Faith in democracy declining among young Europeans, study finds
The socio-political survey conducted by the Tui Foundation, a group that funds projects dedicated to the European youth, found that only 57 per cent of young Europeans prefer democracy to other forms of government. The figures are as low as 48 per cent in Poland, and 51-52 per cent in Spain and France, The Guardian reported.
The study also revealed that more than one-fifth (21 per cent) of all respondents favoured an authoritarian form of government. Italy recorded the highest degree of support for authoritarianism with 24 per cent, followed by France, Spain and Poland with 23 per cent.
As many as 39 per cent of respondents across Europe are of the view that the system needs few changes, while one-third believe 'changes are necessary 'in many respects' because the political system is not working well,' the report noted. In Poland, 41 per cent share this opinion.
Only six per cent of all respondents believe their country's political system functions well and does not need to be changed.
The results come in the backdrop of electoral outcomes – pivoted by discourses on immigration policies – reflecting rising polarisation. Support for tougher restrictions on migration has grown across the board since 2021, from 26 per cent to 38 per cent.
19 per cent of the respondents described themselves as politically right of centre (up from 14 per cent in 2021), while 33 per cent called themselves centrists and 32 per cent as leftist. 16 per cent did not state their designation.
Germany, however, breaks the trend of the growing distrust in democracy. Notwithstanding the polarisation reflected in the 2025 polls, the faith in democratic institutions remains high in the fourth largest economy.
The support for authoritarianism has shown to be the lowest – at 15 per cent – in Germany and 71 per cent still believe in democracy. About 55 per cent believe that the system works well but needs changes in 'some respects', the Tui Foundation noted.
Currently in the middle of a economic slowdown, Germany elected its CDU-led centre-right coalition into power with 28.6 per cent of the votes. The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) has grown popular, receiving 20.8 per cent (doubling its vote share from 10.4 in 2021). The Left, although with as low as 8.8 per cent votes, witnessed 3.9 per centage point rise in the recent polls.
The study involved a survey of 6,703 people between the ages of 16 and 26 in Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Greece, Poland, and Great Britain in April and May 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Democrats claim Pentagon boss Hegesth paused military aid to Ukraine by falsely citing weapon shortages
While Ukraine seeks clarity on the halt of weapon shipments from the US, Democrats argued that Pentagon Chief Pete Hegseth paused military aid by falsely citing weapon shortages read more After US Secretary of State Pete Hegseth unilaterally halted agreed shipments of military aid to Ukraine, Democrats argue that the Pentagon boss cited baseless concerns that the American weapon stockpile was running low to announce such a measure. Before Hegseth's proclamation, a batch of air defence missiles and other precision munitions were due to be sent to Ukraine to aid it in its ongoing war with Russia. These aid pledges were made during former US President Joe Biden's tenure. However, Hegseth went on to conduct a presser in which he announced the halting of shipments of weapons to Ukraine. According to a NBC News report, the Pentagon chief solely decided to halt sending aid even though experts noted the aid would not have jeopardised the US readiness. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As per the report, this is the third time Hegseth has halted US military supplies to Ukraine. When US President Donald Trump was asked about the pause on Thursday, he claimed that it was a necessary move because 'Biden emptied our whole country, giving them weapons, and we have to make sure we have enough for ourselves'. What is the Trump administration's argument? Last week, A White House spokesperson said that the move 'was made to put America's interests first following a [defence department] review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe. The strength of the United States armed forces remains unquestioned – just ask Iran.' Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told reporters on Wednesday that 'the capability review is being conducted to ensure US military aid aligns with our defence priorities.' 'We see this as a commonsense, pragmatic step towards having a framework to evaluate what munitions are sent and where,' Parnell added. He also seemed to confirm that there is no current shortage of arms for US forces. 'Let it be known that our military has everything that it needs to conduct any mission, anywhere, anytime, all around the world,' he said. What is Congress thinking? The move surprised several members of Congress as well as Ukraine's European allies. Democrats argued that there is no evidence that American weapon stocks are in decline. 'We are not at any lower point, stockpile-wise, than we've been in the three-and-a-half years of the Ukraine conflict,' Adam Smith, a Democrat and ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, told NBC News. Smith said that his staff had 'seen the numbers' on weapon supplies and that there is no justification to suspend aid to Ukraine. The weapons that are being delayed by the pause include dozens of Patriot interceptor missiles that can defend against Russian missile attacks, as well as howitzers and other missile systems. Amid the pause, Russia has recently ramped up its bombardment of Ukrainian cities, using missiles, wreaking havoc among civilians in the war-torn country. 'This decision is certainly very unpleasant for us,' said Fedir Venislavskyi, a member of the Ukrainian parliament's defence committee, according to Reuters. 'It's painful, and against the background of the terrorist attacks which Russia commits against Ukraine.' The Department of Defence is yet to respond to the charges. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab: Mann govt to introduce fresh anti-sacrilege bill in assembly
