logo
Asim Munir just stole his 5th star & has nothing to show for it. It'll make him desperate, dangerous

Asim Munir just stole his 5th star & has nothing to show for it. It'll make him desperate, dangerous

The Print2 days ago

He knows that he can't have this fifth star and do nothing more with it. Should India worry?
It's tempting to say, little more. This is just a bit more bling on his collar, cap, car, and, when he chooses, on his pulpit—a main battle tank. That must be the question also assailing his mind.
What can a Pakistan Army chief do with a fifth star that he couldn't with four? What can a Pakistan Army chief, master of all he surveys, do as field marshal that he couldn't as a mere General?
The short answer is, India must always worry about the Pakistani army, and it does. Just that, there's this added concern and urgency with this bizarre promotion from within the 'system' or maybe from outside it, depending on where you place Shehbaz Sharif in this arrangement.
What will he do with his fifth star, only for the second time in Pakistan's and the subcontinent's history? (Our three five-stars, Cariappa, Manekshaw and Arjan Singh were handed ceremonial batons). It is a phenomenon so rare for modern militaries that today, the only example in a country of some consequence would be Egypt's Abdel Fattah El-Sisi. Even the mighty Americans buried the exalted title with Marshall, MacArthur, Eisenhower and Bradley. He would surely want to do something with it. I might suggest taking a leaf out of Idi Amin's book and find some equivalent of his 'Conqueror of the British Empire'. But this isn't the time to be funny.
Firing his civilian government and taking over power would be so boring in Pakistan. He doesn't need that. All our politico-strategic analysis of Pakistan should henceforth be focused on this one central point. How will Field Marshal Asim Munir be different from General Asim Munir? What the General could do, we saw indicated in his speech to overseas Pakistanis on 16 April and in what happened in Pahalgam on 22 April. The one promise in that speech he's yet to fulfil is, making Pakistan 'a hard state'.
Victory celebrations for propaganda apart, he knows his military has suffered a severe setback. Any yet unsubstantiated claims of downing Indian planes can please the population for a while. It is just that the pictures of the battered airbases—each one of them east of the Indus—and the big Jaish-Lashkar establishments reduced to rubble will endure. However much he thumps his chest, the additional jingle of that fifth star will not change those facts on the ground. He would want to do something soon to 'make amends'. In fact, he would need to.
I would go so far as to wager that he will do something sooner than we might have imagined. In the past, in a phenomenon described earlier as the Pakistani army's 'seven-year itch', each major terror attack and the Indian response bought us about seven years of deterrence and relative peace. We will not get that kind of time now, because Munir Munir hasn't got it. When he will act, what he will do, we can wargame but can't be sure. There's only one thing I can say with certainty. If you are looking at six or seven years, I can tell you for sure where Munir will be. Politics, culture, and history of Pakistan indicate that it won't be a good place.
Also Read: What is Asim Munir thinking?
Before we get there, however, the awesome powers he amassed as a four-star deserve a look. He already had at his feet the civilian government he conjured to get 'elected'. Hear the fawning words, the body language and see if there's anything prime ministerial about the younger Sharif brother in the presence of his 'sipahsalar' (commander-in-chief, as he was already addressing Munir before that fifth star). Cheerleader, court-jester, or a bit of both, take your pick. Munir has been speaking on all key issues already, including the promise of a trillion-dollar economy (currently $410 billion).
