Jury retires in trial of man accused of murdering Iraq War veteran
Gregory Twigg, 32, denies intending to cause Lee Woodward, 39, serious injuries when he punched him three times in Trade Street, Stoke-on-Trent, on the night of June 24 2022.
Medically-retired British Army veteran Mr Woodward was left brain damaged in the attack and never recovered from his injuries, dying in hospital from complications 10 months later on April 26 2023.
The defendant, who was jailed for eight years and three months in September 2022 after pleading guilty to grievous bodily harm with intent for the attack on Mr Woodward, is now on trial at Stafford Crown Court accused of his murder.
Twigg, previously of Blurton in Stoke-on-Trent, gave evidence on Wednesday and denied claims from prosecution counsel David Mason KC that he was 'fired up on drink and coke and raging' when he punched Mr Woodward, saying he only intended to give him a black eye.
He told the jury of seven women and five men that Mr Woodward had sworn at and threatened them as the car he was a passenger in drove past him in Hill Street so his friend Nathan Lockley pulled the car over and a confrontation ensued.
CCTV of the lead-up and the attack itself was played to the jury, showing Mr Woodward leaving The Liquor Vaults pub in Trade Street at around 11pm before his fiance and walking down towards Hill Street with a man who has not been identified, where he first encountered the car in which Twigg was a backseat passenger.
The first punch by Twigg knocked Mr Woodward to the ground, with Ms Griffin helping her partner to his feet before the second knocked him into a parked car and the third left him unconscious in the road and he never recovered.
Mr Mason told the court Twigg's punches were 'powerful and cowardly' and that he had intended to 'flatten Lee so he would never get up'.
After getting back into the vehicle and leaving the scene, Twigg was arrested in Newcastle-upon-Lyme, where he had been heading for a night out, around 50 minutes later.
In his closing speech to jury before they retired, Mr Mason said: 'At any stage, does Lee Woodward look like a threat to anyone?
'This man was determined to flatten Lee so he would never get up. He may have been drunk, he was on cocaine, that may have made him more aggressive. He accepted he was a bit angry – but he was raging wasn't he?'
He added: 'He was determined in his agitated, angry, bouncy state, to really hurt Lee Woodward.
'You saw how angry Mr Twigg was and he wasn't going to stop until he was done, was he?
'Even after he had rendered Lee Woodward unconscious for the remainder of his life, he punches Kate Griffin. He said it was a push, not a punch – you decide, ladies and gentlemen.
'He was raging, we suggest he was unstoppable. Of course, now Lee has died, he is trying to wriggle out of a murder charge. He knows his guilty plea to grievous bodily harm with intent makes him guilty of murder.
'Now he is trying to persuade you he only meant to give him a black eye.
'He may feel bad about it now, but I suggest perhaps the person he is feeling most sorry for is himself because he knows he is guilty of murder.'
Ahmed Hossain KC, defending Twigg, urged the jury to put their emotions aside and look at the evidence in a 'clinical' way.
He said: 'It would be surprising if you didn't feel emotions such as anger and revulsion. We ask you to put emotions to the side, which is not easy, but experience shows that when you are deciding the facts, emotions don't help.
'I am not asking you to like Gregory Twigg and I'm certainly not asking you for any sympathy towards Gregory Twigg in his current predicament.
'Ask yourself in a really clinical way if Gregory Twigg intended to cause really serious harm. Mr Twigg is guilty of manslaughter.
'He accepts he unlawfully punched Mr Woodward, he accepts that his punches caused Mr Woodward to fall over, banging his head, and subsequently he very sadly died.
