Elon Musk's Chatbot Questions Trump Team's Crowd Claims
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Questions are being asked about the crowd at a military parade held on President Donald Trump's birthday after apparent discrepancies between the visitor numbers touted by the White House and those given by Elon Musk's chatbot.
Saturday's event, run by organizers America250, was held to mark the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, which was established on June 14, 1775. The military display coincided with the U.S. president's 79th birthday, sparking speculation that the parade was his idea.
However, doubts have been sown about the popularity of the event. While a White House official claimed that more than a quarter-million people turned out, the AI chatbot Grok—founded by tech mogul Musk, Trump's former confidant—suggested that the figure was "exaggerated."
Newsweek has reached out by email to organizers America250 for comment.
President Donald Trump salutes troops during the celebration of the Army's 250th birthday on the National Mall on June 14, 2025, in Washington.
President Donald Trump salutes troops during the celebration of the Army's 250th birthday on the National Mall on June 14, 2025, in Washington.
Doug Mills - Pool/Getty Images
Why It Matters
Trump has often been accused by his critics of exaggerating his own popularity. A similar debate broke out about the number of people that he claimed attended his first inauguration as president in 2017.
Arguments over the military parade's audience numbers this weekend are likely to be fueled by Grok's assessment, and the dispute comes at a tricky time in the relationship between Trump and Musk.
The pair were so close that Musk was once dubbed the "First Buddy" and given the task of running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But the pair had a dramatic falling out this month. In recent days though, a rapprochement appears to be brewing after Trump said he was open to forgiving Musk, while the tech titan confessed that his posts about Trump "went too far."
What To Know
The military parade kicked off on a miserable, gray and rainy day, and Trump supporters had feared that the weather and anti-Trump protests could keep some spectators away.
However, there is no doubt that tens of thousands of people turned up to watch the show, as tanks rolled through the streets while military jets flew overhead. Video filmed during the event shows people lining the route and milling around. But the footage also shows sparse crowds and empty bleachers, and it remains unclear exactly how many people attended the parade.
The highest figure, and the one being used by the White House, is 250,000, although the amount is highly disputed.
Even if that number is accepted, however, it is still dwarfed by the millions who demonstrated against Trump in the nationwide "No Kings" protests, although that was a U.S.-wide coordinated event compared to the localized parade in Washington.
What People Are Saying
White House Director of Communications Steve Cheung, on Musk-owned X, formerly Twitter: "Amazing. Despite the threat of rain, over 250,000 patriots showed up to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the @USArmy. God Bless the USA!"
Amazing. Despite the threat of rain, over 250,000 patriots showed up to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the @USArmy.
God Bless the USA! https://t.co/7IarXheJbf — Steven Cheung (@StevenCheung47) June 15, 2025
Grok, when asked whether it was true that "over 250,000 patriots show[ed] up to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the @USArmy in person": "Claims of over 250,000 attendees at the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary parade in Washington, D.C., on June 14, 2025, appear exaggerated. Official permits allowed for up to 200,000 for the parade and 50,000 for the festival, but news reports suggest actual attendance was lower than expected. No official figures confirm the 250,000 claim, and sources like PBS and KTLA indicate turnout fell short of 200,000. Exact numbers remain unverified as of now."
Claims of over 250,000 attendees at the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary parade in Washington, D.C., on June 14, 2025, appear exaggerated. Official permits allowed for up to 200,000 for the parade and 50,000 for the festival, but news reports suggest actual attendance was lower than... — Grok (@grok) June 15, 2025
One X user, whose profile said she was a "Wife/Mother/Christian": "I'm sure more would've shown up but there was the threat by @TheDemocrats Paid protesters."
Another X commentator, who identifies as a Trump supporter in their profile: "It has been an absolutely fantastic evening! The fireworks right now are incredible. So proud of our Army, our country, and President Trump. Thank you God!"
One X user, whose profile says they are a "Gen X advocate [...who] champions immigrant contributions": "The claim of 250,000 attendees is nothing short of laughable. It's as if the laws of physics were suspended for the day, allowing an impossible number of people to fit into a space that clearly couldn't hold them [...] Perhaps next time, we could invest in a reliable counting method, like actual headcounts or, dare I say, honesty."
