
The Adversary by Michael Crummey review – dark humour and depravity at the edge of the Earth
Crummey hails from Newfoundland; all six of his novels are set there. He understands the power of lashing sea, scouring wind, an eked-out existence far from what many consider to be civilisation. In The Innocents he told a kind of Adam-and-Eve story of two children left alone to raise themselves in a shack in the early years of the 19th century. Supplies are occasionally brought in a ship called the Hope; its black-clad captain is known as the Beadle.
There is no need to read The Innocents to enjoy The Adversary, but it's a pleasure to spot the connection. The new novel is set in a town called Mockbeggar, and the Beadle is one of its itinerant grandees. This is the Canadian frontier, the harried edge of wilderness, though in comparison with the world of The Innocents the municipality's physical comforts seem positively Parisian.
Despite the prevalence of funerals, the reader encounters a wedding in the novel's opening pages. It is between a trembling girl, Anna Morels, brought over from far-off Jersey, and Abe Strapp, one of the grandees of Mockbeggar, the two syllables of his name landing like blows. 'He was a fright for a child to look upon as a prospective husband, bacon-faced, with a small full mouth that gave him the air of a greedy infant.' He turns out to be worse than a greedy infant – Strapp is a brutal tyrant whose violent whims are the scourge of Mockbeggar.
The marriage will not, in fact, take place: as in a gothic tale, an impediment is presented when another girl, Imogen Purchase, is revealed to have been impregnated by Strapp – or at least such testimony is given – and she becomes his forlorn bride. Neither girl's fate is enviable. If you ever entertained romantic ideas of what it might be like to live in a wild and isolated place in centuries past, Crummey's work will disabuse you of such idle fancy.
The book's true mechanism, however, is the rivalry between Strapp and a woman we first meet as the Widow Caines. I am not the first critic to note that, like The Innocents, The Adversary plays on another story in Genesis, that of Cain and Abel; later in the book we find a kind of trinity, too, in the three young people who are the leavening element of goodness and go by the resonant names of Solemn, Bride and Lazarus.
The novel's blurb compares it to Deadwood, David Milch's brilliant HBO series from the early 00s. It is an apt analogy, and not only because both present a portrait of a society forged under duress. Plot doesn't, strictly speaking, drive the tale. Rather, Crummey and Milch alike have built nuanced portraits of the allegiances that must be forged in adversity, and the enmities that arrive not only from longstanding hatreds but from scarce resources too.
And, like Milch, Crummey luxuriates in vivid swearing and slang. The Widow Caines dresses in her late husband's clothes to run her business – she dismisses a skirt as a 'fucksail'. The madam of the whorehouse, known as the Abbess, refers to the use to which the servant's room in her domicile has been put: ''The blanket hornpipe,' she said. 'The goat's jig. Clicket. Making feet for children's stockings.'' In his acknowledgments the author bows to the 1811 edition of Francis Grose's Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue, now freely available online for all to peruse. You won't be sorry if you do.
Sign up to Inside Saturday
The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend.
after newsletter promotion
Crummey is a wise and unsparing writer whose understanding of human foibles retains a scrap of empathy even for his blackest creations. The bloody denouement of The Adversary is well earned. The title, if we think along biblical lines, refers to the devil, but Crummey shows that the Adversary is in all of us, just waiting – alas – to be released.
The Adversary by Michael Crummey is published by Serpent's Tail (£9.99). To support the Guardian, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tube passengers who tackled man with trousers down investigated by police
A group of Tube passengers who kicked and dragged a man off the carriage after he removed his trousers are being investigated by police. In a video shared online, a man who was later detained under the Mental Health Act, can be seen being kicked and thrown to the floor by passengers on a District Line train in east London last week. British Transport Police said officers are treating the incident as an assault and are appealing for witnesses. The clip shows several passengers kicking the man against the carriage door after he exposed his genitals and buttocks and repeatedly refused to pull up his trousers. Onlookers could be seen moving out of the way as the fight broke out during the eastbound journey between Upton Park and East Ham on Thursday at around 3.30pm. The man had reportedly been yelling and placing a belt around his neck during the journey and then dropped his trousers. At the start of the video the man can be seen swearing and shouting when he was challenged by a passenger. A passenger stood up and confronted him and firmly told him: 'You need to get off the train.' But the man yelled back: 'F*** off.' The commuter said in response: 'What do you mean "f*** off"? You need to get off the f***ing train. Now. There are kids on here.' It then escalated into a fight, and he was pinned to the carriage floor and dragged off the Tube onto the platform. An off-duty police officer arrested the man after passengers alerted London Underground staff. British Transport Police are now investigating whether passengers who confronted the man committed any criminal offences. However, no arrests have been made so far. A spokesperson for the British Transport Police said: 'The man had been assaulted by a number of other passengers and was initially arrested by an off-duty officer, before being detained under the Mental Health Act and taken to hospital where he remains having been sectioned. 'One man involved in the assault has been interviewed by officers, and the investigation into the incident is ongoing.' 'Anyone who witnessed what happened, who hasn't already spoken to police, is asked to contact BTP by texting 61016 quoting ref 458 of 07/08/25.'


