Musk wades back into politics, slamming Trump's domestic policy bill
Mr Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, had been relatively quiet since his blowup with the president in June. PHOTO: REUTERS
Mr Elon Musk waded back into the political fray on June 28, slamming a major domestic policy bill that Senate Republicans are scrambling to pass, just weeks after he ended a feud with President Donald Trump over the legislation.
In the wee hours of the morning on June 28, GOP leaders released a new 940-page version of the legislation to carry out the President's agenda.
Like the House version, the bill would slash taxes, scale back Medicaid, cut nutritional assistance and increase spending on the military and immigration enforcement.
But the Senate also included some new measures intended to mollify holdouts in the Republican ranks, including a fund to help rural hospitals that depend on Medicaid.
Leaders in the Republican majority are hoping to push the bill through the Senate and win final approval in the House before Mr Trump's deadline of July 4.
Mr Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, had been relatively quiet since his blowup with the president in June, but as the Senate convened to discuss the package on the afternoon of June 28, he reentered the debate, calling the bill 'utterly insane and destructive' in a post on his social platform X.
'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' he wrote.
The bill lies at the center of his earlier feud with the President. Mr Musk had said he believed that the package would significantly add to the national debt and would undermine the savings he claims were found by the Department of Government Efficiency, a federal government cost-cutting project he led.
He called the bill a 'disgusting abomination' that would make the country bankrupt.
The spat quickly became personal as both men unleashed a torrent of attacks at each other. Mr Musk suggested that Mr Trump was named in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein, the financier and convicted sex offender who killed himself in jail while awaiting trial.
Mr Trump said that Mr Musk's 'crazy' behavior was linked to drug use.
The war of words came as Mr Musk was taking a step back from his role in the Trump administration to focus on his companies, which had been struggling.
Though Mr Trump said he had no interest in repairing their relationship, Mr Musk said a week after their dispute that he regretted some of his posts and felt that he 'went too far', signaling a possible truce.
It is unclear how much influence Mr Musk wields over the Senate and what, if any, impact his views will have on the passage of the legislation. But his recent comments criticising what Mr Trump calls his 'Big Beautiful Bill' certainly do not bode well for his relationship with the President. NY TIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Stablecoin frenzy fuels steep stock gains that make funds wary
[HONG KONG] Some investors are growing wary over the global stablecoin craze that has driven massive gains in shares of companies linked to the still-emerging technology. Short bets continue to climb on Circle Internet Group, even as its stock has surged about 500 per cent since its New York debut just three weeks ago. In South Korea, global and local funds dumped shares of Kakaopay as they tripled over the past month. Such cautious trades buck the rabid retail frenzy seen as governments in the US and elsewhere move towards legitimising stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies pegged to other assets such as the US dollar. Vocal backing from US President Donald Trump has helped drive the boom despite the wariness of regulators and the financial industry. 'This is reminiscent of the indiscriminate buying of metaverse-related stocks by retail investors in 2020 and 2021,' said SeokKeun Ha, chief investment officer at Eugene Asset Management in Seoul. 'This is essentially a bet on government policy,' and is driven more by sentiment than any real fundamentals. Stablecoins are gaining momentum as regulatory frameworks develop. The Senate passed stablecoin legislation this month, though it has yet to clear the House. Hong Kong's legislature approved a stablecoin bill in May, while South Korea's new President Lee Jae Myung has pledged to allow the issuance of such tokens by local companies. In addition to the progress of the Trump-backed Genius Act through Congress, the stellar listing of Circle has been another key event. The company's USDC is the second-largest stablecoin by market share behind Tether, which is operated by an unlisted company based in El Salvador. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Circle's market cap has expanded to top US$40 billion, already larger than more than half the companies in the S&P 500 Index. The rapid ascent has some traders wagering on a decline, with short interest rising steadily to more than 25 per cent of the free float, according to data from S&P Global. Seoul-listed shares of Kakaopay are beating all peers in the FTSE Global Fintech & Blockchain Index this year, nearly doubling the gain in Robinhood Markets. While retail investors have piled into the stock, domestic and foreign institutions have been sellers on a net basis. 'Although we recognise the long-term optionality, the opportunity remains at an early stage, with limited visibility on timing and end-user adoption,' Citigroup analysts John Yu and Alicia Yap wrote in a recent note. They rate Kakaopay a sell, 'viewing valuations as stretched'. Stablecoin-related stock boosts are spreading through global markets, boosting Kakaopay parent Kakao and its rival Naver. Circle peers such as Coinbase Global have climbed in the US. In Hong Kong, small-cap brokerages including Guotai Junan International Holdings and China Everbright have surged on the theme. Risks remain, however, despite high-profile backing from global leaders such as Trump and Lee. The Bank of Korea has warned that stablecoin adoption could hamper effective monetary policy. The Bank for International Settlements says stablecoins have an 'unclear' future. While many still see potential for the technology as a means to stabilise transactions and store value in the crypto realm, there are big questions as to whether related stocks have run ahead of themselves. Kakaopay shares dropped 10 per cent on Friday (Jun 27) following a brief suspension as regulators flagged the need for caution on the steep rally. 'Stablecoins are a very important issue, although it's a risky play,' said Cha So-Yoon, an equity investment manager at Taurus Asset Management in Seoul. 'It's actually too early to say whether the stocks are at the right levels or to gauge their valuations, but one way or the other, the stablecoin will be issued and the issuer will be raking in billions while sitting back.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Japan auto trade ‘unfair', could buy more US oil, Trump tells Fox News
JAPAN engages in 'unfair' automobile trade with the United States and should increase its imports of US energy resources and other goods to help reduce the US trade deficit, President Donald Trump said in an interview broadcast on Sunday. Tokyo is scrambling to find ways to get Washington to exempt Japan's automakers from 25 per cent automobile industry-specific tariffs, which are hurting the country's manufacturing sector. Japan also faces a 24 per cent so-called reciprocal tariff rate starting on July 9 unless it can negotiate a deal. 'They won't take our cars, and yet we take millions and millions of their cars into the United States. It's not fair, and I explained that to Japan, and they understand it,' Trump said in an interview on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo. 'And we have a big deficit with Japan, and they understand that too. Now we have oil. They could take a lot of oil, they could take a lot of other things.' The automobile sector accounted for about 28 per cent of the total 21 trillion yen (S$185 billion) worth of goods Japan exported to the US last year. REUTERS
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Can donors fill the major budget holes that colleges face under Trump?
