Fashion designer found dead on yacht in New York, police investigating
2:11
40 months ago
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Eye-watering cost of sorority hopeful's rush outfit sparks fierce backlash: 'Four months of my rent'
It's that time of the year again - rush week at the University of Alabama. Back in 2021, a series of women who were trying to join the University of Alabama's Panhellenic community documented their road to being accepted into one of the 18 different sororities at the school, and uploaded it all to TikTok. Their videos quickly exploded, and many people on the web became enthralled with watching the lengthy process play out. Since then, every time August rolls around, #BamaRush goes viral once again, as a whole new set of freshmen hopefuls at University of Alabama and other Southern schools put their best foot forward to vie for the chance to get accepted into sororities on campus. And many of them figure that the best way to do this is to make sure that foot is covered in a designer shoe. Tons of the women rushing this year have been showcasing their daily outfits throughout the process on TikTok and Instagram - and some of them have donned ensembles worth thousands of dollars. And while their stacks of expensive jewelry and name brand skirts used to elicit awe from their audiences, now it seems as though they only stir disbelief and anger. One Instagram creator recently broke down some of the sky-high prices of these girls' rush looks, and it sparked immense backlash for the students. Destinee Wilson, who calls herself 'your favorite price breakdown analyst,' has been reposting videos of girls rushing sororities in the South and detailing the prices of each article of clothing they wear. Tons of the women rushing this year have been showcasing their daily outfits throughout the process on TikTok and Instagram - and the ensembles worth thousands of dollars. The outfit featured Shila Fijal earrings, a Tiffany necklace, a Tory Burch watch, a Hermes bangle, and a Farm Rio skirt, amongst other things. After finding all of the individual products and their prices, Destinee revealed that the outfit costs a whopping $4,776. And viewers were shocked to say the least. 'She spent four months of my rent on that outfit,' one Instagram user pointed out. 'How much money does she HAVE?!' another commented, incredulous. Some users even had choice words for the parents of the student. She also donned a Tiffany T white gold bracelet, which is priced at $1,350, and the $350 Tory Burch Small Eleanor Watch She sported a $135 Farm Rio skirt, amongst other things. And after finding all of the individual products and their prices, Destinee revealed that the outfit cost a whopping $4,776 'Unless these girls are making their money on social media… their parents are failing them by buying them all this shit that's so damn expensive,' one outraged person said. 'They will never understand the true value of a dollar.' Others even made fun of the outfit, claiming it looked cheap despite its high cost. 'Meanwhile the whole outfit looks like it came from Old Navy,' another user added. Destinee herself did not mock the outfit or its price. In fact, in one of her other videos, she captions her price breakdown: 'The GSU girls were absolutely rocking rush week.'
Japan Today
11 minutes ago
- Japan Today
New Instagram location sharing feature sparks privacy fears
Instagram says its new feature allowing users to share locations in real time is off by default, meaning people have to opt-in Instagram users are warning about a new location sharing feature, fearing that the hugely popular app could be putting people in danger by revealing their whereabouts without their knowledge. The Meta-owned image sharing platform added an option last Wednesday which shares locations using an Instagram map, similar to a feature rival Snapchat has offered since 2017. Some users have since been shocked to discover that their location was being shared, viral posts have shown. "Mine was turned on and my home address was showing for all of my followers to see," Instagram user Lindsey Bell wrote in reply to a warning posted by "Bachelor" reality television personality Kelley Flanagan to her 300,000 TikTok followers. "Turned it off immediately once I knew but had me feeling absolutely sick about it." In a TikTok video, Flanagan called Instagram's new location sharing feature "dangerous" and gave step-by-step instructions on how to make sure it is turned off. Instagram chief Adam Mosseri fired off a post on Meta-owned Threads stressing that Instagram location sharing is off by default, meaning users need to opt in for it to be active. "Quick Friend Map clarification, your location will only be shared if you decide to share it, and if you do, it can only be shared with a limited group of people you choose," Mosseri wrote. "To start, location sharing is completely off." The feature was added as a way for friends to better connect with one another, sharing posts from "cool spots," Instagram said in a blog post. Users can be selective regarding who they share locations with, and can turn it off whenever they wish, according to Instagram. Wariness regarding whether Instagram is watching out for user privacy comes just a week after a federal jury in San Francisco sided with women who accused Meta of exploiting health data gathered by the Flo app, which tracks menstruation and efforts to get pregnant. A jury concluded that Meta used women's sensitive health data to better target money-making ads, according to law firm Labaton Keller Sucharow, which represented the plaintiffs. Evidence at trial showed Meta was aware it was getting confidential health data from the third-party app, and that some employees appeared to mock the nature of the information, the law firm contended. "This case was about more than just data -- it was about dignity, trust, and accountability," lead attorney Carol Villegas said in a blog post. Damages in the suit have yet to be determined. © 2025 AFP
