logo
What the U.S. Dollar's Dip Means For You

What the U.S. Dollar's Dip Means For You

Time​ Magazine4 hours ago

Americans' wallets could be set to take a hit as the U.S. dollar has tumbled to a three-year low amid concerns about the stability and strength of the country's economy.
The dip could aid domestic businesses that export U.S. goods, but will make international travel and imports pricier for Americans. The U.S. dollar has already lost about 10% of its value this year, in contrast with the euro, which reached its highest level in nearly four years after gaining 0.4% on Tuesday.
The devaluation of the dollar, the world's dominant reserve currency, on Thursday came after news outlets reported that President Donald Trump is considering announcing a new Federal Reserve Chair this fall, ahead of the end of current Chair Jerome Powell's term. The Wall Street Journal first reported the news on Wednesday. The Fed has faced pressure from Trump to lower borrowing costs, but has stopped short of doing so in order to assess the potential impact of the President's tariffs and keep unemployment low.
In addition to Trump's tariffs, his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' has contributed to uncertainty surrounding the U.S. economy. Economists have warned that the legislation could add more than $2.5 trillion to the federal debt, despite claims by the Administration that it would save money.
Here's what to know about the weakening dollar.
Why did the U.S. dollar fall?
A number of factors contribute to the value of the U.S. dollar, among them how in demand it is from central banks and other financial institutions. The country's broader fiscal situation, including inflation rates, trade relationships, debt, and trade deficits, also play a role.
As economists have warned about a potential U.S. recession or economic slowdown, investors have pulled back on investing in the U.S. 'The institutional quality that the U.S. had in terms of being a safe haven has been really undermined,' says Bilge Erten, a professor of economics at Northeastern University. 'Why would you invest in U.S. assets when you know that the U.S. dollar is likely to continue to lose value?'
Trump and his policies have contributed to many of the concerns raised about the economy in recent months. Some experts, however, say that while political factors help shape the strength of the U.S. dollar, its devaluation was projected to occur regardless of the winner of the 2024 presidential election. 'No matter what happened, there was a high chance that the dollar was going to fall, and I think it's going to fall further,' says Kenneth Rogoff, a Harvard professor and author of Our Dollar, Your Problem: An Insider's View of Seven Turbulent Decades of Global Finance and the Road Ahead.
Rogoff, who predicted the fall of the U.S. dollar in his book, argues that its dip in value is part of its typical fluctuation. 'It had reached a high we had only seen in 2002 and 1985 and both of those times, it fell very sharply in the ensuing years,' he says. The dollar most recently saw a spike in value around 2015, though it deteriorated during the COVID-19 pandemic, before rising again. Its recent high rate meant that it was projected to fall in the years to come, according to Rogoff.
That's not to dismiss the role that Trump's policies may be playing, however.
Rogoff points to the President's sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs as a policy that he says 'accelerated the process.'
'Trump can absolutely make the dollar go down by saying, 'I'm going to tax investors if they come into the United States,' which is in the Senate Bill. That's obviously going to discourage money. It's going to drive down the dollar. So there are lots of ways to play with it,' Rogoff says.
How will the dip in the U.S. dollar impact Americans?
The dip in the U.S. dollar means that its exchange rate is less strong, making international travel more expensive for Americans. The prices of imported goods will also be higher, experts warn. 'When someone from Europe is selling to the U.S., they're going to take [the dollar's devaluation] into account, because once they convert what they get in dollars into euros, they're getting less,' says Erten. 'That means they have to sell it at a higher price to get the same value.'
Companies that export U.S. goods, however, may benefit from a more competitive edge. The dollar's lowering value means that the cost of American goods and services will decrease in price when taking into account the exchange rates. 'Services that U.S. workers compete for will cost less,' says Rogoff.
In that respect the fall of the U.S. dollar may work to the advantage of Trump, who has vowed to bring back manufacturing jobs to the U.S. On the other hand, the labor market, which has already become increasingly challenging, might be impacted. A reduction of foreign investments into the U.S. could lead to more unemployment, which currently stands at a low 4.2%, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lawmakers remove ‘revenge' tax provision from Trump's big bill after Treasury Department request
Lawmakers remove ‘revenge' tax provision from Trump's big bill after Treasury Department request

Washington Post

time18 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Lawmakers remove ‘revenge' tax provision from Trump's big bill after Treasury Department request

WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans agreed to remove the so-called revenge tax provision from President Donald Trump's big bill on Thursday after a request by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The Section 899 provision that was nixed would have allowed the federal government to impose taxes on companies with foreign owners, as well as investors from countries judged as charging 'unfair foreign taxes' on U.S. companies.

