logo
'Trump's diplomacy, hastily and wrongly labeled as isolationist, is interventionist'

'Trump's diplomacy, hastily and wrongly labeled as isolationist, is interventionist'

LeMonde7 hours ago
Donald Trump does not claim to be an expert on the conflict between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), but he knows two things about it: "They were going at it for many years, and with machetes." While not inaccurate, the oversimplification, which featured in his statement on Friday, June 27, to salute the peace deal the United States had brokered between the two countries, was somewhat glib for a war that has killed several million people over nearly 30 years, and not just with machetes. In reality, the US president knows at least two other things about the region, both of which largely explain his unexpected involvement in the negotiations: It is rich in critical minerals, and China is heavily invested there.
Trump's style of diplomacy, which has been hastily and wrongly labeled as isolationist, has been active, messy and interventionist, including where it is least expected. His "peace through strength" concept is, in practice, a deal-making style of diplomacy: Diplomacy as conducted by a handful of the president's trusted agents, in which economic objectives play a significant role and a style which does not rule out the use of force, as seen with the strikes against Iran. It is a diplomatic policy of ceasefires far more than it is one of just and lasting peace agreements.
The US president has, admittedly, stayed stuck on the two major issues he had promised to resolve upon his return to the White House – Ukraine and Gaza – but, in the meantime, his envoys have been busy on all fronts. His loyal ally Steve Witkoff, who, like Trump, comes from the New York real estate world, has had a lot on his plate: Gaza, Ukraine, Russia, Iran.
Staged events
More conventionally, General Keith Kellogg, who is officially in charge of Ukraine, recently made a trip to Minsk, where he secured the release of 14 political prisoners from dictator Alexander Lukashenko, a vassal of Vladimir Putin, including the opposition leader Siarhei Tsikhanouski, who was unrecognizable after five years in prison. More than 1,000 others remain in Belarusian jails, being just as mistreated as Tsikhanouski had been, and it is unclear whether Kellogg's intervention will lead to any further releases.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump halts delivery of some US missiles to Ukraine, a wake-up call for Europeans
Trump halts delivery of some US missiles to Ukraine, a wake-up call for Europeans

LeMonde

timean hour ago

  • LeMonde

Trump halts delivery of some US missiles to Ukraine, a wake-up call for Europeans

The skies over Ukraine darkened considerably on Wednesday, July 2, with the announcement of a "pause" in the delivery of crucial US air defense systems needed to counter the daily volleys of missiles and drones launched by Russia. After raising doubts at the NATO summit on June 24 and 25 in The Hague, Donald Trump carried out his threat "to put America's interests first," according to White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly. This decision, supported by Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby – a strong proponent of shifting US focus toward Asia and a highly influential figure at the Pentagon – was approved on Wednesday by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. It calls for suspending the delivery to Ukraine of Patriot anti-missile missiles, as well as 155 mm artillery shells, GMLRS ground-to-ground missiles, Hellfire anti-tank missiles, Stinger surface-to-air missiles and air-to-air missiles for F-16 aircraft. Russia immediately welcomed the news. "As far as we understand the reason for this decision was empty [US] warehouses [...] But in any case, the fewer weapons are supplied to Ukraine, the closer the end of the 'special military operation,'" said Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov.

US House sets make-or-break final vote on Trump tax bill
US House sets make-or-break final vote on Trump tax bill

