How To Find And Value The Work That Comes Easiest To You
For many high achievers, the work that comes most naturally is often the work they undervalue. They discount the ease and this phenomenon, which I write about in The Rest Revolution as the paradox of ease, is a pattern in which individuals fail to recognize their innate gifts precisely because those gifts feel effortless.
This dynamic is closely intertwined with imposter syndrome: a well-documented psychological pattern where successful individuals doubt their skills, minimize accomplishments, and fear being exposed as a fraud. When combined with deeply ingrained social messaging around hard work, imposter syndrome can push high achievers to dismiss ease and pursue paths of unnecessary struggle.
Among women, people of color, immigrants, and members of historically excluded groups, the message that one must 'work twice as hard to get half as much' has often been internalized as survival strategy. Passed down generationally, this mindset equates worthiness with hard work and relentless labor.
But when high achievers have been conditioned to view effort as the primary indicator of value, they may struggle to see the worth in what comes naturally. In coaching and consulting settings, many professionals recoil at accurately articulating their accomplishments, feeling that if something was easy, it couldn't possibly be worth much.
This internalized belief can lead to overworking on autopilot—a form of professional muscle memory where pushing through exhaustion becomes default behavior, even in the face of trauma, loss, or health challenges.
Imposter syndrome amplifies the paradox of ease. Even in the face of repeated success, high achievers may doubt their competence. Rather than embrace their strengths, they may overwork to compensate for internalized feelings of inadequacy.
This often shows up in subtle ways: a reluctance to apply for promotions, a hesitance to speak up in high-stakes meetings, or discomfort in presenting a polished resume or LinkedIn profile. When one's core talents are so familiar they feel mundane, it becomes difficult to communicate them with confidence.
In practice, this can lead professionals to over-deliver, overthink, and overprepare, and spend too much time and energy on tasks that should be straightforward. Not only does this limit upward mobility, it also contributes to chronic burnout and a disconnection from one's authentic professional identity.
For high achievers who are ready to step out of overwork and into alignment, here are three practical steps to begin valuing what comes naturally—and to build a career that reflects that value:
Start by asking yourself: What do people consistently thank me for? What do others struggle with that I find relatively easy? These questions can reveal your 'effortless excellence'—skills that are intuitive to you but transformative for others. Resist the urge to downplay them just because they don't feel hard. Ease is often a sign of mastery.
Once you've named your natural strengths, practice articulating them in terms of the results they produce. For example, instead of saying, 'I'm good at organizing,' you might say, 'I help fast-moving teams streamline processes and increase efficiency.' Language matters. Frame your ease as a strength that creates measurable outcomes. This is the foundation of a magnetic personal brand.
Use your professional platforms like your LinkedIn, bios, and speaking engagements, to reinforce your brand around what you do best. Showcase case studies, share insights, or highlight client wins that stem from your zone of genius. The more you speak from this place of alignment, the more you attract opportunities that don't require you to contort or overextend yourself.
Careers built on the belief that only hard work counts often come at the price of burnout, under-compensation, and a persistent sense of never being enough. But when high achievers learn to value what comes easily, they unlock their next level.
Success does not need to be synonymous with struggle. Professionals who make this shift not only reclaim their time and energy, they also position themselves for the opportunities and recognition their talents truly deserve.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 days ago
- Forbes
We Need To Rethink How We Recommend Women On LinkedIn, Study Says
Reviewers use different words to recommend men and women on LinkedIn (Photo Illustration by Sheldon ... More Cooper/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) New research reveals that women are typically seen as concrete thinkers—task-oriented and detail-focused—while men are more often viewed as thinking more abstractly, focusing on strategy, vision, and the big picture. These beliefs about men and women even appear in LinkedIn recommendations, and they could have significant consequences for who gets hired, who gets promoted, and who is assigned the most menial tasks. The researchers conducted six studies to investigate whether people tend to associate men with abstract thinking, such as big-picture ideas and strategy, and women with concrete thinking, which is more focused on details and execution. In nearly every study, the same pattern emerged: women were seen as more concrete, and men as more abstract. The authors explain why this is a problem: 'When decision-makers perceive women as more concrete than men, they might pigeonhole women into administrative tasks that are low in status and power. If this is the case, then beliefs that women are more concrete than men could perpetuate gender inequality, with women being relegated to low-construal, low-status tasks more often than men because people believe they will execute these tasks more effectively.' Previous research shows that people who exhibit abstract thinking skills are perceived as having more power, are more likely to be regarded as experts and have greater potential for growth than those who are more concrete thinkers. In one of the studies, researchers analyzed written recommendations on the LinkedIn profiles of more than 500,000 professionals. They focused exclusively on the recommendation text, not the endorsed skills section. All of the profiles included in the study had at least one recommendation. The team then examined how often words associated with concrete thinking (such as 'detail' or 'exact') appeared compared to words reflecting abstract thinking (like 'visionary' or 'theoretical'). In the LinkedIn recommendations, women were once again more likely to be described with concrete terms, while men were more likely to be characterized with abstract terms. The researchers used different methods to analyze the text. First, they found women had 13% greater odds of being described with only concrete terms, and men had 22% greater odds of being described with only abstract terms. In a separate analysis, they found that words like 'detail,' 'details,' and 'exact' were more likely to appear near feminine pronouns, while abstract terms such as 'philosophical,' 'theoretical,' 'visionary,' 'vision,' 'farsighted,' and 'forward-looking' were more likely to appear near masculine pronouns. To be sure that these differences weren't simply a reflection of the kinds of jobs men and women tend to hold, the researchers controlled for both occupation and industry. They also eliminated profiles of professionals in executive roles, which tend to involve abstract thinking and are often held by men. In other words, women weren't being described as more concrete just because they worked in more detail-oriented roles. The stereotypes persisted even when comparing men and women in the same jobs. In other studies included in the research paper, participants were asked to describe fictional individuals based on brief profiles, and the same pattern emerged: men were described as more abstract, while women were described as more concrete. In one test, participants even linked 'concreteness' with women and 'abstractness' with men more quickly than the reverse, revealing that this bias likely occurs subconsciously. It's possible that one person can possess both abstract and concrete thinking abilities. In one of the six studies, women were rated higher than men on both concrete and abstract traits, but they were still seen as more concrete than abstract. And men were still rated more abstract than concrete. So, even when women are described as having abstract qualities, they're still seen as more concrete than abstract overall. It's important to note that the studies provide no evidence to suggest that women are actually more concrete thinkers or that men are more abstract. Instead, they show that people believe this to be true. Because women are often perceived as better suited for detail-oriented work, they may be more frequently assigned to those roles. Over time, doing this kind of work repeatedly can build expertise, reinforcing the stereotype and creating a self-fulfilling cycle that keeps women in support roles and men in strategic ones. So, the next time you write a LinkedIn recommendation, consider whether your compliments might be inadvertently reinforcing gender stereotypes. Even well-meaning words like 'detail-oriented' may subtly shape how others perceive someone's capabilities.
