Audience with late Queen more nerve-racking than FMQs, recalls Sturgeon
However she said that following her death in 2022, she believed the 'absurdities' surrounding the monarchy could 'start to come to the fore much more without the Queen to keep it going'.
The former Scottish first minister stressed she is 'not a monarchist', describing herself as being a 'republican by instinct'.
But speaking on BBC Breakfast, she said the late Queen was a 'remarkable woman'.
The former SNP leader said: 'I am a republican, but I have such incredible respect for the Queen, and incredible woman.
'The Queen was an amazing woman. There are few people in life I had a greater respect for.
'When I was a wee girl growing up in Ayrshire, the idea that one day I would sit in a room alone with the Queen would have been beyond my comprehension.
'To sit in a room with her, it was like a window on to 20th century history, she would talk about chatting to Winston Churchill and Nelson Mandela and all the big figures from her reign.
'Going for an audience with the Queen was more nerve-racking than doing First Minister's Questions, she was so well informed about everything, from the local to the national, to the global.'
She said there was a 'mystique' about Queen Elizabeth II, saying: 'If you were in a room and the Queen walked in, even if you weren't looking at her you could feel her presence.'
While she stressed her 'respect' for the rest of the royal family, she said given this 'mystique' is no longer present, 'perhaps the absurdities of the monarchy will start to come to the fore much more'.
When Queen Elizabeth II died at the Balmoral estate in Aberdeenshire, Ms Sturgeon, who was first minister at the time, described it as a 'profoundly sad moment', adding that her life had been one of 'extraordinary dedication and service'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
Appeals court allows Arkansas' first-in-the-nation ban on gender transition care for minors to be enforced
A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld an Arkansas law prohibiting doctors from providing gender transition medical treatment to minors, reversing a lower court decision that blocked the first-in-the-nation law. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 8-2 on Tuesday to overturn a lower court decision, now allowing the state to enforce the law. The appeals court cited the U.S. Supreme Court decision in June upholding a similar ban in Tennessee, in which the nation's highest court ruled that the law was constitutional and did not discriminate against transgender people. Referencing the Supreme Court's decision, the appeals court agreed with Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin, a Republican, that the law did not violate transgender minors' equal protection rights under the U.S. Constitution. "I applaud the court's decision and am pleased that children in Arkansas will be protected from experimental procedures," Griffin said in a statement following the ruling. Arkansas Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders wrote on social media that the ruling "is a win for common sense -- and for our kids." Arkansas became the first U.S. state to ban transgender treatments such as puberty blockers, hormones and surgery for minors in 2021, when the Republican-led legislature passed the ban after they overruled the veto of then-GOP Gov. Asa Hutchinson. Four families of transgender children and two doctors challenged the law, arguing the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act violated parents' due process rights under the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. Writing the majority opinion, U.S. Circuit Judge Duane Benton said parents have never had a right to obtain medical treatment for their children that a state government had banned. The judge also wrote that the lower court's decision, in which U.S. District Judge Jay Moody ruled in 2023 that the law discriminates against transgender people and poses "immediate and irreparable harm" to transgender children, conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in the Tennessee case. The law was also previously blocked from taking effect in 2021. U.S. Circuit Judge Jane Kelly, meanwhile, wrote in the dissent that there is a "startling lack of evidence connecting Arkansas' ban on gender-affirming care with its purported goal of protecting children." The American Civil Liberties Union and the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas were among the groups representing the plaintiffs. "This is a tragically unjust result for transgender Arkansans, their doctors, and their families," Holly Dickson, executive director of the ACLU of Arkansas, said in a statement. "The state had every opportunity and failed at every turn to prove that this law helps children; in fact, this is a dangerous law that harms children," she continued. "The law has already had a profound impact on families across Arkansas who all deserve a fundamental right to do what is best for their children. As we and our clients consider our next steps, we want transgender Arkansans to know they are far from alone and we remain as determined as ever to secure their right to safety, dignity, and equal access to the health care they need." The ruling on Tuesday comes after the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously last week that a similar ban in Oklahoma is constitutional, also relying upon the Supreme Court's decision on the Tennessee law.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US says UK human rights have worsened in past year