Another X account, whose profile does not reveal a political allegiance: "Were these 250,000 people also wearing camo?"
What Happens Next
The crowd size is likely to continue to be debated by both sides, and Trump has yet to comment on the exact number in attendance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Travel Ban Could Target Dozens of Countries, U.S. Memo Reveals
The U.S. government is reportedly considering a dramatic expansion of its travel restrictions, which could bar citizens from 36 more countries from entering the United States. According to an internal State Department cable obtained by Reuters, the potential expansion hinges on national security concerns and cooperation benchmarks. The memo, signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, outlined a 60-day window for these countries to address U.S. concerns or face partial or full travel suspensions. The list includes nations across Africa, the Caribbean, and parts of Asia, such as Angola, Ghana, Cambodia, and Syria. Citing issues like unreliable identity documentation, lack of cooperation in deportation cases, and visa overstays, the document emphasized the need to maintain the integrity of U.S. borders and public safety. The State Department pointed to passport security and anti-American activity as additional risk factors. While not all concerns apply equally to each country, the message is clear: cooperate or face consequences. If enacted, this would mark one of the largest expansions of U.S. travel restrictions in recent memory. Earlier this month, a proclamation suspended entry from 12 countries under similar national security justifications. Now, with this latest proposal, that number could more than triple. A senior State Department official declined to discuss the specifics of the memo but emphasized that visa policies are under constant review to ensure the safety of Americans. For travelers with ties to any of the listed nations, or for global mobility at large, the potential fallout could be significant. Business trips, academic visas, family reunifications, and tourism could all be impacted by this travel ban expansion depending on how the final policy takes shape. As the 60-day clock begins to tick, all eyes are on diplomatic responses and whether these countries will meet the U.S. government's requirements, or risk being shut Travel Ban Could Target Dozens of Countries, U.S. Memo Reveals first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 15, 2025
9 minutes ago
Judge extends block on Trump ban prohibiting Harvard students from entering US
A temporary restraining order on President Donald Trump barring foreign Harvard University students from entering the U.S. will remain in effect until next Monday while a federal judge considers arguments made for a preliminary injunction. The temporary block was due to expire on Thursday before being extended Monday by U.S. District Court Judge Allison Burroughs. Harvard's lawyers argued Trump's proclamation violates its First Amendment rights and is outside the authority of the executive branch. Listing the actions taken by the government against Harvard in recent weeks, attorney Ian Gershengorn argued in a court hearing Monday in Boston that the move was retaliation and viewpoint discrimination against the institution. Gershengorn argued the president is not restricting entry, but instead limiting what you do and who you associate with after you enter. The permissible way to classify a class of aliens is based on the character of the alien, he argued. The government pushed back, arguing the administration does not "trust" Harvard and that it did not monitor the "aliens" that it brought into the U.S. The government said bringing in foreigners is a privilege not a right, according to Tiberius Davis, counsel to the assistant attorney general. "We don't trust Harvard to vet, host, monitor or discipline" foreigners, Davis argued. Davis also raised concerns about Harvard's "foreign entanglements" with the Chinese government and said it did not provide sufficient information to the government on foreign students -- which Harvard has denied. Harvard University filed the lawsuit against the government after U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced it was canceling Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, which would bar the school from enrolling foreign students. The suit was later amended to include the proclamation and Harvard moved to request a second block on Trump's proclamation. That would have gone into effect for at least six months before it was blocked by Burroughs. The judge questioned arguments made by the government over its concerns about Harvard that motivated the proclamation. "I can't imagine that anything that you just described applies only to Harvard," Burroughs said. Davis argued the government is free to investigate other institutions and said that "a lot of these other universities are willing to" do more to address issues on campus. Davis also argued that different government agencies chose to terminate grants with Harvard because they believed the institution was not following the law, saying that move was not retaliation either. Davis also said Harvard is not being singled out with grant terminations because other institutions have suffered the same. The government argued it is not singling out Harvard, but rather other institutions have been more willing to take action to address issues on campus, while Harvard has not, Davis said. "There's a lack of evidence of retaliation here," Davis said in court. Burroughs said if the point is to root out antisemitism, "Why aren't we letting in people from Israel?" Davis argued antisemitism was just one part of the issue, along with foreign entanglements and not providing sufficient information to the government. Because of their other conduct on campus and their inattentiveness to it "we don't trust