How ISO 27001 Boosts Cybersecurity in Qatar
In today's digital era, businesses in Qatar face increasing threats from cyberattacks, data breaches, and information theft. As the nation advances toward a knowledge-based economy under Qatar National Vision 2030, the protection of sensitive information has become critical—not just for IT firms but for every organization handling data. One proven solution, therefore, is ISO 27001 certification.
ISO 27001 is the international standard for Information Security Management Systems (ISMS). It provides a structured framework that helps organizations assess risks, implement controls, and continuously improve their information security posture. Whether it's customer data, intellectual property, financial information, or employee records, ISO 27001 ensures your systems are secure, confidential, and resilient.
Qatar's rapid digital transformation, boosted by smart city initiatives, cloud computing, e-government services, and data-driven industries, has exposed organizations to more sophisticated cyber threats. From oil and gas companies to banks, hospitals, and logistics firms, data breaches can cause financial loss, regulatory penalties, and reputation damage.
Moreover, the Qatar National Cyber Security Strategy emphasizes the need for strong cybersecurity governance across both public and private sectors. Therefore, ISO 27001 certification aligns perfectly with these goals by helping businesses secure their digital infrastructure.
To begin with, ISO 27001 starts with identifying your organization's unique information security risks. It forces businesses to think beyond generic firewalls and anti-virus tools and assess vulnerabilities across people, processes, and technologies.
Next, the standard includes a comprehensive set of 114 controls covering access control, cryptography, physical security, operations security, and more. These controls ensure that threats are minimized and sensitive information is only accessible to authorized individuals.
In addition, ISO 27001 helps organizations in Qatar comply with local laws such as Law No. 13 of 2016 (the Personal Data Privacy Protection Law) and sector-specific regulations. Compliance reduces the risk of fines and builds trust with customers and stakeholders.
Furthermore, with ISO 27001, companies establish formal incident response procedures, ensuring that cyberattacks and breaches are detected, contained, and resolved efficiently—minimizing downtime and damage.
Finally, through internal audits, management reviews, and regular updates, ISO 27001 promotes continuous improvement of cybersecurity defenses. This adaptive approach keeps your systems resilient to evolving threats.
Having ISO 27001 certification is also a badge of trust and professionalism. It clearly differentiates your business in tenders, especially in government or enterprise contracts. Notably, many large companies in Qatar now require their vendors and partners to be ISO 27001 certified, making it a gateway to new business opportunities.
To sum up, cyber threats are no longer an IT problem—they're a business risk. ISO 27001 certification in Qatar provides businesses with a globally recognized, systematic approach to managing and securing information assets. By implementing its controls, companies across various sectors can protect their data, meet compliance requirements, build customer confidence, and align with Qatar's digital transformation goals.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Journals
a day ago
- Business Journals
The hidden cyber risk you're probably ignoring: User access reviews
Poorly managed user access reviews don't just jeopardize audit outcomes; they create pathways for data breaches, fraud, operational inefficiencies, regulatory fines and reputational damage. Despite these risks, many organizations struggle with timely, thorough and precise execution, or worse, they skip these reviews altogether. Far from trivial, this 'routine' process plays a pivotal role in broader cybersecurity and risk management strategies. Access reviews serve as a frontline defense, ensuring that only authorized individuals have appropriate access to systems and data, and help prevent privilege escalation, insider threats and vulnerabilities that could compromise an organization's security posture. User access reviews are essential for maintaining compliance with a wide range of frameworks, including SOX, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2, HITRUST, NIST 800-53 & 171, HIPAA, GDPR and others. A well-executed access review helps reduce the risk of: Individuals having unauthorized or inappropriate access based on their role. Excessive access that creates segregation of duties conflicts. This guide provides an eight-step process for establishing and conducting a quality access review that will satisfy multiple compliance frameworks. Step 1: Identify relevant compliance frameworks and standards that require an access review Before identifying compliance requirements, organizations should begin with a clear strategy for their access review process. This includes understanding the overarching goals, such as reducing security risk, maintaining regulatory compliance, enhancing operational efficiency or supporting audit readiness. With this strategic direction in mind, organizations can then determine which regulations and standards they must adhere to. This will help establish the frequency, scope, control ownership and documentation requirements of the review. In the absence of a specified frequency, a risk-based approach should be used to determine how often reviews should occur. The following factors should be considered: Minimum required frequency to meet compliance requirements Complexity of the access within the system Volume of accounts and frequency of access changes Significance of the data stored within the system History of errors Effectiveness of preventive provisioning and termination controls Inherent risks of processes being supported by the systems Step 2: Identify the information systems in scope Determine which systems (i.e., applications, tools, database management systems, operating systems/servers and network domains) require an access review. This could