UK landmine charity wins global humanitarian prize
The Mines Advisory Group (MAG) has been selected as the 2025 recipient of the Conrad N Hilton Humanitarian Prize, an annual award which honours a non-profit organisation leading efforts to alleviate human suffering.
The group, set up in 1989 in Cockermouth, Cumbria, and now based in Manchester, has worked in more than 70 countries across the world to clear and raise awareness of landmines, as well as being part of international efforts to stop the use of the explosives.
Bosses say their work is more important than ever as new and ongoing conflicts have led to a spike in the number of landmine casualties.
MAG chief executive Darren Cormack said eight out of 10 people killed or injured by landmines were civilians and 40% were children.
He said: 'Predominantly, civilians are most at risk where landmines and unexploded ordnance litter communities.
'They pose an immediate risk to life and limb in contexts where war is ongoing, so Syria, Gaza, Sudan, Myanmar, Ukraine, and we're in a desperate race really to get safety messages to those communities who are at risk, to avoid the risk and to clear the landmines and unexploded ordnance from harm's way.'
The group was part of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, backed by Princess Diana, which in 1997 was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for its work.
Their campaign led to the Ottawa Treaty, an international convention banning landmines, but, some countries are planning to withdraw from the agreement.
Mr Cormack said the treaty was 'one of the most successful instruments of international humanitarian law' and the group believed it was 'vitally important' it was maintained.
He said: 'We have seen that it is an effective way of ultimately protecting civilians who are at risk many, many years after conflicts have ended.
'Yes, there are pressures right now that some states are certainly under and we're seeing that in Europe and the Baltic states – Poland, Ukraine – who are considering withdrawing.
'Our position is we would regret that and believe it is something that should be upheld.'
Executive director of MAG US, Shari Bryan, said: 'As levels of conflict rise across the world and as several countries have expressed intent to exit the Ottawa Treaty amidst escalating conflict in eastern Europe, our work has never been more important.'
The prize of three million dollars (£2.2 million) will support MAG's work, which has a community-centred approach, with the majority of its 5,500 staff coming from areas affected by conflict.
Mr Cormack said: 'Too often we're in a race to find a landmine before a child does and what this funding will enable us is to find different ways of potentially doing what we do.'
Peter Laugharn, president and chief executive of the Conrad N Hilton Foundation, said: 'The selection of the Mines Advisory Group as this year's Hilton Humanitarian Prize recipient serves as a reminder that compassion and peace should still be at the top of our global agenda.
'Through its extraordinary efforts to help communities return to safety and prosperity after conflict, the Mines Advisory Group exemplifies the kind of humanitarian excellence our prize has sought to celebrate and inspire over the last three decades.'
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'Landmines kill indiscriminately and remain lethal long after conflicts are over, so I was privileged to see how the Mines Advisory Group are tackling this critical issue first-hand during my visit to Laos last year.
'Their expert teams not only clear landmines but also run life-saving educational programmes for returning communities to reduce the risk of injury or death.
'It is a source of great pride to see a UK-based organisation receive this prestigious prize, and to support their vital work in this time of conflict and geopolitical instability.'
A prize ceremony will be held in New York in October.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Premier League and EFL at odds over redistribution deal
The Premier League have seen their latest attempt to tweak how football's wealth is distributed hit a roadblock. According to The Athletic, the English Football League (EFL) rejected a redistribution proposal just weeks before a landmark bill introducing an independent football regulator was passed. The offer was made in April and backed by Premier League chief executive Richard Masters. However, it fell short of the EFL's long-standing demand for 25% of the top flight's television rights revenue. That has been a huge sticking point in negotiations about bridging the financial gap between the Premier League and lower divisions. Speaking in the House of Lords on July 15, West Ham United vice-chairman Karren Brady revealed that the EFL board had turned down what she described as a 'credible and generous' proposal. Brady is one of many voices that have campaigned against the incoming regulator and warned that it could entrench a 'closed shop' among the league's elite clubs. However, she cautioned that the Premier League's 'future success' is not guaranteed, pointing to the growing threat from FIFA and UEFA expanding their competitions and commercial reach. Despite the setback, the Premier League remains hopeful that they can reach a deal without outside intervention. The independent regulator will be formally established by November, although it is expected to take time to become fully operational. For now, the Premier League and EFL will carry on with their existing arrangements without a deadline to focus on as far as any of the authorities potentially involved in any discussions are concerned. The debate stems from the Premier League being cautious about surrendering too much of its broadcasting income. They fear it could weaken the league's competitive edge and reduce their ability to invest in both top-tier football and the game as a whole. On the other hand, the EFL argues that a larger share of the game's richest revenue stream is essential for the sustainability of its 72 clubs, many of which face ongoing financial challenges.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
War must be seen as a last resort, the only reason for war is to create peace