France 24

time2 hours ago

  • France 24

US House sets make-or-break final vote on Trump tax bill

Trump is seeking a green light in the House of Representatives for his Senate-passed "One Big Beautiful Bill" -- but faces opposition on all sides of his fractious party over provisions set to balloon the national debt while launching a historic assault on the social safety net. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson spent much of Wednesday struggling to corral his rank-and-file members as the package scraped through a series of "test" votes that laid bare deep divisions in the party. It was set for a final vote to advance it from Congress to Trump's desk around 8:30 am (1230 GMT) after passing its last procedural hurdle in the early hours. "We feel very good about where we are and we're moving forward," an upbeat Johnson told reporters at the Capitol. "So we're going to deliver the Big, Beautiful Bill -- the president's 'America First' agenda -- and we're going to do right by the American people." Originally approved by the House in May, Trump's sprawling legislation squeezed through the Senate on Tuesday by a solitary vote but had to return to the lower chamber for a rubber stamp of the senators' revisions. #photo1 The package honors many of Trump's campaign promises, boosting military spending, funding a mass migrant deportation drive and committing $4.5 trillion to extend his first-term tax relief. But it is expected to pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the country's fast-growing deficits, while shrinking the federal food stamps program and forcing through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance scheme for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch. While moderates in the House are anxious that the cuts will damage their prospects of reelection, fiscal hawks are chafing over savings that they say fall far short of what was promised. Johnson has to negotiate incredibly tight margins, and can likely only lose three lawmakers in the final vote, among more than two dozen who have declared themselves open to rejecting Trump's bill. 'Abomination' #photo2 Republican leaders had been hoping to spend just a few hours on Wednesday afternoon approving the package, although they had some breathing room ahead of Trump's self-imposed Independence Day deadline on Friday. The 887-page text only passed in the Senate after a flurry of tweaks that pulled the House-passed version further to the right. Republicans lost one conservative who was angry about adding to the country's $37 trillion debt burden and two moderates worried about plans for around $1 trillion in health care cuts. Some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their health insurance under the bill at 17 million, while scores of rural hospitals are expected to close. Legislation in the House has to go through multiple preliminary votes before it can come up for final approval, and a majority of lawmakers must wave it through at each of these stages. But there were warning signs early on as the package stumbled at one of its first procedural steps, with a vote that ought to have been straightforward remaining open for seven hours and 31 minutes -- making it the longest in House history. Johnson had been clear that he was banking on Trump leaning on waverers, as the president has in the past to turn around contentious House votes that were headed for failure. The Republican leader has spent weeks hitting the phones and hosting White House meetings to cajole lawmakers torn between angering welfare recipients at home and incurring his wrath. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" Trump thundered in one of multiple posts to his Truth Social platform that sounded increasingly frustrated as Wednesday's marathon voting session spilled into Thursday. The minority House Democrats have signaled that they plan to campaign on the bill to flip the chamber in the 2026 midterm elections, pointing to analyses showing that it represents a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest.

US-Vietnam trade deal sows new China uncertainty
US-Vietnam trade deal sows new China uncertainty

France 24

time4 hours ago

  • France 24

US-Vietnam trade deal sows new China uncertainty

The Southeast Asian nation has the third-biggest trade surplus with the United States of any country after China and Mexico, and was targeted with one of the highest rates in the US president's "Liberation Day" tariff blitz on April 2. The deal announced Wednesday is the first full pact Trump has sealed with an Asian nation, and analysts say it may give a glimpse of the template Washington will use with other countries still scrambling for accords. The 46 percent rate due to take effect next week has been averted, with Vietnam set to face a minimum 20 percent tariff in return for opening its market to US products including cars. But a 40 percent tariff will hit goods passing through the country to circumvent steeper trade barriers -- a practice called "transshipping". Washington has accused Hanoi of relabelling Chinese goods to skirt its tariffs, but raw materials from the world's number two economy are the lifeblood of Vietnam's manufacturing industries. "From a global perspective, perhaps the most interesting point is that this deal again seems in large part to be about China," said Capital Economics. It said the terms on transshipment "will be seen as a provocation in Beijing, particularly if similar conditions are included in any other deals agreed over coming days". 'The looming question' Shares in clothing companies and sport equipment manufacturers -- which have a large footprint in Vietnam -- rose on news of the deal in New York. But they later declined sharply as details were released. "This is a much better outcome than a flat 46 percent tariff, but I wouldn't celebrate just yet," said Hanoi-based Dan Martin of Asian business advisory firm Dezan Shira & Associates. "Everything now depends on how the US decides to interpret and enforce the idea of transshipment," he added. "If the US takes a broader view and starts questioning products that use foreign parts, even when value is genuinely added in Vietnam, it could end up affecting a lot of companies that are playing by the rules." Vietnam's government said in a statement late on Wednesday that under the deal the country had promised "preferential market access for US goods, including large-engine cars". But the statement gave scant detail about the transshipment arrangements in the deal, which Trump announced on his Truth Social platform. Bloomberg Economics forecast Vietnam could lose a quarter of its exports to the United States in the medium term, endangering more than two percent of its gross domestic product as a result of the agreement. Uncertainty over how transshipping will be "defined or enforced" is likely to have diplomatic repercussions, said Bloomberg Economics expert Rana Sajedi. "The looming question now is how China will respond," she said. "Beijing has made clear that it would respond to deals that came at the expense of Chinese interests." "The decision to agree to a higher tariff on goods deemed to be 'transshipped' through Vietnam may fall in that category," added Sajedi.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store