include enterprise and/or financial applications, PaaS (Platform as a Service), database management systems, operating systems/servers, identity and access management (IAM) systems, source code migration and development tools, facilities and infrastructure components. Ultimately, the scope should be driven by the relevance and significance of the underlying data and/or system function governed by the system. Step 3: Assign ownership Clearly define who is responsible for: 1. Generating the information used in the reviews, and 2. Coordinating and/or executing the review and remediating any exceptions identified. Tip: Consider leveraging an off-the shelf tool to assist with automating and tracking reviews. Step 4: Generate the access listings Generate a complete and accurate listing of accounts from each system. Consider automating these reports for efficiency. The access listings should be granular enough so that the reviewer can see what role and/or permissions are assigned to each account. Provide enough details in the review documents so reviewers can make informed decisions. Some examples are below: expand Frazier & Deeter Tip: Retain documentation for how all access listings were generated (i.e. menus, reports, parameters, queries, time/date stamps, etc.). Explain any exclusions such as inactive accounts or accounts with read-only access. If the report is automated, include evidence that the underlying queries have not been modified. Step 5: Train the reviewers Provide clear expectations, guidelines, timelines and definitions for reviewers to reference. Ensure roles and responsibilities are clearly defined. Tip: Consider implementing a joiner-mover-leaver process in your IAM tools to automatically grant, revoke or modify access when employees join, leave or get promoted. This helps mitigate the risk of individuals being inadvertently granted the wrong level of access or access not being removed upon termination. Step 6: Execute the review and retain sufficient evidence Reviewers: Document proof of review, including justifications for approved and revoked access. Control Owner: Retain audit logs, screenshots, spreadsheets or other reports as needed. Tip: Store evidence in a central location that makes it easy to distinguish what is being reviewed. Consider using a template to consistently document each review. Step 7: Revoke unnecessary access and validate remediation Immediately remove or disable access that has been identified as needing to be revoked. Document the reason for revocation and verify timely deactivation of revoked accounts. Tip: Run a follow-up report to confirm that all access identified as a revoke within the access review are appropriately disabled and/or removed from the system. Step 8: Perform a lookback for anomalous activity Before closing the review: Review logs and audit trails for any inappropriate and/or unauthorized activity performed by revoked accounts. Investigate and follow up on any unusual activity. Define the scope of activities that are relevant to the framework and/or standard. Pay close attention to administrative accounts who can perform all transactions (including modifying user access). Tip: Accounts with admin privileges, segregation of duties conflicts or terminations are the revoked accounts with the highest risk of potential misuse. Final thought: Making user access reviews a business-as-usual process While each organization has unique circumstances, these steps may support you in conducting thorough, repeatable and audit-ready access reviews that will allow your organization to meet multiple compliance requirements and mitigate logical security risks in an efficient, consistent and cost-effective manner. Need help making your access reviews more efficient and compliant? Frazier & Deeter can help you design a process that meets your compliance requirements while saving time and reducing risk. Contact our experts today to get started. Frazier & Deeter (FD) is comprised of Frazier & Deeter, LLC, a US licensed CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Frazier & Deeter Advisory, LLC, an alternative practice structure that provides tax and advisory services to clients worldwide. Learn more at
Business Journals
a day ago
- Business Journals
How to choose the right cybersecurity framework: A guide for mid-market companies
As cyber threats become more sophisticated and regulatory requirements more stringent, companies, especially mid-market, must take a proactive approach to security. Choosing the right cybersecurity framework is a critical step in protecting sensitive data, maintaining compliance and building trust with customers, investors and regulators. However, with so many frameworks available, each with different requirements and industry applications, determining the best fit can be challenging. Understanding cybersecurity frameworks vs security standards Cybersecurity frameworks: Structured sets of best practices and methodologies for managing cybersecurity risks. Helps organizations build a structured approach to security, ensuring that policies, processes and technologies align with industry-recognized standards. Security standards: Defines specific requirements that organizations must meet to achieve compliance. Typically associated with audits, ensuring that an organization meets legal and contractual obligations. Common security standards include HIPAA, PCI DSS and GDPR. While standards ensure compliance with regulatory requirements, frameworks offer strategic guidance for building a resilient security posture. Choosing the right framework ensures a comprehensive approach to cybersecurity that not only satisfies legal requirements but also strengthens overall protection against evolving threats. Key cybersecurity frameworks in 2025 Selecting the best framework depends on your industry, regulatory landscape and business operations. NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the NIST CSF 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based cybersecurity framework focuses on six core functions: govern, identify, protect, detect, respond and recover. It provides a variety of high-level cybersecurity outcomes that organizations can use to understand, assess, prioritize and