Humza Yousaf pleads for 'meaningful action' in Gaza
'It's impossible for me to put it into words,' Yousaf said.
'Yesterday, we received some very sad news that my father-in-law's cousin – who is only a few years older than me [and] has two children – was killed by the Israeli forces trying to get flour.
READ MORE: Israel 'threatens to stop aid flights if media film Gaza from the sky'
'His family begged him not to go to get food, but he couldn't bare to see his family starving, so he went go get flour.'
Yousaf was visibly upset as he felt he had to point out that his in-law was 'not Hamas', nor a 'terrorist'.
He described how Israeli forces 'shot him in the stomach' before running over his body with a tank.
The former First Minister went on to detail how his father-in-law was 'inconsolable with grief' when he made contact.
Councillor Nadia El-Nakla's cousin – whom she wrote about in The National just last week – was mentioned in the interview, with Yousaf saying her children had become 'emaciated' as a result of the forced starvation in Gaza.
'I feel helpless', he said.
'Choked with pain when I think of [how] they're in pain. How can we possibly imagine what a Gazan mother or father must be going through, when they themselves are starving and watching their children become skeletons?
Yousaf pleaded with people to think about Gaza 'as a father, a mother, or just a human being'.
READ MORE: SNP and Greens condemn Starmer's conditional stance on Palestine statehood
'We must do everything in our gift to stop this atrocity. That's why I plead with the Prime Minister – and I use that word, I plead with the Prime Minister – to take meaningful action.
'Sanctions, end all arms sales to Israel. Not necessarily for geopolitical reasons, but because I want to see an end to the inhumanity we're all witnessing.'
His comments come as Keir Starmer announced the UK Government would recognise the state of Palestine in September if Israel committed to a two-state solution.
Starmer's move has been widely criticised for it's conditional nature, with the SNP and the Scottish Greens both urging that recognition of Palestine must not be 'conditional'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
39 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer's not the issue. But nor were Johnson, May, Brown…
'The end is Nige.' That was how The Sun's front page reported my discovery, in 2017, that 'Nigel' had fallen off the official list of baby names. At the time, it seemed not just striking but symbolic: with Ukip at 2 per cent in the polls, and its former leader out of frontline politics, Nigel's best days really did seem to lie in the past. Last week, the list came out again. In the register office as in public life, Nigel was firmly back, with five boys both this year and last — one of whom even joined the Reform leader on the campaign trail in Clacton. Rishi was there, and Kemi too. But poor old Keir had disappeared. Again, the symbolism was irresistible. This time last year, Starmer was at his height as prime minister, delivering a muscular response to the riots that captured the national mood. But he has steadily become more and more disliked. Today, only 19 per cent of voters tell YouGov he is doing a good job, against 69 per cent who disagree. As of the latest polls, he is in the negatives even among Labour voters. • Top baby names in England and Wales revealed — but no new Keirs There are all sorts of reasons why this has happened — which you could fairly summarise as a bad hand, badly played. But what fascinates me is the familiarity of the Labour response. Back in the Boris Johnson days, and the Theresa May days, and the Gordon Brown days, any given setback would usually be accompanied by briefings about the flaws in the No 10 team. The prime minister, journalists would report, was deeply frustrated by the failures they saw, and would be reshuffling their team to get a personal grip. That, or the problem was that they had become overly dependent on — almost hypnotised by — a particular adviser or advisers. Now, with lessons learnt, we would see the real Boris. The real Theresa. The real Gordon. There are two intellectual traditions at work here — one old and one new. The new one is that a generation of politicians have grown up watching The West Wing, and in particular the scene where the struggling administration decides that it needs to cast off caution and pragmatism and allow Martin Sheen's president to be the campaigning, crusading figure who first inspired them: 'Let Bartlet be Bartlet!' goes the cry. But the second tradition is far older. Indeed, it's one of the oldest patterns in political history. In Britain, as in many other countries and cultures, it was not just treason but verging on heresy to criticise a divinely appointed king. So the discontented would always stress that their complaints were not about the wise and goodly monarch, but the evil counsellors around them. As late as the Civil War, the Roundheads blamed the outbreak of hostilities not on Charles I himself, but 'an abounding malignity in those parties and Factions; who doe still labour to foment Jealosies betwixt the King and this Parliament' — godless bishops, sinister Jesuits and treacherous nobles. It took six full years of war for them to adopt the literally revolutionary position that the blame truly lay with 'Charles Stuart, that man of blood'. Studying recent reporting, you can see exactly the same themes. We have had the briefing for and against the prime minister's favourite — aka his chief of staff. The reports of new blood being brought in to freshen things up. Accounts of how the prime minister will take a personal grip on the policy-making process, since decisions were reaching him too late in the day. (By miraculous coincidence, the main mistake cited, making cuts to welfare, was also hugely unpopular with Labour backbenchers.) We have had a cabinet awayday with excited talk of a 'progressive pivot', and rebuilding the government around the prime minister's personal obsession with 'life chances'. 