He's locked up Imran Khan, the only leader to challenge the army's exalted power. This, after he banned his party from contesting. The fact that Munir's preferred parties (the coalition led by PML-N) couldn't even win this one-horse race didn't matter. He installed them nevertheless.
The judiciary has caved in, especially as it conceded to the military courts the power to try civilians for some most serious offences, especially treason. He's already got his handmaiden parliament, elected in an institutionally stolen election to rubber stamp amendments to mangle the Constitution and give himself an extended tenure. There are some collateral benefits for the judges too. He's got it all sewn up. So, what's next?
See it from where the field marshal sits. If he looks seven years ahead, he would dearly hope and pray that statutory warning on mutual fund advertising applies in his case: past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. Because the past will tell him that every exalted army chief with political ambition has ended up badly: disgraced in defeat, prosecuted, exiled, even assassinated and in some cases three out of four. Ayub, Yahya, Zia, Musharraf, the four make a straight line.
To stretch this, even Zulfikar Ali Bhutto became a dictator and shared the same fate. Munir's two predecessors, Qamar Javed Bajwa and Raheel Sharif were prudent in ultimately fading away, whatever power they exercised when in uniform. A Pakistani chief with the kind of power that Munir now has, no longer enjoys the luxury of thinking of retirement one day to play golf. That option out, Munir has the compulsion to do something with what the religious teacher in him might see as a god-given opportunity. I seem to be the chosen one, and if so, what is it that I was chosen to do?
Also Read: Islam doesn't kill democracy. The army-Islam combo does
His rise is sui generis even for Pakistan. The country has given us a chief who the civilian government appointed defence and home minister simultaneously (Ayub), later the chief martial law administrator and who in turn fired the same civilian government to become president and, soon after, anointed himself field marshal. We've seen Yahya, Zia and Musharraf as garden variety military rulers all meeting one of these ends.
The last two also installed some kind of elected governments. This 'bonsai' phenomenon was Pakistan's unique contribution to political science. When the generals were not directly in power, they held it from outside. Again, that uniquely Pakistani phenomenon was called 'hybrid' government. How would you describe what we have now? A field marshal with a captive government and his only likely challenger in jail.
More than three decades back (India Today, 15 May, 1993) when Nawaz Sharif was dismissed by the military establishment he had said to me defiantly in an interview: 'What kind of system is this, addha tittar, addha bater (half a partridge, half a quail)'. When he returns with a majority next, he said, he would make sure there's clarity. Either they (the army) should rule, or us (elected civilians).
I wonder how he would describe what he sees now, self-exiled from politics in his own country. How would you see this? An army chief elevated to field marshal, most popular leader jailed for almost two years, a farcically elected civilian government.
Do you remember duck-billed platypus from your Class 5 biology class: the unique Australian organism with characteristics of a mammal, bird and reptile used to make the case for evolution between species? I know you are laughing, but please don't. This isn't funny. This is what Field Marshal Munir is now presiding over. He cannot have it all and do nothing with it. That fifth star is as much of a burden as fake claims of victory. India had better be prepared. Munir hasn't got another 5-7 years. He could be back at our throats soon, even within the next 12 months.
Also Read: Lesson from Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Pakistan: if you have no patience, you don't deserve democracy

