Gordon signs off on universal school vouchers, praising bill as 'remarkable' legislation
Nearly a week before Gordon signed House Bill 199, 'Steamboat Legacy Scholarship Act,' U.S. District Judge Peter H. Froelicher released a 186-page decision, concluding Wyoming's funding model for the K-12 public school block grant is 'unconstitutional' and 'no longer cost-based.'
Several lawmakers who voted against HB 199 argued it unconstitutionally uses state funds to send children to private schools. Sen. Wendy Schuler, R-Evanston, who voted against the bill, said she supports school choice, but only if it's within constitutional boundaries.
Sen. Wendy Schuler, R-Evanston (2025)
Sen. Wendy Schuler, R-Evanston
'Right now, (the Wyoming Constitution) says public money can't be used for private, religious education,' Schuler told the Wyoming Tribune Eagle. 'I just think this bill could end up in the courts.'
The Wyoming Legislature passed a bill last year to create an educational savings account (ESA) program, and Gordon limited ESA eligibility to families at or below 150% of the federal poverty level. He explained in his line-item veto letter these changes made the ESA program more constitutionally sound.
HB 199 removes the ESA family income-based requirement for grades K-12 and increases the per child amount from $6,000 a year to $7,000. During negotiations, House representatives agreed to include pre-kindergarten eligibility in the ESA program for families at or below 250% of the federal poverty level.
Gordon said during a news conference Tuesday morning that Wyoming is the first state in the nation to include preschools in its universal school voucher program.
However, without a similar means test for ESA recipients in grades K-12, several lawmakers in both legislative chambers argued the bill directly violates the Wyoming Constitution. Rep. Landon Brown, R-Cheyenne, told the WTE he suspected the law will be immediately challenged in court.
Rep. Landon Brown, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Rep. Landon Brown, R-Cheyenne
'It's just going to tie up more resources and money,' Brown said.
Monday night, Gordon vetoed a bill that lifted the cap on how many charter schools the Wyoming Charter School Authorizing Board can authorize. He referred to Froelicher's decision in his veto message, saying it 'highlights an urgent issue that must be addressed before we consider authorizing additional charter schools.'
'Without a sustainable, transparent plan to ensure adequate funding for public schools, education savings accounts, and charter schools alike, lifting the cap on charter school authorization is both premature and irresponsible,' Gordon wrote in his veto message.
Gordon was asked during Tuesday's news conference why he felt vetoing the lift on the charter school cap was the right choice for public education, but not doing the same with the universal school voucher program.
'Look, I'm a conservative, fiscally and otherwise,' Gordon said. 'I want to make sure that we have a measured approach that doesn't end up with us having to fund a bunch of things that we can't afford, and (there are) a lot of pieces of charter legislation that need to be addressed before we just open doors.'
Wyoming was put under the national spotlight two weeks ago when President Donald Trump pressured senators into passing HB 199. Trump urged every senator to vote in favor of the bill through a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, adding that 'I will be watching!'
The bill appropriates $30 million from the general fund to the Steamboat Legacy Scholarship Program Account, and notes that the Legislature's intent is to include this money in the standard budget for the Wyoming Department of Education starting with the 2027-28 biennium.
The Wyoming Education Association was the organization that brought the lawsuit against the state for underfunding its public schools, which Froelicher ruled on last week. In a prepared statement, the WEA found Gordon's support of HB 199 'disappointing.'
'The district court's ruling from only days ago confirmed that the state is not funding public education to the level as it is required,' the WEA stated. 'The choice to take taxpayer dollars to support a voucher program is a curiously poor decision.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Failed New Mexico candidate gets 80 years in shootings at officials' homes
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A failed political candidate was sentenced to 80 years in federal prison Wednesday for his convictions in a series of drive-by shootings at the homes of state and local lawmakers in the aftermath of the 2020 election. A jury convicted former Republican candidate Solomon Peña earlier this year of conspiracy, weapons and other charges in the shootings in December 2022 and January 2023 on the homes of four Democratic officials in Albuquerque, including the current state House speaker. Prosecutors, who had sought a 90-year sentence, said Peña has shown no remorse and had hoped to cause political change by terrorizing people who held contrary views to him into being too afraid to take part in political life. Peña's lawyers had sought a 60-year sentence, saying their client maintains that he is innocent of the charges. They have said Peña was not involved in the shootings and that prosecutors were relying on the testimony of two men who bear responsibility and accepted plea agreements in exchange for leniency. 'Today was a necessary step toward Mr. Peña's continued fight to prove his innocence,' said Nicholas Hart, one of Peña's attorneys. 'He looks forward to the opportunity to appeal, where serious issues about the propriety of this prosecution will be addressed.' The attacks took place as threats and acts of intimidation against election workers and public officials surged across the country after President Donald Trump and his allies called into question the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. Prosecutors said Peña resorted to violence in the belief that a 'rigged' election had robbed him of victory in his bid to serve in the state Legislature. The shootings targeted the homes of officials including two county commissioners after their certification of the 2022 election, in which Peña lost by nearly 50 percentage points. No one was injured, but in one case bullets passed through the bedroom of a state senator's 10-year-old daughter. Two other men who had acknowledged helping Peña with the attacks had previously pleaded guilty to federal charges and received yearslong prison sentences.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Skipping Mike Johnson
