing its strategic and security purposes and instead served primarily the political and personal interests of the government. It thus became an unmistakably immoral war, and increasingly appeared to be a war of revenge... 'The Air Force has become a tool for those, in government and even in the military, who claim that there are no innocent people in Gaza... Recently, a member of the Knesset even boasted that one of the government's achievements is the ability to kill 100 people a day in Gaza without anyone being shocked. 'In response to such statements, we say: As horrific as the October 7 massacre was, it does not justify complete disregard for moral considerations or the disproportionate use of deadly force. We do not want to become like the worst of our enemies. It is time for a similar movement calling out Hamas' vile excesses, led by those who support Palestinian statehood and a peaceful resolution in Gaza. No one should accept Hamas prolonging this war to keep itself in power. Nothing would do more to pressure Hamas to accept a ceasefire than to be denounced across the world, on college campuses and in high-profile demonstrations from those who have been giving this hate-driven organisation a free pass. This is what being pro-Palestinian really sounds like. — The New York Times Thomas L Friedman The writer is a foreign-affairs columnist of The New York Times
Observer
17 hours ago
- Observer
The spotlight on hate speech and radicalisation online
The prevalence of hate speech and incitement to violence on social platforms is becoming increasingly alarming. A wave of misogyny, slander and threats is becoming normalised, while social platforms are being exploited as podiums for bigotry and radicalisation. The boundaries between terrorism and other forms of offending are often blurred. Recent incidents involving vehicular homicide, hate crimes, school shootings and extremist acts have raised serious concerns. According to studies, the rise in unfiltered hate significantly facilitated radicalisation on social media. Studies indicate that online extremism and online offending are likely to encourage and endorse violence. Beyond violent behaviour, radicalisation can also be recognised as the process of embracing extremist beliefs. Younger individuals are more susceptible to being influenced by radical ideologies. Easy access to extremist content and instructions online directly fuels a rise in youth radicalisation. According to the United Nations, hate speech coupled with disinformation can lead to discrimination and large-scale violence. The Internet radicalisation of youngsters and children is one of the most pressing current problems. Digital natives spend a lot of time online, and important aspects of their lives and social interactions are rooted online. Adolescents can lack critical judgement in their decisions and be impulsive, which can facilitate violent actions. The radicalisation of youth can occur over an extended period. Social variables such as health, economics and politics can all create situations of oppression. In some cases, a specific incident, a deep dissatisfaction with authority, global politics, or grievance triggered it. Children as young as 12 years old are being radicalised. The way the Internet presents, selects, links,and assembles information has been of concern in the context of extremist beliefs, according to scholars Jeans Binder and Jonathan Kenyon in "Terrorism and the Internet: How Dangerous is Online Radicalisation". The alarming normalisation and acceptance of extremist beliefs online points to the formation of echo chambers, in which individuals can surround themselves with like-minded people and help reinforce each other's views, thus contributing to the amplification of opinions and acts of violence. In the article 'Public Mental Health Approaches to Online Radicalisation: An Empty Systematic Review', the authors suggest that peer-to-peer, video hosting and collaborative platforms can serve as conduits to extremist content. The authors claim that there is a growing number of radicalised persons among younger users of short video platforms, such as TikTok, Discord, Telegram, gaming platforms and online videogames. They build upon one another to create a more multifaceted and variegated threat. In 'The Third Generation of Online Radicalization', Jacob Ware recounts how Estonian police caught a 13-year-old boy in early 2020 for leading an international terrorist organisation. Ware writes that the teen's radicalisation stemmed from encrypted chatrooms; he radicalised others, drawing inspiration from a mix of revolutionary ideologies. Investigators on counter-terrorism claim that violent posts on social media, forums and end-to-end encrypted messaging services are mostly visual and depict violence. According to investigators, this is a common tactic criminal actors use to heighten an emotional response. Unintentional individuals may fall into radical Internet rabbit holes. The lack of knowledge and understanding of extremism among young people can lead to misinterpretations of the factors that put youth at risk. It is crucial to recognise that radicalisation is a social process; the problem involves not only social media but also online relationships and beliefs derived from the Internet. Sonia Ambrosio The writer is journalist, academic and researcher in media studies
Times of Oman
19 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Oman participates in UNICEF session in New York
New York: The Sultanate of Oman took part in the activities of the annual session of the Executive Board of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). The session will run until 13 June 2025 at the UN headquarters in New York. In its opening statement during the session, the Sultanate of Oman affirmed the strength of its existing cooperation and partnership with the UNICEF. The speech highlighted national efforts to promote children's rights and underscored Oman's strong commitment to protect children's rights and make childcare a core component of its national policies. It also lauded the vital role undertaken by UNICEF at all levels, notably in crisis circumstances. Oman also contributed to the preparation of a joint statement (on behalf of 30 countries under the humanitarian action item) that voices deep concern over the deteriorating humanitarian situation of children in the Gaza Strip. The statement calls for immediate and comprehensive protection for the Palestinian children and demands unhindered access to humanitarian aid. Oman also presented a statement (under the item on protecting children from exploitation and abuse) in which it hailed the UNICEF's efforts in this regard. In its statement, Oman stressed the importance of maintaining constant international coordination to protect children from all forms of violence and exploitation. It laid emphasis on consolidating the capacities of national systems of monitoring, reporting and protection. Oman's participation in the UNICEF session stems from its commitment to the principles of international cooperation. It reflects steadfast support for humanitarian initiatives that enhance the protection and dignity of children around the world.