Harvard University saw a surge in donations in the spring after its president pushed back against the Trump administration PHOTO: SOPHIE PARK/NYTIMES WASHINGTON - The T.H. Chan School of Public Health at Harvard University has not been disguising its plight. 'With Harvard's federal funding frozen, we are relying on philanthropy to power our research and support our educational programs,' the school's donation website says. 'Your ongoing engagement is vital to keeping our mission on track.' The Trump administration's decision to block billions of dollars in research money to certain colleges is forcing administrators and their fundraising teams to scrounge for cash. As schools across the country contemplate layoffs, lab shutdowns and other drastic steps, they are weighing how much the gaps can be plugged by private philanthropy – and how pointedly political their pleas for donations ought to be. A handful are wagering that the financial rewards of trying to leverage donors' concerns about the federal cuts will outweigh the risk of antagonising the White House. In an April 30 note to alumni, Brown University President Christina H. Paxson said about three dozen of its grants and contracts had been cancelled, and that the government had stopped funding many research grants. She said news reports stated that the Trump administration had threatened an additional US$510 million (S$650.5 million) in grants and contracts to the university. The moves, she wrote, represented 'a significant threat to Brown's financial sustainability'. She urged alumni to lobby lawmakers about the issue and added links for making donations to the university, including to support research whose federal funding was cancelled or delayed. (Brown said data was not yet available for release about whether giving had increased as a result.) Many other institutions have opted for more caution. Mr Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education and a former leader of Occidental College, suggested that some schools may be worried about turning off right-leaning donors who may agree with President Donald Trump's opinion that academia has tilted too far to the left. Some schools would like to emphasise the political attacks in their fundraising appeals, Mitchell said, 'but their donor base is at least purple, if not red, and it's tough for them to make a really anti-Trump statement and keep their donor base.' A White House spokesperson, Mr Harrison Fields, said colleges and universities should address their financial problems by tightening their belts. 'If these higher education institutions were serious about lowering costs,' he said in an emailed statement, 'they would cut the bloated salaries of their faculty and stop wasting money on useless programs that do little to advance education.' Universities have been grappling for months with sudden losses of research funding that cumulatively threaten thousands of jobs and an array of carefully planned projects. Relationships with donors can be fickle and fleeting, and many of the wealthiest donors have complex financial pictures with overlapping interests. And while universities collectively pull in billions of dollars in gifts each year, some of their causes are easier sells than others. Student financial aid, for instance, is a reliable attraction for donors. Scientific research, on the other hand, is a notoriously tricky target in fundraising efforts, though some of the biggest gifts are tied to the sciences. Even if appeals to bolster threatened research could raise millions of dollars, it might not be enough to replace the hundreds of millions or even billions that colleges and universities stand to lose in the federal cuts. Harvard, for example, said that in its 2024 fiscal year, it received about US$528 million in current-use gifts. In that same period, the university received about US$687 million from the federal government for research. Harvard received a surge in donations this spring after its president wrote a scathing letter to the Trump administration, according to the university's student newspaper, The Crimson. The university did not provide data on donations for this article. Even so, private fundraising by colleges and universities seems unlikely to be enough to fill the void. 'I think we can be sure that the amount of money would not come close to replacing what has been suspended,' said Mr Lee C. Bollinger, who has served as president of Columbia University and the University of Michigan. 'You're not going to make that up with donations.' One task for college leaders is to discern how much they should emphasise politics in their appeals, whether in public solicitations for money or private meetings with their biggest givers. Referring to the Trump administration's funding cuts, Mr Bollinger said, 'I think universities, broadly speaking, have been very clear in saying this is an overreach and an assault and intrudes into areas of academic decision-making and is part of a broader effort to break down the norms.' Still, he added, 'I don't need to go in and talk to a donor and make the case that we're up against authoritarianism and we really need your help. I think it can be much more delicately handled than that.' One looming question for higher education is whether this burst of government hostility, however long it lasts, will force a wholesale rethinking of how to fund universities. Mr Bollinger has found himself wondering whether institutions should routinely designate a portion of the contributions they take in as 'a fund to support freedom of the university when it's under assault'. Such a strategy, he conceded, would have limits. 'Over time, you could build up a substantial reserve – a rainy-day fund, but for these kinds of assaults,' he said. 'But it would only get you through a period of time.' Trump administration officials, among others, have urged universities with multibillion-dollar endowments to tap them to replace lost federal money. But there are often restrictions on how a university may use its endowment money. In many instances, donors have attached conditions to their contributions, specifying that the money go toward a specific discipline or department. And now a Republican-backed bill moving through Congress may increase the taxes that universities pay on their endowments. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
