The spotlight on hate speech and radicalisation online
The prevalence of hate speech and incitement to violence on social platforms is becoming increasingly alarming. A wave of misogyny, slander and threats is becoming normalised, while social platforms are being exploited as podiums for bigotry and radicalisation.
The boundaries between terrorism and other forms of offending are often blurred. Recent incidents involving vehicular homicide, hate crimes, school shootings and extremist acts have raised serious concerns.
According to studies, the rise in unfiltered hate significantly facilitated radicalisation on social media. Studies indicate that online extremism and online offending are likely to encourage and endorse violence. Beyond violent behaviour, radicalisation can also be recognised as the process of embracing extremist beliefs.
Younger individuals are more susceptible to being influenced by radical ideologies. Easy access to extremist content and instructions online directly fuels a rise in youth radicalisation. According to the United Nations, hate speech coupled with disinformation can lead to discrimination and large-scale violence.
The Internet radicalisation of youngsters and children is one of the most pressing current problems. Digital natives spend a lot of time online, and important aspects of their lives and social interactions are rooted online. Adolescents can lack critical judgement in their decisions and be impulsive, which can facilitate violent actions.
The radicalisation of youth can occur over an extended period. Social variables such as health, economics and politics can all create situations of oppression. In some cases, a specific incident, a deep dissatisfaction with authority, global politics, or grievance triggered it. Children as young as 12 years old are being radicalised.
The way the Internet presents, selects, links,and assembles information has been of concern in the context of extremist beliefs, according to scholars Jeans Binder and Jonathan Kenyon in "Terrorism and the Internet: How Dangerous is Online Radicalisation".
The alarming normalisation and acceptance of extremist beliefs online points to the formation of echo chambers, in which individuals can surround themselves with like-minded people and help reinforce each other's views, thus contributing to the amplification of opinions and acts of violence.
In the article 'Public Mental Health Approaches to Online Radicalisation: An Empty Systematic Review', the authors suggest that peer-to-peer, video hosting and collaborative platforms can serve as conduits to extremist content. The authors claim that there is a growing number of radicalised persons among younger users of short video platforms, such as TikTok, Discord, Telegram, gaming platforms and online videogames. They build upon one another to create a more multifaceted and variegated threat.
In 'The Third Generation of Online Radicalization', Jacob Ware recounts how Estonian police caught a 13-year-old boy in early 2020 for leading an international terrorist organisation. Ware writes that the teen's radicalisation stemmed from encrypted chatrooms; he radicalised others, drawing inspiration from a mix of revolutionary ideologies.
Investigators on counter-terrorism claim that violent posts on social media, forums and end-to-end encrypted messaging services are mostly visual and depict violence. According to investigators, this is a common tactic criminal actors use to heighten an emotional response. Unintentional individuals may fall into radical Internet rabbit holes.
The lack of knowledge and understanding of extremism among young people can lead to misinterpretations of the factors that put youth at risk. It is crucial to recognise that radicalisation is a social process; the problem involves not only social media but also online relationships and beliefs derived from the Internet.
Sonia Ambrosio
The writer is journalist, academic and researcher in media studies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Russia launches strike in east Ukraine amid stalled peace talks
KHARKIV: Fresh Russian strikes on Ukraine's northeastern city of Kharkiv killed three people and wounded 60 others, including children, on Wednesday, authorities said, as Moscow pushed ahead with attacks after rejecting an unconditional ceasefire. Ukraine said it had received the bodies of more than 1,200 soldiers, handed over by Moscow, part of a repatriation deal the two sides agreed at talks last week. Russia has fired record numbers of drones and missiles at Ukraine over recent weeks, escalating three years of daily bombardments as it outlines hardline demands — rejected by Kyiv as "ultimatums" — to halt its three-year attack. The northeastern city of Kharkiv, just 30 kilometres from the Russian border, again bore the brunt of the attack. "Seventeen strikes by enemy UAVs (drones) were carried out in two districts of the city tonight," Kharkiv Mayor Igor Terekhov said on Telegram. Kharkiv regional Governor Oleg Synegubov said three people had been killed. "Every new day now brings new cowardly strikes from Russia, and almost every strike is demonstrative. Russia deserves increased pressure," Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky said on social media after the shelling of Kharkiv. Journalists in the city saw damaged apartment blocks, burnt out cars and streets strewn with debris after the attacks. Ukraine's air force said that Russia had fired 85 drones overnight — fewer than in recent days. On the front line, Moscow's troops have been advancing steadily. The Russian defence ministry said on Wednesday that more units had crossed into the Dnipropetrovsk region. US President Donald Trump has been urging the two sides to strike a peace deal, but has seen little progress. Zelensky has in turn called on the West to increase the pressure on Russia with hard-hitting economic sanctions that he says would limit its capacity to wage war. He is expected to press that message with Trump and European leaders at a G7 summit in Canada, which kicks off on Sunday. Leaders from several countries across southeastern Europe were expected in the Ukrainian port city of Odesa on Wednesday, hours after it was targeted by Russian strikes. Two rounds of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine have failed to yield a breakthrough in ending the war. Russia has rejected calls for an unconditional ceasefire and demanded that Ukraine give up large swathes of territory and its bid to join Nato. But the two sides agreed to swap more than 1,000 prisoners of war and hand over the bodies of dead soldiers. Ukraine said on Wednesday that Russia had handed over the corpses of 1,212 killed soldiers and was working to identify them. Russia's top negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, confirmed the handover and said Russia had received "the remains of 27 Russian soldiers." Ukraine did not say how many bodies it returned to Russia, which says Western estimates of the number of its deaths are untrue.