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EC to cancel EPIC of Afghan nationals living illegally in Patna house
EC to cancel EPIC of Afghan nationals living illegally in Patna house

Time of India

time20 minutes ago

  • Time of India

EC to cancel EPIC of Afghan nationals living illegally in Patna house

Lucknow: Following TOI's May 29 report about a house in Patna that allegedly became a hotbed for immigrants with multiple fake Indian identity cards, the Election Commission of India is set to remove their elector's photo identity card (EPIC) from the electoral roll. The move is significant as Bihar assembly polls are around the corner. Jandullah Dad Mohammad, an Afghan national from Paktika province, was living at Patna's Wakil Anwer House, impersonating as Rehan, son of Kabir, alongside his brother Mansur. After entering India on a six-day medical visa in December 2019, Jandullah went off the radar in Delhi. By 2020, he had managed to obtain a complete set of fake Indian identity documents. His EPIC (AFS3853934), Indian passport (C6978659), Aadhaar card (322874855132), PAN card (ETXPR8222K), driving license (BR0120210005369), SBI bank passbook (39914603822), Patna Municipal Corporation issued birth certificate (B-2019 10-90097 025254), and even a ration card painted a convincing picture of an Indian citizen. "We are now preparing to revoke the EPIC issued in the name of Rehan," said electoral registration officer (ERO) Raghvendra Pratap Singh. The accused foreign national is currently lodged in Lucknow jail after being caught by the Bureau of Immigration from Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport on May 19. The ECI's consolidated electoral list, published on Jan 7, 2025, under a special summary revision, revealed that the Wakil Anwer House has 12 male occupants, all in their 20s and 30s except one, with no women registered. At least four of them shared identical details: Same age, same father's name (Kabir), and EPICs. Kabir's real identity has been established as Dad Mohammad Khan. His elder son Mansur, who left for Dubai more than six months ago, is registered in electoral roll with two EPICs AFS4130290, AFS4127999. Another resident, Mohammad Sher Khan, also had dual EPICs AFS4129953 and AFS4125266. "Currently, Kabir is missing from Wakil Anwer House, with no confirmation of his existence, though locals confirm his presence in Patna 7-8 years ago. We have cancelled Mansur's and Mohammad Sher Khan's EPICs... One individual cannot have two EPICs," said ERO Raghvendra. He added, "The owner of Wakil Anwer House has not returned to Patna from New Delhi till date. He has now assured to be back around June 9, following which he would furnish details of everyone living in his property."

Bill Clinton slams Donald Trump's governing style: ‘We've never seen anything like this before in my lifetime'
Bill Clinton slams Donald Trump's governing style: ‘We've never seen anything like this before in my lifetime'

Mint

time21 minutes ago

  • Mint

Bill Clinton slams Donald Trump's governing style: ‘We've never seen anything like this before in my lifetime'

Former US President Bill Clinton criticised Donald Trump's defiance of legal norms and called for a renewed national focus on common ground, warning against political intimidation and democratic erosion. Clinton described Trump's governing style as unprecedented in modern US history. 'We've never seen anything like this before in my lifetime – somebody that says, 'Whatever I want should be the law of the land. It's my way or the highway,'' he told CBS. 'And most Americans don't agree with that.' Clinton also suggested Trump's aggressive rhetoric and disregard for norms may have diminished his popularity. 'I like to think that he's paid a price for this – you know, name-calling and throwing his weight around… I think it's made him less popular.' Clinton emphasised that the only path to countering Trump lies in democratic participation, saying, 'Only elections are going to change this.' He said Democratic gains in this year's gubernatorial races and a potential House win in 2026 could help galvanize opposition to Trump. He also pointed to the judiciary as a remaining check on executive overreach. Clinton condemned Trump's reported efforts to prevent law firms from representing clients before federal agencies if they opposed him. 'That ain't America,' Clinton said. 'We've never done that. The whole purpose of having a legal system is to have both sides be heard.' He praised the courts — including judges appointed by Trump — for resisting these attempts: 'The courts are stopping the president, including a lot of judges he appointed… He is looking for ways to basically defy all these court orders. But I think he'll have a hard time doing that. And if he does, I think it will hurt him in America.' Despite acknowledging deep political divisions, Clinton urged Americans to reject humiliation and divisiveness in favor of mutual respect. 'Someone needs to stand up and say, 'Damn it, what we have in common matters more. We cannot throw the legacy of this country away. We cannot destroy other people's trust in us.'' 'We gotta just calm down and try to pull people together again. That's what I think.' Clinton dismissed claims from a recent book that questioned President Joe Biden's cognitive abilities, saying he never observed any decline. 'I thought he was a good president… I had never seen him and walked away thinking, He can't do this anymore. He was always on top of his briefs.' He admitted he hadn't read the book, stating: 'I didn't want to. 'Cause he's not president anymore, and I think he did a good job. And I think we are facing challenges today without precedent in our history. And some people are trying to use this as a way to blame him for the fact that Trump was reelected.'