communicate their cybersecurity efforts more effectively. Best for: Organizations of any size or sector, particularly those looking for a flexible and risk-based approach to managing cybersecurity and aligning with industry standards. ISO/IEC 27001 The ISO/IEC 27001 is an internationally recognized standard for information security management. It provides a structured framework for implementing an Information Security Management System (ISMS), ensuring the confidentiality, integrity and availability of corporate data, including financial information, intellectual property, employee details and third-party managed data. Best for: Organizations of any size or sector, especially those needing a comprehensive ISMS to ensure data protection and demonstrate compliance to international standards. CIS Controls Developed by the Center for Internet Security (CIS), CIS Controls are a structured and simplified set of best practices designed to help organizations strengthen their security posture. Best for: Small to mid-market organizations seeking a simplified, actionable set of cybersecurity best practices to quickly strengthen their security posture with minimal resource investment. CMMC The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) is a unified standard developed by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to ensure contractors and subcontractors meet specific cybersecurity practices when handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). CMMC integrates various cybersecurity standards and best practices and assigns them across maturity levels, ranging from foundational to advanced. Best for: Defense contractors and subcontractors in the DoD supply chain who must demonstrate compliance with strict cybersecurity requirements to be eligible for government contracts. FedRAMP The Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization and continuous monitoring for cloud services used by federal agencies. It ensures that cloud providers meet strict federal security requirements before working with government entities. Best for: Cloud service providers aiming to do business with U.S. federal agencies and needing to prove compliance with federal cybersecurity standards. StateRAMP Modeled after FedRAMP, StateRAMP offers a standardized approach to cybersecurity for state and local governments. It helps ensure that cloud service providers meet consistent security requirements when providing services to government agencies, promoting transparency, verification and trust. Best for: Cloud vendors looking to work with state and local governments that require proven compliance with standardized cybersecurity benchmarks. How to choose the right framework for your business Assess your current security posture Before selecting a new framework, conduct a comprehensive gap assessment to evaluate your institution's existing cybersecurity controls. Identify strengths, pinpoint vulnerabilities and determine where enhancements are needed to align with your chosen framework. Understand your industry requirements Certain frameworks are better suited for meeting industry-specific regulations. Understanding your industry's unique regulatory landscape will help you determine which security frameworks align with these requirements and which ones are most effective for addressing sector-specific risks. Consider business goals and objectives When selecting a security framework, it's important to align your choice with your company's broader business objectives. For example, with the FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool being phased out, financial institutions may consider adopting ISO 27001 to enhance their cybersecurity posture and build credibility with investors and regulators. Additionally, if your organization is focused on streamlining compliance processes or reducing the burden of managing multiple audits, a consolidated compliance framework, combining assessments like NIST, ISO, PCI DSS, HITRUST and/or SOC 2, can help alleviate audit fatigue and ensure consistent, efficient compliance across various regulatory requirements. Real-world example: For companies navigating a complex landscape of regulatory requirements, working with multiple providers testing the same controls can strain internal resources. Learn how FD's Consolidated Compliance Assessment Program helped a leading global payments technology company streamline compliance, exceed regulatory requirements and reduce audit redundancies. Read more here. Engage key stakeholders Cybersecurity is not just an IT concern; it requires collaboration across executive leadership, technology teams, risk and compliance professionals and internal audit. Engaging these stakeholders early ensures alignment on strategic priorities and regulatory expectations. Monitor, validate and adapt Cyber threats and regulatory expectations continue to evolve, making ongoing monitoring essential. Regularly measure progress against targeted cybersecurity maturity levels, reassess risk factors and adjust your strategy as needed. Internal audit should be involved in periodic reviews to validate compliance and readiness for regulatory examinations. Next steps: Strengthening your security posture Choosing the right security framework is more than just a compliance requirement; it's a strategic investment in your company's resilience, reputation and long-term success. As cyber threats grow more sophisticated and regulatory landscapes shift, companies must take a proactive approach to security. By assessing your current security posture, aligning with industry requirements and considering business goals, you can implement a framework that not only meets compliance standards but also strengthens your overall cybersecurity strategy. Navigating these complexities can be challenging, but you don't have to do it alone. Frazier & Deeter's experts are here to help you evaluate your options, implement the right framework and build a security posture that protects your business now and in the future. Contact us to get started. Frazier & Deeter (FD) is comprised of Frazier & Deeter, LLC, a US licensed CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Frazier & Deeter Advisory, LLC, an alternative practice structure that provides tax and advisory services to clients worldwide. Learn more at
