logo
Need advice? Join columnist Carolyn Hax's weekly chat (August 15

Need advice? Join columnist Carolyn Hax's weekly chat (August 15

Washington Post3 days ago
More from Carolyn Hax
From the archive:
Mom's permanent vacation leaves a big onus for Dad
When your sexual history leads to her current anxiety
She feels the need to confront your husband's former mistress?
Can you age out of the rule against dating a friend's ex?
Mom-in-law is all social media, no action with grandchild
More:
Sign up for Carolyn's email newsletter to get her column delivered to your inbox each morning.
Carolyn has a Q&A with readers on Fridays. Read the most recent live chat here. The next chat is July 25 at 12 p.m.
Resources for getting help. Frequently asked questions about the column. Chat glossary
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Plane passenger annoyed when another flyer refused to do her a ‘favor' — but there's a big reason why you shouldn't
Plane passenger annoyed when another flyer refused to do her a ‘favor' — but there's a big reason why you shouldn't

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Plane passenger annoyed when another flyer refused to do her a ‘favor' — but there's a big reason why you shouldn't

A plane passenger refused to do a 'favor' for a fellow traveler — but she might've had good reason. The passenger took to Reddit to ask whether she was in the wrong for refusing to watch someone's bags at the gate. The user explained that they were sitting next to a woman with a young son who needed to go to the bathroom 10 minutes before boarding began. The mom asked the passenger for what she said was a 'big favor' — to watch their bags while she took her son to the bathroom. 'I said I'm really not supposed to. She gives me the stink eye,' the user wrote. A different woman next to them in the boarding area said she would watch the bags, but the mom was 'clearly still mad' that they said no. They explained their reasoning in the post, saying that 'not only is this a safety issue (probably not in this case, but in theory), but also I wouldn't have wanted to miss my boarding group.' The mom and son did end up coming back in time to board, but not before boarding started, the poster said. 'I used to have young kids, and if mine had to go to the bathroom, I would always just schlep my bags to the bathroom. I wouldn't ask someone else to watch the bags,' the user said. They also explained that they had a previous experience where they got 'bawled out' by a gate agent when they were about to watch someone else's bags, with the agent saying it wasn't allowed. In the U.S., there are regular TSA announcements warning passengers not to leave luggage unattended and to keep their belongings with them at all times, as well as not to accept any items from strangers. People on Reddit sounded off in the comments, with a majority of users agreeing that the passenger was right to decline. 'If the woman and son were your wife and child, you'd be the [a–hole]. Otherwise you're good,' one said. 'TBH I'm more surprised that she trusted a stranger enough to watch her bags,' another wrote. 'But yeah that's something airport employees mention every time you go through an airport. Don't do that. Not worth it!' 'It's actually a safety issue in airport s… you're never supposed to take responsibility for someone else's bags bc you don't know what could be in them. May sound crazy considering it's a lady and a kid, but you never know, and that's what airports advise,' someone commented. 'If there is something dangerous or hazardous in the bags, you could be held responsible. They should have taken their bags with them to the bathroom.' 'The list of possible bad outcomes is too large. It's not a matter of being nice or not, it's just not the right thing to do,' a user said. Others weren't as sure. 'I've watched bags for moms with kids running to a bathroom before, because I'm a nice person. I also hold the door open for people because I'm a nice person. It's not like she asked you to transport her luggage … she needed to take her kid to go to the bathroom,' someone said. 'Is it really that big of a deal to watch someone's bags for 5 minutes?' another questioned. 'I guess it might be situational but do you really think a woman with a young child has packed contraband and gotten through security? And somehow you'll be blamed for it?' one asked. Solve the daily Crossword

Spirit Airlines to furlough 270 pilots, demote 140 more on downsized schedule
Spirit Airlines to furlough 270 pilots, demote 140 more on downsized schedule

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Spirit Airlines to furlough 270 pilots, demote 140 more on downsized schedule

Spirit Airlines said on Monday that it will furlough about 270 pilots while demoting another 140, as the cash-strapped budget carrier looks to scale down its workforce to match a downsized schedule. The furloughs will go into effect on November 1, while designation downgrades for captains will take place on October 1, the company told Reuters in an emailed statement. 'We are taking necessary steps to ensure we operate as efficiently as possible as part of our efforts to return to profitability,' the airline said. The announcement, first reported by Bloomberg News, comes as Spirit tries to overhaul its business to move away from its no-frills image and rebrand as a premium airline. The Florida-based carrier had filed for bankruptcy protection last November, following years of losses, heavy debt, and failed merger attempts. It emerged from bankruptcy in March. 'Spirit continues to shrink, and with it, the value of pilot seniority and Spirit careers continues to erode,' said Captain Ryan Muller, chairman of the Spirit unit of the Air Line Pilots Association, adding that this marks the third round of pilot furloughs and downgrades since September 2024. The union said it is working on a third Furlough Mitigation Memorandum of Understanding to pursue voluntary options to reduce the scope of the furloughs and preserve pilot careers.

Hilton Pushes Direct Sales by Targeting Small Business Travelers
Hilton Pushes Direct Sales by Targeting Small Business Travelers

Skift

timean hour ago

  • Skift

Hilton Pushes Direct Sales by Targeting Small Business Travelers

Everyone in corporate travel is trying to cut out the middleman, which is awkward because half the people in corporate travel are the middleman. Hilton's gained traction with a new program for small- and medium-sized businesses and easier processes for payments. Hilton has shifted its corporate travel strategy in recent years to focus more heavily on small- and mid-sized businesses, aiming to reduce reliance on intermediaries and drive commission-free, direct bookings. These travelers now account for 85% of Hilton's business bookings, up from 76% in 2019 — a shift fueled both by faster post-pandemic recovery among smaller companies and Hilton's targeted outreach. Last year, the company launched Hilton for Business, a platform designed to streamline travel management for these companies and deepen direct customer ties. "A couple hundred thousand accounts have registered," said Frank Passanante, Hilton's senior vice president for global sales. "We launched a partnership with American Express in December 2024 that has accelerated enrollments." Participating companies must join Hilton's Honors loyalty program, creating repeat customers that hotels prefer over traditional commissioned bookings. "It's a

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store