them," Davis said. "They don't have to pull over everybody who's speeding. Frankly they can't do that," Davis said. Pushing back on arguments that it did not monitor its students, Harvard said it is the government's responsibility to vet students being allowed into the country. "The vetting is done by the State Department in their visa process," Gershengorn said. At one point in the Monday hearing, the judge asked Harvard's attorneys why it did not name the president in its lawsuit, asking if he needed to appear in this case. Gershengorn said it sued the people who are tasked with implementing the proclamation. Gershengorn argued Trump's usage of the proclamation to block entry of foreign Harvard students is a "vast new authority to regulate the domestic conduct of domestic institutions," a departure from how this proclamation has been used in the past. Gershengorn said it has been used to block the entry of individuals or nationals of a country that have "done something bad." The question is not whether the action is lawful or not, Gershengorn argued. If lawful action is taken as a First Amendment-motivated action, it is no longer lawful, he added. Gershengorn said what Harvard has suffered over the last two months is probably the most "irregular" and "improper" action any institution has suffered. Harvard pushed back against claims there is widespread violence on campus, saying the story the government cites identified two incidents of violence on the basis of religion. The government is "throwing things at the wall to see what sticks," Gershengorn said. Harvard has alleged that the administration is in an "escalating campaign of retaliation" against the school. After Harvard publicly refused to comply with demands made by the Trump administration, the administration responded by freezing more than $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts to the school.
San Francisco Chronicle
12 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump fires Democratic commissioner of independent agency that oversees nuclear safety
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has fired a Democratic commissioner for the federal agency that oversees nuclear safety as he continues to assert more control over independent regulatory agencies. Christopher Hanson, a former chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, said in a statement Monday that Trump terminated his position as NRC commissioner without cause, 'contrary to existing law and longstanding precedent regarding removal of independent agency appointees.' The firing of Hanson comes as Trump seeks to take authority away from the independent safety agency, which has regulated the U.S. nuclear industry for five decades. Trump signed executive orders in May intended to quadruple domestic production of nuclear power within the next 25 years, a goal experts say the United States is highly unlikely to reach. To speed up the development of nuclear power, the orders grant the U.S. energy secretary authority to approve some advanced reactor designs and projects. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told reporters that 'all organizations are more effective when leaders are rowing in the same direction' and that the Republican president reserves the right to remove employees within the executive branch who exert his executive authority. Trump fired two of the three Democratic commissioners at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, an independent federal agency responsible for enforcing federal laws that prohibit discrimination in the workplace. In a similar move, two National Labor Relations Board members were fired. Willie Phillips, a Democratic member and former chairman of the independent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, stepped down in April, telling reporters that the White House asked him to do so. Trump also signed an executive order to give the White House direct control of independent federal regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission. New Jersey Rep. Frank Pallone, the top Democrat on the the House Energy and Commerce Committee, called Hanson's firing illegal and another attempt by Trump to undermine independent agencies and consolidate power in the White House. 'Congress explicitly created the NRC as an independent agency, insulated from the whims of any president, knowing that was the only way to ensure the health, safety and welfare of the American people," Pallone said in a statement. Senate Democrats also said Trump overstepped his authority. Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, Patty Murray and Martin Heinrich said in a joint statement that 'Trump's lawlessness' threatens the commission's ability to ensure that nuclear power plants and nuclear materials are safe and free from political interference. Hanson was nominated to the commission by Trump in 2020. He was appointed chair by President Joe Biden in January 2021 and served in that role until Trump's inauguration to a second term as president. Trump selected David Wright, a Republican member of the commission, to serve as chair. Hanson continued to serve on the NRC as a commissioner. His term was due to end in 2029. Wright's term expires on June 30. The White House has not said if he will be reappointed. Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists, called Hanson a dedicated public servant and a strong supporter of the NRC's public health and safety mission. Firing Hanson is Trump's 'latest outrageous move to undermine the independence and integrity' of the agency that protects the U.S. homeland from nuclear power plant disasters, Lyman said in a statement. The NRC confirmed Hanson's service ended on Friday, bringing the panel to two Democrats and two Republicans. The commission has functioned in the past with fewer than the required five commissioners and will continue to do so, the statement said. ___