'It was all very 'Let Keir be Keir',' claimed an anonymous minister. • Keir Starmer needs his authority back. Can a Blairite veteran help? But the problem for the government is that it's never the advisers. It's always the king. Just like it was for King John or Charles I or any of the others. Indeed, one of the peculiarities of the British state is that there are surprisingly few formal, institutional structures around the prime minister. Instead, Downing Street functions almost like a royal court, moulding itself around the personality of each new incumbent. And once set, that mould is surprisingly hard to break. Certainly, it is a lot easier to list the excitable articles about prime ministerial relaunches, revamps and resets than examples of such resets actually working. Ironically, for all her intractable reputation, one of the few to manage it is arguably Margaret Thatcher, who retooled her administration in 1981-2 after receiving perhaps the most wounding memo ever sent to a PM by their underlings. ('Your own management competence, like that of most of your colleagues, is almost non-existent … You break every rule of good man-management. You bully your weaker colleagues. You criticise colleagues in front of each other and in front of their officials…').As for 'let Keir be Keir', who will Keir actually be? We've been told, over the years, that the Starmer mission is all about service, or change, or radicalism, or necessary decisions. But it feels like a series of attempts to project a personality, and a narrative, on to a blank screen. Recently, on the train back from Kyiv, my colleague Josh Glancy asked Starmer about standing in the spotlight of history. The PM, he wrote, bristled impatiently: 'I don't do all this self-analysis bit. I thought you'd picked that up a year ago. You're still desperately trying to get in there. Come on.' Starmer's position is that his job is not to construct fancy theories. It is to sit down and do the work — to make decision after decision until there are no more problems left to solve. But all truly successful politicians tell a story about themselves. Whitehall, too, works best when everyone can buy into a single shared narrative, imposed from the centre. Starmer not only hasn't done that, but actively resists it. The result, to steal a put-down from Bismarck, is that he ends up seeming like a Sphinx without a riddle. And the government ends up with a majority but no mission. It may be that the PM can turn things around — that by the time he leaves office, maternity wards will be packed with little Keirs, Morgans and Angelas. But I can't help feeling that progressive Keir will soon be discarded alongside change Keir, growth Keir, and tough decisions Keir with kung-fu grip. Because if there's one lesson from history for our leaders, it's that the fault lies not in their advisers, but in themselves.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Benjamin Netanyahu under increasing pressure to accept Gaza ceasefire amid famine
Intelligence analysis reveals Israel's aid blockade and constant air attacks on Gaza have backfired, leaving Benjamin Netanyahu nearer isolation from his ally, the US Israel's PM Benjamin Netanyahu is facing rising pressure to accept a ceasefire because of the famine horror in Gaza. Intelligence analysis reveals Israel 's aid blockade and constant air attacks have backfired leaving him nearer isolation from his ally, the US. The Soufan Centre, run by Middle East expert Ali Souffan, says he 'is coming under broad pressure to wind down Israel's military involvement in Gaza' as US President Donald Trump draws back from his support because of the famine. 'Trump has not urged him to end the war,' says the independent analysis organisation's report. 'But he has broken with him on the humanitarian situation.' The report adds that Mr Trump's aides 'appear to be pressing on with efforts to forge another temporary ceasefire'. It came as a United Nations Food Security panel claimed 'the worst-case scenario of famine is playing out in the Strip'. Meanwhile there was more anguish in Gaza yesterday as hospitals reported the killing of at least 18 people by Israeli fire, eight of them food-seekers. Close to a Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) distribution site, Yahia Youssef, looking for aid, described how he helped carry out three people with gunshot wounds. He said he saw many others lying on the ground bleeding. 'It's the same daily episode,' Mr Youssef said. The GHF media office said 'nothing [happened] at or near our sites'. It came a day after US officials visited one site and the US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee called the GHF's distribution 'an incredible feat'. International outrage has mounted as the group's efforts to deliver aid to hunger-stricken Gaza have been marred by violence and controversy.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Hamas releases shocking video of Israeli hostage looking like a concentration camp victim after 666 days in captivity