'The issue is intention.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
US citizen denies being present at the scene of 2019 Birmingham murder plot
An American woman has denied any involvement in a failed assassination plot, telling jurors she never had a gun in her possession at any time during her visit to the UK. Aimee Betro is alleged to have flown into Britain and taken part in a plot orchestrated by co-conspirators Mohammed Aslam, 56, and his son Mohammed Nabil Nazir, 31, to attack a rival family in September 2019. The 45-year-old, from West Allis in Wisconsin, told jurors on Tuesday that she did not know there had been an attempted shooting when she left the UK two days afterwards. Prosecutors allege Betro hid her identity using a niqab when she tried to shoot Sikander Ali at point blank range outside his home in Measham Grove, Yardley, Birmingham, but the gun jammed, allowing him to flee. Addressing the evidence against her in chronological order during questioning by defence barrister Paul Lewis KC, Betro claimed she was in Birmingham city centre at the time of the attempted assassination and a follow-up shooting at the intended victim's house hours later. She also maintained that a woman described as having an American accent and being small and fat, who bought a vehicle linked to the plot, was not her. During her second day of evidence to Birmingham Crown Court, Mr Lewis asked Betro: 'In effect the Crown are saying that Mr Nazir or his father got you involved in a plan to kill, and that you were the person who actually wielded the gun?' Betro answered 'it wasn't me' and added that there was no truth in the allegations made against her. Asserting that she had 'no reason or motive' to carry out the shooting and did not know the intended victim's family, Betro said she would have said no if she had been asked to take part in any plot. After viewing CCTV in court and claiming the person seen in the niqab was not her, Betro said she was in Birmingham city centre at the time of the incident. Asked where she was at the time, Betro said: 'I don't really know where but I didn't leave the centre.' At the time of the second gun-related incident, Betro said of her whereabouts: 'I was out with my friend and his friends – my friend that did work with a music streaming service. 'We just went out – just around the centre. I don't really know where we went. I don't know the names.' Betro went on to claim that she did not have possession of a gun at any time during the night of September 7 into the early hours of September 8, when three shots were fired at a house in Measham Grove after a woman arrived there in a taxi. She added that she did not have a gun in her possession at any time while in the UK, which she left via Manchester Airport two days after the attempted assassination. Betro told the jury on Monday that she flew into the country to celebrate her birthday and attend a boat party, having met Nazir on a dating app and having previously travelled to the UK to meet him. The defendant denies conspiracy to murder, possessing a self-loading pistol and a charge of fraudulently evading the prohibition on importing ammunition. The court has heard Aslam and Nazir, who were jailed last year for their part in the assassination plot, were involved in a feud with Mr Ali's father, Aslat Mahumad. Nazir and Aslam, both of Elms Avenue in Derby, had been injured during disorder at Mr Mahumad's clothing boutique in Birmingham in July 2018, jurors have been told, leading them to conspire to have someone kill him or a member of his family. The trial continues.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Brazen Byker thief stole £10,000 piece of art from Newcastle city centre gallery
A piece of art worth almost £10,000 was stolen by a serial crook who walked into a Newcastle gallery and helped himself to it. Christopher Scott, who has more than 100 offences on his record, took the Mr Brainwash Spray Can piece from it's stand, snapped a security cable, and wandered off with it, a court heard. The brazen theft happened at Clarendon Fine Art gallery, in Newcastle city centre, in February last year. Newcastle Crown Court the artwork was valued at £9,950. Now Scott, who also burgled a house and a building site, has been jailed for more than three years. The court heard that in May last year, he stole power tools worth more than £4,000 from a building site on Collingwood Street, Newcastle. He and an accomplice were captured on CCTV and identified. READ MORE: Whitley Bay incident: Updates on emergency response after child gets into difficulty in the sea READ MORE: Child airlifted to hospital after getting into difficulty in the sea at Whitley Bay He also broke into a woman's house in April, stealing a laptop worth £500, £500 of coins and several bottles of spirits. When he was arrested, he was in possession of cocaine. Scott, 44, of The Chevron, Byker, Newcastle, who has 130 previous convictions, including 58 for theft and similar, pleaded guilty to theft of the piece of art, two burglaries and possessing cocaine. He was jailed for a total of 1,240 days. Jonathan Cousins, defending, said: "He's has a long-standing drug addiction since he was a child and he had a difficult upbringing. "He has PTSD as a result of being stabbed in the late 1990s and his life has been marred by custodial sentences, being released in circumstances where he is homeless and returning to drug addiction and offending. He is extremely remorseful, especially for the burglary offence."


The Hill
19-07-2025
- The Hill
Trump's long-stalled suit against Bob Woodward dismissed
A federal judge on Friday dismissed President Trump's lawsuit against famed Watergate journalist Bob Woodward for publishing audio tapes of interviews he conducted with Trump for a 2020 book. U.S. District Judge Paul Gardephe's ruling comes a year and a half after Woodward and his publisher asked the judge to dismiss the suit. Trump's attorneys had long complained about the lack of progress, repeatedly urging Gardephe to rule. An appointee of former President George W. Bush, Gardephe rejected Trump's arguments that he is a joint author of the tapes and ruled that even if he wasn't, the interview responses are protected copyright. 'There is almost no support in the case law for the notion that an interviewee has a copyright interest in his responses to interview questions, and such a conclusion would run counter to animating principles of the Copyright Act,' the judge pushed back. The judge also dismissed Trump's state law claims, ruling those were preempted by federal copyright law. 'In another biased action by a New York Court, this wrongful decision was issued without even affording President Trump the basic due process of a hearing. We will continue to ensure that those who commit wrongdoing against President Trump and all Americans are held accountable,' a spokesman for Trump's legal team said in a statement. Trump sued Woodward in January 2023 after giving him 19 interviews for his book, 'Rage.' The lawsuit conceded Trump gave the interviews and permitted Woodward to record them, but the complaint claimed the journalist and his publisher were not authorized to sell the audio recordings themselves. The $49 million lawsuit named Woodward, Simon & Schuster and its then-parent company, Paramount Global, as defendants. Paramount later sold the publishing giant to a private investment firm. The Hill has reached out to Simon & Schuster and Paramount for comment. Trump's attorney had repeatedly expressed frustration with the judge for mulling the dismissal motion for months without taking action. Following Trump's election, his attorneys kept pressing the judge to move ahead, but in December, the judge said he was 'at work' on it and declined to expedite it further.