In 1982, the Falklands War began, and for the first time in my life, I knew men and women who were leaving Portsmouth as members of the Royal Navy to go to war. The stark realisation came to me that they might not come back. I was working as a priest at Portsmouth Cathedral at the time and came in close touch with members of the Armed Forces, especially naval chaplains. Like the diocese of St Edmundsbury and Ipswich, the diocese of Portsmouth was founded in the twentieth century. For the cathedral, Portsmouth chose the parish church of Old Portsmouth, St Thomas of Canterbury, down by the harbour mouth. Watching the television news coverage in recent weeks and months from the ever-increasing countries ravaged by war brought back my Portsmouth memories and challenged me to think about the idea of war as a just thing. As a student studying theology, part of our course was in philosophy, which included the concept of a just war. The notion of a just war is not an easy one to accept. How can any war, killing, be right? What we need to understand is that the idea of a just war does not exist to put forward reasons for justifying going to war. What it does do is to provide a set of criteria for judging one way or the other: is going to war the answer or not? As we gaze at the horrors on our television screens, how do we even begin to work out the rights and wrongs of it all? Much international and military law has the idea of a just war woven into it. For instance, there must be a just cause for going to war. Today, the only justifiable cause is acknowledged as self-defence. Then, before war is even considered, every other means of solving the crisis must have been tried and have failed. Bishop Graeme Knowles (Image: Supplied) War must be seen as a last resort; the only reason for war is to create peace. This means a just peace, not peace at any price. There must be a careful weighing of the consequences of going to war. There must be proportion, a belief that more good than evil will be the result of the action taken. The last criterion is that there must be a reasonable chance of success. All this reads rather coldly, but there are two other vital components when considering the idea of a just war. The first is that there must be no direct attacks on people who pose no military threat; in other words, unarmed civilians. The second is that there must be a careful weighing of the consequences of warfare. All these arguments assume a calm, logical approach to human affairs. They ignore the baser elements of human nature: greed, jealousy, and racial and religious bigotry. In navigating our way through the war of words and images with which we are presented, we must, though, have something to balance our own prejudices. The idea of a just war and what that means is simply one tool we can use. As I have been writing this article, resounding in my ears have been the words of Jesus: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the children of God." Jesus bears the title Prince of Peace. My primary purpose, therefore, as a Christian and as a human being, is to be a peacemaker. I might not be able to have very much of a direct effect on international politics, but I can have a direct and purposeful effect on the way I live my life. In 1955, Jill Jackson wrote a hymn which began: "Let there be peace on earth and let it begin with me." It is a text we should all take to heart and act on. Bishop Graeme Knowles is acting Bishop of St Edmundsbury and Ipswich


News24
40 minutes ago
- News24
Trump supports journalists going into ‘dangerous' Gaza amid ‘numerous deaths and injuries'
US President Donald Trump supports journalists going into Gaza. Israel does not allow journalists without a military escort. At least 17 people were killed in Gaza on Thursday. US President Donald Trump said on Thursday he would like to see journalists gain access to Gaza to see humanitarian efforts. Israel has not allowed foreign reporters to enter Gaza since the start of its war in October 2023, unless they are under Israeli military escort. 'I'd like to see that happen. Sure,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'I would be very fine with journalists going. And it's a very dangerous position to be in, as you know, if you're a journalist, but I would like to see it.' AFP reported that Gaza's civil defence agency said at least 17 people were killed on Thursday in Israeli strikes as the military intensified its bombardment of Gaza City. READ | Israel minister announces West Bank settlement 'burying the idea of a Palestinian state' The dead included six civilians who had been waiting for humanitarian aid, said civil defence spokesperson Mahmud Bassal. 'The Israeli occupation forces are intensifying their raids in the Zeitun area' of Gaza City, he said. The Israeli military has yet to comment. 'For the fourth consecutive day, the area has been subject to a military operation, resulting in numerous deaths and injuries,' said Bassal. 'Since dawn today, we have received 28 calls from families and residents of this neighbourhood, some of whose children have been killed.' Many people cannot leave these areas due to artillery fire. Mahmud Bassal Maram Kashko, a resident of Zeitun, said the strikes had increased over the past four days. 'My nephew, his wife and their children were killed in a bombardment,' he told AFP. An AFP videographer said their bodies were taken to Al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza City and buried shortly afterwards at the Sayyid Hashim cemetery. On Wednesday, the head of the Israeli military said he had approved a new plan for operations in the Gaza Strip aimed at freeing all hostages and defeating Hamas. The military intends to take control of Gaza City and neighbouring refugee camps, some of the most densely populated areas in the Palestinian territory, which has been devastated by more than 22 months of war. Over the past three days, Zeitun has been the target of repeated air strikes, according to multiple sources, including the military. Adding to the dire humanitarian situation, Gaza has been experiencing a spell of extreme heat, which is particularly difficult for displaced residents living in tents and makeshift shelters. 'The heat is unbearable. We live in a nylon tent - it's like an oven. We cannot stay inside during the day, there is no ventilation,' said Umm Khaled Abu Jazar, 40, displaced in the Al-Mawasi camp. 'My children have developed skin rashes. Even the water we drink is hot from the sun. There is nothing to cool us down. The heat only adds to our daily suffering,' the mother of five told AFP.