Business Insider
4 days ago
- Business Insider
Navigating the future of cybersecurity: Insights from Chigozie Ejeofobiri, TikTok's security specialist
Chigozie Ejeofobiri is a distinguished cybersecurity leader with over 13 years of experience protecting critical enterprise networks and cloud infrastructure across the UK, US, South Africa, and Nigeria. Currently serving as Network Security Operations Specialist at TikTok, where he designs and implements advanced threat prevention and zero-trust architectures across complex environments. He discusses differences in cybersecurity approaches across regions, emphasizing the importance of adaptation and innovation. Chigozie Ejeofobiri shares his formative experiences in Nigeria and how his curiosity led to a career in cybersecurity. Chigozie mentors cybersecurity professionals through structured programs and community initiatives, fostering growth and innovation. Q: Given your position at the forefront of cybersecurity innovation, What motivated your interest in tech and security? A: My journey started back in Nigeria, long before I got into technology and cybersecurity. I was the kind of kid who took apart radios just to figure out how they worked, and sometimes couldn't put them back together. I recall building television antennas with stainless steel plates and magnets. That curiosity turned into a real purpose in university, where I studied Electrical Electronics Engineering majoring in Telecommunications. I did my IT in computer village Ikeja because I wanted to learn more about the physical components of computers, then I moved to learning about computer networks. As a network Engineer the need to protect network infrastructure, through VPNS and other technology motivated me into network security. Seeing how vulnerable systems could be, and how they could be protected, led me further into this path and that motivation has remained with me. Q: You've worked in security across Nigeria, South Africa, the UK, and now the U.S. What cultural or operational differences have you noticed in how organizations approach cybersecurity? A: That's a great question. Each region brings unique challenges and perspectives. In Nigeria, for instance, we often had to innovate around infrastructure limitations and organizations taking a reactive approach to cybersecurity, Although a lot has changed there is more room for improvement. In South Africa, the awareness and investment in cybersecurity is quite strong even though maturity widely varies across sectors. In the UK, Cybersecurity is highly regulated and proactive with strong emphasis on governance and frameworks like ISO 27001. While the U.S. is very fast-paced, especially in tech, and leans heavily into automation and AI. I've learned to blend these experiences and lessons: stay agile, stay compliant, and build for scale. Q: With your experience across industries and geographies, how do you tailor security strategies to fit different business environments and regulatory requirements? A: In my experience, tailoring security strategies requires a methodical approach that starts with a comprehensive business objectives analysis, understanding the risk appetite and regulatory landscape of each organization. It is important to carry out a detailed mapping of critical assets, understand data flow and operational dependencies that is specific to each environment. Designing architectural maps that identify control overlaps across multiple frameworks (GDPR, HIPAA, etc) to create efficiency while ensuring compliance is vital for regulated industries. Technical implementations vary across industries For example, financial services demand transaction integrity controls using frameworks like PCI-DSS, while manufacturing may prioritize uptime and resilience, the healthcare sector requires clinical system isolation with interoperability considerations. Any implemented governance model must correspond to the organizational structure and the implementation must tie industry specific metrics to business outcomes to ensure that investments in security provide tangible value. This approach ensures security is not a roadblock but an enabler for business growth. Q: Zero-Trust Architecture has gained a lot of traction in the industry. You have implemented this architecture. How do you ensure they scale across hybrid environments? A: In my past implementations of Zero-Trust Architecture, I have always followed a strategic approach of balancing security with scalability. My process begins with establishing strong identity and access management as the foundation, ensuring every user, service and device is continuously authenticated and authorized regardless of location. I leverage cloud-native security tools alongside on-premises controls, integrating them through unified policy enforcement and centralized monitoring. I add this with micro-segmentation (via VLANs and virtual firewalls) and policy-based access control. I add the implement Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) solutions to integrate multiple security functionality like firewalls, intrusion prevention, secure web gateways and data loss prevention which aims to maintain consistent security enforcement across on-prem and cloud environments, enabling secure remote access and protection of data and applications from threats regardless of where they are accessed. I also conduct regular reviews and collaboration with both IT and business teams to help maintain a shared objective between security policies and evolving operational needs, ensuring the Zero-Trust model remains effective and manageable as the organization scales. Q: What are the common mistakes organizations make when securing hybrid or multi-cloud environments, and how do you address them? A: Some of the common mistakes organizations make is in implementing inconsistent security architectures that rely excessively on native cloud tools without unified frameworks, neglecting proper Identity and access managements, failing to validate security continuously across hybrid infrastructure environments and a struggle with complexity of network security at interconnection