Deccan Herald
11 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Why we must not talk of infidelity only as betrayal
It was a fleeting moment involving a CEO and his HR head during a Coldplay concert in Boston, broadcast on the stadium's jumbotron. Within 48 hours, the clip went viral, garnering over 30 million views on TikTok and sparking severe repercussions amid outrage. A private moment turned public scapegoating – a staggering 89% of Americans disapprove of affairs – and framed the incident as a moral failure in infidelity. What this moment reveals is not the secret life of cheaters. It highlights the emotional complexity of modern relationships and how we often misunderstand fidelity as the sole measure of relational health. Sexual exclusivity is important in creating psychological safety, but dimensions such as emotional intimacy, communication quality, and mutual respect are equally critical for relational health. Perhaps that's why nearly 70% of couples choose to stay together after infidelity, reporting greater emotional closeness during is common yet often underreported. About 12 million men and 7.8 million women in the US have cheated. A YouGov-Ashley Madison survey found that 53% of Indian adults admitted to an affair. This highlights how desire and dissatisfaction can linger beneath societal happy couples face infidelity. Many individuals cheat not to abandon their partners but to escape their dissatisfaction due to stagnation, loneliness, or the burden of domestic invisibility. Affairs enable a reconnection with one's personal vitality, identity, and autonomy; they emerge during life transitions as a response to existential drift. The kiss-cam moment is also about how much technology is infringing on our privacy and is redefining intimacy. Infidelity now involves WhatsApp messages, AI companions, or late-night scrolls of pornography. In India, 40% of married respondents confessed to 'digital affairs', dismissed as harmless fun (cities leading in these affairs include Kanchipuram, Delhi, Pune, and Bengaluru). Emotional secrecy can erode the attention partners offer each other. This reflects a broader paradox: a society that sanctifies marriage, yet fails to nurture emotional interpretations of infidelity vary. The French would smirk at the puritanical drama of American sexual peccadilloes. In France, infidelity is viewed as a lapse in exclusivity, not necessarily a collapse in love. Indian wives cite emotional neglect, 'I felt invisible,' not sexual dissatisfaction, as the primary driver of infidelity. In America, women report 'feeling more alive,' and for men, the pull is more commonly tied to opportunity and novelty. In the UK, over half of those who cheated reported aftermath of betrayal is costly. Infidelity is closely associated with poorer mental health, particularly among betrayed partners, 78% of whom manifest depression, anxiety, and and power dynamics complicate infidelity. In societies where women have limited agency, infidelity may be less a personal choice and more a result of coercion. In India, Brazil, Bolivia, and Mexico, female infidelity – real or imagined – is often a trigger for domestic violence. Under the pretext of protecting women, romantic relationships can become opportunities to manipulate women into affairs, using their transgressions as tools for control through shame or blackmail. In patriarchal cultures, men may engage in affairs to boost their ego, reaffirm their masculinity, enhance their social status, and project an image of a thriving marriage. In impoverished countries, concerns about infidelity may seem trivial compared to the struggle to provide food for children. We often reduce infidelity to a binary of sinner and saint. But what if the cheater was someone aching for closeness, and met with coldness? What if the 'faithful' partner had emotionally checked out years earlier? What if the affair was a symptom of a deeper, mutual disengagement and slow erosion of affection? The individual who cheats becomes the scapegoat for a dysfunction that was of fidelity vary. In the US, some couples choose open relationships or polyamory that prioritise transparency over exclusivity. Yet America's moral absolutism makes public dialogue about desire fraught with hypocrisy. It makes one wonder how many among the disapproving millions have strayed, or stayed silent about betrayals. Fidelity, in truth, is less a static rule than a moving target – one shaped by love, context, and consent. Infidelity isn't always a moral collapse. Sometimes, it's a maladaptive attempt to resuscitate one's emotional life. As painful as affairs are, as a psychologist who works with couples, I've discovered they expose what couples avoid: unfinished conversations, neglected inner worlds, and unmet longings. To talk about infidelity only as betrayal is to miss the a culture of increasing disconnection, it's time to expand our language to allow for the complexity of connection. To explore not just what fidelity is, but what it's for. In the rubble of a scandal, there is sometimes a path to truth, intimacy, and the courage to begin again.
