Walmart Products Recalled Nationwide as Customers Told to Dispose of Items
Two products sold at Walmart have been recalled, with customers being urged to dispose of the items.
Guidance on the product recall page on Walmart's website reads: "Walmart and Sam's Club are committed to the health and safety of our customers and members and to providing products that are safe and compliant, all supported by our health and wellness, product safety, and food safety professionals."
"In the event of a product recall, we work swiftly to block the item from being sold and remove it from our stores and clubs."
Newsweek reached out to Walmart via an online contact form for comment.
Using recalled products or consuming recalled food items can pose serious health risks. Recalls can be initiated for myriad reasons, including undeclared allergens or potential contaminants.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has announced a recall of approximately 8,560 MaxKare Electric Blankets, sold exclusively online at Walmart.com, between June 2021 and November 2024, for $27 to $80.
The recall targeted models HB18A-7284-1, HB18A-8490-2, and HB18A-6284-1, which were available in three sizes (twin, full, queen) and two colors (brown and gray).
Yumo, which manufactures the blankets, received 34 reports of the blankets overheating, including two reports of blankets catching fire and three reports of burn injuries.
The affected blankets featured six heating levels and a nine-hour auto-off function. Shenzhen Yumo Commerce and Trade Corporation manufactured the blankets in China.
Consumers should immediately stop using the product and are advised to contact Yumo for instructions on how to dispose of it.
Newsweek reached out to Yumo via email for comment.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) issued a recall for FreshRealm's Chicken Fettuccine Alfredo products and is investigating an outbreak of Listeria connected to the recall.
In response to a request for comment, Fresh Realm directed Newsweek to a press release that read in part: "Out of an abundance of caution, FreshRealm is recalling the product while the investigation proceeds. The investigation will focus on how Listeria may have entered the product, and whether it entered from a FreshRealm facility, or through any of the ingredients that FreshRealm received from external ingredient suppliers."
"FreshRealm remains committed to the highest standards of food safety and is working closely with the Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to provide full transparency and access throughout the process."
The recall affected three different ready-to-eat products:
MARKETSIDE GRILLED CHICKEN ALFREDO WITH FETTUCCINE Tender Pasta with Creamy Alfredo Sauce, White Meat Chicken and Shaved Parmesan Cheese
Details: 32.8oz, best-by—date of 6.27.25, EST. P-50784
MARKETSIDE GRILLED CHICKEN ALFREDO WITH FETTUCCINE Tender Pasta with Creamy Alfredo Sauce, White Meat Chicken, Broccoli and Shaved Parmesan Cheese
Details: 12.3oz, 6.26.25, EST. P-47770
HOME CHEF Heat & Eat Chicken Fettuccine Alfredo with pasta, grilled white meat chicken, and Parmesan cheese
Details: 12.05oz, 6.19.25, EST. P-47718
Consumers who purchased the product are advised to destroy it or return it to the place of purchase for a refund.
The FSIS said in their recall notice that they are "investigating an outbreak of Lm that currently includes 17 ill people in 13 states. As of June 17, 2025, there have been three reported deaths and one fetal loss associated with this outbreak.
"The outbreak strain of Lm was isolated from ill people on dates ranging from August 2024 – May 2025. The same outbreak strain was isolated from a routine chicken fettuccine alfredo sample collected by FSIS in a FreshRealm establishment in March 2025. The lot of chicken fettuccine alfredo represented by this sample was held during sampling, destroyed, and never entered commerce."
The FSIS, on its website: "Listeriosis can cause fever, muscle aches, headache, stiff neck, confusion, loss of balance and convulsions sometimes preceded by diarrhea or other gastrointestinal symptoms. An invasive infection spreads beyond the gastrointestinal tract.
"In pregnant women, the infection can cause miscarriages, stillbirths, premature delivery or life-threatening infection of the newborn. In addition, serious and sometimes fatal infections in older adults and people with weakened immune systems. Listeriosis is treated with antibiotics."
Both recalls are ongoing.