points. To address this, I advocate for unified security policy management and centralized logging across all environments, Implementations of microsegmentation and SASE solutions for centralized inspection. I also stress the importance of identity and access management and Multi Factor authentication ensuring least-privilege access and regular entitlement reviews. Finally, I conduct regular tabletop exercises to test incident response across the entire hybrid environment. Q: How have you leveraged AI or machine learning in security operations, such as for threat detection or incident response and how did you mitigate its limitations and risk? A: I developed AI-driven intrusion detection models during my MSc research program, focusing on anomaly detection in Internet of Things networks. In the production environment, I have worked with AI driven Web application firewalls and Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) tools to automatically detect anomalies and patterns in network traffic, investigate alerts, and prioritize high-risk threats. I also explore machine learning models to help identify patterns that indicate advanced persistent threats or insider risks, thereby accelerating response times by reducing false positives. My use of AI-powered automation also assists in routine tasks like malware analysis and phishing email detection. This has significantly reduced incident response time and alert fatigue. A common drawback with AI tools is its susceptability to false positives, adversarial attacks, and bias in training data. We address some of these risks by ensuring human oversight remains integral to our final decision making and regularly retraining of models with diverse and highly effective datasets. We also understand the importance of conducting regular red team exercises to test the resilience of AI and a fallback process for critical security functions. Q: What's your approach to mentoring or upskilling junior security professionals in your team and within the cybersecurity community? A: In this industry it is vital to keep a supply chain of security professionals especially in Nigeria and Africa. My approach to mentoring junior security professionals is by first understanding their career history, current path and future plans, these help me curate effective learning objectives as regards to their upskilling and growth. I recommend certification pathways, providing hands-on lab opportunities involving real world projects to accelerate their growth. I also encourage a supportive environment where questions are welcomed and mistakes are seen as learning opportunities. As an active mentor on the ISACA Mentorship program, I follow a structured program that offers one-on-one mentorship to aspiring security professionals worldwide from diverse backgrounds for a duration of 6 months helping mentees navigate their career paths, prepare for certifications, tackle real world challenges and advance their knowledge and careers. I also offer one on one mentorships outside of formal programs. Some of my mentees have gone on to lead their own security team, contribute to their organizations and open source security projects and give back to the community as mentors themselves. Q: How do you stay ahead of emerging threats and technologies in the cybersecurity landscape? A: To remain relevant in the cybersecurity industry, It is important to prioritize continuous learning and improvement on the job, taking courses to broaden your perspective and proactive engagement and collaboration with the security community. I make it a priority to regularly attend global leading conferences like Black Hat, DEFCON and other regional security conferences. These platforms not only provide education and insights into the latest threats and technologies but also foster valuable connections with peers and thought leaders. I am a member of both The International Information System Security Certification Consortium (ISC2) and Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA), two of the world's leading cybersecurity organizations which provide opportunities for professional development, networking, and access to valuable resources. I actively collaborate with Nigerian cybersecurity groups and communities like NaijaSecCon and Cyblack, which helps me stay attuned to region-specific threat landscapes and best practices. I also participate in professional forums, contribute to research initiatives, and maintain close relationships with key vendors and academia. Within my organization, I actively participate in Capture The Flag events and security awareness programs while also encouraging my team to experiment with new tools and approaches in controlled environments, fostering a culture of innovation. Q: Where do you see the future of cybersecurity heading, and how are you preparing for it? A: The future of cybersecurity like other industries is moving towards a large-scale adoption of Artificial Intelligence driven defensive systems that provide real-time threat detection and response against sophisticated threats even as organizations have embraced zero-trust architectures. I am currently focusing on AI and machine learning applications for predictive threat modeling and automated response. I also believe quantum-resilient cryptography will become essential, and I am exploring post-quantum algorithms to secure current architectures. Q: Outside of cybersecurity, what do you do to unplug and recharge? A: Outside work, I love to play with my son, take a walk in the park or cycle together. I am a huge fan of football and music, particularly House and Afrobeat. Music gives me balance. I also love traveling to explore new cultures which helps me bring fresh perspectives back into my work. About Chigozie Ejeofobiri Chigozie holds an MSc in Information Security and Digital Forensics from the University of East London, and certifications including CISSP, CISM, CCIE Security, AWS, Azure and top security credentials. He is also a published researcher in AI-enhanced cybersecurity and blockchain security. A firm believer in security as a business enabler, Chigozie is passionate about creating future-proof, scalable solutions that drive both protection and progress. --