A report produced by the Trump administration says the human rights situation in the UK has "worsened" over the past year. The annual report, which looks at global human rights, specifically pointed to what it said were restrictions on freedom of expression and threats of violence motivated by antisemitism in Britain. The criticism echoes comments previously made by members of the US president's senior team, including Vice-President JD Vance. A UK government spokesperson said: "Free speech is vital for democracy around the world including here in the UK and we are proud to uphold freedoms whilst keeping our citizens safe." The report also describes the human rights situation as having "worsened" in France and Germany. On freedom of speech in the UK, it said "specific areas of concern" included restrictions on political speech deemed "hateful" or "offensive". It said the response to last year's Southport attacks had been an "especially grievous example of government censorship", adding, "censorship of ordinary Britons was increasingly routine, often targeted at political speech". Three young girls were stabbed to death at a Taylor Swift dance class by 18-year-old Axel Rudakubana in July 2024. A peaceful vigil was held in the town the next day, but misinformation spread online about Rudakubana led to violent protests. Posts claiming he was an asylum seeker, who had arrived in the UK on a small boat, were shared widely. In the wake of the rioting, action was taken against internet users who made the false claims and urged revenge. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer promised that those involved would "face the full force of the law". The US state department report said local and national government officials had "repeatedly intervened to chill speech". State department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, without naming the UK specifically, said online restrictions had targeted "disfavoured voices on political or religious grounds." "No matter really how disagreeable someone's speech may be, criminalising it or silencing it by force only serves as a catalyst for further hatred, suppression or polarisation," Bruce told reporters. The report also pointed to buffer zone laws which prohibit protests outside abortion service centres and Public Spaces Protection Orders, powers local councils can use to ban certain anti-social activities. Scotland implemented 200m (656ft) buffer zones in September 2024. A month later, 150m buffer zones were put in place around abortion clinics in England and Wales. When they were introduced, safeguarding minister Jess Phillips said: "We will not sit back and tolerate harassment, abuse and intimidation as people exercise their legal right to healthcare." In April, a woman was convicted of holding a sign reading "Here to talk, if you want" outside a clinic in Bournemouth. Livia Tossici-Bolt's case was highlighted by Vance and the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labour - a bureau within the US state department. The bureau said it was "disappointed" by the ruling. "Freedom of expression must be protected for all," it added. On a more positive note, the report also highlighted how "the government effectively enforced laws protecting freedom of association, collective bargaining, and the right of workers to engage in a strike or other industrial action". Police get new guidance on releasing suspects' ethnicity Trump administration rewrites and scales back annual human rights report How a deleted LinkedIn post was weaponised and seen by millions before the Southport riot
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Live facial recognition to be rolled out in Greater Manchester as part of government crackdown
Live facial recognition is to be rolled out in neighbourhood policing in Greater Manchester as part of a government crackdown. The Home Office said that the technology will be used to catch "high-harm" offenders, and that new rules are being drawn up to ensure "safeguards and oversight". Greater Manchester is one of several regions which will see the use of the tech expanded in its neighbourhood operations, with 10 specialist vans being rolled out across seven police forces. READ MORE: Helicopter filmed mysteriously circling over Manchester city centre READ MORE: Benefits cheat claimed £100k she wasn't entitled to Other police forces to receive the tech are West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley, and Hampshire. Never miss a story with the MEN's daily Catch Up newsletter - get it in your inbox by signing up here The new vans are not the only expansion with regard to the facial recognition technology that the Labour government is planning to roll out. At present the rules mean that facial recognition checks can only be done against police watchlists of wanted criminals, suspects, people on bail, and people subject to court orders such as sex offenders. However, a government consultation due to start in the Autumn will aim to "shape a new legal framework" on the use of facial recognition, which will include examining how and when it can be deployed. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has said the uses would be focused on identifying sex offenders or 'people wanted for the most serious crimes who the police have not been able to find'. The Home Office has also said: 'The algorithm being used in the vans has been independently tested and will only be operated in specific circumstances and with robust oversight." Privacy campaigners have criticised the use of facial recognition, expressing concern about proper regulation, as well as transparency over the technology's use. Join the Manchester Evening News WhatsApp group HERE Chief Superintendent Tim Morgan of South Wales Police, which is co-ordinating the rollout with the National Police Chiefs' Council, has tried to reassure the public that facial recognition will be deployed "ethically". He said: 'We understand the concerns which are raised about the use of live facial recognition technology and we use any new technology ethically and spend time and effort making sure it's deployed in line with all legislation and guidance. 'It is important to remember that use of this has never resulted in a wrongful arrest in South Wales and there have been no false alerts for several years as the technology and our understanding has evolved.' Police forces which use facial recognition have previously used it to arrest suspects of rape, domestic abuse, knife crime, robbery, and sex offenders who have breached conditions. Lindsey Chiswick, NPCC lead for facial recognition, has praised the technology, saying it has been deployed 'to great success, locating thousands of wanted offenders, or others breaching their bail conditions.' She added: 'I am confident that the increased use of this technology will continue to support the safety of communities across the country moving forward."