Related Articles
How Recall of 20 Million Eggs Could Affect US PricesWalmart's Post About Grilling Flooded With Negative CommentsWalmart Faces MAGA Boycott After Heiress Funds 'No Kings' AdRetail Layoffs Soar Nearly 300% So Far This Year
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
Transgender Veterans Barred From Fertility Treatment Under New Rules
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Transgender veterans eligible for Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) health benefits will no longer receive financial coverage for egg- and sperm-freezing fertility treatments, new guidance shows. According to a leaked email from a person at the VA's Women Veterans Health Care department, transgender veterans preparing for gender dysphoria treatment and seeking cryopreservation—the process in which eggs or sperm (gametes) are frozen and stored to be thawed for later use—will no longer see the costs of this process covered by the department. Treatment for gender dysphoria or gender identity disorder can affect an individual's ovaries or testes and thus fertility. Individuals sometimes freeze their eggs to mitigate against this prior to treatment. The email indicates a shift from previous policy. As it stands, everyone eligible for VA health care benefits (i.e. those who previously served in the military, navy or air service) can access these fertility preservation treatments, including transgender veterans, according to a Women Veterans Health Care document, published in October 2023. There are more than 134,000 transgender veterans in the U.S., according to the Williams Institute, a research center at UCLA School of Law that focuses on sexual orientation and gender identity. Newsweek contacted the VA by email to comment. A laboratory assistant shows a sperm sample in a cryopreservation container at minus-170 degrees Celsius at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine in Muenster, Germany, on February 6, 2013. A laboratory assistant shows a sperm sample in a cryopreservation container at minus-170 degrees Celsius at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine in Muenster, Germany, on February 6, 2013. Photo by: Friso Gentsch/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images Since taking office for the second time, President Donald Trump has made a plethora of actions regarding transgender people, including signing an executive order stating that there are only two unchangeable sexes and another attempting to ban transgender women from competing in women's sports. He also signed an order aimed at restricting access to puberty blockers and other gender care for people under age 19. Some of the actions have sparked ongoing legal challenges. On February 18, he also signed an executive order expanding access to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and making it more affordable for patients. While IVF does not always require cryopreservation, it is often used to store excess embryos or to enable people to delay embryo transfer until a time of their choosing. The White House directed Newsweek to the VA after a request for comment. In the VA specifically, in March it was announced that the department was phasing out treatment for gender dysphoria in response to Trump's executive order recognizing two sexes. The VA said trans veterans would still continue to receive VA health care. The VA email, viewed by Newsweek said: "On yesterday's (6/16/2025) National Fertility Interdisciplinary Teams Office Hours call, it was announced that VA will no longer pay for cryopreservation of gametes for a medical indication if it involves transgender veterans seeking cryopreservation in preparation for treatment of Gender Dysphoria or Gender Identity Disorder. This will reportedly affect new authorizations and will not disrupt cryopreservation that has already been initiated." It added that according to another senior official in the Veterans Health Administration "the change is reportedly already in effect and an official announcement will be forthcoming" and advised the department to "hold on authorizing any new cryopreservation for medical indications related to gender dysphoria/gender identity disorder" while waiting for further guidance. "We want to avoid a situation where veterans could be told they are approved for cryo, only to find out after the fact that VA cannot pay for care they received," the email read. Newsweek chose not to name the person who sent the email as well as the senior official named in the correspondence to protect their privacy. According to the October 2023 Women Veterans Health Care document, fertility preservation of eggs and sperm, but not embryos, is covered by the VA for medical reasons. "If your VA health care provider determines there is a medical indication, VA can cover the cost of retrieving and freezing your eggs or sperm to preserve your fertility preservation," it said. It listed examples of medical indications that would be covered, including "veterans who are undergoing gender-affirming care that can affect their ovaries or testes." Roz Keith, the founder and executive director of the Michigan-based transgender charity Stand With Trans, said the policy was "discrimination." "Clearly, the rights of the trans community are the target of attack," she told Newsweek. "It doesn't matter whether someone is an adult, a minor, a veteran, a professional, or other, if one is trans identified, they are seeing rights being taken away one by one. It is deplorable. If one class of people can receive treatment paid for with their benefits, then other classes of people should receive the same. This is why we have the equal protection clause in our Constitution. "No one should be excluded from a particular treatment because they are transgender. This is the very definition of discrimination."