Indian-American banned from MIT graduation ceremony for pro-Palestine speech. Who is Megha Vemuri?
Indian-American banned from MIT graduation ceremony for pro-Palestine speech. Who is Megha Vemuri?

Indian Express

time23 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Indian-American banned from MIT graduation ceremony for pro-Palestine speech. Who is Megha Vemuri?

Indian-American student Megha Vemuri of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), was banned from attending a graduation ceremony on Friday after she delivered a pro-Palestinian speech during a commencement event on May 29. Vemuri was designated to be the marshal at the graduation ceremony, however, the university announced that she and her family were barred from attending the event. Vemuri, the elected class president and a double major in computation and cognition and linguistics, spoke at MIT's OneMIT Commencement Ceremony in Cambridge. Her speech, which was not pre-approved, denounced MIT's research ties with Israel and accused the university of being complicit in the 'genocide' of the Palestinian people. Following the speech, University Chancellor Melissa Nobles informed Vemuri that she would not be allowed to participate in the graduate ceremony on Friday, adding that she would receive her diploma by mail. In a statement, the university said: 'MIT supports free expression but stands by its decision, which was in response to the individual deliberately and repeatedly misleading Commencement organizers and leading a protest from the stage.' In response to MIT's decision to bar her from the graduation ceremony, Vemuri said she was not disappointed about missing the event. 'I see no need for me to walk across the stage of an institution that is complicit in this genocide,' she wrote. However, she expressed disappointment with the university's handling of the situation, saying school officials 'massively overstepped their roles to punish me without merit or due process.' According to data from the United States Department of Education, MIT received $2.8 million in grants, gifts, and contracts from Israeli entities between 2020 and 2024, as reported by The Boston Globe and cited by The New York Times. Born and raised in Alpharetta, Georgia, Vemuri graduated from Alpharetta High School in 2021. She studied computer science, cognition, and linguistics at MIT, recently completing her degree while serving as the class president. At MIT, Vemuri was also a part of the Written Revolution, a student group that 'platforms revolutionary thought on campus' through writing and art, which it describes as 'powerful tools for conducting a revolution.' Before enrolling at MIT, she interned at the Neuroscience Institute at the University of Cape Town in South Africa and participated in various youth leadership and science outreach programs. Vemuri's ONEMIT speech quickly went viral on social media, drawing widespread criticism. In response to the online backlash, she has since taken down her LinkedIn profile. Taking the stage wearing a red keffiyeh – a symbol of solidarity with Palestine – Vemuri was one of nine speakers at MIT's OneMIT Commencement Ceremony on Thursday. Read from crumpled sheets of paper, her speech, roughly four minutes long, was addressed to her classmates, highlighting some of their efforts to protest against Israel. 'You showed the world that MIT wants a free Palestine,' she said, adding, 'The MIT community that I know would never tolerate a genocide.' After Vemuri left the stage to a round of applause, MIT President Sally Kornbluth spoke next. She paused as some people began chanting, and then responded, 'OK, listen folks. At MIT, we believe in freedom of expression. But today is about the graduates.' President Kornbluth has found herself on this type of tightrope before. In December 2023, she testified before the US House Committee on Education and the Workforce, alongside student presidents of Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania. The hearing was on how universities were handling campus protests and allegations of antisemitism. Unlike her counterparts Claudine Gay and Liz Magill —both of whom were replaced by their schools — Kornbluth managed to avoid serious consequences. The 2023-24 academic year saw widespread pro-Palestinian protests on many college campuses, including encampments and tense standoffs across the country. Graduation ceremonies became a stage for political expression, with walkouts and protest speeches common. Generally, those who participated in such actions were not subjected to disciplinary measures. Vemuri's also drew criticism from the House Speaker, Mike Johnson, a key ally of US President Donald Trump. 'Ignorant. Hateful. Morally bankrupt. Where is the shame—or appropriate response from the institution?' he wrote on X. 'Have your children avoid MIT & the Ivy League at all costs.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store