The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Vigilante cyclist speaks out after collision with car caught on video
A well-known cycling activist has claimed he could not stop his e-bike from being struck by a car driving through a no-entry sign in west London. Michael van Erp, known for his Cycling Mikey YouTube channel, posted a video on Sunday showing his bike being hit. On Tuesday, Mr van Erp wrote on the social media platform X that he "couldn't… brake a 28kg e-bike once I realised the driver wasn't stopping". The 52-year-old activist's video also shows him initially blocking the car from passing the no entry sign, installed at the junction due to roadworks. After gesticulating with Mr van Erp, the male driver reverses and allows vehicles coming in the opposite direction to pass, before driving forward again. The cyclist makes a second attempt to block him, but the motorist collides with his bike and drives off. Mr van Erp's belongings were scattered in the road, but it appears he escaped injured and his bike avoided serious damage. A spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police said: 'We are aware of footage circulating on social media which appears to show an incident on Paddenswick Road, Hammersmith on Sunday August 10. 'No arrests have been made at this stage. 'We urge victims of crime to contact the police by calling 101, or 999 in an emergency.' Mr van Erp, who has more than 35,000 followers on his X account, regularly films drivers who he claims are breaking road rules, such as using a handheld mobile phone behind the wheel. He says since 2019 he has reported 2,280 drivers, who have received a total of £165,700 in fines and 2,649 penalty points. He claims that 35 people have been disqualified from driving because of his actions. In October 2022, theatrical agent Paul Lyon-Maris, then 60, was cleared of assault and dangerous driving after telling a jury at Southwark Crown Court Mr van Erp 'jumped' on his car. Mr Lyon-Maris – who has represented Oscar-winner Colin Firth and Lord Of The Rings actor Sir Ian McKellen – was said to have lost his temper when the cyclist tried to stop him driving on the wrong side of the road in the outer circle of Regent's Park in central London.


The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Palestine Action terror ban too heavy-handed, former Supreme Court judge warns Starmer
The terror law that saw hundreds arrested for supporting Palestine Action is 'not consistent with basic rights to free speech' and should be changed, a former Supreme court judge has warned. Writing for the Independent, Lord Sumption said the Terror Act's definition of what amounts to support for a proscribed organisation is 'far too wide'. He warned that one of the criteria – wearing, carrying or displaying something that supports the group – goes too far and should be rowed back to avoid the more than 500 people arrested at Saturday's protest against the group's ban under terror laws from being criminalised. Urging the government to amend the Act, he said, 'merely indicating your support for a terrorist organisation without doing anything to assist or further its acts should not be a criminal offence'. He also suggested that many of the more than 500 people arrested over the weekend, nearly half of whom are over the age of 60, should not be prosecuted, saying there was a 'simple solution' for the prosecuting authorities. 'The director of prosecution's consent is required for any prosecution of those who have been arrested. Where a demonstrator acted peacefully, he would be wise not to authorise a prosecution.' But he said that 'in the longer term' the 'right course would be to amend the Terrorism Act so as to redefine in a more sensible way the offence of supporting a proscribed organisation'. Sir Keir Starmer is facing a furious backlash against the arrests and has been warned he is making a mistake of 'poll tax proportions'. Politicians from across the political divide have warned of an excessive use of counterterrorism powers that were riding roughshod over the right to peaceful protest. The Metropolitan Police confirmed on Sunday that 532 arrests were made, 522 for displaying an item in support of a proscribed organisation at the march in central London. Civil liberties groups, including Amnesty and Liberty, said the arrests were 'disproportionate to the point of absurdity' and that the government's terrorism laws were a threat to freedom of expression. Labour peer Shami Chakrabarti told The Independent the 'proscription of Palestine Action is in danger of becoming a mistake of poll tax proportions' – a reference to Margaret Thatcher's unpopular policy that triggered civil disobedience and riots. Home secretary Yvette Cooper has defended the police but suggested those who were arrested may not 'know the full nature of this organisation'. Her comment led to calls for the authorities to be more 'clear-cut' about why they proscribed Palestine Action last month. The group hit the headlines earlier this year when four members were accused of causing around £7m worth of damage to aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. After the arrests, Downing Street defended the move to ban the group, saying it was 'violent', had committed 'significant injury' as well as criminal damage, and that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre had found the organisation had carried out three separate acts of terrorism. But former Conservative cabinet minister Sir David Davis told The Independent the arrests were an 'excessive use of counterterrorism law', adding 'they've gone over the top'. He said: 'We've not really been given any evidence for the reasoning behind proscribing Palestine Action. I mean, they broke in and painted an aircraft, they did not set bombs or anything. So that's the first question. What was the criteria? And then secondly, should you be arresting lots of people because they support a particular side and put up a banner?' He added: 'The authorities should be more clear cut about why they have proscribed Palestine Action.' Meanwhile, veteran backbencher Diane Abbott said the government is in danger of making itself look 'both draconian and foolish'. And former Labour cabinet minister Peter Hain described the mass arrests as 'madness' and said Palestine Action was not 'equivalent to real terrorist groups like al-Qaeda or Islamic State [which is] why I voted against its ban'.