Newsweek
13 hours ago
- Newsweek
New York Boomers Lose Medicare Battle
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New York's highest court has rejected a legal challenge by retired city workers seeking to block a plan to move them from traditional Medicare - with city-funded supplemental coverage - to private Medicare Advantage plans. Newsweek has contacted the New York City Law Department for comment via email. Why It Matters New York City is required by law to provide health insurance coverage for retirees formerly employed by the city. The roots of the policy go back to 2021, when city officials and leaders of major public employee unions agreed to cut $600 million annually from the city's healthcare spending. The agreed-upon solution was to shift roughly 250,000 retirees and their dependents to a Medicare Advantage plan - an alternative to traditional Medicare that typically offers lower premiums. At the time, City Hall, then under the helm of former New York Mayor Bill De Blasio, argued in favour of the change because of the annual savings it would generate. The current Mayor Eric Adams has since embraced the idea. But critics have said the plan would mean more out-of-pocket costs for former New York government employees. What To Know In a unanimous decision issued Wednesday, June 18, Judge Shirley Troutman of the State of New York Court of Appeals said the retirees failed to provide adequate evidence that the shift would reduce their health benefits. The court also found no legally binding agreement ensuring the city would maintain their existing coverage. Stock image/file photo: Medicare enrollment form. Stock image/file photo: Medicare enrollment form. GETTY "If forced into a Medicare Advantage plan, retirees will lose access to many of the doctors they depend on for life-saving treatment and will routinely be denied coverage for medical care. That is because, unlike traditional Medicare (a publicly run program), private Medicare Advantage plans limit access to medical providers and medical care in order to maximize profits," the Organization of Public Service Retirees said in a statement following the decision. Medicare Advantage plans are private insurance options approved by Medicare. They replace traditional Medicare Parts A and B, covering hospital and outpatient care — except hospice. Most also include prescription drug coverage (Part D). Insurance companies offering these plans get a set payment from Medicare for each person enrolled. They also charge patients out-of-pocket costs and often require them to use doctors in their network or get referrals to see specialists. What People Are Saying The Council of the City of New York Common Sense Council said in a statement: "While we are extremely disappointed with the Court of Appeals decision today, it only strengthens our resolve to fight for our municipal retirees and ensure they are provided the supplemental Medicare insurance they were promised. We encourage our colleagues to join us in supporting Intro 1096, which would prevent this administration and any future administration from taking away this fundamental right and forcing retirees into a lesser health insurance plan." Marianne Pizzitola, president of the NYC Organization of Public Service Retirees, said in a press release: "On behalf of 250,000 retirees, we call on the City Council and the next mayor to prevent us from being forced into a privatized Medicare Advantage plan and to let us continue receiving the health insurance we were promised and desperately need: traditional Medicare plus a supplemental plan." Justin Brannan, New York City Council Finance Committee Chair and Democratic candidate for city comptroller, said on X: "The City of New York should never, ever be screwing over retirees – and neither should the courts. Nobody will ever want to work for New York City again. Zero trust. Medicare Advantage is a bait and switch scam & betrayal. Enough! City Hall clearly doesn't care about retirees." What Happens Next While the Court of Appeals dismissed the retirees' primary claims, it sent the case back to a lower court to resolve remaining legal issues.