Even as two anti-sacrilege bills passed by the Punjab assembly in 2018 await Presidential assent, the state government is set to introduce a fresh and more stringent bill to deal with acts of sacrilege. The Punjab government has decided to called a two-day assembly session on July 10 and 11 to bring this new legislation, apart from tearing the Opposition on drug issues. (Shutterstock) The Punjab government has decided to call a two-day assembly session on July 10 and 11 to bring this new legislation, apart from tearing the Opposition on drug issues. Chief minister Bhagwant Mann on last Saturday, during a meeting with representatives of the Sarb Dharam Beadbi Rokko Kanoon Morcha at his official residence, had announced to bring the new legislation. Mann said the proposed legislation will provide harsher punishments, including life imprisonment and the possibility of capital punishment, for sacrilege of holy scriptures. He stated that the existing legal framework had loopholes that allowed perpetrators of such offences to escape with minimal consequences.. The state government is expected to convene a Cabinet meeting soon to finalise the draft bill before introducing it in the assembly. The move revives the long-pending issue of anti-sacrilege legislation in the state. In 2018, the then Congress-led government had unanimously passed two bills, amending the Indian Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure to insert Section 295-AA. This section proposed life imprisonment for acts of sacrilege against the Guru Granth Sahib, Quran, Bible and Bhagavad Gita. While those bills were cleared by the Punjab governor, they have been awaiting Presidential approval for nearly seven years. Despite multiple appeals by successive governments, including the current AAP administration, to the Union home ministry and Rashtrapati Bhavan, no action has been taken. In November 2024, AAP MP Malvinder Singh Kang had raised the matter in the Lok Sabha, urging the Centre to expedite the process, calling it an issue that affected 'millions of faith-driven citizens in Punjab.' Mann pointed out that while the newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) provided provisions for religious places, it remained silent on desecration of religious scriptures. He emphasised that the issue fell under the Concurrent List, allowing the state to enact its own law. 'We are hopeful that under the new BNS provisions the new legislation will pass through and get nod from the governor,' said an official dealing with the legislation. He said the old bills had been rendered irrelevant after IPC was replaced by BNS. Notably, the BNS provisions for offences related to religion carry significantly lighter penalties than the life term — or even capital punishment — proposed under Punjab's upcoming legislation. Section 298 of BNS entails imprisonment up to two years for injuring or defiling place of worship, with intent to insult the religion of any class. Section 299 of BNS provides for a jail term up to three years for deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs. Despite several attempts, parliamentary affairs minister Dr Ravjot Singh could not be contacted for comments.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Kerala chief ministers, their overseas medical voyages — a historical route map
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan's journey to the United States for medical treatment has once again brought into focus a long-standing practice among top political leaders — seeking advanced healthcare abroad. While the move sparked political criticism over the state of Kerala's public healthcare system, it also aligns with a historical pattern of chief ministers, cutting across party lines, turning to foreign countries for treatment. Rare exceptions included CPM's E K Nayanar and CPI's P K Vasudevan Nair, who are perhaps among the few state CMs who never travelled abroad for medical treatment. The practice dates back to the pre-1990 era when left leaders, particularly from the CPI and CPM, preferred the erstwhile Soviet Union for higher medical care. Two of Kerala's most iconic communist chief ministers — E M S Namboodiripad and C Achutha Menon — travelled to the USSR for treatment during their time in office. Back then, the country was seen as a trusted destination, both ideologically and diplomatically, especially by left leaders. However, the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s brought a shift in preferences. The US emerged as the new destination of choice, not only due to its advanced medical infrastructure but also because of the presence of a large number of Keralite doctors in its hospitals. Among the first to make this transition was Congress leader and former Chief Minister K Karunakaran. After surviving a car accident in the 1990s, Karunakaran was flown to the US for specialised treatment. In 2000, CPM veteran V S Achuthanandan, who later became the CM in 2006, found himself at the centre of a political storm when he flew to London for medical care. His trip became a key talking point during the UDF's campaign for the 2001 assembly election. The Congress-led UDF trod a similar path. Former Chief Minister A K Antony travelled abroad for medical purposes after stepping down as Union defence minister. His successor, Oommen Chandy, too, underwent surgery in Davos, Switzerland, after slipping on snow during a visit to the World Economic Forum (WEF). Chandy sought further treatment in the US and Germany, though not during his tenure as chief minister.
