
Pakistan: No jobs for families of deceased civil servants under new govt rule
Islamabad: Pakistan's government has abolished the policy that allowed family members of deceased civil servants to automatically receive government employment, the Express Tribune reported.
This decision aligns with a Supreme Court ruling from October 18, 2024, which deemed the practice unconstitutional and discriminatory. The move comes as the government instructs all ministries and divisions to strictly adhere to the new guidelines, the report added.
In the notification issued by the Establishment Division, it was made clear that the policy of offering government jobs to the families of deceased civil servants has been withdrawn, following the Supreme Court's ruling.
According to the Express Tribune report , the new policy will take effect immediately from the date of the ruling. However, the family members of deceased employees will still be eligible for other benefits under the Prime Minister's Assistance Package. The ruling does not apply to the families of law enforcement personnel who lose their lives in terrorist attacks. Appointments made before the Supreme Court's decision will remain unaffected by the ruling.
The Supreme Court's ruling dismantled the government's job quota scheme for the family members of civil servants, declaring it discriminatory and unconstitutional. Under the scheme, a widow, widower, spouse, or child of a deceased or medically retired employee was appointed to a government position without the need for open competition or merit-based selection, reported the Express Tribune.
In its ruling, the Court noted that the scheme was specifically discriminatory against low-grade employees and their families. "These jobs neither are nor can be made hereditary," the order stated.
The 11-page judgment, authored by Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, emphasised that public sector employment could not be "parcelled out to the functionaries of the state," as it would undermine the principles of fairness and equality. The Constitution mandated that equal employment and economic opportunities must be provided to all citizens.
The Court also explained that any policy or law that contradicted constitutional principles was subject to judicial review. "Any law, policy or rule was subject to judicial review if it was manifestly inconsistent with the constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the citizens," the order read.
The ruling struck down previous orders, declaring that appointing a widow, widower, spouse, or child of a civil servant--who had passed away during service or become permanently disabled--under this quota scheme was "discriminatory and ultra vires to Articles 3, 4, 5(2), 18, 25(1), and 27 of the Constitution," the Express Tribune added in its report.
However, the Court clarified that the decision did not affect appointments already made under the hereditary quota for current employees. Federal and provincial authorities were instructed to withdraw these laws, aligning them with the constitutional framework. (ANI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
EU gives final approval to Russian fertiliser tariffs
BRUSSELS: EU countries on Thursday gave final approval to new tariffs on fertiliser imports from Russia, a move aimed at throttling Moscow's war effort in Ukraine that has upset some European farmers. Justice ministers from the bloc's 27 nations signed off on the measure, which also puts a levy on additional farm products, during a meeting in Luxembourg. "These measures increase our economic security by reducing dependencies from Russia," said Michal Baranowski, undersecretary of state for trade for Poland, which holds the EU's rotating presidency. "We are further reducing Russia's export revenues and therefore its ability to finance its brutal war. This is united Europe at its best." The regulation will enter into force next month and also covers Russia's ally Belarus. It targets nitrogen-based fertilisers, as well as all farm goods that had not yet been affected by sweeping tariffs that came into force last year. The levies it imposes will increase gradually up to a point where they would make imports unviable in 2028. European farmer groups had opposed action on fertilisers fearing an increase in prices, with Russia still a major supplier. — AFP


Times of Oman
03-06-2025
- Times of Oman
India: NEET-PG 2025 postponed; exam to be held in single shift as per SC order
New Delhi: The National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) on Monday announced the postponement of the NEET-PG 2025 examination, following a directive from the Supreme Court to conduct the exam in a single shift while ensuring transparency and security. In compliance with the court's order, the NBEMS stated that NEET-PG 2025, initially scheduled for June 15, will now be held at a later date to allow for logistical adjustments. The board emphasised that the postponement is aimed at expanding the number of test centres and upgrading the required infrastructure to meet the court's standards for fairness and security. The NBEMS order read, "NBEMS will conduct NEET-PG 2025 in a single shift. NEET-PG 2025, scheduled to be held on 15.06.2025, has been postponed to arrange for more Test Centres and required infrastructure. The revised date for the conduct of NEET-PG 2025 shall be notified shortly." The announcement comes in response to the Supreme Court's order in the case of Writ Petition No. 456/2025 (Aditi & Ors vs National Board of Examination in Medical Sciences & Ors), where the apex court directed the authorities to make necessary arrangements for conducting the NEET-PG 2025. "We, accordingly, direct the respondents to make necessary arrangements for holding the NEET-PG 2025 examination in one shift, duly ensuring that complete transparency is maintained and secure centres are identified and commissioned," said the bench in an order. The NEET-PG exam is a key gateway for admission to postgraduate medical courses across India. Conducting the exam in a single shift is expected to reduce disparities in difficulty levels and