
Melinda Gates Q&A: 'A man with a gun is not as powerful as a girl with a book'
Illustration by Kristian Hammerstad
Melinda French Gates was born in 1964 in Dallas, Texas. She co-founded and co-chaired the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, a charitable organisation focused on improving healthcare and reducing poverty around the world.
What's your earliest memory?
Being a little girl, sick in bed in the middle of the night, and my mother staying up with me, rubbing my back, being so kind to me.
What book last changed your thinking?
Timothy Snyder's On Tyranny: yet another reminder that we cannot take democracy for granted.
Who are your heroes?
One of my heroes as a child was my friend Ellen's mother, Barbara Schneider. In a time and place that expected a lot of conformity, I was struck by Barbara's ability to be no one but herself. Now, topping my list of heroes is the incomparable Malala Yousafzai, who taught the world that a man with a gun is nowhere near as powerful as a girl with a book.
What's currently bugging you?
The US Supreme Court has decided that my daughters and granddaughters will have fewer rights than I had. 'Bugging' isn't a strong enough word for it. I'm enraged. It's been a powerful call to action.
In which time and place, other than your own, would you like to live?
I think I'll have to stick with right now. When you look at the long arc of history, there has never been a better time to be born a woman. There is so much left to do to reach true equality but at least I am alive in an era when women are finally gaining representation in the power systems that can change things.
Which political figure do you look up to?
Jimmy Carter, who I got to know through his work in global health. President Carter was particularly obsessed with eradicating Guinea-worm disease. He used to joke that he wanted to outlive the last Guinea worm, and he actually came remarkably close. That was him: charming, funny, generous, and deeply concerned about anyone he feared the world was leaving behind.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
What's the best piece of advice you've ever received?
Easy. It came from my mother. She told me: 'Set your own agenda, or someone else will set it for you.' This was good advice for me as a young woman trying to figure out my direction in life, and it's been good advice for me as an adult deciding how I want to use my voice and resources on behalf of other women. I think about it all the time.
What single thing would make your life better?
Learning to fight against perfectionism earlier in my life. I got there eventually, but I wish I'd figured it out a little earlier.
When were you happiest?
In the delivery room. The moment they handed me my oldest daughter, Jenn – it just upended my world. It was like I was hit by a truck. I was so completely in love. And then to get to relive that moment twice over.
In another life, what job might you have chosen?
In early motherhood, I spent a lot of time pumping milk imagining inventing and patenting a better pump. My daughter assures me the technology has improved since then, but I wish I could have moved fast enough to design my generation some better options. In another life, Melinda French Gates: Breast-Pump Pioneer.
Are we all doomed?
Optimism isn't a passive expectation that things will get better on their own – it's a belief that we can make them better. So no, I don't think so at all. There are too many people working too hard to tear down barriers and keep progress moving forward. The best part of my job is having a front-row seat to that work.
Melinda French Gates's 'The Next Day' is published by Bluebird
[See also: The music of resistance]
Related
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
35 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Scottish landowners face massive £40k fines for 'management plan' breaches in 'attack on rural life'
Sign up to our Scotsman Rural News - A weekly of the Hay's Way tour of Scotland emailed direct to you. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The paper, which aims to improve transparency in landownership, includes a requirement for landowners to produce Land Management Plans (LMP) with an emphasis on promoting engagement within communities. Under current plans, if landowners breach such arrangements, fines up to £5,000 could be issued. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, an amendment has been put forward by Glasgow SNP MSP Bob Doris to increase this sum eight times over after the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee said the current fine would not be sufficient. Land around Loch Laxford seen through the hills. Picture: PA Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon said the £40,000 figure will only apply to the maximum fine that could be levied under the new Bill, which is at stage two. Ms Gougeon said: 'Decisions on fines would be for the new Land and Communities Commissioner to consider in the event of a breach, and the maximum fine would not be levied automatically. I have always been clear that the intention is for the new commissioner to work with landowners and communities in the first instance, and the Bill makes provision for an appeals route as well. 'The Land Reform Bill sets out ambitious proposals that will change how land is managed in our rural and island communities for the better. Our Bill takes steps to better ensure that landholdings in scope are transferred and used in ways that support communities and take account of local need and I look forward to working with parliament as the legislation progresses.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish Conservative Tim Eagle MSP said the new sum was 'wildly disproportionate'. He said only Scottish Tory MSPs on the committee voted against the 'punitive' plans. The MSP for the Highlands and Islands region, home to a large number of estates likely impacted by the measures, said: 'This amendment put forward by a Glasgow-based SNP MSP is wildly disproportionate. 'These fines if they are passed in the final version of the SNP's Land Reform Bill will now hit land managers with £40,000 for merely failing to produce a plan. 'That is eight times the level of the current level of fines and will set alarm bells ringing among our rural communities. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It was only the Scottish Conservatives on the committee who voted against these punitive measures. 'The fines are greater than people would get for a breach of the peace or for behaving in a drunk and disorderly manner. 'The SNP's version of the Land Reform Bill as it stands is an attack on the rural way of life and is backed by Holyrood's cosy left-wing consensus, some of whom want to go even further.


