logo
Commentary: Singaporeans, we need to pump the brakes on our bubble tea obsession

Commentary: Singaporeans, we need to pump the brakes on our bubble tea obsession

CNA5 hours ago

SINGAPORE: If you saw weekend queues at Changi Airport this June, don't blame immigrations just yet. The more plausible culprit: Popular Malaysian boba brand Tealive's first and only Singapore outlet, freshly opened at Terminal 3.
With Tealive's arrival, we are one of the rare airports in the world with nine bubble tea brands, including HeyTea, Chicha San Chen, Naixue, Koi, LiHo, TP Tea, amps tea and iTea. Sounds like a lot of pearls per square metre, but not once you leave the airport. Just two years ago, Tampines was dubbed Singapore's 'bubble tea capital', with 21 bubble tea shops within a 500m radius.
As of 2022, we had more than 60 bubble tea brands in Singapore – and new entrants are still pouring in. Besides Tealive, China's 8,000-outlet-strong chain ChaPanda will also be arriving on our shores soon.
With over 60 brands offering upwards of 30 drinks each, the bubble tea maths is mind-boggling. Even for a single ingredient like brown sugar, we have brown sugar milk tea, brown sugar pearls, a variant with cream cheese, one with cheese brulee and another with just fresh milk, no tea.
As thousands of boba variants take up more and more space on our little red dot, have we finally reached bubble tea oversaturation in Singapore?
INSIDE THE BOBA ECONOMY
Bubble tea is a guilty pleasure of mine too, so I totally get it. We love it because it marries two of our familiar indulgences: the comforting taste of kopitiam milk tea and the illicit chew we've missed since the sale of gum was banned in 1992 – all wrapped in an Instagram-ready cup.
Barely anyone anticipated bubble tea to have this kind of cultural impact when the drink first came to our shores – also in 1992, served in cocktail glasses from a cafe at Marina Square.
As the tea-dessert hybrid evolved to its current takeaway format, it quickly spread across the island and overtook even our ubiquitous milk tea. By 2002, there were more than 5,000 shops in Singapore. But just a year later, the market reached oversaturation and the bubble burst, leading boba shops to shutter all across the island.
In those days, it seemed as if bubble tea had all the makings of a fleeting fad. Who would've thought it would evolve into the multi-billion-dollar micro-industry it is today?
Few food trends can boast such longevity and multigenerational appeal. It's not just Gen Zers who are hooked – millennials and Gen X were the same, particularly in their youth.
Bubble tea's characteristic combination of caffeine, sugar and chewable pearls is not the only reason for this timeless love affair. After the first market bubble pop in 2003, the beverage reinvented itself by tapping into Starbucks' winning formula of offering extreme customisation options.
The second wave of brands such as Koi The and Gong Cha began offering sugar and ice customisation around 2007. Ten years later, Tiger Sugar and LiHo introduced newfangled toppings like brown sugar and cheese foam. More recently, speciality teas – fruit tea and premium or single origin leaves – has emerged as a key consumer draw.
Today, most major brands put Starbucks to shame with their personalisation options: Multiple tea options, five tiers of sugar levels, three tiers of temperature variation, and as many as 10 different toppings, including pearls, aloe, konjac, collagen jelly, ice cream – adding up to hundreds of different possible combinations and permutations per brand.
As consumerism becomes increasingly intertwined with self-expression, this level of customisation transformed the beverage into a lifestyle choice, an expression of individuality, and vibe signalling, especially for young people.
ARE WE BECOMING A BUBBLE TEA NATION?
While I understand the value of such customisation, I do wonder if we're taking it a tad too far.
These days, if you are not a regular bubble tea drinker with default preferences, it can take a minute or two to even order a single drink.
I sometimes find myself in boba limbo, struggling to make five different decisions for a single beverage. Do I swop out pearls for aloe or collagen jelly? What about ice cream?
My chronic indecision aside, do these minor tweaks really matter, or are brands just too caught up in the ingredients arms race?
Blindfolded, could the average consumer tell the difference between golden bubble pearls, red sugar pearls and pink cactus pearls, or differentiate between single-estate oolong and regular oolong, especially when mixed with milk and starchy pearls?
Even the more distinguishable seasonal launches feel somewhat forced – LiHO's Salted-Egg Lava Brown Sugar Milk in 2018, Takagi Ramen's Chilli-Crab Matcha Macchiato in 2022, and Gong Cha's Century-Egg and Salted Egg special in 2024.
Wouldn't we rather just enjoy these flavour trends with crabs or congee, rather than in a cup of sugar and milk?
To a certain extent, these options were introduced to create brand differentiation, especially with multiple brands often competing against each other in close quarters.
But when bubble tea takes over so much of Singapore's prime retail space, it inadvertently transforms our food culture, crowding out other cuisine richer in both nutrients as well as historical and cultural significance.
Moreover, many regular boba drinkers are youths. Many brands appeal to this demographic with cute mascots – Koi's BB Bear, Mixue's Snow King and ChaPanda's Ding Ding Cat – as well as tie-ins with toy brand. Gong Cha recently collaborated with Pop Mart to launch Pino Jelly themed drinks, including packaging and merchandise.
Partly persuaded by the fun and hype, some parents are also starting their kids on these caffeinated beverages younger than they otherwise would – a friend of mine offers her primary school kids bubble tea on a semi-regular basis. Paediatricians warn that there is no safe caffeine dose for children under the age of 12.
How will these daily habits impact Singapore's children, tweens and teens as they come of age?
I am by no means arguing for a boba ban – like all indulgences, bubble tea has its place in our diverse food nation. But rather than hurtling towards our 2,000th boba variation, perhaps it's time to pump the brakes on this obsession. Why not leave some stomach and retail space for other heartier – and healthier – food instead?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More investigations needed for 3 men accused of fraud linked to movement of Nvidia chips: Prosecution
More investigations needed for 3 men accused of fraud linked to movement of Nvidia chips: Prosecution