improve the overall integrity of the examination process. The Supreme Court on May 30 had directed the National Board of Examination (NBE) to hold the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test for Postgraduate courses (NEET-PG) 2025 in a single shift. A vacation bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjay Kumar, and NK Anjaria rejected the decision of NBE to hold the exam in two shifts, saying it creates "arbitrariness". The bench said it will be open for NBE to apply for extension of time if they find that the arrangements can't be done by 15 June, the scheduled date of exam. "Holding the exam in two shifts leads to arbitrariness and cannot give a level playing field. The question papers in the two shifts can never be of the same difficulty level... The examining body ought to have considered making arrangements for holding the examination in one shift," the order stated. As the counsel of NBE said that to hold exam in one shift, 900 extra centres will have to be arranged, which is not possible before June 15, the bench said, "We are not ready to accept that in entire country and considering the technological advancements in this country the examining body could not find enough centres to hold the examination and one shift." The counsel further said that NBE has even very limited centres to hold the exam in one shift. "Infrastructure for Wi-Fi, good computer safety security, etc. All possible problems have been considered and then this solution (of two shifts) has been given," added the counsel. The counsel said that out of over 2.5 lakh candidates, only a handful of them have approached the court against the NBE decision to hold the exam in two shifts. The top court was hearing petitions challenging the conduct of NEET-PG 2025 in two shifts.


Times of Oman
30-05-2025
- Times of Oman
White House vows Supreme Court fight over Trump tariff ruling
Washington, DC: The Trump administration has threatened to escalate its tariffs dispute to the Supreme Court after a court ruling overturned many of the president's new import duties. The administration is demanding that the decision be suspended. White House Press Secretary Karine Leavitt declared, "We will win this battle in court", in a press briefing and said the administration is working to "tackle rogue judges." When asked why other countries would continue trade negotiations amid the legal uncertainty, she said the U.S. trade ambassador had heard from countries that morning confirming their intention to continue working with the United States. During a Thursday briefing, Leavitt also informed reporters that U.S. President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba spoke by phone on Thursday, exchanging views on tariff-related issues. The press secretary added that members of the president's cabinet--Secretary Lutnick, Secretary Bessent, and Ambassador Jamieson Greer--have been in contact with their counterparts worldwide to signal that the United States remains committed to negotiations. "Countries around the world have faith in the negotiator in chief, President Donald J. Trump. And they also probably see how ridiculous this ruling is, and they understand the administration is going to win," Leavitt said. "And we intend to win. We already filed an emergency appeal, and we expect to fight this battle all the way to the Supreme Court," the press secretary asserted. White House lawyers petitioned the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday to halt Wednesday's decision from taking effect. The move followed a second court ruling that found President Trump had exceeded his authority in implementing the tariffs. The rulings represent significant victories for small businesses and states that have mounted legal challenges to the measures, striking at policies central to Trump's economic and foreign policy agenda. Leavitt also criticised the court's tariff ruling as an example of "judicial overreach." She argued that Trump's tariffs were introduced to address U.S. trade deficits with other nations and described the taxes as "legally sound" and "long overdue." Meanwhile, a US team is scheduled to visit India on June 5-6 for the next round of negotiations on a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) between the two countries. The India-US trade deal would mark a significant milestone in economic relations between the two big economies, potentially opening new avenues for bilateral commerce and investment. Additionally, Ray Vickery, Former United States Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Trade Development, said that the trade agreement between India and the US can't happen with Washington's "bullying approach." "In Trump, 1.0, there was a negotiation that came close to getting a freer trade, not a free trade arrangement between the United States and India. One hopes that that would happen, but it's not going to happen with this bullying approach, which the Trump administration has indicated," Ray Vickery told ANI. President Donald Trump has made repeated claims that the US mediated the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan and offered them "a lot of trade." However, India has emphasised that the two nations' militaries negotiated directly and resolved the conflict through an agreement and understanding for a cessation of fire and military action. The cessation of hostilities was agreed upon following a call from Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) to his Indian counterpart, Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai, after India destroyed nine terror infrastructure sites in Pakistan and Pakistan occupied Jammu and Kashmir under Operation Sindoor. Additionally, Vikrey said that the Trump administration has a "misunderstanding" regarding trade deficits, due to which the US is determined to impose tariffs on other countries. "The Trump administration has a misunderstanding in regard to trade deficits. Trade deficits are not necessarily something imposed just by unfair trade practices by another country, but they have to do with the United States' own saving and spending habits, he said.