Scottish Sun
7 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Major change impacting over 1.5million drivers could be confirmed TOMORROW – and saves you £200 a year
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A HUGE change to motor laws could save drivers up to £200 - if Parliament approves it tomorrow. The major overhaul is expected to affect 1.5 million drivers across the UK. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 A proposed change to motoring laws could save drivers hundreds of pounds Credit: Getty 2 The Government is planning to slash VAT when charging Electric Vehicles Credit: AFP On Friday, MPs will meet in the House of Commons to discuss slashing VAT when using electric charging points. The bill - named The Exemption from Value Added Tax (Public Electric Vehicle Charging Points) Bill - will be read for the second time in parliament tomorrow. Currently, motorists pay 20 per cent VAT when charging their electric vehicle, which means the new law could save drivers hundreds of pounds. According to data from Zapmap, EV drivers spend £1,690 on charging their cars per year. With the bill proposed by Labour, that cost could fall by a staggering £211 per year. Daniel Kunkel, the CEO at sustainable energy company GRIDSERVE, said: "Removing VAT from public charging would be a significant move towards levelling the playing field and making EV ownership easier for everyone, no matter where they live. "The current disparity between the 20 per cent VAT on public EV charging and the per cent on home charging puts a disproportionate financial burden on those without home charging facilities, which could affect more lower-income households.' It is hoped that the move will encourage more drivers to give up diesel and petrol cars for good, as the Labour government continues to pursue its Net Zero goal. The UK has a legally binding obligation to hit the target by 2050, after the then-Prime Minister Theresa May signed the commitment into law. The plans to slash VAT costs for drivers come just days after Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered her spending review. Top 5 takeaways from Spending review In her speech, the Chancellor said she would be injecting a staggering £300 billion into public services. The defence sector and the NHS were the biggest beneficiaries, with the National Health Service receiving a huge £29 billion cash boost. A staggering £39 billion will be injected into the housing sector, in a major drive to build social and affordable housing. The controversial Winter Fuel Payment cuts are being rolled back too, with three-quarters of pensioners being eligible for the seasonal payment once again. In a bid to support their Net Zero mission, the government also announced that construction would begin soon on a £14billion Sizewell C nuclear power plant - which will provide electricity for six million homes and create over 10,000 jobs.


New Statesman
10 hours ago
- New Statesman
A new era for the New Statesman
Welcome to a new era of the New Statesman. I hope it will be much like the last, updated for our new age. 'We do not propose… to ignore the tradition long associated with English weekly reviews,' wrote the first editor of this journal, Clifford Sharp, in the Leader of the very first issue in 1913: 'But our critical standpoint will be fresh.' As then, so now. There is something a little daunting about assuming a role once held by the likes of Sharp, Kingsley Martin, Paul Johnson and, of course, Jason Cowley. In fact, rather like Keir Starmer – the subject of this week's cover story – before the general election, I feel as though I have been handed some beautiful Ming vase which I must protect until I pass it on to the next trustee in years to come, dusted off and – I hope – newly polished. An editor can dream. For much of the last few months, I have been absorbing myself in the magazine's history and picking the brains of those who know it best. A special thank you must go to Tom Gatti, the magazine's outgoing acting editor. The result is before you: an issue I hope is true to all that has made the magazine great, but fresh all the same. We have made no drastic alterations. All the great writers you have come to love are there: Kate Mossman, Nicholas Lezard, Andrew Marr, Hannah Barnes. The changes are gentle and true to the title's history. How could I do otherwise? This is the magazine of Virginia Woolf and Martin Amis, not to mention Mehdi Hasan, Stephen Bush, Patrick Maguire and Helen Lewis. We were founded as a weekly review of politics and literature, and remain so. Only now we cover more. The eagle-eyed among you may have noticed a change to the strapline: the New Statesman, reviewing politics and culture since 1913. We are a magazine of writers, but one that must look good too, as you can see from this week's extraordinary front cover put together by our head of design, Erica Weathers. Here is the Prime Minister as few have seen him, thanks to the wizardry of photographer Phil Sharp, and our creative editor, Gerry Brakus. Starmer himself is the central focus of this issue, a man of far deeper emotions than I had expected. My profile of this most normal, and abnormal, of prime ministers is here. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Elsewhere, we have an expanded Commons Confidential and a refreshed culture section, now called The New Society – a nod to the magazine of the same name that was absorbed into the New Statesman in 1988. We have a few new additions: a sketch, written this week by the magazine's new deputy editor, Will Lloyd, a new column from Lamorna Ash and, to close the magazine, a piece 'From the Archives'. This week it features a ferocious polemic by Paul Johnson from 1977, castigating the government of Jim Callaghan one year into his premiership. Elsewhere, the talented Nicholas Harris finds himself overwhelmed by nostalgia as he chats to Geoff Dyer about a lost England. Sondos Sabra details the everyday horror of life in Gaza with a dispatch of piercing tenderness. James Marriott offers a eulogy to English literature, which he believes is fading from our culture. To round off the edition we have a hopeful dispatch from Syria by David Miliband, columns from Finn McRedmond and Rachel Cunliffe, and a Diary taking us behind the scenes of Donald Trump's America from His Majesty's most loyal ambassador, Peter Mandelson. Over the coming weeks and months there will be much more to come, but the essence of the magazine will never change. 'We shall deal with all political, social, religious and intellectual questions; but in doing so we shall be bound by no ties of party, class or creed,' declared the Leader over a century ago. A spirit of detachment was required, it argued. 'The cultivation of such a spirit and its deliberate application to matters of current controversy is the task which the New Statesman has set for itself.' It is the task to which I happily recommit the magazine 112 years later. [See also: What Keir Starmer can't say] Related