New GOP bill would protect AI companies from lawsuits if they offer transparency
Lummis' bill, the Responsible Innovation and Safe Expertise Act, seeks to clarify that doctors, lawyers, financial advisers, engineers and other professionals who use AI programs in their decision-making retain legal liability for any errors they make — so long as AI developers publicly disclose how their systems work.
'This legislation doesn't create blanket immunity for AI — in fact, it requires AI developers to publicly disclose model specifications so professionals can make informed decisions about the AI tools they choose to utilize,' Lummis, a member of the Commerce Committee, said in a statement first shared with NBC News. 'It also means that licensed professionals are ultimately responsible for the advice and decisions they make. This is smart policy for the digital age that protects innovation, demands transparency, and puts professionals and their clients first.'
Lummis' office touted the bill as the first piece of federal legislation that offers clear guidelines for AI liability in a professional context. The measure would not govern liability for other AI elements, such as self-driving vehicles, and it would not provide immunity when AI developers act recklessly or willfully engage in misconduct.
'AI is transforming industries — medicine, law, engineering, finance — and becoming embedded in professional tools that shape critical decisions,' her office said in a release. 'But outdated liability rules discourage innovation, exposing developers to unbounded legal risk even when trained professionals are using these tools.'
Exactly who is liable when AI is used in sensitive medical, legal or financial situations is a bit of a gray area, with some states seeking to enact their own standards.
The House-passed 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which is advancing through Congress and supported by President Donald Trump, includes a provision that would ban states from enacting any AI regulations for 10 years. Senate Republicans last week proposed changing the provision to instead block federal funding for broadband projects to states that regulate AI.
Both Democratic and Republican state officials have criticized the effort to prohibit state-level regulations over the next decade, while AI executives have argued that varying state laws would stifle industry growth when the United States is in stiff competition with countries like China.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bondi: 68 arrested overnight in DC
Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Sunday that authorities arrested 68 people overnight in Washington, D.C., amid a federal crackdown on crime in which President Trump has sent the National Guard to the nation's capital and federalized the police force. 'Over 300 arrests in D.C. — and counting: Just last night, our federal and DC law enforcement partners made 68 arrests and seized 15 illegal firearms,' Bondi said in a post on the social platform X. 'Homicide suspects, drug traffickers, and more are being charged. I'll continue to stand with you as we make DC safe again!' Trump last week said he would take federal control of D.C.'s police department and deploy the National Guard to the city. The president's moves have drawn heavy blowback from Democrats and D.C. residents. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who also recently compared the nation's capital to multiple foreign war zones, said in a post on the social platform X that 'graffiti is coming down in Washington, DC.' 'Graffiti left untouched to scar public spaces is the visual declaration of a society's surrender,' Miller said in his Sunday post. On Sunday, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) dismissed Trump's recent crackdown on the nation's capital as a 'stunt' and suggested, like other Democrats, that the effort is meant to distract from other events in the news. 'What's happening here in Washington, D.C., is just a stunt. Donald Trump didn't like the fact that the walls were closing in on him, that his own base was questioning why he wouldn't release the Epstein files, why he was protecting very powerful people,' Murphy told NBC News's Kristen Welker on 'Meet the Press.' 'He didn't want to talk anymore about the fact that our health care system is about to collapse because of the cuts that they have made, that premiums are going to go up by 75 percent on Americans,' the Connecticut senator added. But Republicans and the administration have argued the federal crackdown is a necessary step given high murder and crime rates in D.C., while suggesting that Democrats running cities have done a poor job handling the issue.

16 minutes ago
Parenting in the age of AI
Parenting expert and GMA e-commerce editor Bethany BraunSilva joins ABC News Live to discuss how parents are using AI to get ahead.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Murphy dismisses Trump's DC crime crackdown as a ‘stunt'
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on Sunday dismissed President Trump's recent crackdown on Washington, D.C., as a 'stunt.' 'What's happening here in Washington, D.C. is just a stunt. Donald Trump didn't like the fact that the walls were closing in on him, that his own base was questioning why he wouldn't release the Epstein files, why he was protecting very powerful people,' Murphy told NBC News's Kristen Welker on 'Meet the Press.' 'He didn't want to talk anymore about the fact that our health care system is about to collapse because of the cuts that they have made, that premiums are going to go up by 75 percent on Americans,' he added. 'And so, true to form, he just decided to create a new news cycle.' Earlier this week, Trump announced he was taking federal control of D.C.'s police department and deploying the National Guard in the city in an effort to fight crime. Trump's recent moves in the nation's capital have drawn heavy blowback from Democrats and reignited calls for statehood for the District, which does not have voting representation in Congress. On Saturday, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster (R) announced that he had authorized the deployment of 200 National Guard troops to help 'restore law and order' in D.C., also saying that they could be recalled if there was a South Carolina disaster. 'I've authorized the deployment of 200 S.C. National Guardsmen to support President Trump in his mission to restore law and order to our nation's capital. The federal government will pay for this deployment under Title 32,' McMaster said on the social media platform X. 'Our National Guard will work to assist President Trump's mission, and should a hurricane or natural disaster threaten our state, they can and will be immediately recalled home to respond,' the governor added. The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment.