Did Samantha Ruth Prabhu remove her Ye Maaya Chesave tattoo, years after divorce from Naga Chaitanya?
Samantha Ruth Prabhu has made it to the news yet again, but this time, it is not for her movies or looks, but for her old Ye Maaya Chesave tattoo. In a video featuring the actress, netizens have spotted that her iconic tattoo linked to ex-husband Naga Chaitanya is no longer there.
Spotted by many, the upper back tattoo with 'YMC' written on it has been removed by the actress. It was supposedly 1 of the 3 tattoos that she had symbolizing her relationship with her ex-husband.
4 years after the duo finalized their divorce, with Chay even remarrying, Samantha has gotten rid of the tattoo, as showcased in the new video.
For those unversed, Naga Chaitanya and Samantha were in a relationship for quite some time back in the day, which eventually led to their marriage. Tying the knot in 2017, one of the most beloved couples in South cinema entered marital life after two different ceremonies, a Hindu ritual and a Christian one.
However, the couple decided to part ways in 2021, sending shockwaves around the industry and fans. Both penned their statements on social handles regarding the separation, making it official.
While many seem to believe that the actress has removed her 'YMC' tattoo after so many years, some suggest that it might have been hidden with foundation.
Interestingly, Samantha is also making headlines amid rumors of her being in a relationship with The Family Man director Raj Nidimoru. We exclusively reported how the duo is planning to move in together, with them even scouting for properties.
Coming to Samantha Ruth Prabhu's work front, the actress was recently seen in her maiden production venture, Shubham, playing a cameo role. The horror comedy flick directed by Praveen Kandregula featured an ensemble cast of actors like Harshith Reddy, Gavireddy Srinivas, Charan Peri, Shriya Kontham, and many more.
Moreover, the actress has a film titled Maa Inti Bangaram and the web series Rakt Brahmand: The Bloody Kingdom in her lineup. The latter will have Aditya Roy Kapur as the co-lead with Wamiqa Gabbi and Ali Fazal expected to play supporting roles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Kerala Travel Vlogger Applies Sindoor On Women's Foreheads In Viral Video, Draws Netizens Ire
Last Updated: The vlogger, identified as Maheen Shajahan shared the video on his Instagram handle where he was seen entering the temple with his friends and greeting them by placing sindoor. A Kerala-based travel vlogger is facing backlash after sharing a video of himself visiting a Hindu temple with foreign friends and applying sindoor to their foreheads. Many viewers have deemed the act inappropriate and disrespectful to Hindu traditions. The vlogger, identified as Maheen Shajahan shared the video on his Instagram handle where he was seen entering the temple with his friends and greeting them by placing a sindoor on their foreheads. 'Muslim boy in Kerala Temple; In Kerala, faith isn't a barrier – it's a bridge. As a Muslim visiting a Hindu temple with my foreign friends, I felt nothing but warmth, welcome, and peace. Here, in this lush corner of India, religious harmony isn't just an idea – it's lived every day. We respect. We celebrate. We share. Different paths, one love," he captioned the video. However, the clip quickly drew backlash online, with many netizens accusing him of misusing a sacred Hindu practice. 'Sindoor', the Hindi word for vermillion that married Hindu women apply to their foreheads, holds age-old significance in Hinduism. Traditionally worn by Indian women to signify their married status, 'sindoor' is first applied by a woman's husband during the 'pheras' (ritual related to marriage) on their wedding day. Amid the backlash, Shajahan clarified that none of the women in his video objected to his actions. 'I was very aware that married people put this (sindoor) but I wasn't aware that this was such an important thing and no other person can put it. If I would have known, I wouldn't have done that cause I'm a traveller and I try to respect all religions even though I don't believe in religion," he clarified in a statement given to Brut India. He also said that some were misusing his clip to fuel communal tensions, and apologised to those whose sentiments were hurt. top videos View All The video uploaded by Brut India went viral and many took to the comments to share their views on it. One user commented, 'Why is there so much intolerance in India?" Another user said, 'It's acceptable in movies but it's not for the reels." Shajahan left a comment on the video as well. 'Peace peace peace. I never tried to offend any religion. As a Malayali, I had the freedom to enter all the religious centers in Kerala without problems. I never had to face any backlash. We lived in peace. Unfortunately time changed and nowadays politics dividing people," he wrote. About the Author Shobhit Gupta First Published:
Hans India
5 hours ago
- Hans India
Hindu Group Demands Ban on Auction of M.F. Husain's Controversial Paintings