CNA

time42 minutes ago

  • CNA

More investigations needed for 3 men accused of fraud linked to movement of Nvidia chips: Prosecution

SINGAPORE: Investigations into the cases of three men accused of fraud possibly linked to the movement of Nvidia chips remain in the preliminary stage, the prosecution said on Friday (Jun 27) as it asked the court for further adjournment. It has been four months since Singaporeans Aaron Woon Guo Jie, 40, and Alan Wei Zhaolun, 49, and Chinese national Li Ming, 51, were first produced in court for charges mostly of fraud, with about US$390 million (S$519 million) involved. The trio's cases were heard again on Friday at the State Courts. None of the three men appeared in court as their attendances had been dispensed with. The prosecution sought a further eight-week adjournment for police to conduct more investigations. Deputy Public Prosecutor Phoebe Tan told the court that the police had been actively pursuing leads and conducting further investigations from the very start. Asked by a District Judge if the case should be fixed for a pre-trial conference, Ms Tan maintained that the cases should not be moved as investigations remained at the preliminary stage. A pre-trial conference is an administrative hearing that is held in chambers and is not open to the public. While Woon and Wei's lawyers had no objections, Li's lawyer, Andrew Chua, sought clarification on why the cases should not progress to a pre-trial conference. He said that he would prefer a pre-trial conference for his client. He then asked the prosecution to explain why it needed a further adjournment, given that the case had previously been adjourned as well. Ms Tan told the court that since the last hearing on May 2, the police had 10 follow-up interviews with persons of interest, witnesses and the accused persons. The police have also initiated contact with relevant agencies, including foreign ones, and are still waiting for responses, Ms Tan said. These responses relate to evidence that would be material to the case at hand, she added. Meanwhile, the police's forensic branch has examined only 35 of 53 electronic devices. The rest are still pending data extraction, she said. The police are also looking into new documents that have surfaced since the last hearing, Ms Tan added. The prosecution would simply not be ready if the case were to be sent to a pre-trial conference, as investigations and responses from parties involved will have a "material bearing" on the case at hand, Ms Tan said. After hearing the prosecution, Mr Chua said he had no objections to an adjournment. No fresh charges were tendered to the accused persons at this hearing. The District Judge then adjourned the trio's cases to Aug 22, with a view to fixing them for pre-trial conferences then. Woon and Wei each face two charges of being in a criminal conspiracy to commit fraud on two suppliers of servers, Dell and Super Micro, with the amount involved at about US$250 million, the prosecution said in a previous hearing. The pair are said to have made false representations in 2024 that the items would not be transferred to a person other than the "authorised ultimate consignee of end users". Li is accused of committing fraud on Super Micro by allegedly claiming in 2023 that the end user of the items would be a company called Luxuriate Your Life. He is also suspected of accessing an OCBC corporate bank account without authorisation to make and receive transfers for Luxuriate Your Life, a company he controlled, on Jun 19, 2024. His alleged offences involve around US$140 million, the court previously heard. The three men were among nine people arrested during raids by the Singapore Police Force and Singapore Customs in February, after media reports stated that intermediaries in the country were involved in the illegal movement of Nvidia chips to China, bypassing US export controls.

CNA938 Rewind - Stock take today: S&P 500 rallies near record, tariff deadline extension
CNA938 Rewind - Stock take today: S&P 500 rallies near record, tariff deadline extension

CNA

timean hour ago

  • CNA

CNA938 Rewind - Stock take today: S&P 500 rallies near record, tariff deadline extension

CNA938 Rewind - Big Shot: Halimah Yacob and life after presidency In the June edition of Big Shot, Andrea Heng and Hairianto Diman speak with former President Halimah Yacob, who's now Chancellor of Singapore University of Social Sciences, on her time as Singapore's head of state and life after presidency. 20 mins CNA938 Rewind - Stock take today: S&P 500 rallies near record, tariff deadline extension On the daily markets analysis on Open For Business, Andrea Heng and Hairianto Diman speak with Kingsley Jones, CIO, Jevons Global. 12 mins CNA938 Rewind - Is it time to lift the 15-month wait-out period for private home owners? National Development Minister Chee Hong Tat said recently that private property owners looking to buy a non-subsidised resale HDB flat may not need to wait till 2027 or 2028 for a review of the wait-out requirement. Andrea Heng and Hairianto Diman speak with Dr Lee Nai Jia, Head of Real Estate Intelligence at PropertyGuru, to find out if it's the right time to remove this temporary restriction. 10 mins CNA938 Rewind - TalkBack: Why does it seem challenging for Singapore football to hold on to a head coach? Tsutomu Ogura has resigned as head coach of the Singapore national football team due to personal reasons. This leaves Singapore looking for its fourth national coach in six years. Lance Alexander and Daniel Martin speak with Yazeen Buhari, FIFA consultant and former General Secretary of the Football Association of Singapore. 28 mins

CNA938 Rewind - Is it time to lift the 15-month wait-out period for private home owners?
CNA938 Rewind - Is it time to lift the 15-month wait-out period for private home owners?

CNA

timean hour ago

  • CNA

CNA938 Rewind - Is it time to lift the 15-month wait-out period for private home owners?

CNA938 Rewind Play National Development Minister Chee Hong Tat said recently that private property owners looking to buy a non-subsidised resale HDB flat may not need to wait till 2027 or 2028 for a review of the wait-out requirement. Andrea Heng and Hairianto Diman speak with Dr Lee Nai Jia, Head of Real Estate Intelligence at PropertyGuru, to find out if it's the right time to remove this temporary restriction.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store