Newsweek
14 hours ago
- Newsweek
Trump Considering Asbestos Ban Reversal Sparks Warning: 'Lives at Risk'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration will "reconsider" a ban on the use of asbestos in the U.S. that took a decades-long battle to be finalized, sparking concern among health advocates. "This is another attempt by industry, going back to when they blocked the first EPA asbestos ban in 1989, to allow for continued use of a deadly material responsible for some 40,000 U.S. deaths and some 250,000 worldwide deaths each year," Dr. Arthur L. Frank, a professor of public health and medicine at Drexel University, told Newsweek. "We know in some settings as little as one day of exposure can give some individuals cancer," he added. Newsweek has contacted the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) via email for comment. File photo: Workers begin the abatement and demolition of a property contaminated with asbestos in Michigan. File photo: Workers begin the abatement and demolition of a property contaminated with asbestos in Michigan. Conor Ralph/The Flint Journal- via AP Why It Matters Asbestos was used by building and construction industries for strengthening cement and plastics as well as for insulation, roofing, fireproofing and sound absorption. Since 2000, more research uncovered the health risks associated with the mineral, and it has been classified by various U.S. departments as a known human carcinogen. Exposure to asbestos is linked to more than 40,000 deaths in the U.S. each year, according to the EPA under the Biden administration. Chrysotile asbestos, also known as white asbestos, is banned in 50 countries because of its association with lung cancer, and in 2024, the Biden administration finalized its own ban, meaning the last type of asbestos used in or imported into the country would be prohibited. What To Know According to court documents filed with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the EPA said that the process of re-evaluating the ban would take about 30 months, delaying the implementation of the ban finalized by the Biden administration. The move was opposed by the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, the court filings said. "Reconsidering the EPA's 2024 Chrysotile Asbestos Rule is deeply concerning," Linda Reinstein, president and co-founder of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, told Newsweek. Reinstein lost her husband, Alan, to a type of lung cancer, mesothelioma, caused by asbestos. "While this rule was a landmark step under the Toxic Substances Control Act, it only banned one fiber—chrysotile—in six specific conditions of use," Reinstein added. "Now, due to litigation and political pressure, the EPA has signaled it may reverse core parts of the rule, including protections for chlorine and caustic soda manufacturing." The Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, within the EPA, will be investigating whether the Toxic Substances Control Act "went beyond what is necessary to eliminate the unreasonable risk and whether alternative measures—such as requiring permanent workplace protection measures—would eliminate the unreasonable risk." The Toxic Substances Control Act includes the Biden administration's plan to ban asbestos from use in the U.S. When the Biden administration announced its finalization of the ban in the summer of 2024, the EPA administrator at the time, Michael Regan said: "The science is clear—asbestos is a known carcinogen that has severe impacts on public health." However, Trump, in his 1997 book The Art of the Comeback, said that asbestos is "100 percent safe, once applied." "I believe that the movement against asbestos was led by the mob, because it was often mob-related companies that would do the asbestos removal," he added. In 2018, Uralasbest, one of the world's largest producers and sellers of asbestos, put Trump's face, along with the words "Approved by Donald Trump, 45th president of the United States," on some of its products, according to the Guardian. What People Are Saying Dr. Arthur L. Frank, a professor of public health and medicine at Drexel University, told Newsweek: "Although this partial ban went through proper procedures, to now come and claim, as their document states, 'no party would be prejudiced by the requested abeyance,' fails to recognize that putting off this ban will lead to unnecessary disease and death for some Americans going forward. The U.S. has not yet joined some 70 countries in the world, including all developed countries, in banning—and in all other cases totally banning—the use of all forms of asbestos. "While there is currently little import of much raw asbestos fiber, products containing asbestos such as friction products and roofing materials can still be bought and used. The U.S. should have a comprehensive and total ban on import and use and should see that proper disposal takes place for tons still in place. Because of the long latency to develop disease, even with such a ban, new cases of asbestos disease will still be seen 50 years from now." Linda Reinstein, president and co-founder of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, told Newsweek: "This rollback is happening in the context of broader deregulatory actions by the Trump administration. Executive Orders 14303 and 13771, combined with EPA staffing cuts, will severely limit the agency's ability to evaluate and manage chemical risks. These changes threaten to dismantle science-based safeguards and delay action on a known carcinogen that kills 40,000 Americans annually. "There is no safe level of asbestos exposure. Only federal legislation can ensure a comprehensive and lasting ban. That's why the bipartisan 2025 Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now (ARBAN) Act is essential. It would ban all forms of asbestos, close dangerous loopholes and prevent further rollbacks." Senator Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, on Monday: "The Trump Administration's 'Polluters over People' agenda is once again threatening our health, this time undermining the chance for all Americans to have a future free of asbestos exposure. We know that asbestos is a killer, which is why it has been banned in more than 50 countries around the world. "The United States was starting to catch up, but the Trump EPA is delaying and rolling back this vital public health safeguard, undermining this progress. I will continue to explore all options—including legislation—to phase out all dangerous asbestos fibers and provide stronger protections for our health." What Happens Next While the EPA said, according to the court filings, it would need 30 months to review the legislation, it has requested that the court extend the suspension of the law for six months, subject to additional extension requests.