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Austrian police search for answers
Austrian authorities were searching on Wednesday for clues to why a 21-year-old gunman shot dead 10 people in a rampage at his former high school before killing himself, in one of the worst outbreaks of violence in the country's modern history. Police said the man had acted alone, armed with a shotgun and a pistol. They are scouring his home and the Internet to find out why he opened fire at the school in Austria's second city of Graz on Tuesday, before shooting himself in a bathroom. Austria came to a standstill at 10 am on Wednesday to commemorate the dead with one minute's silence. Churches rang funeral bells, including St Stephen's Cathedral in Vienna, where around 900 public transport vehicles halted for a minute. Public broadcaster ORF paused all radio and TV programmes for one minute, with TV showing images of candles and a message to say the country was mourning the victims. — Reuters
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
The spotlight on hate speech and radicalisation online
The prevalence of hate speech and incitement to violence on social platforms is becoming increasingly alarming. A wave of misogyny, slander and threats is becoming normalised, while social platforms are being exploited as podiums for bigotry and radicalisation. The boundaries between terrorism and other forms of offending are often blurred. Recent incidents involving vehicular homicide, hate crimes, school shootings and extremist acts have raised serious concerns. According to studies, the rise in unfiltered hate significantly facilitated radicalisation on social media. Studies indicate that online extremism and online offending are likely to encourage and endorse violence. Beyond violent behaviour, radicalisation can also be recognised as the process of embracing extremist beliefs. Younger individuals are more susceptible to being influenced by radical ideologies. Easy access to extremist content and instructions online directly fuels a rise in youth radicalisation. According to the United Nations, hate speech coupled with disinformation can lead to discrimination and large-scale violence. The Internet radicalisation of youngsters and children is one of the most pressing current problems. Digital natives spend a lot of time online, and important aspects of their lives and social interactions are rooted online. Adolescents can lack critical judgement in their decisions and be impulsive, which can facilitate violent actions. The radicalisation of youth can occur over an extended period. Social variables such as health, economics and politics can all create situations of oppression. In some cases, a specific incident, a deep dissatisfaction with authority, global politics, or grievance triggered it. Children as young as 12 years old are being radicalised. The way the Internet presents, selects, links,and assembles information has been of concern in the context of extremist beliefs, according to scholars Jeans Binder and Jonathan Kenyon in "Terrorism and the Internet: How Dangerous is Online Radicalisation". The alarming normalisation and acceptance of extremist beliefs online points to the formation of echo chambers, in which individuals can surround themselves with like-minded people and help reinforce each other's views, thus contributing to the amplification of opinions and acts of violence. In the article 'Public Mental Health Approaches to Online Radicalisation: An Empty Systematic Review', the authors suggest that peer-to-peer, video hosting and collaborative platforms can serve as conduits to extremist content. The authors claim that there is a growing number of radicalised persons among younger users of short video platforms, such as TikTok, Discord, Telegram, gaming platforms and online videogames. They build upon one another to create a more multifaceted and variegated threat. In 'The Third Generation of Online Radicalization', Jacob Ware recounts how Estonian police caught a 13-year-old boy in early 2020 for leading an international terrorist organisation. Ware writes that the teen's radicalisation stemmed from encrypted chatrooms; he radicalised others, drawing inspiration from a mix of revolutionary ideologies. Investigators on counter-terrorism claim that violent posts on social media, forums and end-to-end encrypted messaging services are mostly visual and depict violence. According to investigators, this is a common tactic criminal actors use to heighten an emotional response. Unintentional individuals may fall into radical Internet rabbit holes. The lack of knowledge and understanding of extremism among young people can lead to misinterpretations of the factors that put youth at risk. It is crucial to recognise that radicalisation is a social process; the problem involves not only social media but also online relationships and beliefs derived from the Internet. Sonia Ambrosio The writer is journalist, academic and researcher in media studies