House Speaker Mike Johnson 's right flank is trying to bypass him repeatedly next month by forcing votes on releasing the Epstein files and banning congressional stock trading. Why it matters: The tool these members plan to use — the discharge petition — has been the source of growing controversy in the House. A discharge petition allows the House rank-and-file to force a vote on any piece of legislation if at least 218 members sign on. Top Republicans have discouraged the use of the maneuver, arguing it would effectively turn over control of the House floor to Democrats, but GOP populists have increasingly ignored that guidance. State of play: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) wants to force a vote on Rep. Tim Burchett's (R-Tenn.) bill to ban members of Congress, their spouses and dependent children from trading or owning stocks. Tamping down congressional stock trading has been a cause célèbre for lawmakers in both parties for years, but congressional leaders have largely stonewalled their efforts to secure a vote. Another discharge petition from Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) on forcing the release of the Justice Department's documents on Jeffrey Epstein is set to trigger a vote within days of the House's return in September. Between the lines: The Epstein petition is widely expected to obtain 218 signatures, with most Democrats and several right-wing Republicans likely to sign on. Luna's petition may be more contentious, sources said, as there have already been months of bipartisan negotiations around carefully crafting a stock trading bill that can pass with support from leadership. Several Democrats told us Luna may not get the support she needs to pass her bill unless she coordinates with that bipartisan group. Luna previously secured 218 signatures this spring for a vote on allowing House members who are new parents to vote by proxy for up to three months, but the vote never came to pass. Johnson failed to procedurally kill the petition, then scrapped House votes until Luna agreed to a compromise. One House Republican involved in that saga, speaking on the condition of anonymity, predicted Johnson would have a tougher time trying to spike the Epstein and stock trading discharge petitions due to broad public interest. Zoom out: The Epstein push is a clear revolt against both President Trump, who has dismissed the matter, and Johnson, who has called for transparency but quashed several rogue efforts to release the files. Johnson has indicated his support for a stock trading ban, but it's unclear if he would support doing so through a discharge petition that could undermine his authority. Trump has indicated support for a stock trading ban in theory, but opposed a bipartisan Senate bill that would have extended the ban to future presidents and vice presidents. A spokesperson for Johnson did not respond to a request for comment. The bottom line: Both measures could also run aground in the Senate, which is less given to populist passions than the House and has a 60-vote threshold that makes it harder to pass legislation.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
GOP populists plot to repeatedly bypass Mike Johnson
House Speaker Mike Johnson 's (R-La.) right flank is trying to bypass him repeatedly next month by forcing votes on releasing the Epstein files and banning congressional stock trading. Why it matters: The tool these lawmakers are planning to use — the discharge petition — has been the source of growing controversy in the House in recent years. A discharge petition allows the House rank-and-file to force a vote on any piece of legislation if at least 218 members — a majority of the chamber — sign on. Top Republicans have discouraged the use of the maneuver, arguing it would effectively turn over control of the House floor to Democrats, but GOP populists have increasingly ignored that guidance. State of play: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) wants to force a vote on Rep. Tim Burchett's (R-Tenn.) bill to ban members of Congress, their spouses and dependent children from trading or owning stocks. Tamping down congressional stock trading has been a cause célèbre for lawmakers in both parties for years, but congressional leaders have largely stonewalled their efforts to secure a vote. Another discharge petition from Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) on forcing the release of the Justice Department's documents on Jeffrey Epstein is set to trigger a vote within days of the House's return to session next month. Between the lines: The Epstein petition is widely expected to obtain 218 signatures, with most Democrats and several right-wing Republicans likely to sign on. Luna's petition may be more contentious, sources said, as there have already months of bipartisan negotiations around carefully crafting a stock trading bill that can pass with support from leadership. Several Democrats told Axios that Luna may not get the bipartisan support she needs to pass her bill unless she coordinates with that bipartisan group. Flashback: Luna previously secured 218 signatures this spring for a vote on allowing House members who are new parents to vote by proxy for up to three months, but the vote never came to pass. Johnson slipped a provision into an unrelated procedural measure to kill the discharge, but it failed. He then scrapped House votes until Luna agreed to a compromise. One House Republican involved in that saga, speaking on the condition of anonymity, predicted that Johnson would have a tougher time trying to spike the Epstein and stock trading discharge petitions. That is "much harder to do on these issues since they've had a lot more national attention," the lawmaker told Axios, "Epstein especially." Zoom out: The Epstein push is a clear revolt against both President Trump, who has dismissed the matter, and Johnson, who has called for transparency but quashed several rogue efforts to release the files. Johnson has indicated his support for a stock trading ban, but it's unclear if he would support doing so through a discharge petition that could undermine his authority. Trump, for his part, has voiced support for a stock trading ban in theory, but opposed a bipartisan Senate bill that would have extended the ban to future presidents and vice presidents. A spokesperson for Johnson did not respond to a request for comment.