PCAOB imposes smaller exam cheating fines, citing cooperation
PCAOB imposes smaller exam cheating fines, citing cooperation

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

PCAOB imposes smaller exam cheating fines, citing cooperation

This story was originally published on CFO Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily CFO Dive newsletter. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board announced three separate settled disciplinary orders against Netherlands member firms of Deloitte, Ernst & Young and PricewaterhouseCoopers, sanctioning them with penalties totaling $8.5 million for violating the board's rules and quality control standards related to their internal training programs, according to a Wednesday press release. From 2018 to 2022 hundreds of the firms' professionals, including partners, improperly shared answers to tests for mandatory firm training courses on such topics as professional independence, audit requirements and professional integrity, the PCAOB release states. Without admitting or denying the findings, Deloitte Netherlands and PwC Netherlands each agreed to pay a $3 million civil penalty and EY Netherlands agreed to pay $2.5 million. The fines would have been 'significantly larger' if the firms had not been as cooperative, according to the release. The U.S. audit watchdog's latest exam-cheating sanctions come as the board's broader future is uncertain: Republican lawmakers have proposed to eliminate the Enron-era body and fold its duties into the Securities and Exchange Commission. The PCAOB was handed a legislative lifeline last week when the Senate Parliamentarian found that the provision in President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill wasn't compliant with the so-called Byrd rule. Still, the Trump administration's push for deregulation could drive other means of curbing the board's powers, CFO Dive previously reported. The fines are smaller than the record $25 million penalty imposed last year by the board when it sanctioned KPMG Netherlands and its former head of assurance in connection with cheating and sharing of answers on the firm's internal training exams during a five-year period. At the time, the PCAOB noted that the widespread cheating on the training courses was enabled by the firm, which took 'virtually no steps to investigate' the misconduct which was ultimately brought forward by a whistleblower. With the clock potentially ticking with regard to the board, Robert Pawlewicz Ph.D., an assistant professor of accounting at the University of Richmond's Robins School of Business, said the PCAOB may be willing to settle for less to have these violations closed and made public before the SEC makes any changes. It's possible 'the PCAOB was incentivized to wrap up the enforcements,' he said. He also said that the board, acting alongside the newly appointed SEC administration, isn't likely to pursue such actions that aren't audit-related which can be criticized by some as regulatory overreach, although Pawlewicz doesn't agree with that view. 'With a new Board, I would not expect to hear about more of these violations,' Pawlewicz said in an email. A PCAOB spokesperson declined to comment on the matter. In a statement emailed to CFO Dive, EY Netherlands said integrity is a core value and that it takes such matters seriously, noting that it has fully cooperated with PCAOB. 'We have taken extensive actions to reinforce our culture of compliance, ethics, and integrity, as well as further measures to address the issues identified through our investigation. With this settlement, we can bring these matters with the PCAOB to a conclusion and will work with local regulator AFM [Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets] to ensure the long-term effectiveness of the measures we have taken,' the statement from EY said. In a press release PwC Netherlands said it has taken steps to remediate the problem and that the settlement coincides with its internal investigation. 'This behaviour is contrary to our values, and we have imposed a range of sanctions on those found to be involved, including written warnings, financial penalties, demotions and exits from the firm,' the release states. Deloitte did not respond immediately to a request for comment. Recommended Reading PCAOB wins Senate lifeline while future remains murky Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

UK made fewer vehicles for the fifth straight month in May as tariffs bite
UK made fewer vehicles for the fifth straight month in May as tariffs bite

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

UK made fewer vehicles for the fifth straight month in May as tariffs bite

(Reuters) -Britain's vehicle production declined from a year ago for the fifth successive month in May, industry data showed on Friday, as factory disruptions and U.S. tariffs weighed on automakers. UK car and commercial vehicle production dropped 32.8% from a year ago to 49,810 units last month, marking the worst percentage drop in May output since 1949, excluding the COVID-19 pandemic-hit 2020, according to data from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders. Exports to the UK's two biggest markets, the EU and the U.S., declined by 22.5% and 55.4% respectively, SMMT said. U.S. President Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on imported automobiles and parts, imposed in March, have disrupted global supply chains, added hundreds of millions of dollars in costs for manufacturers, prompted export suspensions and pushed several automakers, especially in Europe, to consider shifting production to the U.S. to avoid the duties. British manufacturing also contracted in May, as output, orders and employment declined. Still, SMMT chief Mike Hawes said the UK's trade deals, especially with the U.S., and a more positive relationship with the EU, provided some optimism. The U.S. and UK reaffirmed a previously agreed trade deal during the G7 summit in Canada earlier this month, under which up to 100,000 UK-made cars a year can enter the U.S. at a 10% tariff, lower than the 25% rates other countries face. In May, Britain reached a trade deal with India to lower tariffs and set quotas on auto imports, while also moving closer to the European Union on cooperation in defence, energy and agriculture. Car production, excluding commercial vehicles, dropped by 31.5% in May, largely driven by model changeovers, restructuring and the impact of U.S. tariffs, SMMT said. Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store