Hamas has released a horrifying video of an emaciated Israeli hostage after 666 days in captivity - as his devastated family said he only has a few days left to live. Evyatar David's family approved the use of the terrorist organisation's video on Saturday, which shows him bare chested on a dirty mattress inside a tunnel in Gaza. He can be seen writing on a piece of paper on the wall and walking around in the tunnel which is just tall enough for him stand up. The video goes on to accuse Israel of starving not only Palestinians but Israeli hostages as well. The last proof of life from Evyatar, who was taken hostage from the Nova music festival during the October 7 attacks, was back in February. Then Hamas published a video of him and fellow hostage Guy Gilboa Dalal sitting inside a car as they watched other captives being released from Gaza. In a statement today, the David family said: 'We are forced to witness our beloved son and brother, Evyatar David, deliberately and cynically starved in Hamas's tunnels in Gaza - a living skeleton, buried alive. 'Our son has only a few days left to live in his current condition. Hamas is using our son as a live experiment in a vile hunger campaign. 'The deliberate starvation of our son as part of a propaganda campaign is one of the most horrifying acts the world has seen. He is being starved purely to serve Hamas's propaganda. 'Israel and the international community must oppose Hamas's cruelty and ensure that our Evyatar immediately receives proper nutrition.' The Instagram account 'Bring Evyatar Home' also posted on social media 'The Holocaust must end' as they shared the latest images of him. Meanwhile on Thursday, Islamic Jihad released a hostage video, showing a starved Rom Braslavski crying and begging for his life. Families of Israeli hostages criticised the shocking images of the hostages in Gaza. Speaking at a demonstration against the Israeli government on Saturday, the mother of hostage Matan Angrest said her son was too going through a Holocaust. 'I am the image of failure for the prime minister. I avoided using the word Holocaust until now, because I am a daughter of a Holocaust survivor,' Anat Angrest said. 'My father is going through a second Holocaust through his grandson. We see videos of the Holocaust in colour. 'The 2025 Holocaust is continuing and extending thanks to the Israeli government,' she added. Einav Zangauker, the mother of Israeli hostage Matan Zangauker, said: 'In recent days, we saw the difficult videos of Rom and Evyatar from captivity. 'Our children are undergoing a Holocaust. Jews are becoming skin and bones because of political survival. 'If we don't free everyone now, they will not survive for much longer,' Zangauker said. She has repeatedly accused Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu of prolonging the war for his own political survival. The Hostage Forum in Israel also released a scathing statement following the images of Evyatar, appealing directly to both the Israeli and American governments. 'Look our loved ones – and us – in the eyes. The danger to their lives is tangible and immediate,' it read. 'The risk of losing those deceased is growing. This is the time for a comprehensive deal and an end to the war. 'No more delays. No more leaving them behind. Stop this nightmare and bring them out of the tunnels and home,' the forum said. Vicky Cohen, mother of hostage Nimrod Cohen, posted the word: 'Holocaust 2025' on X after seeing the video of David. Former hostage, Eliya Cohen, said that seeing the video of Evyatar took him back to the day a terrorist came to him and said: 'There's no more food, no more water, no more anything. 'You'll eat whatever is left of our food, because your people are starving us — so we'll starve you.' 'Don't get me wrong,' Cohen continued: 'I don't have an ounce of compassion for those sons of b******. 'But while we're being shredded in the global media, the people we're trying to target are sitting underground, and 90 percent of the time they're in the kitchen, trading maqluba recipes, dipping hummus.' Opposition Leader Yair Lapid meanwhile asked ministers in Netanyahu's government to 'watch the video of Evyatar before going to bed and try to fall asleep while thinking about Evyatar trying to survive in a tunnel.' Israel's Foreign Ministry said that Evyatar is known for his 'kind soul and musical talent. He dreams of traveling to Asia and studying music production.' US special envoy Steve Witkoff met with families of hostages in Tel Aviv on Saturday, where he stressed that the current plan is to end the war and not expand it. 'A majority of Israelis want the hostages at home, and a majority of Gaza's public wants the return of hostages because they want the rehabilitation of the Strip, Witkoff said. 'There is no victory without bringing everyone home; all of you have become part of my family.'