Forbes
05-06-2025
- Forbes
Today's ‘Wordle' #1448 Hints, Clues And Answer For Friday, June 6th
How to solve today's Wordle. Looking for Thursday's Wordle hints, clues and answer? You can find them here: The first full weekend of June is almost here which means it's 2XP Friday for all you Competitive Wordle players out there. Double your points, double your losses. It's a high-risk, high-reward day for Wordlers. Let's solve this one, shall we? The Hint: To instruct or improve. The Clue: This Wordle begins with a vowel. Okay, spoilers below! The answer is coming! FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder . . . Today's Wordle Every day I check Wordle Bot to help analyze my guessing game. You can check your Wordles with Wordle Bot right here. While not quite as challenging as yesterday's Wordle, this is still a pretty tricky word. I got off to a mediocre start with CHAIR, leaving me with just one yellow box and 285 words remaining. SLOPE only cut that down to 41, though thankfully DEIGN slashed that to just two. I could only think of one: EDIFY for the win! Today's Wordle Bot I thought surely the Wordle Bot would take four today but it beat me with three. That means I get -1 for losing to the Bot which turns into -2 due to 2XP Friday. The Bot gets 1 point for guessing in three and another for beating me, which ends up being 4 points for 2XP Friday. The narrow game we've been playing this month widens considerably with June tallies now at: Erik: 0 points Wordle Bot: 6 points The verb edify comes from Latin aedificāre 'to build' (itself from aedes 'building' or 'temple' + facere 'to make'). In Late Latin it became edificāre; Old French borrowed it as edifier, and it entered Middle English as edify with the sense 'to instruct' or 'build up (morally or spiritually).' Let me know how you fared with your Wordle today on Twitter, Instagram or Facebook. Also be sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel and follow me here on this blog where I write about games, TV shows and movies when I'm not writing puzzle guides. Sign up for my newsletter for more reviews and commentary on entertainment and culture.
Indianapolis Star
05-06-2025
- Indianapolis Star
Climber dies from 3,000 feet fall at Denali National Park
A Seattle man who was ascending a climbing route at Denali National Park in Alaska fell 3,000 feet to his death on June 2, the National Park Service said. Alex Chiu, 41, was climbing along the West Buttress route with two others when he fell from Squirrel Point towards the Peters Glacier icecap. His body was recovered two days later, NPS said in a news release on June 4. The group was ski mountaineering, which involves climbing uphill before skiing back downhill. Chiu was not using a rope at the time of the fall, officials said. Denali National Park encompasses more than six million acres of Alaska's wilderness. Mount McKinley, the park's highest peak at more than 20,000 feet, is also the tallest mountain in North America, according to NPS. Falls are the No. 1 cause of death at the park, according to NPS. Over 120 climbers have died at the park since 1932, a spokesperson told USA TODAY in 2022. Along the West Buttress route's treacherous upper portion, at least 14 climbers have died since 1980, NPS said in 2024. Chiu's body was recovered two days after the fatal fall and was transferred to the state medical examiner, NPS said. The two other climbers who were with Chiu at the time of the fall said they lowered over the edge of the peak as far as possible but could not hear or see him. They descended the route to seek help, the release said. Search crews couldn't immediately reach the site by ground or air because of high winds and snow. Once weather began to clear on June 4, rangers searched the area via an aerial helicopter and were able to recover Chiu's body, NPS said. Chiu was an aerospace engineer, according to his LinkedIn profile. In an Instagram post on May 19, Chiu said he spent most weekends alpine climbing before the COVID-19 pandemic. "When I am in the mountains, I realize I was at my best, I was smart, witty, passionate, and bold," he wrote. He said he mostly stopped climbing in the aftermath of the pandemic, but in recent years, began growing more interested in returning to the sport. "So tomorrow I am getting on an airplane to Alaska, in an attempt to climb the third highest peak in the world because I don't want to know what happens to a dream deferred…," he wrote.