Mangaluru: M.F. Husain paintings, Hindu Janajagruti Samiti, art auction ban, controversial art India, religious sentiments protest, Mumbai art galleryThe Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) has demanded a complete ban on the upcoming auction of 25 paintings by late artist M.F. Husain, scheduled to be held at the Pundole Art Gallery in Mumbai on June 12. The organisation submitted memoranda to Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Mumbai Police Commissioner, and the Mumbai District Collector, calling the proposed sale 'a glorification of anti-national and anti-Hindu sentiments.' In a press release issued here today the Samiti has alleged that several of the works being auctioned include controversial and 'vulgar' depictions of revered Hindu deities and Bharat Mata (Mother India), which sparked nationwide outrage in the past. Among them, they point to a painting titled Rape of Mother India, which HJS claims Husain created during the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. The group argues that this work amounts to sedition and deeply insults India and its cultural identity. 'Glorifying such a figure under the guise of 'artistic freedom' is unacceptable,' said the HJS in its statement, warning of public protests if the auction is not halted. 'Art that mocks national symbols and religious icons cannot be shielded as creativity. It is an assault on the spiritual and emotional ethos of a nation.' Maqbool Fida Husain, often referred to as the 'Picasso of India,' was one of the country's most celebrated yet polarising artists. Despite his global acclaim, his depictions of Hindu gods and goddesses in the nude led to more than 1,200 legal complaints across India. His critics accused him of deliberately hurting religious sentiments, while supporters defended his work as a bold exploration of mythology through modernist lenses. Notably, in one painting, he portrayed Sita seated nude on Hanuman's tail, and in others, Lord Ram, Sita, and Hanuman are depicted nude together — images that provoked widespread outrage. There were also paintings of goddesses Saraswati, Parvati, Ganga, and Yamuna in nude or suggestive forms, which many Hindu groups deemed offensive. In the face of mounting protests and legal challenges, Husain left India in 2006 and later accepted Qatari citizenship in 2010. He passed away in exile in London in 2011. The Samiti also referenced a recent directive by Delhi's Patiala House Court to seize Husain's controversial painting, calling it a legal precedent that should influence upcoming actions. 'Several of his exhibitions have previously been cancelled, and awards in his name were revoked. Allowing a public auction now undermines judicial intent,' the statement said. The HJS has urged the government to not only ban the auction but also declare Rape of Mother India as anti-national and ensure its destruction. They've also demanded legal action against galleries or individuals who attempt to sell or display such works, citing public harmony and national interest. When contacted, officials at Pundole Art Gallery offered no comments.
New Indian Express
5 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Paramasivan Fathima Movie Review: This predictable film is ideologically inept and clumsily crafted
Generally, filmmakers find it easy to dish out social issues if their films are set in a fictional world. This helps you stay away from offending any powerful person, organisation or community. It also creates a space for uninhibited discussions. But filmmaker Esakki Karvannan is disingenuous with things he presents as issues and lacks honesty in exploring them fully. Paramasivan Fathima introduces the fictional world of Subramaniyapuram and the towns split from it, namely Yokobpuram (predominantly Christian) and Sultanpettai (predominantly Muslim). The film begins with the narration that the rampant conversions are the reason for the split, and prospective grooms from both these towns die a day before their D-day. In parallel, we get glimpses of Paramasivan (Vemal) and Fathima/Tamilselvi (Chayadevi), teasing us with what could have happened to them even though the familiar stench of honour killing is discernible from a mile away. However, the film chooses to take a tiring 140 minutes to uninspiringly tell us the relation between the deaths and conversions. Putting itself on a high pedestal, the film claims to impart some noble message, but is off the target right from the beginning. It reeks of contrivance, especially with no villager in this film having anything to do except be bothered by religion. It could be said that communal flare-ups in Tamil Nadu are few and far in between when compared to cases of caste discrimination. However, the absence of an engaging fictional story cannot be blamed on the social fabric of the state. The film should have ideally explored how bigotry comes in the way of religious harmony in the 21st century rather than creating a fictional world filled with people, who seem to be straight out of the Middle Ages. The film also trivialises hunger and unemployment through Hindu characters coercing others in their community to not convert for "food and jobs" as though they aren't important enough for sustenance. The question is, what kind of pride should one take in a religion where one follower does not take care of another? Why will anyone not be grateful to someone from some other faith, who has taken it upon themselves to provide sustenance to live a dignified life? Also, it is important to note that the act of service done with an ulterior motive of converting more people to their religion cannot be brought under the umbrella term of 'service.' It is but a transactional relationship. Can an apathetic person judge when someone from his 'brethren' converts to another religion after receiving certain favours from them? No. Some scenes and dialogues reflect the 'rice-bag convert' condescension in social media, but this anger would have been better justified if it was targeted at those depriving the starving people of their 'rice bag'. 20th-century American psychologist Abraham Maslow would have created a five-tier needs hierarchy that treats physiological and safety needs as having paramount importance for a bare minimum decent life. Food and material requirements aren't nothing. I am duty-bound to remind such self-righteous people that the miracle stories of Lord Krishna filling his impoverished friend Kuselan's house with riches just for a morsel of puffed rice and Lord Jesus multiplying five bread loaves and two fishes to feed 5000 people are being taught to their respective followers even to this day to praise God's glory, generosity and magnanimity.
